Hearth Record

We Care Hospice Services

A hospice in Skokie, Illinois 60077

5360 Fargo Ave, Suite 202, Skokie, Illinois 60077. (847) 597-1870.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026. We couldn’t read Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services’ list since Oct 27, 2026: qcor.cms.gov now refuses our reader. This record is as of then.

The last 24 months 10 deficiencies in 2 months of the last 36. Last cited Oct 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean2
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

10 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 25 hospices serving ZIP code 60077 had 7.

The last inspection on record was on Oct 8, 2025: a reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

10 deficiencies in 2 months of the last 36. Last cited Oct 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

10 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Oct 8, 2025: reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care9 deficiencies
  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(6))

    The inspectors’ words, 124 words

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 14 (Patient #3) did not have evidence in the patient record that a review was completed of all prescription and non-prescription medications, including herbal remedies that could affect drug therapy. This review includes, but is not limited to: • Effectiveness of drug therapy • Drug side effects • Actual or potential drug interactions • Duplicate drug therapy • Drug therapy currently associated with laboratory monitoring Patient #3 - The medication list contained MiraLax 30 gm daily for constipation. There was no evidence that a diluent was included in the medication instructions. The plan of care included an education for the safe use of oxygen as an intervention. The medication profile did not include oxygen. These were corrected onsite.”

    Rule L0530. Standard-level.

  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(7))

    The inspectors’ words, 192 words

    “Upon patient record review, 3 of 14 (Patient #1,3,4) did not have evidence in the patient record that the comprehensive assessment includes a bereavement component which includes the needs of the patient’s family and other individuals focusing on the social, spiritual, and cultural factors that may impact their ability to cope with the patient’s death. Information gathered from the initial bereavement assessment is incorporated into the plan of care and is considered in the bereavement plan of care. Patient #1 - Patient was admitted on 09/18/24. There is no evidence that an initial bereavement assessment was completed by any IDG member within the first 5 days of admission. A bereavement assessment was completed during this survey. Patient #3 - Patient was admitted on 07/02/25. There is no evidence that an initial bereavement assessment was completed by any IDG member within the first 5 days of admission. A bereavement assessment was completed during this survey. Patient #4 - Patient was admitted on 04/07/24. There is no evidence that an initial bereavement assessment was completed by any IDG member within the first 5 days of admission. A bereavement assessment was completed during this survey.”

    Rule L0531. Standard-level.

  • Approach to service delivery (42 CFR 418.56(a)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 162 words

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 14 (Patient #4) did not have evidence that a Registered Nurse is designated to ensure continuous assessment of the patient and family’s needs and to coordinate activities with other members of the interdisciplinary group (IDG). The IDG must work together and is responsible for supervision of the care and service for each patient and family. Patient #4 - The medical record showed a coordination note dated 09/16/25, documented a call into the agency by one of the patient’s son. The son stated they had not yet received the patient’s fentanyl patches from the pharmacy. The RN taking the call then noted that a call was placed to the pharmacy to locate the fentanyl. The pharmacist stated the medication was delivered but delivered to another family member who resides at the patient’s home. The RN then called the son to give him this information. There was no documented follow up on if the patient received their medication.”

    Rule L0540. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 159 words

    “Upon patient record review, 2 of 14 (Patient #2,3) did not have evidence in the patient record that the hospice has developed an individualized written plan of care for each patient. The plan of care must reflect patient/family goals and interventions based on the problems identified in the initial, comprehensive, and updated comprehensive assessments. The plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions. Patient #2 - The medication profile included aspirin as a blood thinner. There were no bleeding risk problems, goals or interventions listed on patient’s plan of care. This was corrected onsite. Patient #3 - The initial certification of terminal illness narrative written by the hospice physician dated 07/02/25, outlined diabetes as related diagnosis to the terminal prognosis and hospice team was managing this and patient was on Lantus. There were no problems, goals or interventions related to the endocrine system. This was corrected onsite.”

    Rule L0545. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))

    The inspectors’ words, 92 words

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 14 (Patient #3) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including medications and treatments. Patient #3 - There was no evidence that a diluent was included in the physician order for MiraLax 30 gm daily for constipation. The plan of care also included an education for the safe use of oxygen as an intervention. There was no evidence of a physician order for oxygen. These were corrected onsite.”

    Rule L0549. Standard-level.

  • Counseling services (42 CFR 418.64(d)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 154 words

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 14 (Patient #6) did not have evidence the hospice offers bereavement counseling that includes: • Making bereavement services available to the family and other individuals in the bereavement plan of care up to 1 year following the death of the patient. Bereavement counseling also extends to residents of a SNF/NF or ICF/IID when appropriate and identified in the bereavement plan of care • Ensuring that bereavement services reflect the needs of the bereaved • Development of a bereavement plan of care that notes the kind of bereavement services to be offered and the frequency of service delivery Patient #6 - Patient expired on 12/10/24. The last contact to the bereaved was on 01/03/24 with a condolence card. There was no evidence of any follow up since that time and no updates to the bereavement plan of care. There was no evidence that the bereaved declined any follow up.”

    Rule L0596. Standard-level.

  • Cost saving (42 CFR 418.78(d))

    The inspectors’ words, 108 words

    “Upon observation, there was no evidence the hospice documented the cost savings achieved through the use of volunteers. Documentation must include the following: • The identification of each position that is occupied by a volunteer • The work time spent by volunteers occupying those positions • Estimates of the dollar costs that the hospice would have incurred if paid employees occupied the positions identified in paragraph (d)(1) of CFR 418.78 for the amount of time specified in paragraph (d)(2) of CFR 418.78 The cost savings report in the EMR had no evidence that any volunteer hours had been entered into the system. The report showed a negative savings.”

    Rule L0646. Standard-level.

  • Level of activity (42 CFR 418.78(e))

    “Upon observation, there was no evidence the annual report documents the use of volunteers providing day to day administrative and/or direct patient care services in an amount that, at a minimum, equals 5 percent of the total patient care hours of all paid hospice employees and contract personnel. The EMR Volunteer Activity report, showed 0% volunteer hours documented in 2024.”

    Rule L0647. Standard-level.

  • Content (42 CFR 418.104(a)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 220 words

    “Upon patient client record review, 4 of 14 (Patient #2,3,4,10) did not have evidence that each patient record contains: • Signed copies of the notice of patient rights in accordance with 418.52 • Signed election statement in accordance with 418.24 Patient #2 - Upon admission on 07/19/25, the POA elected to receive an addendum to the Election of Benefit. The addendum was signed by the POA without any related/unrelated diagnosis or list of non covered items. These sections were left blank. Patient #3 - On page one of the Election of Benefit form, the area to document the effective date for the hospice benefit to begin was left blank. Patient #4 - On page one of the Election of Benefit form, the area to document the effective date for the hospice benefit to begin was left blank. On page 2 of the Election of Benefit form, the patient/POA neither declined or requested the admission addendum - these boxes were left blank. The addendum was signed and dated for on 04/07/25 but did not include any related/nonrelated information. The form was left blank. Patient #10 - Upon admission on 04/29/25, the patient elected to receive an addendum to the Election of Benefit. The addendum was signed without any related/unrelated diagnosis or list of non covered items. These sections were left blank.”

    Rule L0673. Standard-level.

Aug 7, 2025: complaint inspection by the state1 deficiency
  • Criminal background checks (42 CFR 418.114(d)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 194 words

    “Based on personnel files review and Staff interview, the Hospice failed to complete the web portal background checks for 2 of 3 (Employees #1 and #3) Home Health Aides upon hire. Findings include:1. The personnel file for Employee #1 date of hire 12/27/24 was reviewed on 08/07/25. The personnel file included an undated Illinois Department of Public Health (IDPH) Health Care Worker Registry web site profile page. The profile page includes Work Eligibility as “Eligible”. The profile document lacked the required 6 website searches and lacked the initial employment verification.2. The personnel file for Employee #3 date of hire 06/12/25 was reviewed on 08/07/25. The personnel file included an IDPH Health Care Worker Registry web site profile page dated 07/08/25. The profile includes Work Eligibility “Eligible” the profile document lacked the name of the Hospice as the registering Agency. The document also lacked the required 6 website searches and FEE APP selection. 3. During an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 08/07/25, the DON confirmed the Hospice failed to implement the required criminal background check process for Hospice Aides through the IDPH Health Care Worker Background Check web -portal site upon hire.”

    Rule L0795. Standard-level. From a complaint.

All 2 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Oct 8, 2025Reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care9 deficiencies cited
Aug 7, 2025Complaint inspection by the state1 deficiency cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Oct 27, 2022.
  • CMS doesn’t list its type of ownership.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 1 deficiency cited in the last three years came from an inspection that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • CMS hasn’t published nursing time from Medicare claims for this hospice.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 100% at home.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • 2 owners or officers are people: Dawn M Wagner (owns 5% or more directly, 100%); Dawn M Wagner (managing employee (on the payroll), 100%).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What do families say?

  • CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
  • CMS gives no Hospice Care Index for this hospice.
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 25 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 60077, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 7; this one had 10.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 8, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.