Hearth Record

United Hospice, Inc.

A hospice in Park Ridge, Illinois 60068

1420 Renaissance Drive, Ste 209, Park Ridge, Illinois 60068. (847) 779-3989.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 56 deficiencies in 2 months of the last 36. Last cited Jul 2024. Most serious: Condition-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
Condition-level deficiency
For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual.

What did inspectors find?

56 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 36 hospices serving ZIP code 60068 had 6.

The last inspection on record was on Oct 6, 2025: a complaint inspection by the state.

8 deficiencies at condition level, the more serious of CMS’s two levels

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

56 deficiencies in 2 months of the last 36. Last cited Jul 2024. Most serious: Condition-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

56 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Jul 18, 2024: recertification inspection by the state5 deficiencies
  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(5))

    The inspectors’ words, 394 words

    “Based on home visits, clinical record reviews and staff interviews, it was determined that in 2 of 3 (Pts. # 1 and 2) routine home visits conducted, wherein the Pt. resides in an Assisted Living Facility (ALF), the Hospice failed to ensure services were coordinated with facility staff. Findings include: 1. Pt. #1 was admitted to hospice services on 10/23/23 with diagnosis of Senile Degeneration of Brain, Not Elsewhere Classified. A home visit was conducted on 07/16/24 with Employee #12. During the home visit, an interview was conducted with the employee. It was stated, she does not provide any documentation regarding personal care services provided to the Pt. by the hospice. A verbal report is provided to facility staff. An interview was conducted with facility staff. It was stated, the hospice does not provide a written POC, care coordination documentation, or written physician orders to the facility. A medication list is provided to facility staff. As of 07/16/24, the hospice failed to provide the facility with documentation indicating the goals, services, treatments, and nutritional requirements of the hospice Pt. to ensure effective care coordination between the ALF and the hospice. 2. Pt. #2 was admitted to hospice services on 10/20/23 with diagnosis of Alzheimer’s Disease, Unspecified. A home visit was conducted on 07/16/24 with Employee #18. During the home visit, an interview was conducted with the Employee. It was stated, she does not provide any documentation regarding professional services provided to the Pt. by the hospice. The facility staff is not provided with the hospice POC and/or written care coordination. A written medication list and a verbal report regarding the care/service provided to the Pt. is shared with the facility staff. An interview was conducted with facility staff that stated the hospice does not provide a written POC, care coordination documentation, or written physician orders to the facility. A medication list is provided to facility staff. As of 07/16/24, the hospice failed to provide the facility with documentation indicating the goals, services, treatments, and nutritional requirements of the hospice Pt. to ensure effective care coordination between the ALF and the hospice. 3. During an interview with the Administrator and Director of Clinical Services on 7/17/24 at 1:40 PM, the Director of Clinical Services stated the ALF should have a hospice folder with the POC and other Pt. related documents contained in the folder. .”

    Rule L0558. Standard-level.

  • Program data (42 CFR 418.58(b)(3))

    The inspectors’ words, 111 words

    “Based on the review of the Governing Board minutes and Staff interview, it was determined the Hospice failed to ensure the details of the quality assessment and performance improvement program were approved by the governing body. This has the potential to affect all patients served by the Hospice. Findings include: 1. The Governing Board minutes and Hospice quality assessment and performance improvement program were reviewed on 07/16/24. The minutes lacked documentation that the Governing Body met to approve the data collection frequency and details of the quality assessment and performance improvement program. 2. The findings were confirmed during the interview on 07/16/24 at 10:30 AM, with the QA Director and Administrator.”

    Rule L0565. Standard-level.

  • Executive responsibilities (42 CFR 418.58(e)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 93 words

    “Based on the review of the Governing Board minutes and Staff interview, it was determined the Hospice failed to ensure the annual evaluation of the QAPI program. Findings include: 1. The Governing Board minutes and Hospice quality assessment and performance improvement program were reviewed on 07/16/24, and lacked the annual evaluation. During the interview with the Director of Clinical Services, it was stated the last Governing Body meeting was in 2024. 2. The findings were confirmed during the interview on 07/16/24 at 10:30 AM, with the Director of Clinical Services and the Administrator.”

    Rule L0574. Standard-level.

  • Supervision of hospice aides (42 CFR 418.76(h)(1)(i))

    The inspectors’ words, 245 words

    “Based on a review of clinical records and staff interview, it was determined that in 2 of 17 (Pts. #1 and 9) clinical records reviewed of Pts. receiving hospice Aide services, the hospice failed to ensure the Aide was supervised by the RN every 14 days. Findings include: 1. Pt. #1 was admitted to hospice services on 10/23/23 with a diagnosis of Senile Degeneration of Brain, Not Elsewhere Classified. The clinical record was reviewed on 07/16/24. The clinical record contained the Hospice Aide supervisory visit completed by the RN and dated 06/10/24. The Hospice Aide provided services 2 times a week from 06/11/24 to 06/29/24. The next Hospice Aide supervisory visit was conducted by the RN on 07/01/24. The record lacked documentation the RN supervised the Hospice Aide every 14 days. 2. Pt. #9 was admitted to hospice on 02/17/23 with a diagnosis of Cerebrovascular Disease, Unspecified. The clinical record was reviewed on 07/17/24. The clinical record contained the Hospice Aide supervisory visit completed by the RN and dated 06/16/24. The Hospice Aide provided services 3 times a week form 06/17/24 to 07/4/24. The next Hospice Aide supervisory visit was conducted on by the RN on 07/07/24. The record lacked documentation the RN supervised the Hospice Aide every 14 days. 3. During an interview with the Administrator and Director of Clinical Services on 7/17/24 at 1:40 PM, the Director of Clinical Services confirmed the hospice failed to ensure the Aide was supervised every 14 days.”

    Rule L0629. Standard-level.

  • Level of activity (42 CFR 418.78(e))

    “Based on the review of the Volunteer Program and Staff interview, it was determined the Hospice failed to ensure the use of volunteers, at minimum, equaled 5 percent of total patient care hours paid. Findings include: 1. The Governing Board minutes and Volunteer program were reviewed on 07/16/24. The documents lacked evidence of the 5 percent cost savings provided by the use of volunteers. 2. The findings were confirmed during the interview on 07/16/24 at 10:30 AM, with the Volunteer Coordinator/ Administrator.”

    Rule L0647. Standard-level.

Apr 12, 2024: reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care51 deficiencies
  • Establishment of the Emergency Program (EP) (42 CFR 418.113)

    “Upon observation, there was no evidence the hospice complies with all applicable federal, state, and local emergency preparedness requirements by establishing and maintaining an emergency preparedness program that meets the requirements of 42 CFR 418.113.”

    Rule E0001. Condition-level.

  • IDG, care planning, coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56)

    “Condition of Participation: Interdisciplinary Group, Care Planning, and Coordination of Services. L536”

    Rule L0536. Condition-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.60)

    “Condition of Participation: Infection Control.”

    Rule L0557. Condition-level.

  • Quality assessment & performance improvement (42 CFR 418.58)

    “Condition of Participation: Quality Assessment and Performance Improvement.”

    Rule L0559. Condition-level.

  • Prevention (42 CFR 418.60(a))

    “Upon observation, there was no evidence the hospice follows acceptable standards of practice to prevent the transmission of infections and communicable diseases, including standard precautions. Upon observation of home visit, the aide used a bag that was not a nursing bag but a purse. It did not have a designated clean and dirty side. Per agency bag policy 6.013.01 “The bag will contain a clean and dirty side.””

    Rule L0579. Condition-level.

  • Hospice aide and homemaker services (42 CFR 418.76)

    “Condition of Participation: Hospice Aide and Homemaker Services. L607”

    Rule L0607. Condition-level.

  • Volunteers (42 CFR 418.78)

    “Conditions of Participation - Volunteers. L641”

    Rule L0641. Condition-level.

  • Organizational environment (42 CFR 418.100)

    “Condition of Participation: Organization and Administration of Services.”

    Rule L0648. Condition-level.

  • Plan Based on All Hazards Risk Assessment (42 CFR 418.113(a)(1))

    “Upon observation, there was no evidence the Emergency Preparedness plan: • Is based on and includes a documented, facility-based and community-based risk assessment, utilizing an all-hazards approach • Includes strategies for addressing emergency events identified by the risk assessment, including the management of the consequences of power failures, natural disasters, and other emergencies that would affect the hospice’s ability to provide care”

    Rule E0006. Standard-level.

  • EP Program Patient Population (42 CFR 418.113(a)(3))

    “Upon observation, there was no evidence the The Emergency Preparedness plan addresses patient population, including, but not limited to: • The type of services the hospice has • The ability to provide in an emergency; and continuity of operations, including delegations of authority and succession plans”

    Rule E0007. Standard-level.

  • Development of Communication Plan (42 CFR 418.113(c))

    “Upon observation, there was no evidence the hospice develops and maintains an emergency preparedness communication plan that complies with federal, state, and local laws and must be reviewed and updated every two years.”

    Rule E0029. Standard-level.

  • EP Training and Testing (42 CFR 418.113(d))

    “Upon observation, there was no evidence of emergency preparedness training and testing program that is based on the emergency plan, policies and procedures and the communication plan.”

    Rule E0036. Standard-level.

  • EP Testing Requirements (42 CFR 418.113(d)(2))

    “Upon observation, there was no evidence the agency has conducted exercises to test the emergency plan every two years.”

    Rule E0039. Standard-level.

  • Rights of the patient (42 CFR 418.52(c)(4))

    The inspectors’ words, 145 words

    “Upon patient record review, 5 of 19 (Patient #4,7,9,12,18) did not have evidence that the patient chooses a health care provider, including an attending physician. Patient 4: The medical record contains an election of benefits that is signed by the POA though no election of attending physician was completed. Patient 7: The medical record contains an election of benefits that is signed by the POA though no election of attending physician was completed. Patient 9: The medical record contains an election of benefits that is signed by the POA though no election of attending physician was completed. Patient 12: The medical record contains an election of benefits that is signed by the POA though no election of attending physician was completed. Patient 18: The medical record contains an election of benefits that is signed by the POA though no election of attending physician was completed.”

    Rule L0515. Standard-level.

  • Rights of the patient (42 CFR 418.52(c)(5))

    The inspectors’ words, 129 words

    “Upon patient record review, 4 of 19 (Patient #9, 12, 18, 19) did not have evidence of the appropriate documentation for release of confidential information. Patient 9: The PHI consent has a section of items to check that pt consents to giving access to PHI and none of them are marked. Patient 12: The PHI consent has a section of items to check that pt consents to giving access to PHI and none of them are marked. Patient 18: The PHI consent has a section of items to check that pt consents to giving access to PHI and none of them are marked. Patient 19: The PHI consent has a section of items to check that pt consents to giving access to PHI and none of them are marked.”

    Rule L0516. Standard-level.

  • Timeframe for completion of assessment (42 CFR 418.54(b))

    “Upon patient record review 1 of 19 (Patient #13) did not have evidence in the patient record that the hospice interdisciplinary group, in consultation with the individual’s attending physician (if any), completed the comprehensive assessment no later than 5 calendar days after the election of hospice care. Patient 13: There was no evidence of spiritual comprehensive completed by any discipline within 5 days of election. The SC did not make a visit with in the first 5 days. The first visit was 3/22/24.”

    Rule L0523. Standard-level.

  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 175 words

    “Upon patient record review 5 of 19 (Patient #10,11,15,16,19) did not have evidence in the patient record that the comprehensive assessment identifies the physical, psychosocial, emotional, and spiritual needs related to the terminal illness that must be addressed in order to promote the hospice patient’s well-being, comfort, and dignity throughout the dying process. Patient 10: There is evidence the patient/family refused social work and chaplain upon admission. The comprehensive assessment by the RN did not include a spiritual or psychosocial assessment and the MSW and SC providers did not see the patient. Patient 11: The family refused chaplain and there is no evidence the RN performed a spiritual assessment in the comprehensive assessment. Patient 15: The family refused the chaplain and there is no evidence the RN performed an spiritual care assessment on the comprehensive assessment. Patient 16: The family declined social work and there is no evidence the RN performed a psychosocial assessment in the comprehensive assessment. Patient 19: The family declined chaplain, there is no evidence the RN performed a spiritual comprehensive assessment.”

    Rule L0524. Standard-level.

  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(6))

    The inspectors’ words, 144 words

    “Upon patient record review, 4 of 19 (Patient #1,2,9,11) did not have evidence in the patient record that a review was completed of all prescription and non-prescription medications, including herbal remedies that could affect drug therapy. This review includes, but is not limited to: Patient 1: The medication profile contains an order for Aspirin 81mg daily, the facility has the Aspirin 325mg daily. Corrected on site. Patient 2: The nurse documented on 4/5/24 “O2 used intermittently”, this was not included on the medication profile. Corrected on site. Patient 9: The medication profile contains an order for Miralax with no diluent. Corrected on site. Patient 11: SN documents on 3/2 and 3/24 “O2 2 liters via nasal cannula” and on 3/21 SN documented “O2 3 liters via nasal cannula”. There is no evidence of an order for Oxygen on the medication profile. Corrected on site.”

    Rule L0530. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))

    The inspectors’ words, 132 words

    “Upon patient record review, 4 of 19 (Patient #1,2, 9,11) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including medications and treatments. Patient 1: The POC contains an order for Aspirin 81mg daily, the facility has the Aspirin 325mg daily. Corrected on site. Patient 2: The nurse documented on 4/5/24 “O2 used intermittently”, this was not included on the POC. Patient 9: The POC contains an order for Miralax with no diluent. Corrected on site. Patient 11: SN documents on 3/2 and 3/24 “O2 2 liters via nasal cannula” and on 3/21 SN documented “O2 3 liters via nasal cannula”. There is no evidence of an order for Oxygen on the POC. Corrected on site.”

    Rule L0549. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(5))

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 19 (Patient #14) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including equipment and supply needs. Patient 14: The SN documented “pt ambulates with walker”. The walker is not listed on the POC. Corrected on site.”

    Rule L0550. Standard-level.

  • Review of the plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(d))

    “Upon client record review, 19 of 19 (Patient #1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19) did not have evidence that the IDG in collaboration with the attending physician reviewed, revised and documents the individualized plan as frequently as the patient’s condition requires but no less frequently then every 15 calendar days. Patient 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19: The medical records contains evidence of the plan of care was reviewed and updated towards progress of goals.”

    Rule L0552. Standard-level.

  • Review of the plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(d))

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 19 (Patient #1) did not have evidence that a revised plan of care includes information from the patient’s updated comprehensive assessment and must note the patient’s progress towards outcome/goals from the plan of care. Patient 1: The medical record contains evidence of IDG being conducted 2/21/24, 3/6/24, 3/20/24 the IDG does not contain evidence that the comprehensive assessment notes the patient’s progress toward outcomes/goals from the POC. Each IDG the goals are marked progressing 90%.”

    Rule L0553. Standard-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(2))

    “Upon client record review, 1 of 19 (Patient #16) did not have evidence that the IDG ensures that the care and services are provided in accordance with the plan of care. Patient 16: The POC 7/2/23 does not contain orders for the SC to see the pt. Pt was seen by SC on 7/6/23. There is evidence the pt refused MSW upon admission. The POC still has ordered MSW 1x per month without evidence of visits.”

    Rule L0555. Standard-level.

  • Program data (42 CFR 418.58(b)(1))

    “Upon observation, there was no evidence the program must use quality indicator data, including patient care, and other relevant data, in the design of the program.”

    Rule L0563. Standard-level.

  • Program data (42 CFR 418.58(b)(2))

    “Upon observation, there was no evidence the QAPI program uses quality indicator data, including patient care and other relevant data in the design of its program. The hospice must use the data collected to: • Monitor the effectiveness and safety of services and quality of care • Identify opportunities and priorities for improvement”

    Rule L0564. Standard-level.

  • Program activities (42 CFR 418.58(c)(1)(i))

    “Upon observation, there was no evidence QAPI activities focus on high risk ,high volume, or problem prone areas.”

    Rule L0566. Standard-level.

  • Program activities (42 CFR 418.58(c)(1)(ii))

    “Upon observation, there was no evidence Quality Assessment and Performance Improvement activities focus on high risk, high volume or problem-prone areas by considering incidence, prevalence, and the severity of problems.”

    Rule L0567. Standard-level.

  • Program activities (42 CFR 418.58(c)(1)(iii))

    “Upon observation, there was no evidence Quality Assessment and Performance Improvement activities focus on high risk, high volume or problem-prone areas by understanding how they affect palliative outcomes, patient safety and quality of care.”

    Rule L0568. Standard-level.

  • Performance improvement projects (42 CFR 418.58(d)(1))

    “Upon observation, there was no evidence the number and scope of distinct QAPI projects conducted annually is based on the needs of the hospice’s population and internal organizational needs and must reflect the scope, complexity, and past performance of the hospice’s services and operations.”

    Rule L0572. Standard-level.

  • Executive responsibilities (42 CFR 418.58(e)(1))

    “Upon observation, there was no evidence of involvement of the governing body and organizational leaders in the Quality Assessment/Performance Improvement (QAPI) program.”

    Rule L0574. Standard-level.

  • Executive responsibilities (42 CFR 418.58(e)(3))

    “Upon observation, there was no evidence the hospice ensures the implementation of a hospice wide Quality Assessment/Performance Improvement (QAPI) program by the designation of a person responsible for coordinating QAPI activities.”

    Rule L0576. Standard-level.

  • Infection control (42 CFR 418.60)

    “Upon observation, there was no evidence the hospice maintains and documents an effective infection control program that protects patients, families, visitors, and hospice personnel by preventing and controlling infections and communicable diseases.”

    Rule L0577. Standard-level.

  • Control (42 CFR 418.60(b)(1))

    “Upon observation, there was no evidence in QAPI reports that the hospice maintains a coordinated agency-wide program for the surveillance, identification, prevention, control, and investigation of infectious and communicable diseases that is an integral part of the hospice’s Quality Assessment and Performance Improvement program.”

    Rule L0580. Standard-level.

  • Licensed professional services (42 CFR 418.62(c))

    “Upon observation, there was no evidence licensed professionals participate in the hospice’s QAPI program.”

    Rule L0586. Standard-level.

  • Counseling services (42 CFR 418.64(d)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 140 words

    “Upon patient record review, 3 of 19 (Patient #17,18,19) did not have evidence the hospice offers bereavement counseling that includes: Patient 17: The medical record does not contain a bereavement POC and the record indicated last mailing was to the family on 11/9/23 patient expired 4/30/23. Patient 18: The Bereavement assessment completed by the MSW/BC indicated family is at high risk for bereavement. There was no bereavement assessment completed with in 4-6 weeks of death as per bereavement agency policy, no phone call made after death as per bereavement policy. The medical record does not contain a bereavement POC and the record indicated last mailing was to the family on 10/16/23 patient expired 4/16/23. Patient 19: The medical record does not contain a bereavement POC and the record indicated last mailing was to the family on 10/30/23 patient expired 4/30/23.”

    Rule L0596. Standard-level.

  • In-service training (42 CFR 418.76(d))

    “Upon personnel record review, 1 of 11 (Personnel #5 ) did not have evidence in the personnel file that the hospice aide had received at least l2 hours of in-service training during each 12-month period. In-service training may occur while an aide is furnishing care to a patient. Personnel 5: The personnel file contains evidence of 12 hours of education in 2021. There has been no further education completed by the aide.”

    Rule L0620. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 612 words

    “Upon patient record review, 12 of 19 (Patient #2,4,5,6,7,8,11,12,13,14,15,16) did not have evidence in the patient record that hospice aide assignments and duties are: Patient 2: The aide POC 6/21/21 contains orders for the following tasks to be done PRN: turn, reposition, change linens, make bed and ambulation. There is no documentation to support pt can decide whether or not these tasks should be completed and the aide is not able to make this choice. . Corrected on site. Patient 4: The aide POC 4/6/24 contains the following tasks ordered PRN: Transfers, change linen, make bed, housekeeping, nail care and shave. There is no documentation to support pt can decide whether or not these tasks should be completed and the aide is not able to make this choice. . Corrected on site. Patient 5: The aide POC 3/27/24 contains the following tasks ordered PRN: Transfers, change linen, make bed, housekeeping, nail care and shave. There is no documentation to support pt can decide whether or not these tasks should be completed and the aide is not able to make this choice. . Corrected on site. Patient 6: The aide POC 1/21/24 contains the following tasks ordered PRN: Transfers, change linen, make bed, housekeeping, nail care and shave. There is no documentation to support pt can decide whether or not these tasks should be completed and the aide is not able to make this choice. . Corrected on site. Patient 7: The aide POC 11/3/23 contains the following tasks ordered PRN: foot care, oral care, dentures, shave. It also orders both tasks of shower and bed bath every visit. There is no documentation to support pt can decide whether or not these tasks should be completed. Corrected on site. Patient 8: The aide POC 2/16/24 contains the following tasks ordered PRN: bed bath, comb hair, back rub, shower. There is no documentation to support pt can decide whether or not these tasks should be completed and the aide is not able to make this choice. . Corrected on site. Patient 11: The aide POC 10/5/23 contains the following tasks ordered PRN: change linen, house keeping, make bed, ambulate, transfer, ROM. There is no documentation to support pt can decide whether or not these tasks should be completed and the aide is not able to make this choice. . Corrected on site. Patient 12: The aide POC 2/24/24 contains an order for aides 2-4 times per week. The aide POC orders to complete the following tasks all every visit: complete shower, complete bed bath, partial shower. There is no evidence the pt is documented as being able to make those decisions and the aide is not able to make this choice. Corrected on site. Patient 13: The aide POC 3/14/24 contains the following tasks ordered PRN: Foot care, denture care, partial bath, shower, ambulation, ROM. There is no evidence the pt is documented as being able to make those decisions. Corrected on site. Patient 14: The aide POC 2/7/24 has both complete and partial showers ordered every visit. There is no evidence the pt is documented as being able to make those decisions and the aide is not able to make this choice and the aide is not able to make this choice. . Corrected on site. Patient 15: The aide POC 1/1/24 has “x” beside every task the aide is to perform with no frequency. Shower, partial shower, bed bath all ordered. There is no evidence the pt is documented as being able to make those decisions and the aide is not able to make this choice. Patient 16: The aide POC 7/2/23 has all of the tasks ordered “yes” with no frequencies.”

    Rule L0625. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 240 words

    “Upon patient record review 5 of 19 (Patient #3,11,12,13,14) did not have evidence documentation in the patient record that a hospice aide provides services that are: Patient 3: The POC contains on order for Aide 4 times per week. The week of 3/24/24-3/30/24 the aide saw the pt on 3/26,3/28,3/29. There was no fourth visit made that week and no missed visit documentation. The aide documented on 3/22/24 the showered and shaved the pt and this is not ordered on the aide POC. On 3/21/24 and 3/28/24 the aide documented they shaved the patient and this is not ordered on the aide POC. Patient 11: The aide POC contains orders for aide 2 times per week. The aide saw the pt the week of 9/31-10/7 once on 10/5. There is no missed visit documentation or evidence it was reported to the RN. Patient 12: The aide documented completing the following tasks 4/10/24: shower, bed bath and partial shower. The aide did not complete foot care that was ordered every visit. There was no documentation the Aide contacted the RN. The aide was ordered to see pt 2-4 times per week though the week of 2/18-2/24/24 the aide saw the pt on time on 2/24/24. Patient 13: The aide documented on 4/1,4/5,4/8 completed all of the following during their visit: partial shower, complete shower. Patient 14: The aide documented on 2/8 and 3/29 completing both a partial shower and complete shower.”

    Rule L0626. Standard-level.

  • Role (42 CFR 418.78(b))

    “Upon observation, there was no evidence volunteers are used in day to day administrative and/or direct patient care roles.”

    Rule L0644. Standard-level.

  • Recruiting and retaining (42 CFR 418.78(c))

    “Upon observation, there was no evidence the hospice documents and demonstrates viable and ongoing efforts to recruit and retain volunteers.”

    Rule L0645. Standard-level.

  • Cost saving (42 CFR 418.78(d))

    “Upon observation, there was no evidence the hospice documented the cost savings achieved through the use of volunteers. Documentation must include the following: • The identification of each position that is occupied by a volunteer • The work time spent by volunteers occupying those positions • Estimates of the dollar costs that the hospice would have incurred if paid employees occupied the positions identified in paragraph (d)(1) of CFR 418.78 for the amount of time specified in paragraph (d)(2) of CFR 418.78”

    Rule L0646. Standard-level.

  • Level of activity (42 CFR 418.78(e))

    “Upon observation, there was no evidence the annual report documents the use of volunteers providing day to day administrative and/or direct patient care services in an amount that, at a minimum, equals 5 percent of the total patient care hours of all paid hospice employees and contract personnel.”

    Rule L0647. Standard-level.

  • Governing body and administrator (42 CFR 418.100(b))

    “Upon observation, there was no evidence the hospice is directed by a Board of Directors/governing body which assumes full legal authority and responsibility for the operation of the hospice. There is no evidence in the governing body meeting minutes that the new Administrator was appointed by the governing body. The agency governing body/administrator is lacking oversight of the staff following policies, QAPI,. Emergency preparedness, Infection control, and the volunteer program.”

    Rule L0651. Standard-level.

  • Training (42 CFR 418.100(g)(3))

    “Upon personnel record review, 2 of 11 (Personnel #6,7) did not have evidence that a skills competency assessment, specific to each discipline had been conducted for all personnel including volunteers initially during orientation. Personnel 6: The PT does not have evidence of an initial skills competency in the employee file. Personnel 7: The OT does not have evidence of an initial skills competency in the employee file.”

    Rule L0663. Standard-level.

  • Content (42 CFR 418.104(a)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 197 words

    “Upon patient client record review, 6 of 19 (Patient #4,7,8,9,12,18) did not have evidence that each patient record contains: Patient 4: The medical record contains an election of benefits that is signed by the POA though no election of attending physician was completed. The level of care with cost of services were omitted from the documentation the form was signed by POA with out the costs of service. Patient 7: The medical record contains an election of benefits that is signed by the POA though no election of attending physician was completed. Patient 8: The level of care with cost of services were omitted from the documentation the form was signed by POA with out the costs of service. Patient 9: The medical record contains an election of benefits that is signed by the POA though no election of attending physician was completed. Patient 12: The medical record contains an election of benefits that is signed by the POA though no election of attending physician was completed. Patient 18: The medical record contains an election of benefits that is signed by the POA though no election of attending physician was completed. The date of election was blank.”

    Rule L0673. Standard-level.

  • Content (42 CFR 418.104(a)(5))

    “Upon patient client record review, 1 of 19 (Patient #7) did not have evidence that each patient record contains Physician certification and recertification of terminal illness. Patient 7: The medical record does not contain a CTI from the patient’s chosen attending physician. The CTI was completed by the medical director.”

    Rule L0676. Standard-level.

  • Authentication (42 CFR 418.104(b))

    The inspectors’ words, 187 words

    “Upon patient client record review, 4 of 9 (Patient #1,8,9, #16) did not have evidence that all entries are legible, clear, complete, and appropriately authenticated and dated in accordance with the organizations policies and procedures and currently accepted standards of practice. Electronic signatures are acceptable as long the hospice is following appropriate safeguards to prevent unauthorized access to the patient records. Patient 1: The RN documented in the comprehensive assessment 11/2/23 the patient is “alert, forgetful, non responsive”. Patient #5: The nurse documented 3/27,3/30,4/4,4/6 “Cleanse with NS, pat dry, apply calcium alginate and cover with Optifoam”. This is just restating the order no evidence nurse followed POC. 4/6 nurse documented “wound care done, pt tolerated well” no evidence the nurse followed POC. Patient 8: The RN documented 3/29 “Pain subsided b4 Sn left”. b4 and Sn are not approved abbreviations. Patient 9: The RN documented in the comprehensive assessment 2/22/24 the patient is “alert, forgetful, non responsive”. Patient 16: The SN documented 12/6/23 “Cleanse wound with NS iodine applied.” and on 11/29/23 “wound care performed per order”. There is no evidence the SN followed the POC orders.”

    Rule L0679. Standard-level.

  • Discharge or transfer of care (42 CFR 418.104(e)(3))

    “Upon client record review, 2 of 19 (Patient #15,16) did not have evidence that the discharge summary includes all required information. Patient 15 and 16: The discharge documentation does not include: A summary of the patient’s stay, including treatments, symptoms and pain management, The patient’s current plan of care, the patient’s latest physician orders, any other documentation that will assist in post-discharge continuity of care or that is requested by the attending physician or receiving facility.”

    Rule L0684. Standard-level.

  • Hospice plan of care (42 CFR 418.112(d))

    The inspectors’ words, 702 words

    “Upon client record review, 14 of 19 (Patient #2,3,4,5,6,7,8,10,12,13,14,15,17,19) did not have evidence that a written hospice plan of care is established and maintained in consultation with SNF/NF or ICF/IID representatives. All hospice care provided is in accordance with this hospice plan of care. Patient 2: The POC contains an order for SN 2x per week. Patient seen one time per week on 2/9, 2/16, 2/23 no second visits completed those weeks and no missed visit documentation or documented refusals.. The patient was seen one time per week on 3/1, 3/8, 3/16, 3/22, 3/29. No missed visit docs/refusals. Patient 3: The POC contains an order for SN visits 1 time per week. The medical record contains evidence the SN made 2 visits in the weeks of 3/31/24-4/6/24. Patient 4: The POC 3/12/24 and 4/6/24 contains an order to “Irrigate urinary drainage device as ordered”. There is no frequency, dose, fluid. Corrected on site. Patient 5: The POC order SN visits 1 time per week. The week of 3/24-3/30 visits completed 3/27 & 3/30. Patient 6: The POC 1/23/24 contains an order for SN 1 time per week. The SN saw the pt twice weekly from 1/22/23 through 4/4/24 with no order to increase visits and no evidence of any of the visits being PRN. Patient 7: The record contains an order for ST eval. There is no evidence this was completed or refused. The ST did call one time and documented not being able to get ahold of the pt though did not try again. POC 2/6/24 contains SN 1 time per week, the SN has documented visits twice weekly from 2/5/24-4/5/24. There is no evidence of an order to increase visits to twice weekly. The POC contains an order for PT and OT evals. The PT performed 3 visits 11/7,11/18,11/25 and the OT performed 3 visits 11/6,11/13,11/24. There is no evidence of an order for the visits beyond the evals. Patient 8: The SC is ordered 1 time per week, The SC saw the pt on 2/20 and 3/20 once per month. MSW is ordered “once per qtr” and was visited by MSW 2/19,3/19,4/22,5/20. The nurse documented 3/25 “Pt requested for Valsartan and hospice doctor gave order for 160mg daily”. This was not added to the POC. The POC contains order for PT eval, there is evidence the PT made further visits with no orders for further visits. There is an order 2/16 “per family request SN decrease to 1 time per week.” The SN continued to see pt twice weekly 2/19/24-4/15/24 with no orders to see pt twice weekly. Patient 10: The POC 2/19/24 order is for SN 3 times a week. Pt was seen by SN 4 times per week 3/31/24-4/6/24 and 3/17/24-3/23/24. The medical record contains evidence of the pt refusing MSW and SC, The POC continues to have orders for the MSW and SC 1x per month without evidence of visits. Patient 12: POC order SN 1 time a week. The SN saw pt twice weekly from 2/26/24 through 4/3/24 with no orders to increase the visits. Patient 13: The POC 12/15/23 has no frequency orders for any disciplines and was not updated until 1/2/24. POC 12/15/23 order SN 2x a week. SN saw one time the week of 3/10-3/16 on 3/14. In addition, the nurse documented on 4/4/24 “pt high risk for falls” and on 4/2/24 “max assist for transfers”. There is no fall risk care plan implemented on the POC. Corrected on site. Patient 14: The POC 2/17 order for SN 1x a week. Pt seen by SN 2x a week from 2/7/24 through 4/4/24 with no orders to increase visits to twice weekly. Patient 15: POC 12/13/23 SN visits 1x week. The week of 12/10/23-12/16/23 the pt was seen by the SN 3 times. The week of 12/17/24-12/23/24 pt was seen by the SN twice. The week of 1/2/24 through 2/20/24 the SN saw patient twice weekly. No orders for increased visits, visits were not PRN. Patient 17: POC SN 1x week, pt seen 4/28 and 4/29. No order to increase visits and visit was not PRN. Patient 19: POC SN 1xweek, seen 4/23&4/29,4/24&4/27. 4/27 wound care performed by SN to sacrum no order.”

    Rule L0773. Standard-level.

  • Hospice plan of care (42 CFR 418.112(d)(1))

    “Upon client record review, 1 of 19 (Patient #16) did not have evidence that the hospice plan of care identifies the care and services that are needed and specifically identify which provider (nursing facility or hospice) is responsible for performing the respective functions that have been agreed upon and included in the hospice plan of care. Patient 5: Order for wound care 3/27/24 does not state who is to perform wound care. Corrected on site.”

    Rule L0774. Standard-level.

  • N/a (42 CFR 418.110(c)(1))

    “Upon observation, there was no evidence the hospice has a safety management plan that addresses real or potential threats to the health and safety of the patients, others and property.”

    Rule L0825. Standard-level.

All 3 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Oct 6, 2025Complaint inspection by the stateNo deficiencies cited
Jul 18, 2024Recertification inspection by the state5 deficiencies cited
Apr 12, 2024Reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care51 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Apr 16, 2018.
  • Ownership: for-profit.
  • Cited at in the last three years: it didn’t meet a whole condition of Medicare’s rules.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 13 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 12% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 78.5% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 54% at home, 46% in assisted living.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day13.0 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends12%
Visits near death78.5% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • Omni Healthcare Partners Inc. owns 100% directly since Dec 17, 2018.
  • 8 owners or officers are people: Marvin Rubin (owns 5% or more through other companies, 100%); Marvin Rubin (managing employee (under contract)); Marvin Rubin (corporate officer); Marvin Rubin (corporate director); Annette Heneghan (managing employee (on the payroll)); Eliezer Rubin (corporate officer); Eliezer Rubin (corporate director); Thomas Michalsen (managing employee (under contract)).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Omni Healthcare Partners Inc.Owns 5% or more directly100%Dec 17, 2018
United Hospice Holdco LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Jun 12, 2026

What do families say?

  • CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
  • In CMS’s survey of family caregivers (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 64% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 70% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 9 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 29.2% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 5Not rated
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold9 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 36 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 60068, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 6; this one had 56.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.