Hearth Record

Hospice Care of Illinois

A hospice in Springfield, Illinois 62781

701 North First Street, Springfield, Illinois 62781. (217) 788-4663.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 9 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Oct 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

9 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 2 hospices serving ZIP code 62781 had 4.5.

The last inspection on record was on Nov 22, 2024: a follow-up inspection by The Joint Commission.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

9 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Oct 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

9 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Oct 18, 2024: reaccreditation inspection by The Joint Commission9 deficiencies
  • Initial & comprehensive assessment of patient (42 CFR 418.54)

    The inspectors’ words, 103 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 21 patient records reviewed, the organization failed to document reassessment. During record review for HOS RRNHV#3, the Hospice Nurse Surveyor observed the patient had two wounds to the left shin. One wound was a stage 3 and the other was a stage 4. The wounds were not being assessed as part of the comprehensive assessment. Upon conversation with the Hospice Director, it was noted that the facility manages the wound so they would not be there necessarily to assess. The wound was not assessed for 2 months. 

This was discussed and reviewed with the Hospice Team.”

    Rule L0520. Standard-level.

  • Patient outcome measures (42 CFR 418.54(e)(2))

    “Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 21 patient records reviewed, the organization failed to maintain complete and accurate patient records. During record review for HOS RRHV#5, the Hospice Nurse Surveyor observed the signed care plan stated Oxygen at 2-4 liters PRN but the medication list stated Oxygen 2-4 liters continuous. During home visit with the surveyor, the patient was on 2-4 liters PRN. 

This was discussed and reviewed with the Hospice Team.”

    Rule L0535. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 339 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 2 of 21 patient records reviewed, the organization failed to plan the patient’s care. During record review for HOS RRNHV#8 and HOS RRNHV#10, the care plan did not reflect patient and family goals with measurable outcomes. 

In HOS RRNHV#8, the patient had a goal of desired nutrition hydration needs will be met through cert which was not measurable. 

In HOS RRNHV#10, the patient had lung cancer and a respiratory goal of changes to respiratory system will continue to be identified which was not patient centered or measurable. 

This was discussed and reviewed with the Hospice Team. Observed in Record Review. In 6 of 21 patient records reviewed, the organization failed to plan the patient’s care. During record review for HOS RRHV#3, HOS RRHV#4, HOS RRHV#5, HOS RRNHV#1, HOS RRNHV#2, and HOS RRMHV#4, the care plan did not reflect patient and family goals with measurable outcomes. 

For example in HOS RRHV#3, the patient had a goal of patient desired nutrition needs will be met which did not have detail of what the patient specific goal was and was to be met throughout cert. 

In HOS RRHV#4, the patient had a goal of pain will not interfere with sleep, activities time with family and friends throughout cert. The goal did not contain details of measurable outcomes and the timeframe was not individualized. 

In HOS RRHV#5, the patient had a goal of will verbalize acceptable level of anxiety throughout cert without detail of what level was acceptable. 

In HOS RRNHV#1, the patient had a recent wound to the axilla and a goal of comfort, manage drainage, control odor, maintain integument which was not complete or measurable. 

In HOS RRNHV#2, the patient had a SW goal of SW will make biweekly visits for emotional support but SW visits had been discontinued and the goal was not completed. 

In HOS RRNHV#4, the patient had a goal of chaplain visits every two weeks which was not individualized or patient centered. 

This was discussed and reviewed with the Hospice Team. 


”

    Rule L0545. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 123 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 3 of 21 patient records reviewed, the organization failed to plan the patient’s care. During record review for HOS RRHV#4, HOS RRNHV#3, and HOS RRNHV#7, the Hospice Nurse Surveyor observed not all elements of the plan of care were documented. 

For example in HOS RRHV#4, the patient had been struggling with anxiety that was also affecting her sleep but it was not addressed on her POC. 

In HOS RRNHV#3, the patient had increased dyspnea but the goals were closed out previously and there were no interventions on the POC. 

In HOS RRNHV#7, the patient had goals and interventions for wound but the wound was healed. The goals were not closed out. 

This was discussed with the Hospice Team.”

    Rule L0546. Standard-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(2))

    “Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 3 bereavement records reviewed, the hospice pharmacist surveyor noted that the bereavement care plan indicated that the organization would call the bereaved at 1,3,and 5 months post death, but there was no documentation to indicate that the 3-month call had occurred or for what reason it was not completed as planned. This omission was validated with the hospice administrator and the bereavement cordinator at the time of the survey.




”

    Rule L0555. Standard-level.

  • Supervision of hospice aides (42 CFR 418.76(h)(1)(i))

    The inspectors’ words, 122 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 2 resident records reviewed, the organization failed to supervise effectively. During record review for HOS RRHV#6, the Hospice Nurse Surveyor observed the patient aide services were being supervised once a month, not every 14 days as required. 

This was discussed and reviewed with the Hospice Team. Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 2 patient records reviewed, the organization failed to supervise effectively. During record review for HOS RRNHV#12, the Hospice Nurse Surveyor observed the patient aide services were not being supervised at least every 14 days. 

In HOS RRNHV#12, the aide had been making visits for approximately a month and no supervision had taken place. 

This was discussed and reviewed with the Hospice Team.”

    Rule L0629. Standard-level.

  • Recruiting and retaining (42 CFR 418.78(c))

    “Observed in Tracer Activities. During a review of the organization’s retention and recruitment activities for volunteers, the hospice pharmacist noted that while the organization stated that they had tried to recruit additional volunteers, there was no documentation to support this activity. This omission was validated with the Hospice administrator and the Volunteer cordinator at the time of the survey.”

    Rule L0645. Standard-level.

  • Initial certification of terminal illness (42 CFR 418.102(b)(3))

    The inspectors’ words, 269 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 3 of 21 patient records reviewed, the organization failed to document clinical review for the initial certification of terminal illness. During record review for HOS RRHV#5, HOS RRHV#6 and HOS RRNHV#1, the Hospice Nurse Surveyor observed the CTI did not consider all required elements. 

For example in HOS RRHV#5, the documentation from the provider did not contain documentation that a review had taken place of the current subjective and objective data, current medical findings and the current medications and treatments. 

In HOS RRHV#6, the documentation did not contain documentation that a review had taken place of related diagnosis, current medical findings and current medications and treatments.

HOS RRNHV#1, the patient was admitted 6 weeks prior to survey but the CTI was blank and not signed. 

This was discussed and reviewed with the Hospice Team. Observed in Record Review. In 3 of 21 patient records reviewed, the organization failed to document review of the initial clinical information related to the certification of terminal illness, During record review for HOS RRNHV#8, HOS RRNHV#9, and HOS RRNHV#10, the Hospice Nurse Surveyor observed the all required documentation was not included in the review of certification of terminal illness. 

For example in HOS RRNHV#8, the physician failed to document review of the medical record. The only documentation on the CTI stated diagnosis and comfort measures. 

In HOS RRNHV#9, the documentation review did not include all required elements, such as comorbidities, current treatments and medications. 

In HOS RRNHV#10, the documentation failed to include information that comorbidities, current treatment and medications were reviewed. 

This was discussed and reviewed with the Hospice Team.”

    Rule L0667. Standard-level.

  • Recertification of the terminal illness (42 CFR 418.102(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 183 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 2 of 21 patient records reviewed, the organization failed to document review of the patient clinical information. During record review for HOS RRHV#2, and HOS RRHV#6, there was lack of documentation for the CTI for recertification. 

For example in HOS RRHV#2, the Hospice Nurse Surveyor observed the recertification narrative was blank. 

In HOS RRHV#6, the documentation for recertification did not include subjective/ objective data, medical findings and current medication and treatment. 

This was discussed and reviewed with the Hospice Team. Observed in Record Review. In 3 of 21 patient records reviewed, the organization failed to document clinical review before the recertification process. During record review for HOS RRHV#8, HOS RRNHV#9, and HOS RRNHV#10, the documentation was not completed. 

For example HOS RRHV#8, the medical director failed to document review of patient comorbidities, current treatment and medications. 

In HOS RRNHV#9, the documentation failed to include patient comorbidities treatment and medications. 

In RRNHV#10, the documentation only included the diagnosis, it did not contain information that comorbidities, treatment and medications were reviewed. 

This was discussed and reviewed with the Hospice Team.”

    Rule L0668. Standard-level.

All 2 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Nov 22, 2024Follow-up inspection by The Joint CommissionNo deficiencies cited
Oct 18, 2024Reaccreditation inspection by The Joint Commission9 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Oct 19, 1990.
  • Ownership: other.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 9.8 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 8.7% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 86.5% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 64% at home, 6% in assisted living, 29% in a skilled nursing facility, 1% in a hospital.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day9.8 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends8.7%
Visits near death86.5% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • 10 owners or officers are people: Tamar Kutz (corporate director); Jameson Roszhart (corporate director); Michael T Huffman (corporate director); Melanie Atwood (corporate officer); Melanie Atwood (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); Dolan Dalpoas (corporate director); Ted R Clark (corporate director); Kathryn J Keim (corporate director); Muhammad N Khan (managing employee (under contract), 0%); Henry Hurwitz (corporate director).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What do families say?

  • Family caregivers rate it 4 of 5 in CMS’s survey (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 83% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 83% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 10 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 97.42% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 31.8% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 54 of 5
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold10 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 2 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 62781, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 4.5; this one had 9.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

The 2 hospices CMS lists serving ZIP code 62781
PlaceDeficiencies, 3 years
Hospice Care of Illinois This hospice9
Enhabit Hospice0

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.