Hearth Record

Northern Illinois Hospice

A hospice in Rockford, Illinois 61108

4751 Harrison Avenue, Rockford, Illinois 61108. (815) 398-0500.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 15 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Mar 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

15 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 16 hospices serving ZIP code 61108 had 4.5.

The last inspection on record was on Mar 8, 2024: a reaccreditation inspection by The Joint Commission.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

15 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Mar 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

15 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Mar 8, 2024: reaccreditation inspection by The Joint Commission15 deficiencies
  • EP Program Patient Population (42 CFR 418.113(a)(3))

    “Observed in Emergency Management Session. The organization has a written delegation of authority plan however it did not provide the individual(s) with the legal authorization to act on behalf of the organization for specified purposes and to carry out specific duties. This was discussed with the CEO.”

    Rule E0007. Standard-level.

  • Policies/Procedures-Volunteers and Staffing (42 CFR 418.113(b)(4))

    The inspectors’ words, 142 words

    “Observed in Emergency Management Session. The organization had not developed a staffing plan for managing all staff and volunteers based on the settings and services provided to meet patient care needs during the duration of an emergency or disaster incident or during a patient surge. The plan did not include use of volunteer staffing such as staffing agencies, and those deployed as part of the disaster medical assistance teams. This was discussed with the CEO. Observed in Emergency Management Session. The organization did not have a staffing plan which addressed the management of all staff and volunteers as follows: reporting processes; roles and responsibilities for essential functions; integrating staffing agencies, volunteer staffing, or deployed medical assistance teams into assigned roles and responsibilities; verifying the identity and licensures of volunteer practitioners (such as nurses, physicians, physical therapists). This was discussed with the CEO”

    Rule E0024. Standard-level.

  • Timeframe for completion of assessment (42 CFR 418.54(b))

    “Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 19 patient records reviewed, the hospice’s interdisciplinary group had not completed the comprehensive assessment no later than five calendar days after the election of hospice care. In the chart for RRHV#1, the Spiritual Care assessment had not been completed until six days after the election. This was discussed with the Quality Director.”

    Rule L0523. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 258 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 4 of 19 patient records reviewed, the written plan of care was not based on the patient’s goals and the time frames required to meet those goals. In the chart for RRHV#3, the patient was admitted to hospice after a fall with injury, with a history of falls, yet the goal on the plan of care was that the patient would remain free from falls while on hospice. There was no short term goal related to education about fall risks and fall reduction interventions for this high risk problem. In the chart for RRNHV#9 for the patient who had been admitted after having been hospitalized for bowel obstruction and chronic constipation, the bowel management goal was not objectively measurable and did not have an appropriate time frame for achievement and read Patient will achieve and maintain regular bowel movements while on hospice services. Additionally, the patient was assessed to have a foley catheter, yet there was no goal on the plan of care related to management or care of the catheter. In the chart for RRNHV#8, the patient was admitted with pressure ulcers and was at risk for pressure ulcer development, yet there was no goal on the plan of care addressing this problem. In the chart for RRNHV#10, the anticipated goal achievement date had not been individualized to the patient’s acute pain management needs. Patient will demonstrate use of methods to maintain comfort while on hospice services.. This was discussed with the Quality Director and/or the Quality RN assisting with record review.”

    Rule L0545. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))

    The inspectors’ words, 293 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 5 of 19 patient records reviewed, the plan of care did not include all services needed for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including treatment necessary to meet the patient’s needs. During RRHV#5, the RN drained the pleurex catheter and provided site care and a dressing to the pluerex site. There was no order for site care nor a dressing on the hospice plan of care. In the chart for RRHV#3, the patient was admitted with multiple wounds. The RN documented care to a stage three pressure ulcer during the admission visit. There were no orders for wound care on the plan of care. The patient was sent home from the hospital with NPO as the diet. The hospice plan of care did not address the patient’s diet, yet documentation included an as tolerated diet was provided. Additionally, the plan of care for this patient was not updated to reflect the emergency respite stay, the return to routine level of care post-respite stay, nor was the plan of care revised to remove the oxygen which was not implemented when the patient moved primary residence post-respite stay. In the chart for RRNHV#9, the patient was found to have a Foley catheter upon the initial assessment, yet the plan of care did not include orders for a urinary catheter. In the chart for RRNHV#8, the patient was admitted with a documented stage 2 pressure ulcer, a dressing in place, and a documented pressure ulcer risk, yet the plan of care did not include any pressure ulcer reduction interventions. In the chart for RRNHV#11, the plan of care orders included oxygen equipment, yet no ordered liter flow or frequency. This was discussed with the Quality Director.”

    Rule L0549. Standard-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(2))

    “Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 19 patient records reviewed, the organization had not provided the patient with care according to the patient’s individualized plan of care. In the chart for RRNHV#6, music therapy had been ordered during the initial comprehensive assessment. There was no documentation in the chart to indicate that any attempt had been made to provide a music therapy visit as of the date of the survey, approximately six weeks post-admission. This was discussed with the Quality Director.”

    Rule L0555. Standard-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(4))

    The inspectors’ words, 96 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 19 patient records reviewed, all disciplines that provide care, treatment or services to the patient had not collaborated in the care of the patient and coordinated their efforts to support the goals outlined in the plan of care. In the chart for RRNHV#10, the RN documented that the patient was at the emergency department for treatment and IV fluids. There was no indication the hospice physician was aware of the change in condition until the subsequent IDT note. This was discussed with the Quality RN assisting with record review.”

    Rule L0557. Standard-level.

  • Control (42 CFR 418.60(b)(2)(ii))

    The inspectors’ words, 142 words

    “Observed in Data Session. The organization’s written infection prevention and control goals did not include the following: Limiting the spread of infections associated with procedures. The organization had an overall infection prevention goal, not broken out into the required elements as confirmed with the Quality Director. Observed in Data Session. The organization’s written infection prevention and control goals did not include the following: Limiting the spread of infections associated with the use of medical equipment, devices, and supplies. The organization had an overall infection prevention goal, not broken out into the required elements as confirmed with the Quality Director. Observed in Data Session. The organization’s written infection prevention and control goals did not include the following: Limiting unprotected exposure to pathogens. The organization had an overall infection prevention goal, not broken out into the required elements as confirmed with the Quality Director.”

    Rule L0581. Standard-level.

  • Counseling services (42 CFR 418.64(d)(3)(i))

    The inspectors’ words, 93 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 19 patient records reviewed, the hospice had not conducted and documented a patient-specific comprehensive assessment including patient and family spiritual orientation, including their desire for the involvement of a religious group; spiritual concerns or needs identified by the patient or family, such as despair, suffering, guilt, and forgiveness. In the chart for RRNHV#8, there was no initial spiritual assessment found which included the required elements. The spiritual visits documented were routine follow up visit notes. This was discussed with the QA Nurse assisting with record review.
”

    Rule L0598. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(1))

    “Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 19 patient records reviewed, the RN had not prepared appropriate instructions for the hospice aide. In the chart for RRNHV#6, the initial aide care plan included instructions to provide a shower to the patient who was bed-bound in a private residence. Also to provide for foley catheter care, yet the patient did not have an indwelling catheter. This was discussed with the QA Nurse assisting with record review.”

    Rule L0625. Standard-level.

  • Supervision of hospice aides (42 CFR 418.76(h)(3)(ii))

    “Observed in Tracer Activities. The supervising nurse had not assessed the aide’s ability to demonstrate continued satisfactory performance in the following: creating successful interpersonal relationships with the patient and family. The organization’s aide supervisory documentation form in the medical record did not include the required elements as confirmed with the Quality Director.”

    Rule L0633. Standard-level.

  • Supervision of hospice aides (42 CFR 418.76(h)(3)(iii))

    “Observed in Tracer Activities. The supervising nurse had not assessed the aide’s ability to demonstrate continued satisfactory performance in the following: demonstrating competence with assigned tasks. The organization’s aide supervisory documentation form in the medical record did not include the required elements as confirmed with the Quality Director.”

    Rule L0633. Standard-level.

  • Supervision of hospice aides (42 CFR 418.76(h)(3)(iv))

    “Observed in Tracer Activities. The supervising nurse had not assessed the aide’s ability to demonstrate continued satisfactory performance in the following: complying with infection control policies and procedures. The organization’s aide supervisory documentation form in the medical record did not include the required elements as confirmed with the Quality Director.”

    Rule L0633. Standard-level.

  • Content (42 CFR 418.104(a)(3))

    The inspectors’ words, 205 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 3 of 19 patient records reviewed, the patient record did not include specific notes on care, treatment, or service. In the chart for RRHV#5, the nursing staff was providing site care and dressing changes to the patient’s pleurex chest tube site every other day during the draining of the tube. There was no detail of cleansing solution, dressing nor securement device in the documentation. In the chart for RRHV#3, the RN documented that wound care was provided to a stage three pressure ulcer, yet the documentation did not include the cleansing solution used nor the actual dressing that was applied. In the chart for RRNHV#10, during a prn visit, the RN documented administration of morphine 0.75ml. There was no documentation of milligrams nor route of administration. Additionally, in another visit, a RN documented she administered an enema and suppository yet there was no documentation of what medications were given. This patient had documentation in the most recent IDT that she had been in the ED in the past week and received IV hydration. It was unclear in the documentation how the hospice became aware of the transfer and treatment. This was discussed with the Quality Nurse assisting with record review.”

    Rule L0674. Standard-level.

  • Discharge or transfer of care (42 CFR 418.104(e)(1)(ii))

    The inspectors’ words, 95 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 1 patient records reviewed, in which a transfer occurred, when the care of the patient was transferred to another Medicare/Medicaid-certified facility, the hospice had not provide the receiving facility with a copy of the patient’s clinical record. In the chart for RRNHV#10, the RN documented she checked with the ED about the patient’s presence for treatment, however there was no documentation that any information about the patient’s care, treatment and services were provided to the receiving facility. This was discussed with the Quality RN assisting with record review.”

    Rule L0682. Standard-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Mar 8, 2024Reaccreditation inspection by The Joint Commission15 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Nov 16, 1988.
  • Ownership: non-profit.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 12.1 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 9.6% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 94.4% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 56% at home, 19% in assisted living, 22% in a nursing facility, 1% in a skilled nursing facility, 2% elsewhere.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day12.1 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends9.6%
Visits near death94.4% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • 4 owners or officers are people: Laurie Sievert (corporate officer); Laurie Sievert (managing employee (on the payroll)); Lisa Novak (corporate officer); Lisa Novak (managing employee (on the payroll)).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What do families say?

  • Family caregivers rate it 3 of 5 in CMS’s survey (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 82% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 89% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 10 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 97.87% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 67.3% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 53 of 5
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold10 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 16 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 61108, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 4.5; this one had 15.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.