Hearth Record

Orange City Hospice

A hospice in Orange City, Iowa 51041

400 Central Avenue NW, Mail-1000 Lincoln Circle SE, Orange City, Iowa 51041. (712) 737-5279.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 7 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited May 2025. Most serious: Condition-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean4
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
Condition-level deficiency
For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual.

What did inspectors find?

7 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 6 hospices serving ZIP code 51041 had 10.5.

The last inspection on record was on Jun 16, 2025: a recertification inspection by the state.

1 deficiency at condition level, the more serious of CMS’s two levels

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

7 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited May 2025. Most serious: Condition-level. The last 3 years, to Nov 5, 2026.

7 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 Dec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNov

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

May 7, 2025: recertification inspection by the state7 deficiencies
  • Federal, state, local laws & regulations (42 CFR 418.116)

    The inspectors’ words, 476 words

    “The Iowa Code, Chapter 135C.33 requires hospice agencies to complete a criminal history, a dependent adult abuse, and child abuse record check on all prospective direct or contracted employees with the potential for direct patient contact, within 30 days prior to the date of hire, using either the Iowa Single Information Repository (SING), or using both the Iowa Department of Criminal Investigation (DCI) to conduct the criminal background check, and using the Iowa Department of Human Services to conduct the dependent adult abuse and child abuse background checks. The Iowa Administrative Code, Chapter 119, requires the hospice agency to obtain authorized clearance from the Department of Human Services (DHS) prior to hiring any prospective employee who DCI has reported has a criminal record for any conviction more severe than a simple misdemeanor. Based on review of employee personnel files and staff interview, the hospice failed to ensure completion of a dependent adult abuse or child abuse record checks for 2 of 7 sampled employees (Staff E and L) who began serving hospice patients since their last survey, dated 5/12/22. The hospice reported hiring 7 staff since the last survey. Failure to complete dependent adult and child abuse record checks as required by State regulation, increased the potential risk of harm to agency patients from staff who had direct patient contact. Findings include: According to the hospice policy titled Background Check Procedures, last revised 11/20/23, criminal history, sex offender, dependent adult abuse, and child abuse histories are conducted through the Single Contact Repository Site (SING) for all applicants following an initial offer of employment. During an interview on 5/6/25 at 11:05 AM, the Administrator stated Staff E and Staff L had background checks completed when they previously worked at the hospital. Staff transfered to work for hospice. 1. Staff E, Medical Director, had a hire date of 12/21/23. A criminal background check, dependent adult abuse and child abuse checks were completed and dated 2/3/2020. The hospice failed to complete dependent adult abuse and child abuse checks with the Iowa SING or the Iowa Department of health within 30 days prior to the date of hire. Hospice staff failed to complete dependent adult and child abuse record checks within 30 days prior to the date of hire on all staff prior to hiring. 2. Staff L, Hospice Aide, had a hire date of 2/11/25. A criminal background check, dependent adult abuse and child abuse checks were completed and dated 7/3/19. The hospice failed to complete dependent adult abuse and child abuse checks with the Iowa SING or the Iowa Department of health within 30 days prior to the date of hire. Hospice staff failed to complete dependent adult and child abuse record checks within 30 days prior to the date of hire on all staff prior to hiring. The above findings reviewed with the Administrator and Clinical Manager.”

    Rule L0797. Condition-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 855 words

    “Based on clinical record review, hospice policy review, and staff interview, the hospice failed to ensure hospice aides provided care to patients only as directed by the Interdisciplinary Group (IDG) and according to the hospice aide care plan for 3 of 9 sampled patients receiving hospice aide services ( Patient #1, #4 and #6). Failure to ensure the hospice aide services are provided only as ordered by the physician and according to the hospice aide care plan increased the risk that patients personal care needs were not adequately met. Findings include: 3. Patient #4 had a start of care date of 4/26/25 and received hospice services while residing in a private residence. Clinical record review revealed the following: a. The POC, dated 4/26/25 to 7/23/25, included orders for hospice aide services 1 to 2 times a week. The POC identified the patient had a diagnosis of Acute kidney failure. b. The hospice aide care plan, dated 4/27/25, included the following RN assigned hospice aide tasks: apply lotion to legs and back, assist with ambulation, assist with dressing, assist with eating/feeding, assist patient with oral care, assist with repositioning patient, assist with shampoo and haircare, assist with shaving, provide routine catheter care according to policy, tidy room, provide companionship and entertainment, assist patient with partial/complete bed bath, perform back rub, remove trash, assist with transfers using gait belt and change bed linens. c. The hospice aide visit notes, dated 4/29/25 and 5/2/25, completed by Staff K, LPN, documented the tasks of assist patient with partial/complete bed bath accomplished. The documentation failed to include which of the tasks were accomplished. The above findings were reviewed with the Administrator and Clinical Manager. According to the agency policy titled, Hospice Aide Services, dated 2/5/24, home health aides are assigned to a patient assignment by the RN who determines the appropriate home health aide schedule for the patient based on their individual needs. During an interview on 4/29/25 at 3:06 PM, the Clinical Manager stated if the hospice aide unable to complete a task, the hospice aide would mark they didn’t complete it. If the task routinely not completed, the hospice aide would talk to the nurse and the task would be addressed and modified or removed. 1.Patient #1 had a start of care date of 8/8/24 and received hospice services while residing in a nursing home. Clinical record review revealed the following: a. The plans of care (POCs), dated 1/4/25 to 4/4/25 and 4/5/25 to 6/3/25, included orders for hospice aide services 1 to 2 times a week. The POC identified the patient had a diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease. b. The hospice aide care plan, dated 4/28/25, the Registered Nurse (RN) assigned the following hospice aide tasks: apply compression stocking, apply lotion to patient’s skin, assist incontinence care, whirlpool baths on Mondays, assist with elimination with EZ stand, assist with dressing, assist with eating/feeding, assist with oral care, assist with repositioning, assist with shampoo and haircare, assist with shaving, partial/complete bed bath on Mondays if refuses whirlpool and collaborate with facility/agency staff, c. The hospice aide visit notes, dated 3/31/25 and 4/14/25, Staff K, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), documented the task of a whirlpool and partial/complete bed bath accomplished. She also documented the task of shampoo and/or using brush or comb accomplished. The documentation failed to include which of the task instructions were accomplished. d. The hospice aide visit note, dated 4/7/25, Staff L, Hospice Aide (HA), documented the task of shampoo and/or using brush or comb accomplished. The documentation failed to include which of the task instructions were accomplished. The hospice aide failed to identify which specific services were provided as instructed by the RN assignment. 2. Patient #6 had a start of care date of 9/3/24 and received hospice services while residing in a private home residence. Clinical record review revealed the following: a. The POCs, dated 3/2/25 to 4/30/25 and 5/1/25 to 6/29/25, included orders for hospice aide services 1 to 2 times a week. The POC identified the patient had a diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. b. The hospice aide care plan, dated 4/29/25, the RN assigned the following hospice aide tasks: remove trash, clean bathroom, clean/tidy room, perform nail filing, perform back rub, assist with dressing, apply lotion, assist with foot care, assist with shower, assist with bath-able to decide sponge or shower, prepare meal, apply compression stocking, assist with shampoo and haircare-and/or brush or comb, provide companionship and entertainment and assist with ambulation c. The hospice aide visit notes, dated 3/25/25 and 4/1/25, Staff K, LPN, documented the task of shampoo and/or using brush or comb accomplished. The documentation failed to include which of the task instructions were accomplished. d. The hospice aide visit note, dated 3/28/25, Staff L, HA, documented the task of both a shower and sponge bath accomplished. The hospice aide visit notes, dated 3/28/25 and 4/4/25, Staff L documented the task of shampoo and/or using brush or comb accomplished. The documentaion failed to include which of the task instructions were accomplished. The hospice aide failed to identify which specific services were provided as instructed by the RN assignment.”

    Rule L0626. Standard-level.

  • Professional management responsibility (42 CFR 418.100(e))

    The inspectors’ words, 221 words

    “Based on review of written hospice agreements for services under arrangement, the hospice failed to ensure written agreements between the hospice agency and agencies providing services under arrangement included all required contract components for 2 of 3 sampled services (Massage therapy provider and Pharmacy provider). Failure to include this provision within the contractual agreement increased the potential that hospice management and oversight failed to occur and the patient would not receive services as specified on the plan of care. Findings include: 1.Review of the contract between the hospice and sampled therapeutic massage provider, dated 2/6/23, identified the contract lacked the following required components: a. The hospice retains administrative and financial management and b. The hospice retains oversight of staff and services. 2. Review of the contract between the hospice and sampled pharmacy provider, dated 5/13/14, identified the contract lacked the following required components: a. The hospice retains administrative and financial management, b. The hospice retains oversight of staff and services, c. All services are delivered in a safe and effective manner by qualified personnel and d. All services are delivered in accordance with the patient’s plan of care. The hospice failed to include all required contract components in written agreements between the hospice agency and agencies providing services under arrangement. The above findings were reviewed with the Administrator and Clinical Manager.”

    Rule L0655. Standard-level.

  • Authentication (42 CFR 418.104(b))

    The inspectors’ words, 1,044 words

    “Based on clinical record review and agency staff interview, the hospice failed to ensure all documentation was completed and appropriately authenticated in accordance with accepted standards of practice and agency standards for 7 of 14 sampled patients (Patients #1, #2, #6, #7, #8, #9 and #12). Failure to ensure all documentation was completed, dated and signed in a timely manner decreased the ability of hospice staff to communicate and coordinate patient care effectively and to provide safe, effective hospice services to its patients. Findings include: 5. Patient #2 had a start of care date of 1/8/25 and received hospice services while residing in a private residence. Clinical record review revealed: a. The POCs, dated 1/8/25 to 4/7/25 and 4/8/25 to 7/6/25, identified the patient had a diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease and included orders for skilled nurse, social worker, chaplain, massage therapy and music therapy services. b. The chaplain visit notes, dated 3/8/25, 4/3/25 and 4/17/25, completed by Staff C, Chaplain, included a signature and date but lacked a title of the clinician completing the visit notes. c. The massage therapist visit notes, dated 3/13/25 and 3/28/25, completed by Staff H, Massage Therapist, included a signature but lacked a title of the clinician completing the visit notes and date of signature. The hospice failed to ensure all completed documentation included appropriate authentication. 6. Patient #9 had a start of care date of 1/21/25 and received hospice services while residing in a private residence. Clinical record review revealed: a. The POC, dated 1/21/25 to 4/20/25, identified the patient had a diagnosis of Heart disease and included orders for skilled nurse, social worker, hospice aide, chaplain, music therapy, massage therapy and volunteer services. b. The chaplain visit note, dated 2/19/25, completed by Staff C, Chaplain, included a signature and date but lacked a title of the clinician completing the visit note. c. The massage therapist visit notes, dated 3/12/25 and 3/27/25, completed by Staff H, Massage Therapist, included a signature but lacked a title of the clinician completing the visit notes and date of signature. The hospice failed to ensure all completed documentation included appropriate authentication. 7. Patient #12 had a start of care date of 10/4/24 and received hospice services while residing in a nursing home. Clinical record review revealed: a. The POC, dated 2/1/25 to 4/1/25, identified the patient had a diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease and included orders for skilled nurse, social worker, chaplain, music therapy, massage therapy and volunteer services. b. The chaplain visit note, dated 2/2/25, completed by Staff C, Chaplain, included a signature and date but lacked a title of the clinician completing the visit note. c. The massage therapist visit notes, dated 2/25/25 and 3/25/25, completed by Staff H, Massage Therapist, included a signature but lacked a title of the clinician completing the visit notes and date of signature. The hospice failed to ensure all completed documentation included appropriate authentication. The above findings were reviewed with the Administrator and Clinical Manager. During and interview on 5/6/25 at 2:30 PM the Administrator stated the expectation for the written staff signature to include the name, credentials and date of completion of the documentation of services provided. 1.Patient # 1 had a start of care date of 8/8/24 and received hospice services in a nursing home. Clinical record review revealed the following: a. The Plan of Cares (POCs), dated 1/4/25 to 4/4/25 and 4/5/25 to 6/3/25, identified the patient had a diagnosis of Alzhiemer’s Disease and included orders for skilled nurse, social worker,chaplain, massage therapy, music therapy and hospice aide. b. The chaplain visit notes, dated 3/7/25 and 4/13/25, completed by Staff C, Chaplain, included a signature and date but lacked a title of the clinician completing the visit notes. The hospice failed to ensure all completed documentation included appropriate authentication. 2. Patient # 6 had a start of care date of 9/3/24 and received hospice services in a private home setting. Clinical record review revealed the following: a. The POCs, dated 3/2/25 to 4/30/25 and 5/1/25 to 6/29/25, identified the patient had a diagnosis of chronic obstructive lung disease and included orders for skilled nurse, social worker,chaplain, massage therapy, music therapy and hospice aide. b. The chaplain visit notes, dated 3/26/25, completed by Staff C, Chaplain, included a signature and date but lacked a title of the clinician completing the visit notes. c. The massage therapist notes, dated 2/11/25 and 3/12/25, completed by Staff H, Massage Therapist, included a signature but lacked a title of the clinician completing the visit notes and date of signature. The hospice failed to ensure all completed documentation included appropriate authentication. 3. Patient # 7 had a start of care date of 12/12/24 and received hospice services in a private home setting. Clinical record review revealed the following: a. The POCs, dated 12/12/25 to 3/11/25 and 3/12/25 to 6/9/25, identified the patient had a diagnosis of congestive heart failure and included orders for skilled nurse, social worker,chaplain, massage therapy, music therapy and hospice aide. b. The chaplain visit notes, dated 3/8/25 and 4/27/25, completed by Staff C, Chaplain, included a signature and date but lacked a title of the clinician completing the visit notes. c. The massage therapist notes, dated 3/3/25 and 3/28/25, completed by Staff H, Massage Therapist, included a signature but lacked a title of the clinician completing the visit notes and date of signature. The hospice failed to ensure all completed documentation included appropriate authentication. 4. Patient #8 had a start of care date of 5/9/24 and received hospice services in a private home setting. Clinical record review revealed the following: a. The POCs, dated 1/4/25 to 3/4/25 and 3/5/25 to 5/3/25, identified the patient had a diagnosis of congestive heart failure and included orders for skilled nurse, social worker,chaplain, massage therapy, music therapy, volunteer and hospice aide. b. The chaplain visit notes, dated 3/24/25 and 4/8/25, completed by Staff C, Chaplain, included a signature and date but lacked a title of the clinician completing the visit notes. c. The massage therapist notes, dated 2/4, 2/20 and 2/25/25 and 3/17/25, completed by Staff H, Massage Therapist, included a signature but lacked a title of the clinician completing the visit notes and date of signature. The hospice failed to ensure all completed documentation included appropriate authentication.”

    Rule L0679. Standard-level.

  • Inpatient care provided under arrangements (42 CFR 418.108(c)(3))

    The inspectors’ words, 156 words

    “Based on review of the written agreements between the hospice and inpatient facilities (hospitals), the hospice failed to ensure the written agreement identified the hospital would send a copy of the hospice patient’s discharge summary to the hospice at the time of discharge from the hospital for 1 of 3 sampled written agreements (Hospital A). Failure to ensure the hospital provided the hospice with a discharge summary upon hospital discharge of a hospice patient decreased the possibility of continuity of care when the patient returned home. Findings include: The hospice had a contractual agreement with Hospital A, dated 1/28/25. The contractual agreement failed to specify the hospital would provide the hospice agency with a copy of the discharge summary at the time of discharge and failed to specify a copy of the inpatient clinical record is available to the hospice at the time of discharge. The above findings were reviewed with the Administrator and Clinical Manager.”

    Rule L0713. Standard-level.

  • Inpatient care provided under arrangements (42 CFR 418.108(c)(5))

    The inspectors’ words, 221 words

    “Based on review of the written agreements between the hospice and inpatient facilities (hospitals), the hospice failed to ensure the written agreement identified the hospice’s responsibility to maintain a description of the training and documentation of the names of those giving the training for 3 of 3 sampled written agreements (Hospital A, B and C). Failure to ensure the written agreements with hospitals specified the hospice’s responsibility to ensure hospital staff caring for hospice patients received training and the hospice maintained appropriate documentation of the training placed hospice patients at risk for receiving inpatient care in conflict with the hospice philosophy. Findings include: 1.The hospice agency had a contractual agreement with Hospital A, dated 1/28/25. The contractual agreement failed to specify the agency responsibility to include a description of the training provided and documentation of the training facilitators. 2. The hospice agency had a contractual agreement with Hospital B, dated 1/29/25. The contractual agreement failed to specify the agency responsibility to include a description of the training provided and documentation of the training facilitators. 3. The hospice agency had a contractual agreement with Hospital C, dated 1/8/13. The contractual agreement failed to specify the agency responsibility to include a description of the training provided and documentation of the training facilitators. The above findings were reviewed with the Administrator and Clinical Manager.”

    Rule L0715. Standard-level.

  • Criminal background checks (42 CFR 418.114(d)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 447 words

    “The Iowa Code, Chapter 135C.33 requires hospice agencies to complete a criminal history, a dependent adult abuse, and child abuse record check on all prospective direct or contracted employees with the potential for direct patient contact, within 30 days prior to the date of hire, using either the Iowa Single Information Repository (SING), or using both the Iowa Department of Criminal Investigation (DCI) to conduct the criminal background check, and using the Iowa Department of Human Services to conduct the dependent adult abuse and child abuse background checks. The Iowa Administrative Code, Chapter 119, requires the hospice agency to obtain authorized clearance from the Department of Human Services (DHS) prior to hiring any prospective employee who DCI has reported has a criminal record for any conviction more severe than a simple misdemeanor. Based on review of employee personnel files and staff interview, the hospice failed to ensure completion of a criminal background check for 2 of 6 sampled employees (Staff E & L) who began serving hospice patients since their last survey, dated 5/12/22. The hospice reported hiring 7 new staff since the last survey. Failure to complete criminal background checks as required by Federal regulation, increased the potential risk of harm to agency patients from hospice employees who had direct patient contact. Findings include: According to the hospice policy titled Background Check Procedures, last revised 11/20/23, criminal history, sex offender, dependent adult abuse, and child abuse histories are conducted through the Single Contact Repository Site (SING) for all applicants following an initial offer of employment. During an interview on 5/6/25 at 11:05 AM, the Administrator stated Staff E and Staff L had background checks completed when they previously worked at the hospital. Staff transferred to work for hospice. 1. Staff E, Medical Director, had a hire date of 12/21/23. A criminal background check was completed and dated 2/3/2020. The hospice failed to complete a criminal background check with the Iowa SING or the Iowa DCI within 30 days prior to the date of hire. Hospice staff failed to ensure the completion of a criminal history background check per Iowa law on personnel prior to allowing that person direct contact with hospice patients. 2. Staff L, Hospice Aide, had a hire date of 2/11/25. A criminal background check was completed and dated 7/3/19. The hospice failed to complete a criminal background check with the Iowa SING or the Iowa DCI within 30 days prior to the date of hire. Hospice staff failed to ensure the completion of a criminal history background check per Iowa law on personnel prior to allowing that person direct contact with hospice patients. The above findings reviewed with the Administrator and Clinical Manager.”

    Rule L0796. Standard-level.

All 2 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Jun 16, 2025Recertification inspection by the stateNo deficiencies cited
May 7, 2025Recertification inspection by the state7 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Feb 1, 2006.
  • Ownership: combination government & non-profit.
  • Cited at in the last three years: it didn’t meet a whole condition of Medicare’s rules.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 20 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 5.2% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 99.1% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 25% at home, 15% in assisted living, 44% in a nursing facility, 13% in a skilled nursing facility, 3% in a hospital.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day20.0 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends5.2%
Visits near death99.1% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • Orange City Municipal Hospital runs it.
  • 10 owners or officers are people: Wade Hofland (corporate director); Dale Pluim (corporate director); Timothy J Zeutenhorst (corporate director); Martin W. Guthmiller (corporate director); Korrie Lee Ewoldt (runs it (operational or managerial control)); Chris Immeker (corporate director); Russ Mark Adams (corporate director); James Clemens (managing employee (on the payroll)); Kathy Alons (corporate director); Amy Jungers (corporate director).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What do families say?

  • Family caregivers rate it 5 of 5 in CMS’s survey (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 91% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 98% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 10 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 96.3% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 76.6% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 55 of 5
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold10 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 6 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 51041, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 10.5; this one had 7.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

The 6 hospices CMS lists serving ZIP code 51041
PlaceDeficiencies, 3 years
Orange City Hospice This hospice7
Sioux Center Health Home Care and Hospice12
Sanford Home Health and Hospice Sheldon17
Lakes Regional Healthcare Hospice9
Gentiva16
St Croix Hospice0

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Nov 5, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.