Hearth Record

Burgess Hospice

A hospice in Onawa, Iowa 51040

1600 Diamond Street, Onawa, Iowa 51040. (712) 423-2311.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 5 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jun 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean2
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

5 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 4 hospices serving ZIP code 51040 had 8.

The last inspection on record was on Jun 26, 2024: a recertification inspection by the state.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

5 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jun 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

5 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Jun 26, 2024: recertification inspection by the state5 deficiencies
  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(6))

    The inspectors’ words, 880 words

    “Based on clinical record review, hospice policy review and hospice staff interview, the hospice failed to ensure the Interdisciplinary Group (IDG) performed an accurate and complete drug regimen review for 6 of 14 sampled patients (Patients #1, #3, #5, #7, #8 and #10). Failure to ensure the interdisciplinary group (IDG) members involved in the assessment of patient needs identified actual or potential issues when performing the drug regimen review (DRR) with each update to the comprehensive assessment increased the risk of unidentified side effects and actual interactions of medications. Findings include: The hospice’s policy, titled Patient Assessment, dated 11/2022, the comprehensive assessment must identify the physical, psychosocial, emotional and spiritual needs related to the terminal illness that must be addressed in order to promote the hospice patient’s well-being, comfort and dignity throughout the dying process. the drug profile, a review of all of the patient’s prescription and over-the-counter drugs, herbal remedies and other alternative treatments that could affect drug therapy. This includes, but is not limited to, identification of the following: effectiveness of drug therapy drug side effects, actual or potential drug interactions, duplicate drug therapy, drug therapy currently associated with laboratory monitoring and who can safely administer the patient’s medications. 1. Patient #1 had a start of care date of 5/23/24 and received hospice services in a private residence. a. The plan of care (POC), dated 5/23/24 to 8/20/24, included orders for the medication Levothyroxine (thyroid medication). b. The skilled nurse visit note at admission, dated 5/23/24, included a DRR. The DRR failed to identify the patient had orders for the medication Levothyroxine, which included medication associated with laboratory monitoring. Clinical record review identified the Initial IDG (Interdisciplinary group) conference was held on 6/5/24. The IDG included documentation the DDR completed. The DRR failed to identify the order for Levothyroxine, which included medications associated with laboratory monitoring. The IDG failed to include identification of drugs associated with laboratory monitoring. 2. Patient #3 had a start of care date of 4/17/24 and received hospice services in a nursing home. a. The POC, dated 4/17/24 to 7/15/24, included orders for the medication Bumetanide (diuretic medication). b. The skilled nurse visit note at admission, dated 4/17/24, included a DRR. The DRR failed to identify the patient had orders for the medication Bumetanide, which included medication associated with laboratory monitoring. The IDG meeting, dated 4/24, 5/9, 5/22, 6/5 and 6/19/24 included documentation the DDR completed. The DRR failed to identify the order for Bumetanide, which included medications associated with laboratory monitoring. The IDG failed to include identification of drugs associated with laboratory monitoring. 3. Patient #5 had a start of care date of 1/5/24 and received hospice services in a private residence. a. The POC, dated 4/4/24 to 7/2/24, included orders for the medication Lasix (loop diuretic). b. The skilled nurse visit note at admission, dated 1/5/24, included a DRR. The DRR failed to identify the patient had orders for the medication Lasix, which included medication associated with laboratory monitoring. The Initial IDG meeting notes, dated 4/24, 5/9, 5/22, 6/5 and 6/19/24, included documentation the DDR completed. The DRR failed to identify the order for Lasix, which included medications associated with laboratory monitoring. The IDG failed to include identification of drugs associated with laboratory monitoring. 4. Patient #7 had a start of care date of 1/11/24 and received hospice services in a private residence. a. The POC, dated 4/4/24 to 7/2/24, included orders for the medication Lasix (loop diuretic). b. The skilled nurse visit note at admission, dated 1/5/24, included a DRR. The DRR failed to identify the patient had orders for Ativan, Morphine and Oxycodone which include medications with potential drug interactions. The Initial IDG meeting notes, dated 4/24, 5/9, 5/22, 6/5 and 6/19/24, included documentation the DDR completed. The DRR failed to identify the orders for Ativan, Morphine and Oxycodone which include medications with potential drug interactions. The IDG failed to include identification of drugs associated with potential drug interactions. 5. Patient #8 had a start of care date of 12/21/23 and revoked services 1/15/24, and received hospice services in a private residence. a. The POC, dated 12/21/23 to 3/19/24, included orders for the medications Ativan (antianxiety medication), Hydrocodone and Morphine (narcotic pain medications). b. The skilled nurse visit note at admission, dated 12/21/24, included a DRR. The DRR failed to identify the patient had orders for Ativan, Hydrocodone and Morphine which include medications with potential drug interactions. The Initial IDG meeting notes, dated 2/4/24, included documentation the DDR completed. The DRR failed to identify the orders for Ativan, Hydrocodone and Morphine which include medications with potential drug interactions. The IDG failed to include identification of drugs associated with potential drug interactions. 6. Patient #10 had a start of care date of 1/26/24 and date of death of 1/31/24 and received hospice services in a private residence. a. The POC, dated 1/26/24 to 4/24/24, included orders for the medications Morphine, Ativan and Hydrocodone. b. The skilled nurse visit note at admission, dated 1/26/24, included a DRR. The DRR failed to identify the patient had orders for Ativan, Morphine and Hydrocodone which include medications with potential drug interactions. The IDG failed to include identification of drugs associated with potential drug interactions. The above findings were reviewed with the Administrator and Clinical Manager.”

    Rule L0530. Standard-level.

  • Competency evaluation (42 CFR 418.76(c)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 312 words

    “Based on clinical record review, review of employee personnel files, hospice policy review and staff interview, the hospice failed to ensure 2 of 5 sampled hospice aides (Staff G & H) satisfactorily demonstrated competency in the performance of of basic hospice aide skills in the presence of a registered nurse prior to being assigned to perform the task independently. The hospice employed 7 hospice aides at the time of the survey. Failure to ensure hospice aides have a competent ability to perform all skills above and beyond basic hospice aide skills increased the risk that patients received inadequate or inappropriate care. The Medicare Conditions of Participation direct that the hospice aide may not independently provide any patient cares until the aide has successfully completed competency testing. According to the hospice policy tilted Home Health Aides/Hospice Aides/Homemaker, dated 7/2020, the hospice aides must pass a competency evaluation whether experienced or newly trained. The evaluation may be given without prior training for home health aide/hospice aides while, in the judgment of the agency, can pass the testing without training because they are experienced or competent from their past experience in a hospital or nursing home. For the home health aide/hospice aide in training, the competency evaluation must be successfully passed before he/she can work alone. 1. Staff G, Hospice Aide, had a hire date of 6/19/23. Staff G’s personnel file lacked documentation a Registered Nurse (RN) had administered and reviewed the written competency test, dated 7/3/24. 2. Staff H, Hospice Aide, had a hire date of 4/24/24. Staff H’s personnel file lacked documentation a Registered Nurse (RN) had administered and reviewed the undated written competency test. The personnel filed also lacked documentation a RN had observed Staff H competently perform the task of a bed bath or shampoo in bed for a patient. The above information was reviewed with the Administrator and Clinical Manager.”

    Rule L0615. Standard-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.112(e)(1)(i))

    The inspectors’ words, 321 words

    “Based on clinical record review, hospice policy review and nursing home medication administration records, the hospice failed to ensure hospice staff provided overall coordination of the hospice care in regards to the patient’s medications with the nursing home for 1 of 1 sampled patients (Patient #3) with a nursing home medication review. Failure to ensure the hospice staff provided overall coordination of the patient’s medications with the nursing home placed the patient at risk for receiving inadequate care and/or treatments needed to meet the individual needs of the patient. Findings include: Review of the hospice’s policy, titled Nursing Facility Care Plan, Coordination and Communication, dated 2/3/2023, Patient #3 had a hospice admission date of 4/17/24 and received routine home care hospice services while residing in a nursing home. Review of the clinical record revealed the following: The Plan of Care (POC), dated 4/17/24 to 7/15/24, included Interdisciplinary group (IDG) orders for skilled nursing services 1 to 3 times per week and included physician orders for medications. Review of the patient’s nursing home Physician Order Report, dated 5/20/24 to 6/20/24, identified the following medication discrepancies with the hospice’s POC and Medication Profile, dated 6/18/24, for the patient: a. The hospice medication profile included an order for albuterol sulfate inhaler aerosol solution 90 base 2 puffs every 4 hours inhalation, effective 6/27/23. b. The hospice POC had an order for refresh optive (carboxymethylcellulose-glycern) drops; 0.5-0.9 %; 2 drop 3 times a day for dry eyes. c. The nursing home’s physician orders failed to include orders for albuterol inhaler. e. The nursing home’s MAR had orders for refresh optive (carboxymethylcellulose-glycern) drops; 0.5-0.9 %; 1 drop 3 times a day for dry eyes, effective 5/25/24, and and 4 times a day as needed to affected eye, effective 4/17/24. Hospice staff failed to ensure the coordination of the patient’s medications with the patient’s nursing home. The above findings were reviewed with the Administrator and Clinical Manager.”

    Rule L0778. Standard-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.112(e)(3))

    The inspectors’ words, 238 words

    “Based on clinical record review, nursing home clinical record review, nursing home staff interview and hospice staff interview, the hospice failed to ensure the nursing home received copies of all required documents including physician certification of terminal illness specific to the patient and hospice benefit election form for 1 of 1 sampled patients (Patient #3) with home observation visits in nursing homes. Failure to ensure the hospice staff provided the required documentation to the nursing home staff placed the patient at risk for receiving inadequate care and/or treatments needed to meet the individual needs of the patient. Findings include: According to the hospice policy titled Coordination of Hospice Care For Nursing Facility Residents, dated 10/2011, Patient #3 had a hospice admission date of 4/17/24 and received routine home care hospice services while residing in a nursing facility (nursing home). Review of the hospice clinical record revealed the following: a. An initial CTI, dated 1/20/23 to 4/19/23, and subsequent CTI, dated 4/20/23 to 7/8/23. b. An advanced directives form dated 4/17/24. On 6/20/23 at 8:30 AM, during an interview and record review with nursing facility staff, the nursing home staff was not aware of a copy of the advanced directives form provided by the hospice that related to Patient #3. The hospice staff failed to provide a copy of the patient’s Advanced Directives form to the nursing home. The above findings were reviewed with the Administrator and Clinical Manager.”

    Rule L0781. Standard-level.

  • Orientation and training of staff (42 CFR 418.112(f))

    The inspectors’ words, 225 words

    “Based on patient clinical record review and review of hospice documentation in nursing facilities and nursing home staff interview the hospice failed to assess the education and training needs for staff of a long term care facility where 1 of 1 sampled patient (Patient #3) residing in a long term care facility at the time of the survey. Failure to educate and train the long term care (LTC) facility staff where a patient resides potentially puts the patient as risk for receiving substandard hospice philosophy based care. Findings include: During an interview on 6/18/24 at 8:23 AM, the Administrator stated the hospice has not provided education and training to staff of the nursing homes. Patient #3 had a hospice admission date of 4/17/24 and received care at a nursing home. The patient’s terminal diagnosis was hypertensive heart disease with heart failure. During an interview on 6/20/24 at 8:30 AM, the surveyor discussed Patient #3 with nursing home Staff Registered Nurse, who reported to the surveyor that the hospice had not provided any education or training to nursing home staff regarding hospice philosophy, including policies and procedures regarding methods of comfort, pain control, symptom management, as well as principles about death and dying, individual responses to death, patient rights, appropriate forms, and record keeping requirements. The above findings were reviewed with the Administrator and Clinical Manager.”

    Rule L0782. Standard-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Jun 26, 2024Recertification inspection by the state5 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Mar 9, 1995.
  • Ownership: non-profit.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 18.7 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 8.7% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 98.5% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 99% at home, 1% in a nursing facility.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day18.7 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends8.7%
Visits near death98.5% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • 22 owners or officers are people: Andrew Tirevold (corporate director); Rachel M Martian (managing employee (on the payroll)); Rachel M Martian (runs it (operational or managerial control)); Beau T Hupke (corporate director); Shelia M Duarte (corporate director); Jeffrey R Pratt (corporate director); Lynn R Wold (corporate officer); Lynn R Wold (managing employee (on the payroll)); Lynn R Wold (runs it (operational or managerial control)); Terry Murrell (corporate director); James L Gobell (managing employee (on the payroll)); James L Gobell (runs it (operational or managerial control)); Allison L Kovar (managing employee (under contract)); Allison L Kovar (runs it (operational or managerial control)); Mari B Miller (corporate officer); Mari B Miller (corporate director); Keith A Schrunk (corporate officer); Keith A Schrunk (corporate director); Paul E Dudley (corporate director); Amy Maule (corporate officer); Amy Maule (corporate director); Matthew Minnihan (corporate director).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What do families say?

  • CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
  • In CMS’s survey of family caregivers (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 94% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 94% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 10 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 88.89% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 80.3% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 5Not rated
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold10 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 4 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 51040, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 8; this one had 5.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

The 4 hospices CMS lists serving ZIP code 51040
PlaceDeficiencies, 3 years
Burgess Hospice This hospice5
Care Initiatives Hospice - Sioux City11
Generations Hospice Care Inc.29
St Croix Hospice5

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 8, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.