Hearth Record

Affinity Hospice

A hospice in Athens, Georgia 30606

105 Westpark Drive, Suite A, Athens, Georgia 30606. (205) 949-0400.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 10 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Apr 2026. Most serious: Condition-level, immediate jeopardy. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean4
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
Condition-level deficiency
For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual.
Immediate jeopardy
CMS’s most serious finding: the place’s failure to meet a rule caused, or was likely to cause, serious injury, harm, impairment or death to someone in its care. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 489.3.

What did inspectors find?

10 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 23 hospices serving ZIP code 30606 had 2.

The last inspection on record was on Apr 2, 2026: a complaint and recertification inspection by the state.

Patients in immediate jeopardy, CMS’s most serious finding: Patients’ rights (42 CFR 418.52), Apr 2, 2026

Patients in immediate jeopardy, CMS’s most serious finding: Organizational environment (42 CFR 418.100), Apr 2, 2026

3 deficiencies at condition level, the more serious of CMS’s two levels

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

10 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Apr 2026. Most serious: Condition-level, immediate jeopardy. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

10 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Apr 2, 2026: complaint and recertification inspection by the state10 deficiencies
  • Patients’ rights (42 CFR 418.52)

    The inspectors’ words, 171 words

    “Based on a review of clinical records and staff interviews, it was determined that the agency failed to send a nurse to P1 for treatment and nursing interventions for pain symptom management for one patient (P) (P5) of three sample patients. Findings included: Review of document titled “Patient Bill of Rights,” revised November 2018 revealed the patient has the right to receive effective pain and symptom management for conditions related to terminal illness(es). Review of text messages sent on 02/19/2026 from the family of P5 to the case manager revealed a request for a nurse visit to address a crisis and pain. The case manager advised the family of P5 to administer Morphine 1ml (for pain) and Ativan (for agitation). The case manager failed to provide a nurse visit until 02/23/2026. Review of on call and complaint logs failed reveal the complaint from P5. An interview was conducted on 03/30/2026 at 2:10 PM with the Administrator who confirmed the agency failed to send a nurse to address bowel impaction and pain.”

    Rule L0500. Condition-level, immediate jeopardy. From a complaint.

  • Organizational environment (42 CFR 418.100)

    The inspectors’ words, 310 words

    “Based on review of policies and procedures, record reviews, and staff and family interviews, it was determined that the hospice’s governing body failed to organize, manage, and administer its resources as evidenced by failure to:1. Provide on call staff 24 hours a day, seven days a week to meet the needs of the patient2. Provide pain assessments and management in a timely manner3. Provide staff for a patient visit for a significant change patient in condition4. Ensure all incoming complaints were documented and investigated in a timely manner5. Ensure the hospice administrator provided responsible oversight for day-to-day operations and supervision of hospice staffThese systemic failures impact the agency’s ability to provide care and services necessary for the management of the hospice patients’ terminal illness and related conditions. Findings included: An interview was conducted on 03/30/2026 at 2:10 PM with the Administrator who revealed the agency failed to send a nurse to address a crisis and manage pain. The Administrator confirmed the complaint from the family of P5 had been reported to her by the case manager. The Administrator confirmed the agency failed to investigate the grievance and resolve the grievance to the patient’s satisfaction. An interview was conducted on 03/30/2026 at 2:00 PM with the case manager who stated that she received a text message from the family of P5 with a complaint. She stated she reported to the complaint to the Administrator. She states she failed to document the complaint per the agency’s policy An interview was conducted on 03/30/2026 at 2:10 PM with the Administrator who confirmed the agency failed to investigate the grievance and resolve the grievance to the patient’s satisfaction Cross reference to L0508 and L509 relating to patient rightsCross refer to L0651 relating to the governing body and administrator.Cross refer to L0653 relating to availability of staff on a 24-hour basis seven days a week”

    Rule L0648. Condition-level, immediate jeopardy. From a complaint.

  • Federal, state, local laws & regulations (42 CFR 418.116)

    The inspectors’ words, 526 words

    “Based on policy titled “ON-CALL/WEEKEND SERVICES,” clinical record reviews, on-call log, and staff interviews, it was determined the agency failed to comply with the nursing services one-hour response time of a patient experiencing a crisis situation or change in condition for one patient (P) (P5) of three patients sampled from the agency’s on-call report. The findings included: Review of policy titled “ON-CALL/WEEKEND SERVICES,” Policy no. 4-036.1, revised November 2024” revealed the following:“PROCEDURE5. The on-call nurse will provide follow-up appropriate to the call:A. Call the patient/family/caregiverB. Visit the patient, if necessary6. The on-call nurse will document each patient/family interaction in a clinical note.7. The on-call nurse will maintain an on-call log of all patient contacts during on-call hours.8. On-call staff will respond to a page within 15 minutes and must be able to reach a patient within one (1) hour. (There may be rare exceptions, depending on how far away the patient lives and if the staff member is with another patient at the time of the page.)” Review of on-call and complaint logs for the year of 2026 failed to reveal the complaint was documented and investigated. Review of text messages sent on 02/19/2026 from family member of patient P5 to the case manager revealed a request for a skilled nurse visit to assess the patient for a change in patient condition, pain and symptom management. The case manager advised the family of P5 to administer Morphine 1ml (for pain) and Ativan (for agitation). The case manager failed to complete a nurse visit until 02/23/2026. Review of the clinical record for P5 failed to reveal skilled nurse documentation of communication concerns or change in patient status or any follow up to medication effectiveness. On 03/30/2026 at 1:50 PM an interview was conducted with the case manager. The case manager revealed that she did receive a text message from the caregiver of P5 on 02/19/2026 who reported that P5 had a bowel impaction and was in severe pain and agitation and evidenced by screaming and crying. The case manager stated she had a family emergency and did not make the visit but advised the caregiver to medicate the patient for pain. The case manager reports she did pass the message to the Administrator but did not document any communication in the clinical record regarding communication with the caregiver or interventions provided. On 03/30/2026 at 2:10 PM an interview was conducted with the Administrator who confirmed the agency failed to send a nurse to address bowel impaction and pain of P5. The Administrator confirmed that she did not have a nurse to send so she asked an as needed (PRN) nurse if she could complete the visit but did not follow up to see if the PRN nurse completed the visit. The PRN nurse did not complete the visit and the patient did not receive a skilled nurse visit until four days later on 02/23/2026. Cross reference to L0508 and L0509 relating to patient rights.Cross reference to L0546 relating to the care plan.Cross reference to L0651 relating to the governing body and administrator.Cross reference to L0653 relating to availability of staff on 24-hour basis seven days a week”

    Rule L0797. Condition-level. From a complaint.

  • Exercise of rights/respect for proprty/person (42 CFR 418.52(b)(4)(i))

    The inspectors’ words, 302 words

    “Based on policy titled “COMPLAINT/GRIEVANCE PROCESS,” review of on call and complaint logs, and family and staff interview, it was determined that the agency failed to investigate a complaint for one patient (P) (P5) of three sampled patients related to a crisis and pain. Findings included: Review of policy titled “COMPLAINT/GRIEVANCE PROCESS,” revised date November 2018, revealed its purpose is to set forth guidelines for the resolution of patient concerns, dissatisfaction, or complaints and to protect patient and family rights. The hospice agency staff member receiving the complaint will discuss, verbally and in writing, the grievance with a supervisor within five days of the alleged grievance. Review of on call and complaint logs failed to reveal the complaint from P5. During an interview on 03/30/2026 at 2:10 PM, the Administrator revealed the agency failed to document the complaint from the family of P5 and that the agency failed to send a nurse to address a crisis and manage pain. The Administrator confirmed the complaint from the family of P5 had been reported to her by the case manager. The Administrator confirmed the agency failed to investigate the grievance and resolve the grievance to the patient’s satisfaction. An interview was conducted on 03/30/2026 at 1:19 PM with family member of P5 who stated that she texted the Case Manager (CM) requesting a nurse visit to manage a crisis and pain. The family member of P5 states the CM instructed her to administer Morphine 1ml (for pain) and Ativan (for agitation). The family member of P5 stated the agency did not send a nurse to assess and manage the crisis. The family of P5 stated the CM made a visit on 02/23/2026 four days later. The family member of P5 stated she did not want any other patient to experience a delay in care.”

    Rule L0508. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Exercise of rights/respect for proprty/person (42 CFR 418.52(b)(4)(ii))

    The inspectors’ words, 311 words

    “Based on record review, staff and family interviews, it was determined that he agency failed to immediately investigate a complaint and resolve the complaint for one patient (P) (P5) of three sampled patients related to a crisis and pain. Findings included: Review of text messages sent on 02/19/2026 from family member of P5 to the case manager revealed a request for a nurse visit to address a crisis (potential bowel impaction) and pain. Review of text messages sent on 02/19/2026 from the family of P5 to the case manager revealed a request for a nurse visit to address a crisis (potential bowel impaction) and pain. An interview was conducted on 03/30/2026 at 2:00 PM with the case manager who stated that she received a text message from the family of P5 with a complaint. She stated she reported to the complaint to the Administrator. She states she failed to document the complaint according to the agency’s policy. An interview was conducted on 03/30/2026 at 1:19 PM with family member of P5 who stated that she texted the case manager requesting a nurse visit to manage a crisis and pain. The family of P5 stated she would forward the text messages to surveyors phone for viewing. The family member of P5 states the case manager instructed her to administer Morphine 1ml (for pain) and Ativan (for agitation). The family member of P5 stated the agency did not send a nurse to assess and manage the crisis. The family of P5 stated the case manager made a visit on 02/23/2026 four days later. The family member of P5 stated she did not want any other patient to experience a delay in care. An interview was conducted on 03/30/2026 at 2:10 PM with the Administrator who confirmed the agency failed to investigate the grievance for P5 and resolve the grievance to the patient’s satisfaction.”

    Rule L0509. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Rights of the patient (42 CFR 418.52(c)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 191 words

    “Based on policy titled “PATIENT BILL OF RIGHTS,” facility documents, record review, and staff and family interviews, it was determined that the agency failed to manage the patient’s pain and symptoms related to the terminal illness and related conditions in a timely fashion for one patient (P) (P5) of 19 patients reviewed. Findings included: Review of policy titled “PATIENT BILL OF RIGHTS,” revised November 2018 revealed the patient has the right to receive effective pain and symptom management for conditions related to terminal illness(es). Review of text messages sent on 02/19/26 from the family member P5 to the case manager (revealed a request for a nurse visit to address a crisis and pain. The case manager advised the family of P5 to administer Morphine 1ml (for pain) and Ativan (for agitation). Review of record for P5 failed to reveal a nursed visit after request on 02/19/2026 until 02/23/2026. Review of on call and complaint logs failed to reveal the complaint from P5. An interview was conducted on 03/30/2026 at 2:10 PM with the Administrator who confirmed the agency failed to send a nurse to address bowel impaction and pain of P5.”

    Rule L0512. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 318 words

    “Based on policy titled “THE PLAN OF CARE,” record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the agency failed to manage the pain and symptoms of the crisis for one patient (P) (P5) of 19 patients reviewed. The findings included: Review of policy titled “THE PLAN OF CARE,” Policy No. 4-027.1, revised November 2024 revealed the following:“PROCEDURE4. “The plan of care will identify the patient’s needs and services to meet those needs, including the management of pain and discomfort and symptom relief. It must state, in detail, the scope and frequency of services needed to meet the patient’s and family/caregiver’s needs, goals and outcome achievement.10. Any change in the patient’s condition must result in a change in the plan of care, prior to implementation of the new service.R. Pain and symptom management interventions.14. Care provided to the patient will be in accordance with the plan of care.” Review of text messages sent on 02/19/2026 from family member of patient P5 to the case manager revealed a request for a nurse visit to address a change in patient status, pain and symptom management. The case manager advised the family of P5 to administer Morphine 1ml (for pain) and Ativan (for agitation). Review of the clinical record for P5 failed to reveal skilled nurse documentation of communication regarding the caregiver concerns or change in patient status or any follow up to medication effectiveness. Review of record for P5 failed to reveal a nursed visit after request on 02/19/2026 until 02/23/2026. Review of text messages sent on 02/19/2026 from family member of P5 to the case manager revealed a request for a nurse visit to address a crisis and pain. The case manager failed to complete a nurse visit until 02/23/2026. An interview was conducted on 03/30/2026 at 2:10 PM with the Administrator who confirmed the agency failed to send a nurse to address bowel impaction and pain of P5.”

    Rule L0546. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Serving the hospice patient and family (42 CFR 418.100(a))

    “Based on review of policies and procedures, record reviews, staff interviews, and family interview, it was determined the hospice agency failed to provide patient care that optimized comfort and safety to meet the needs and goals of the patient for one patient (P) (P5) of 19 sampled patient charts reviewed. Findings included: Review of record for P5 failed to reveal a nursed visit after request on 02/19/2026 until 02/23/2026. Refer to citation L512 for findings related to timely assessment of painRefer to citation L546 for findings related to pain management.”

    Rule L0650. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Governing body and administrator (42 CFR 418.100(b))

    The inspectors’ words, 129 words

    “Based on review of policies and procedures, record reviews, staff and family interviews, it was determined the agency’s governing body failed to ensure hospice on call staff were available 24 hours a day, seven days a week to provide services to the patient such as change in patient condition, pain management and implementing and monitoring patients’ plans of care to include coordinating services based on the patient problems and needs for one patient (P) (P5) of 19 sampled patients. Additionally, the Governing Body failed to coordinate with members of the Interdisciplinary Group (IDG), to ensure staff were available at all times to meet the needs of the patient. Findings included: Cross reference to L0512 relating to right to effective pain managementCross reference to L0546 relating to Coordination of Services”

    Rule L0651. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Services (42 CFR 418.100(c)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 501 words

    “Based on policy titled “HOSPICE NURSING CARE,” record review, staff and family interviews the hospice agency failed to ensure hospice staff were made available on a 24-hour basis 7 days a week to meet the needs of the patient for one patient (P) (P5) 19 patients reviewed. Findings included: Review of policy titled “HOSPICE NURSING CARE,” policy No. 4-002.1” revised November 2018 revealed the following:“3. The hospice nurse will: A. Manage discomfort and provide symptom relief5. A hospice nurse will be available on a 24-hour basis to meet the physical, psychosocial, spiritual, and practical needs of the patients and families/caregivers admitted to the hospice program.” Review of text messages sent on 02/19/2026 from the caregiver of patient P5 to the case manager revealed a request for a skilled nurse visit to assess the patient for a change in patient condition, pain and symptom management. The case manager advised the family of P5 to administer Morphine 1ml (for pain) and Ativan (for agitation). Review of the clinical record for P5 failed to reveal skilled nurse documentation of communication regarding the caregiver concerns or change in patient status or follow up to medication effectiveness. The case manager failed to complete a nurse visit until 02/23/2026. An interview conducted on 03/30/2026 at 1:19 PM with family member of P5 stated that she texted the case manager requesting a nurse visit to manage a crisis and pain. The family of P5 states the case manager instructed her to administer Morphine 1ml (for pain) and Ativan (for agitation). The family of P5 stated the agency did not send a nurse to assess and manage the crisis. The family of P5 stated the case manager made a visit on 02/23/2026 four days later. The family of P5 stated she did not want any other patient to experience a delay in care. An interview on 03/30/2026 at 1:50 PM with the case manager who revealed that the she did receive a text message from the caregiver of P5 on 2/19/26 who reported that P5 had a bowel impaction and was in severe pain and agitation evidenced by screaming and crying. The case manager stated she had a family emergency and did not make the visit instead, advising the caregiver to medicate the patient for pain. The case manager reports she did pass the message to the Administrator but did not document any communication in the clinical record regarding communication with the caregiver or interventions provided. An interview was conducted on 03/30/2026 at 2:10 PM with the Administrator who confirmed the agency failed to send a nurse to address bowel impaction and pain of P5. The Administrator confirmed that she did not have a nurse to send so she asked an as needed (PRN) nurse if she could completed the visit but did not follow up to see if the PRN nurse completed the visit. The PRN nurse did not complete the visit and the patient did not receive a skilled nurse visit until four days later on 02/23/2026.”

    Rule L0653. Standard-level. From a complaint.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Apr 2, 2026Complaint and recertification inspection by the state10 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Oct 16, 2008.
  • Ownership: for-profit.
  • Cited for to patients’ health or safety in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 10 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 11.1 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 9.4% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 92.3% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 68% at home, 24% in assisted living, 3% in a nursing facility, 5% elsewhere.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day11.1 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends9.4%
Visits near death92.3% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • Silverleaf Hospice, Inc. owns 100% directly since Sep 21, 2016.
  • 5 owners or officers are people: Ralph Crowe (managing employee (under contract), 100%); Christopher Smith (corporate officer, 100%); Adam C Cruse (corporate officer, 100%); Nicole Cash (managing employee (on the payroll), 100%); Ray L Shrout (owns 5% or more through other companies, 11.8%).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Affinity Hospice Intermediate Holdings LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Dec 17, 2021
Dragonfly Finance Holdco LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Dec 17, 2021
Affinity Hospice Holdings, LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Jun 14, 2019
Silverleaf Hospice, Inc.Owns 5% or more directly100%Sep 21, 2016
Affinity Hospice Ultimate Holdings LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Dec 17, 2021
Bridgeway Hospice Holdings LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Dec 17, 2021
Llr Equity Partners VI LPOwns 5% or more through other companies35.6%Dec 17, 2021
Llr VI-Ah LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies35.6%Dec 17, 2021
Llr VI Ll-Ah LPOwns 5% or more through other companies15.8%Dec 17, 2021
Llr Equity Partners International VI LPOwns 5% or more through other companies15.8%Dec 17, 2021
FOSH Holdings LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies11.8%Dec 17, 2021
Llr LP Co-Invest VI-Ah LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies9.5%Dec 17, 2021
Llr Equity Partners VI Co-Invest LPOwns 5% or more through other companies9.5%Dec 17, 2021
Go IV Equalization (Eci) LPOwns 5% or more through other companies9.4%Dec 23, 2022
Franklin Park Co-Investment Fund V LPOwns 5% or more through other companies6.2%Dec 17, 2021

What do families say?

  • CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
  • In CMS’s survey of family caregivers (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 78% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 82% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 9 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 91.88% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 39.5% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 5Not rated
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold9 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 23 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 30606, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 2; this one had 10.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.