Hearth Record

Gentiva

A hospice in Savannah, Georgia 31405

41 Park of Commerce Way, Suite 200b, Savannah, Georgia 31405. (912) 352-8200.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 11 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jul 2026. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean2
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

11 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 13 hospices serving ZIP code 31405 had 2.

The last inspection on record was on Jul 9, 2026: a reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

11 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jul 2026. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

11 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Jul 9, 2026: reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care11 deficiencies
  • Exercise of rights/respect for proprty/person (42 CFR 418.52(b)(4)(i))

    The inspectors’ words, 130 words

    “Upon observation, there was no evidence that all alleged violations involving mistreatment, neglect, or verbal, mental, sexual and physical abuse, including injuries of unknown source, and misappropriation of patient property by anyone furnishing services on behalf of the hospice, are reported immediately to the Administrator or appropriate designee. Patient#4: Documentation for 6/22/26 visit by MSW states that spouse has bandages to arms. Spouse states it was injuries due to incident with their granddaughter. Spouse also reported to MSW that the pushing or similar incidents also happens to the patient. Granddaughter has an APS worker. There is no evidence of investigation or collaboration with the APS case worker following the incident, the MSW stated she did follow-up up with worker and collaborate for patient; however, there was no documentation in chart.”

    Rule L0508. Standard-level.

  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(6))

    The inspectors’ words, 292 words

    “Upon patient record review, 6 of 19 (Patient #2,#5,#7,#8,#9,#14) did not have evidence in the patient record that a review was completed of all prescription and non-prescription medications, including herbal remedies that could affect drug therapy. This review includes, but is not limited to: • Effectiveness of drug therapy • Drug side effects • Actual or potential drug interactions • Duplicate drug therapy • Drug therapy currently associated with laboratory monitoring Patient#2:The medication profile indicates the following medications are active: loperamide 2mg scheduled to give one twice a day for diarrhea, Colace two times a day for constipation, and MiraLAX 17 grams scheduled for constipation. Patient#5:The medication profile indicates the patient is taking lactase 9000 units 1 tab four times a day orally and Glucerna four times a day orally. However, this patient has a PEG tube for all meds and intake. The medication profile also indicates lactase is marked as no for not having reviewed directions for use, not having reviewed medication purpose, and not having reviewed side effects/interactions. Patient#7:The medication profile indicates patient is using fentanyl patches. However, there is no evidence of specific instructions for application. Patient#8:It is noted during home visit that Lotrimin AF and Neosporin are active on the medication profile. However, per the caregiver the patient is no longer using these. It was also noted that the patient is currently using artificial tears 1% PRN to both eyes. However, there is no evidence of artificial tears on the medication profile. Patient#9: The medication profile indicates patient actively taking Nitrofurantoin for UTI that was ordered on 01/19/26. However, the instructions state to take for 7 days. Patient#14:The medication profile indicates that nitroglycerin sublingual is scheduled daily. However, the instructions state to take as needed for chest pain.”

    Rule L0530. Standard-level.

  • Approach to service delivery (42 CFR 418.56(a)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 137 words

    “Upon patient record review, 2 of 19 (Patient #4,#14) did not have evidence that a Registered Nurse is designated to ensure continuous assessment of the patient and family’s needs and to coordinate activities with other members of the interdisciplinary group (IDG). The IDG must work together and is responsible for supervision of the care and service for each patient and family. Patient#4: There is no evidence of wound #1 to distal right calf being measured the week of 6/21/26. This is not in compliance with agency policy. Patient#14: The record indicates on 5/29/26 the MSW made a PRN visit and documented that patient cried out in pain and also had a fall. MSW documents she contacted RN who stated she would assess the patient. However, there is no evidence of any follow-up or assessment by the RN.”

    Rule L0540. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 290 words

    “Upon patient record review, 6 of 19 (Patient #1,#2,#4,#5,#10,#12) did not have evidence in the patient record that the hospice has developed an individualized written plan of care for each patient. The plan of care must reflect patient/family goals and interventions based on the problems identified in the initial, comprehensive, and updated comprehensive assessments. The plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions. Patient#1:The plan of care contains interventions for education regarding smoking while using oxygen. However, the the RN documents on visits 6/9/26 and 6/30/26 that the patient is not a smoker. There is no evidence of goals and interventions related to oxygen safety and education. Patient#2:There is documentation on 6/23/26 nurse visit that patient is legally blind and also experiences blurred vision. There is no evidence of problems, goals, or interventions on the nursing plan of care. Patient#4:The record indicates that contact precautions due to bed bugs are listed on the aide plan of care. There is no evidence of problems, goals, or interventions related to this on the main plan of care. Patient#5:The record indicates patient uses PEG tube for medications and intake. However, there is no evidence of aspiration precautions problems, goals, and interventions on plan of care. The plan of care also has interventions for abdominal drain. However, the patient does not have an abdominal drain. Patient#10: The record indicates patient is on oxygen. However, there is no evidence of problems, goals, or interventions on the plan of care for oxygen precautions. Patient#12:The record indicates aspiration precautions are listed on the aide plan of care. However, there is no evidence of aspiration precautions problems, goals, or interventions on the main plan of care.”

    Rule L0545. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))

    The inspectors’ words, 153 words

    “Upon patient record review, 4 of 19 (Patient #2,#5,#7,#8) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including medications and treatments. Patient#2:The record indicates there is an active order for loperamide 2mg schedule for 1 twice a day for diarrhea. However, there is also active orders for Colace scheduled for twice a day for constipation, and for MiraLAX 17 grams scheduled daily for constipation. Patient#5:The record indicates lactase 9000 unit take 1 orally 4 times a day. However, this patient is taking all meds via PEG tube. Patient#7: The record indicates fentanyl is ordered for the patient. However, there is no evidence of specific instructions for application. Patient#8:It is noted during home visit that the patient is currently using artificial tears 1% PRN to both eyes. However, there is no evidence of an order for this.”

    Rule L0549. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(5))

    “Upon patient record review, 2 of 19 (Patient #8,#14) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including equipment and supply needs. Patient#8:The supply order on plan of care contains wound care supplies. However, the patient does not have active wounds. Patient#14:The current DME order on the plan of care indicates patient requires use of nebulizer. However, there is no evidence patient is ordered a medication for a nebulizer.”

    Rule L0550. Standard-level.

  • Review of the plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(d))

    “Upon client record review, 1 of 19 (Patient #2) did not have evidence that the IDG in collaboration with the attending physician reviewed, revised and documents the individualized plan as frequently as the patient’s condition requires but no less frequently then every 15 calendar days. Patient#2: IDG notes on 6/2/26 and 6/16/26 contain no evidence of MSW documentation that psychosocial needs or process on plan of care problems, goals, or interventions were reviewed or discussed.”

    Rule L0552. Standard-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(4))

    The inspectors’ words, 100 words

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 19 (Patient #1) did not have evidence that the IDG documents the sharing of information between all disciplines providing care and services in all settings, whether the care and services are provided directly or under arrangement. Patient#1:During home visit the patient and family explained patient was going to a specialist every 3 months in Savannah to get the trach prosthetic changed and the physician also does a deep suction if needed. There is no evidence of these visits, collaboration, or coordination with the physician or the care he is providing in the patient chart.”

    Rule L0557. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 218 words

    “Upon patient record review, 4 of 19 (Patient #4,#5,#8,#9) did not have evidence in the patient record that hospice aide assignments and duties are: • Assigned to a specific patient by a registered nurse that is a member of the interdisciplinary group • Written patient care instructions for a hospice aide must be prepared by a Registered Nurse who is responsible for the supervision of a hospice aide as specified under paragraph (h) of 418.76 • There is evidence in the patient record that the plan of care; indicate what tasks are to be done by the Aide and the frequency of these tasks. The use of “PRN” or “per patient choice”, for any task, whether personal care or non-personal care tasks, are not acceptable Patient#4:There is no evidence on aide plan of care that aide was notified of wound or dressing on on patient. Patient#5:There is no evidence on the aide plan of care of skin precautions or aspirations precautions. These precautions are noted on nursing plan of care. patient #8: There is no evidence on aide plan of care for skin precautions. Skin precautions are noted on the nursing plan of care. patient#9:There is no evidence of the aide plan of care of skin precautions. This is noted to be on the nursing plan of care.”

    Rule L0625. Standard-level.

  • Supervision of hospice aides (42 CFR 418.76(h)(1))

    “Upon patient record review 1 of 19 (Patient #3) did not have evidence documentation in the patient record that a Registered Nurse made an on-site visit to the patient’s home no less frequently than every 14 days to assess the quality of care and services provided by the hospice aide and to ensure that services ordered by the hospice interdisciplinary group meet the patient’s needs. Patient#3: During record review, there was no evidence of an aide supervisory visit documented between 05/14/26 - 06/03/26.”

    Rule L0629. Standard-level.

  • Authentication (42 CFR 418.104(b))

    “Upon patient client record review, 1 of 19 (Patient #5) did not have evidence that all entries are legible, clear, complete, and appropriately authenticated and dated in accordance with the organizations policies and procedures and currently accepted standards of practice. Electronic signatures are acceptable as long the hospice is following appropriate safeguards to prevent unauthorized access to the patient records. Patient#5:The chaplain documents on 6/8/26 visit that the patient was on oxygen when he arrived. However, this patient does not have or use oxygen.”

    Rule L0679. Standard-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Jul 9, 2026Reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care11 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Dec 15, 2004.
  • Ownership: for-profit.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 9.9 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 5.5% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 93.4% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 78% at home, 13% in assisted living, 3% in a nursing facility, 6% in a skilled nursing facility.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day9.9 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends5.5%
Visits near death93.4% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • Odyssey Healthcare Operating B, LP owns 100% directly since Dec 15, 2004.
  • Curo Health Services LLC runs it.
  • 7 owners or officers are people: Ronald C Lazas (corporate officer, 0%); Jessica Leigh Conger (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); David Robinson Arnold (corporate officer, 0%); David Robinson Arnold (runs it (operational or managerial control), 0%); Thomas Joseph Dolan (corporate officer, 0%); David Allen Causby (corporate officer, 0%); Janet L Combs (corporate officer, 0%).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Ch Services Midco Holdings Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Mar 1, 2022
Curo Health Services Holdings, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Mar 1, 2022
Odyssey Healthcare Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Dec 15, 2004
Odyssey Healthcare Operating B, LPOwns 5% or more directly100%Dec 15, 2004
Charlotte Midco, LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Aug 11, 2022
Falcon Hospice, LPOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Aug 11, 2022
Charlotte Buyer, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Mar 1, 2022
Curo Health Services LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Mar 1, 2022
Odyssey Healthcare Holding CompanyOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Dec 15, 2004
Kah Hospice Company, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Mar 1, 2022
Ch Services Group Holdings Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Mar 1, 2022
Ch Services Holdings Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Mar 1, 2022
Odyssey Healthcare LP, LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies99%Dec 15, 2004
Odyssey Healthcare LP, LLCLimited partner99%Dec 15, 2004
Cd&r Falcon Holdings, LPOwns 5% or more through other companies60%Aug 11, 2022
Kentucky Homecare Parent Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies40%Aug 11, 2022
Kentucky Homecare Holdings, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies40%Aug 11, 2022
Humana Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies40%Aug 11, 2022
Centerwell Health Services Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies40%Aug 11, 2022
Curo Health Services LLCRuns it (operational or managerial control)Jul 11, 2018

What do families say?

  • CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
  • In CMS’s survey of family caregivers (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 84% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 80% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 10 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 97.38% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 68.3% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 5Not rated
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold10 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 13 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 31405, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 2; this one had 11.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.