Hearth Record

Northwest Colorado Health

A hospice in Steamboat Springs, Colorado 80487

1475 Pine Grove Dr, Ste 202, Steamboat Springs, Colorado 80487. (970) 879-1632.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 3 deficiencies in 2 months of the last 36. Last cited Jun 2026. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean2
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Sep 1, 2026: a recertification inspection by the state.

3 deficiencies cited in the last three years.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

3 deficiencies in 2 months of the last 36. Last cited Jun 2026. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

3 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Jun 11, 2026: recertification inspection by the state2 deficiencies
  • Plan Based on All Hazards Risk Assessment (42 CFR 418.113(a)(1)-(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 194 words

    “Based on the record review and interview, the agency failed to develop and maintain an emergency preparedness plan. Specifically, the agency did not have an annual updated and reviewed community-based risk assessment.Findings include: 1. Record review completed on 6/11/26, revealed an emergency preparedness plan provided to surveyors by the agency. Further review revealed the agency did not have a current emergency plan or an updated community-based risk assessment.The agency failed to ensure the agency’s emergency preparedness plan contained an updated and completed assessment of hazards or potential emergencies the agency could encounter.During an interview on 6/11/26 at 11:58 a.m., when questioned specifically regarding the lack of an updated plan, Personnel #10 and Personnel #11 reviewed the emergency preparedness plan with surveyors. Upon review, they stated the plan was last reviewed on 3/26/26; however, this was not documented anywhere. They further stated they did not have an updated risk assessment, and the agency was aware of the regulatory requirement. During continued interview, Personnel #10 and Personnel #11 stated the agency was securing further funding and was working with the agency staff to establish a more robust emergency preparedness plan, including an updated community-based risk assessment.”

    Rule E0006. Standard-level.

  • Training (42 CFR 418.100(g)(3))

    The inspectors’ words, 145 words

    “Based on record review and interview, the hospice agency failed to maintain an effective system for supervision, monitoring, and evaluation processes for 2 of 2 volunteer records reviewed (Personnel #12 and #13).Findings include: 1. Record review completed on 6/12/26 at 12 p.m. for Personnel #12 revealed a start date of 1/29/15.a) The hospice agency failed to maintain a system of volunteer oversight. Record review revealed documentation of identification verification, initial orientation, and continued education. Review of Personnel #12’ s record failed to reveal completed volunteer oversight.During an interview on 6/12/26 at 12:39 p.m., the volunteer coordinator (#14) described the hospice agency’s orientation process, including orientation, hospice disciplines’ education, and volunteer manuals. The volunteer coordinator stated that they did not have a process for evaluations and oversight of volunteers and that they were not aware that they needed to. Similar findings were found for Personnel #13.”

    Rule L0663. Standard-level.

Nov 29, 2023: recertification inspection by the state1 deficiency
  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))

    The inspectors’ words, 449 words

    “Based on interview and record review, the hospice failed to ensure the plan of care (POC) established by the interdisciplinary group (IDG) and in collaboration with the attending physician included all services provided to the patient for 1 of 2 patients who received volunteer services records reviewed (Patient #3). Findings include: 1. The clinical record for Patient #3 was reviewed on 11/27/23. The patient was admitted to hospice care on 6/13/23 with a terminal diagnosis of Parkinson’s disease without dyskinesia, without mention of fluctuations. The POC for the certification period, dated 9/11/23 to 12/9/23, included orders for skilled nursing (SN) visits and medical social worker (MSW) visits. a) The agency failed to ensure that the POC included all services provided to Patient #3. Review of Patient #3’s records revealed the patient received volunteer visits for a massage from Volunteer #1 during the previous certification period on 7/21/23, 7/28/23 and 9/5/23. Further review of the record revealed a verbal order dated 7/20/23 for volunteer services once a week for two weeks for a total of two visits and another verbal order on 9/5/23 for volunteer service once a week for one week. Record review of verbal orders, IDG meeting notes, and the POC failed to reveal an order for a volunteer to go out to visit Patient #3 during any part of the month of November. During an home visit interview on 11/28/23 at approximately 1:30 p.m., Patient #3 stated she enjoyed getting the massage from Volunteer #1. Patient #3 also stated the last time she got a massage was maybe one or two weeks ago and could not recall exactly what day the volunteer came. Review of the IDG meeting notes on 10/11/23 and 10/25/23, revealed the the IDG discussed that volunteer services, specifically massage services, would begin again for Patient #3 in November. During an interview on 11/29/23 at 12:07 p.m., Volunteer #1 stated she had seen Patient #3 the week before the Thanksgiving holiday. Volunteer #1 could not recall exactly on what day she visited Patient #3. Record review of the IDG note dated 11/8/23, revealed the IDG set a visit frequency of SN visit once weekly, MSW visits once weekly, and chaplain visits as needed, but did not set a frequency for volunteer visits. During an interview on 11/29/23 at 12:13 p.m., MSW #4 who was in charge of volunteer visits stated the agency did not have a record of the volunteer visit for November in the system. MSW #4 acknowledged the visit did happen. MSW #4 also stated she would have to check the system to see if the agency had orders for the volunteer visit in November. No order for the visit was found.”

    Rule L0549. Standard-level.

All 4 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Sep 1, 2026Recertification inspection by the stateNo deficiencies cited
Jun 11, 2026Recertification inspection by the state2 deficiencies cited
Jan 11, 2024Recertification inspection by the stateNo deficiencies cited
Nov 29, 2023Recertification inspection by the state1 deficiency cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Oct 5, 1994.
  • Ownership: non-profit.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 11.8 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 9.3% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 95.7% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 77% at home, 7% in assisted living, 16% in a skilled nursing facility.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day11.8 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends9.3%
Visits near death95.7% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • 16 owners or officers are people: Matt Morrill (corporate officer, 0%); Matt Morrill (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); Victoria Klohr (corporate director, 0%); Lynn Dubinsky (corporate director, 0%); James David Park (corporate director, 0%); Jennifer Fleuret (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); Elizabeth Plummer (corporate director, 0%); Rosalind D Leaming (corporate director, 0%); Arin Daigneau (corporate officer, 0%); Erin Wilson (corporate director, 0%); Rebecca Lewis (corporate director, 0%); Erika Murphy (corporate director, 0%); Stephanie Einfeld (corporate officer); Stephanie Einfeld (corporate director); Stephanie Einfeld (managing employee (on the payroll)); Jesse Arthurs (corporate director, 0%).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What do families say?

  • CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 9 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 90.63% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 81.6% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 5Not rated
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold9 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • There aren’t enough hospices serving patients in ZIP code 80487 to compare.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

1 compared
PlaceDeficiencies, 3 years
Northwest Colorado Health This hospice3

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.