Hearth Record

Trust Care Hospice, Inc.

A hospice in North Hollywood, California 91602

4605 Lankershim Blvd Suite 218, North Hollywood, California 91602. (818) 740-8135.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026. We couldn’t read Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services’ list since Oct 27, 2026: qcor.cms.gov now refuses our reader. This record is as of then.

The last 24 months 5 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited May 2026. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean2
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

5 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 79 hospices serving ZIP code 91602 had 5.

The last inspection on record was on May 14, 2026: a reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

5 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited May 2026. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

5 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

May 14, 2026: reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care5 deficiencies
  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(7))

    The inspectors’ words, 192 words

    “Upon patient record review, 3 of 14 (Patient #3,6,8) did not have evidence in the patient record that the comprehensive assessment includes a bereavement component which includes the needs of the patient’s family and other individuals focusing on the social, spiritual, and cultural factors that may impact their ability to cope with the patient’s death. Information gathered from the initial bereavement assessment is incorporated into the plan of care and is considered in the bereavement plan of care. Patient #3 - The initial risk assessment completed on 03/18/26 documented that the bereaved was listed as low risk with only one risk factor “exhaustion” listed. This risk assessment did not include the name of the primary bereaved. Patient #6 - The initial risk assessment completed on 02/25/26 documented that the bereaved was listed as low risk with only one risk factor “exhaustion” listed. This risk assessment did not include the name of the primary bereaved. Patient #8 - The initial risk assessment completed on 02/07/26 documented that the bereaved was listed as low risk with only one risk factor “exhaustion” listed. This risk assessment did not include the name of the primary bereaved.”

    Rule L0531. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 166 words

    “Upon patient record review, 3 of 14 (Patient #1,6,8) did not have evidence in the patient record that the hospice has developed an individualized written plan of care for each patient. The plan of care must reflect patient/family goals and interventions based on the problems identified in the initial, comprehensive, and updated comprehensive assessments. The plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions. Patient #1 - The patient’s POLST form showed patient chose to be a full code. There was no evidence of problems, goals, or interventions related to that full code status. Patient #6 - The patient’s medication profile showed patient was taking Eliquis as a blood thinner daily. There was no evidence of problems, goals, or interventions related to the bleeding risk. Patient #8 - The patient’s POLST form showed patient chose to be a full code. There was no evidence of problems, goals, or interventions related to that full code status.”

    Rule L0545. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(5))

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 14 (Patient #3) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including equipment and supply needs. Patient #3 - The medication profile listed the medication albuterol 0.083% nebulized every 4 hrs prn. There was no evidence that a nebulizer machine was added to the DME list on the plan of care.”

    Rule L0550. Standard-level.

  • Review of the plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(d))

    The inspectors’ words, 193 words

    “Upon client record review, 8 of 14 (Patient #1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8,10) did not have evidence that the IDG in collaboration with the attending physician reviewed, revised and documents the individualized plan as frequently as the patient’s condition requires but no less frequently then every 15 calendar days. Patient #1 - The IDG dated 05/02/26 showed no evidence of a plan of care update by the nurse and spiritual care coordinator. Patient #3 - The IDG dated 05/02/26 showed no evidence of a plan of care update by the nurse and spiritual care coordinator. Patient #6 - The IDG dated 05/02/26 showed no evidence of a plan of care update by the nurse and spiritual care coordinator. Patient #8 - The IDG dated 05/02/26 showed no evidence of a plan of care update by the spiritual care coordinator. Patient #10 - The IDG dated 05/02/26 showed no evidence of a plan of care update by the nurse and spiritual care coordinator. Patients 1,3,4,5,6,7,8 showed an IDG was held on 05/02/26, however did not include all discipline signatures as required by the agency process or proof of attendance at the IDG.”

    Rule L0552. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 161 words

    “Upon patient record review 2 of 14 (Patient #2,6) did not have evidence documentation in the patient record that a hospice aide provides services that are: • Ordered by the interdisciplinary group • Included in the plan of care • Permitted to be performed under state law by such hospice aide • Consistent with the hospice aide training Patient #2 - The aide plan of care dated 09/08/25 had a frequency order for aide visits one time per week. The week of 04/26/26 - 05/02/26 had documented visits completed on 04/26/26 and 04/30/26 without evidence of an order for an extra visit. Patient #6 - The aide plan of care dated 02/25/26 had a frequency order for aide visits two times per week. The weeks of 04/05/26, 04/12/26, and 04/19/26 had evidence that only one aide visit was completed in each week: 04/07/26; 04/14/26; and 04/21/26. The medical record showed no evidence of a change in frequency or missed visit documentation.”

    Rule L0626. Standard-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
May 14, 2026Reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care5 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Jun 15, 2023.
  • CMS doesn’t list its type of ownership.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • CMS hasn’t published nursing time from Medicare claims for this hospice.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 100% at home.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • 7 owners or officers are people: Angela Sarkisyan (owns 5% or more directly, 100%); Angela Sarkisyan (corporate officer, 100%); Angela Sarkisyan (corporate director, 100%); Hovhannes Kurghinyan (managing employee (under contract), 0%); Hovhannes Kurghinyan (other role (CMS gives no detail), 0%); Hovsep Khacheryan (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); Hovsep Khacheryan (runs it (operational or managerial control), 0%).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What do families say?

  • CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
  • CMS gives no Hospice Care Index for this hospice.
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 79 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 91602, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 5; this one had 5.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 8, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.