Hearth Record

Aurora Spring Hospice Care, Inc.

A hospice in San Bernardino, California 92408

435 Orange Show Ln., Suite 205, San Bernardino, California 92408. (909) 571-5761.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026. We couldn’t read Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services’ list since Oct 27, 2026: qcor.cms.gov now refuses our reader. This record is as of then.

The last 24 months 11 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jun 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean2
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

11 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 64 hospices serving ZIP code 92408 had 6.5.

The last inspection on record was on Jun 26, 2025: a reaccreditation inspection by The Joint Commission.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

11 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jun 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

11 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Jun 26, 2025: reaccreditation inspection by The Joint Commission11 deficiencies
  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(7))

    “Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 5 Active patient records, the organization failed to ensure an initial bereavement assessment of the needs of the patient’s family and other individuals focusing of the social, spiritual, and cultural factors that may impact their ability to cope with the patient’s death was conducted. On review of RRHV#2 there was no documentation of an initial bereavement risk assessment. This observation was reviewed with the RN/COO.”

    Rule L0531. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 168 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 5 of 5 active patient records, the organization failed to ensure the plan of care reflect patient and family goals that were specific, measurable, and time-bound. In review of all active patient records there was a trend of goals that were not specific, measurable and time-bound. In RRHV#1 an example was Pain will be managed with current pain medication regimen and Pt will verbalize and/or express decreased episodes of SOB at rest. In RRHV#2 an example was Facilitate bowel elimination and comfort. -Pt/Family/PCG will verbalize having elimination needs met at an acceptable level. In RRHV#3 an example was Pt will have adequate food and fluids as tolerated or desired. In RRNHV#4 a goal read SW to assess for needs, provided assistance and support, and coordinate with the team to address any psychosocial concerns. An example in RRNHV#5 was Toileting, Transfer, Dressing, Feeding, Bathing, and Ambulation needs are met with assistance of caregiver/family. These observations were reviewed with the RN/COO, and DPCS, DPCS Designee.”

    Rule L0545. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 143 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 2 of 5 patient records reviewed, for active patient records, the organization failed to ensure the plan of care include all services needed for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions. On review of RRNHV#4 the documentation noted the addition of allergy medication Zyrtec yet no care plan to guide the care. There was documentation of increased agitation with medication changes but the changes in patient condition were not reflected in the plan of care. In RRNHV#5 there was documentation that the family was looking into patient placement at the end of life yet the issue was not reflected in the plan of care. Further, there was a patient fall yet the care plan was not updated to reflect the change in patient status. These observations were reviewed with the RN/COO and Leadership Team.”

    Rule L0546. Standard-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 159 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 5 of 5 Active patient records, the organization failed to ensure the care and services were provided in accordance with the plan of care. On review of RRHV#1, RRHV#2 and RRHV#3 the spiritual care services were per the plan of care at initial, recertification and monthly yet there were no spiritual care visits documented beyond the initial contact in March where the documentation noted the service was declined. For the MSW the orders per the plan of care also specified visits at initial, recertification and monthly yet there was no visits recorded in the month of April for RRHV#1, RRHV#2, and RRHV#3. In RRNHV#4 the MSW was again ordered a frequency of Initial, Recertification, and Monthly yet the documentation noted visits only at recertification and no visit for the 6th benefit period. Similar findings for the MSW and SC frequency were noted in RRNHV#5. These observations were reviewed with the RN/COO, and Quality/Compliance officer.”

    Rule L0555. Standard-level.

  • Program data (42 CFR 418.58(b)(3))

    “Observed in Data Tracer. The surveyor noted the governing body did not approve the frequency and detail of data collection as evidenced by the HCO was not able to produce this documentation at the time of survey. This observation was reviewed with the Leadership team.”

    Rule L0565. Standard-level.

  • Counseling services (42 CFR 418.64(d)(1)(iv))

    The inspectors’ words, 110 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 2 of 5 bereavement records reviewed, the organization failed to ensure a bereavement plan of care that noted the kind of bereavement services to be offered and the frequency of service delivery was developed. On review of RRBR#3 there was no documentation that a bereavement plan of care was developed although bereavement letters were being documented as sent. In RRBR#5 there was documentation that patient bereaved was to get 13 month bereavement letter program in the post death risk assessment yet there was no plan of care developed that noted the frequency of service delivery to be followed. This observation was reviewed with the COO/RN.”

    Rule L0596. Standard-level.

  • Competency evaluation (42 CFR 418.76(c)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 152 words

    “Observed in HR File Review. In 1 of 1 HR files reviewed, for hospice aides, the organization failed to ensure the RN supervisor evaluate the hospice aide’s performance of required tasks with a patient or pseudo-patient as part of a simulation. In review of HR#4 for the CHHA the initial competency of required tasks of: Communication skills, including the ability to read, write, and verbally report clinical information to patients, caregivers, and other staff - Reading and recording temperature, pulse, and respirations - Appropriate and safe techniques in personal hygiene and grooming that include bed, sponge, tub, or shower bath; sink, tub, or bed shampoo; nail and skin care; oral hygiene; toileting and elimination - Safe transfer techniques and ambulation - Normal range of motion and positioning, was documented as being assessed verbally and not via observation as required. This observation was reviewed with the DPCS who supervised the aide’s competency evaluation.”

    Rule L0615. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(2)(ii))

    “Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 4 patient records reviewed, with hospice aide services, the organization failed to ensure the hospice aide provide services that were ordered by the physician or allowed practitioner in the plan of care. On review of RRHV#2 the aide plan of care noted the patient to be shaved with an electric razor, yet on home observation the aide was noted to complete the patient’s shave with a regular safety razor. This observation was reviewed with the RN/COO.”

    Rule L0626. Standard-level.

  • Recertification of the terminal illness (42 CFR 418.102(c))

    “Observed in Record Review. In 2 of 5 patient records reviewed, the organization failed to ensure before the recertification period the medical director review the patient’s clinical information and provide to include all required elements. On review of RRNHV#4, and RRNHV#5 the recertification physician’s narrative failed to include all required elements as it lacked current subjective and objective findings that addressed how the patient continued to meet criteria for terminal status. This observation was reviewed with the RN/COO and the Leadership team.”

    Rule L0668. Standard-level.

  • Content (42 CFR 418.104(a)(6))

    “Observed in Record Review. In 4 of 5 patient records reviewed, the organization failed to ensure the patient record contain all information that reflect the care, treatment, and services. On review of RRHV#1, RRHV#2, RRHV#3 and RRNHV#5 there was no documentation to show if the patient had an advance directive or that the presence of a POA and/or Advance Directive was assessed and documented as part of the clinical record. This observation was review with the RN/COO and Leadership team.”

    Rule L0677. Standard-level.

  • Discharge or transfer of care (42 CFR 418.104(e)(2)(i))

    The inspectors’ words, 105 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 3 of 3 live discharge records reviewed, the organization failed to ensure the complete discharge summary was provided to the patient’s attending physician within 5 days as required. On review of RRDC#1 the patient was discharged live and the discharge summary failed to include a summary of the care provided, and extent to which goals were met or not met, nor was there documentation that the summary was provided to the attending physician. In RRDC#2, and RRDC#3 there was no documentation that the attending physician was sent the discharge summary as required. These observations were reviewed with the Leadership Team.”

    Rule L0683. Standard-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Jun 26, 2025Reaccreditation inspection by The Joint Commission11 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Aug 7, 2022.
  • CMS doesn’t list its type of ownership.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • CMS hasn’t published nursing time from Medicare claims for this hospice.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 100% at home.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • 5 owners or officers are people: Mina Aragon Carandang (owns 5% or more directly, 100%); Mina Aragon Carandang (corporate officer, 100%); Mina Aragon Carandang (corporate director, 100%); Mina Aragon Carandang (managing employee (on the payroll), 100%); Sharon Jamie (managing employee (under contract)).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What do families say?

  • CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
  • CMS gives no Hospice Care Index for this hospice.
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 64 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 92408, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 6.5; this one had 11.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

The 64 hospices CMS lists serving ZIP code 92408
PlaceDeficiencies, 3 years
Ascend HospiceNot given
Remita HealthNot given
Blessed Hope Hospice, Inc.18
Del Rosa Hospice II7
Ally Hospice0
Roze Room Healthcare6
All Lives Matter Hospice15
Aurora Spring Hospice Care, Inc. This hospice11
Heavenly Angel Hospice Inc.1
7 Star Hospice Care Inc.10
Victory Care Hospice1
Beta Hospice Care Inc.3

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 8, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.