Hearth Record

Sincere Hospice and Palliative Care, Inc.

A hospice in Garden Grove, California 92841

12881 Knott St Suite 234, Garden Grove, California 92841. (657) 667-4111.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026. We couldn’t read Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services’ list since Oct 27, 2026: qcor.cms.gov now refuses our reader. This record is as of then.

The last 24 months 18 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jul 2025. Most serious: Condition-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
Condition-level deficiency
For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual.

What did inspectors find?

18 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 125 hospices serving ZIP code 92841 had 8.

The last inspection on record was on Sep 8, 2025: a follow-up inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care.

4 deficiencies at condition level, the more serious of CMS’s two levels

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

18 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jul 2025. Most serious: Condition-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

18 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Jul 18, 2025: reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care18 deficiencies
  • IDG, care planning, coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56)

    “Condition of Participation: Interdisciplinary Group, Care Planning, and Coordination of Services. L536”

    Rule L0536. Condition-level.

  • Core services (42 CFR 418.64)

    “Upon observation, there was no evidence the hospice is in compliance with accepted professional standards and principles for all core services which includes nursing services, medical social services and counseling services. The agency Administrator who is a non-licensed personnel is triaging patient calls for changes in condition and then relaying information to their physician and taking verbal orders then relaying this information to patient/family/caregivers.”

    Rule L0587. Condition-level.

  • Clinical records (42 CFR 418.104)

    “Condition of Participation: Clinical Records.”

    Rule L0670. Condition-level.

  • Drugs biologicals medical supplies & dme (42 CFR 418.106)

    “Condition of Participation: Drugs and Biologicals, Medical Supplies, and Durable Medical Equipment.”

    Rule L0686. Condition-level.

  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(7))

    The inspectors’ words, 95 words

    “Upon patient record review, 6 of 14 (Patient #1,2,4,5,6,7) did not have evidence in the patient record that the comprehensive assessment includes a bereavement component which includes the needs of the patient’s family and other individuals focusing on the social, spiritual, and cultural factors that may impact their ability to cope with the patient’s death. Information gathered from the initial bereavement assessment is incorporated into the plan of care and is considered in the bereavement plan of care. Patients 1,2,4,5,6,7 did not have evidence of an Initial Bereavement Risk Assessment completed at time of survey.”

    Rule L0531. Standard-level.

  • Approach to service delivery (42 CFR 418.56(a)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 854 words

    “Upon patient record review, 6 of 14 (Patient #1,2,4,5,7,9) did not have evidence that a Registered Nurse is designated to ensure continuous assessment of the patient and family’s needs and to coordinate activities with other members of the interdisciplinary group (IDG). The IDG must work together and is responsible for supervision of the care and service for each patient and family. Patient #1 resides in daughter’s home. Communication Note dated 6/6/25 @ 1030am, signed by Administrator, who is not a licensed clinician: “Received call from patient’s daughter that patient had episodes of vomiting clear emesis this morning. She also said patient had been more vocal about being depressed on her condition. Called MD, made aware and obtained orders to increase Paroxetine to 20mg daily and for Ondansetron 4mg every 6 hours as needed for N/V. Noted and carried out. Daughter made aware.” The medication order was entered by the administrator and electronically signed stating she “Read back and verified order”. No evidence of a nurse assessing this patient prior to MD being notified or in the IDT notes. Patient #2 resides in a private board and care home. Communication Note dated 5/24/25 @ 0126am (On Call Note) signed by Administrator, whom is not a licensed nurse: “Received call from patient’s daughter requesting for a sleeping medication due to patient’s current lack of sleep at nighttime. Called MD, made aware and obtained order for Temazepam 15mg 1 cap orally daily at bedtime for insomnia. Noted and carried out. Family and Facility caregiver made aware.” The medication order was entered by the administrator and electronically signed stating she “Read back and verified order”. No evidence of a nurse assessing this patient prior to MD being notified, nor any mention of this in a follow up visit or in the IDT notes. A “new” order dated 6/02/25 @ 1210 am was transcribed as “Phone order/Read back and verified by” the administrator for Norco 10mg-325mg one tab orally every 12 hours for pain management. No evidence of a nurse assessing patient. Patient #4 resides in a private board and care home. Communication Note dated 6/17/25 @0624pm (on call note) signed by Administrator, who is not a licensed nurse: “Received call and photo from caregiver, Kite, that patient had an abscess on left side of face. Relayed to MD and received order for Doxycycline 100mg 1 tab orally 2x daily for 7 days for abscess. Noted and carried out. Facility caregiver made aware.” The medication order was entered by the administrator and electronically signed stating she “Read back and verified order”. This order was not signed by MD as of survey. No evidence of a nurse assessing this patient for the “abscess” prior to MD being notified, or in the IDT notes. Patient #5 resides in a private board and care home. Communication Note dated 4/04/25 @ 0910am, signed by Administrator, who is not a licensed nurse: “Received call from caregiver, that patient had foul smelling urine with discharge and was lethargic. Called MD, made aware and obtained order for Levaquin 500mg 1 tab orally daily for 7 days for UTI. Noted and carried out. Facility caregiver made aware.” The medication order was entered by the administrator and electronically signed stating she “Read back and verified order”. No evidence of a nurse assessing this patient prior to MD being notified, or in the IDT notes. Patient #7 resides at home with a private caregiver. Communication Note dated 3/24/25 @0718am, signed by Administrator, who is not a licensed nurse: “Received call from caregiver that patient has been coughing this morning with clear mucous. Patient requested an old medication that he took before, Benzonatate. Called MD, made aware and obtained order for Benzonatate 100mg 1 cap orally 3x daily for 5 days for cough. Noted and carried out. Patient and caregiver made aware.” The medication order was entered by the administrator and electronically signed stating she “Read back and verified order”. No evidence of a nurse assessing this patient prior to MD being notified, or in the IDT notes. Communication Note dated 3/27/25 @ 1226pm, signed by Administrator, whom is not a licensed nurse: “Received call from PCG that patient had a slight temperature of 99.5 and complained of burning sensation when urinating. Called MD, made aware. Medication to be delivered STAT by pharmacy.” The medication order was entered by the administrator and electronically signed stating she “Read back and verified order”. No evidence of a nurse assessing this patient prior to MD being notified, or in the IDT notes. Patient #9 Resides in private board and care home. Communication Note dated 12/19/24 @ 1030 am, signed by Administrator, whom is not a licensed nurse: “Received call from med tech, Alejandro that patient has occasional cough. MD made aware and obtained order for Tussin DM syrup, give 20ml oral, every 6 hours as needed for cough. Order noted and carried out. Facility caregiver made aware.” The medication order was entered by the administrator and electronically signed stating she “Read back and verified order”. No evidence of a nurse assessing this patient prior to MD being notified, or in the IDT notes.”

    Rule L0540. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(5))

    “Upon patient record review, 7 of 14 (Patient #1,2,3,4,5,6,7) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including equipment and supply needs. Patient #1,2,3,4,5,6,7 Plan of care did not include DME and supplies listed. There were orders for the items, however; they were not listed on the Plan of Care.”

    Rule L0550. Standard-level.

  • Review of the plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(d))

    “Upon patient record review, 2 of 14 (Patient #2,8) did not have evidence that a revised plan of care includes information from the patient’s updated comprehensive assessment and must note the patient’s progress towards outcome/goals from the plan of care. Patients #2,8 had documentation of orders for “Wound Masters” services and uploaded visit notes from the Wound Specialists. However, there was no other documentation of coordination of care. The treatments being provided by the “Wound Masters” were not part of the plan of care.”

    Rule L0553. Standard-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(5))

    “Upon patient record review, 2 of 14 (Patient #2,8) did not have evidence that the IDG shares information on a on-going basis with non-hospice healthcare providers furnishing services unrelated to the terminal illness and related conditions. Patients #2,8 had documentation of orders for “Wound Masters” services and uploaded visit notes from the Wound Specialists. However, there was no other documentation of coordination of care. There was no evidence of discussion amongst IDT and/or Medical director for “relatedness” to terminal diagnosis.”

    Rule L0558. Standard-level.

  • Nursing services (42 CFR 418.64(b))

    “Upon observation, there was no evidence the hospice provides nursing care and services by or under the supervision of a Registered Nurse. Clinical record review revealed documentation of the administrator triaging phone calls and contacting MD, and documenting orders with no involvement of an RN.”

    Rule L0591. Standard-level.

  • Competency evaluation (42 CFR 418.76(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 133 words

    “Upon personnel record review, 1 of 13 (Personnel #5) did not have evidence in the personnel file that the following competency assessment was performed by the aide with a patient: (This standard applies to all Hospice Aides providing care/service who are directly employed by the hospice or through a contractual agreement.) ·Appropriate and safe techniques in personal hygiene and grooming that include-- ·(A) Bed bath ·(B) Sponge, tub, and shower bath ·(C) Shampoo, sink, tub, and bed The other subject areas in this section may be evaluated through written examination, oral examination or after observation of a Hospice Aide with a patient. Personnel #5 competency did not include all 4 bathing procedures. The competency stated, “Bed Bath” and Bath in “tub/shower”. Competency only stated “Shampoo”. It did not specify, “sink, tub and bed”.”

    Rule L0615. Standard-level.

  • Content (42 CFR 418.104(a)(3))

    The inspectors’ words, 817 words

    “Upon patient client record review, 8 of 14 (Patient #1,2,3,4,5,6,7,9) did not have evidence that each patient record contains responses to medications, symptom management, treatments, and services. The following did not have evidence of any documentation of the effectiveness of the medications ordered: Patient #1 resides in daughter’s home. Communication Note dated 6/6/25 @ 1030am, signed by Administrator, who is not a licensed nurse: “Received call from patient’s daughter that patient had episodes of vomiting clear emesis this morning. She also said patient had been more vocal about being depressed on her condition. Called MD, made aware and obtained orders to increase Paroxetine to 20mg daily and for Ondansetron 4mg every 6 hours as needed for N/V. Noted and carried out. Daughter made aware.” No evidence of any mention of this in a follow up visit or in the IDT notes. Patient #2 resides in a private board and care home. Communication Note dated 5/24/25 @ 0126am (On Call Note) signed by Administrator, who is not a licensed clinician: “Received call from patient’s daughter requesting for a sleeping medication due to patient’s current lack of sleep at nighttime. Called MD, made aware and obtained order for Temazepam 15mg 1 cap orally daily at bedtime for insomnia. Noted and carried out. Family and Facility caregiver made aware.” No evidence of any mention of this in a follow up visit or in the IDT notes. Order entered 06/02/25 @ 0210am. Marked as a “New” order, Norco 10mg/325mg tablet, 1 tablet, oral, every 12 hours for pain management. No documentation of response to treatment. Patient #3 resides in private board and care home. Communication note dated 04/26/25 @ 1206 pm: “MD visited patient and ordered the following: 1) D/C Current Haloperidol order, 2) Start Haloperidol 2mg tablet, give 2 tabs =4mg orally at bedtime for agitation/restlessness, and 3) D/C alendronate. Noted and carried out. Patient’s son and facility made aware.” No evidence of a nurse assessing the effectiveness / outcomes of these medication changes. No mention in IDT notes. Patient #4 resides in a private board and care home. Communication Note dated 6/17/25 @0624pm (on call note) signed by Administrator, who is not a licensed nurse: “Received call and photo from caregiver, Kite, that patient had an abscess on left side of face. Relayed to MD and received order for Doxycycline 100mg 1 tab orally 2x daily for 7 days for abscess. Noted and carried out. Facility caregiver made aware.” No evidence of any mention of this in a follow up visit or in the IDT notes. New Order transcribed as “Read back and verified by” the administrator dated, 7/11/25 @ 1252 pm for Norco 5-325mg one tablet oral, every 6 hours, as need for breakthrough pain. No documentation of a nurse assessment or any documentation of the effectiveness of medication. Patient #5 resides in a private board and care home. Communication Note dated 4/04/25 @ 0910am,”Received call from caregiver, that patient had foul smelling urine with discharge and was lethargic. Called MD, made aware and obtained order for Levaquin 500mg 1 tab orally daily for 7 days for UTI. Noted and carried out. Facility caregiver made aware.” No evidence of any mention of this in a follow up visit or in the IDT notes. Patient #6 Communication / On Call Note dated 5/10/25 @ 1219 pm , “Received order for MD to d/c Captopril and Metoprolol due to non-use. Caregiver and family made aware.” No evidence of any mention of this in a follow up visit or in the IDT notes. Patient #7 resides at home with a private caregiver. Communication Note dated 3/24/25 @0718am, signed by Administrator, whom is not a licensed nurse: “Received call from caregiver that patient has been coughing this morning with clear mucous. Patient requested an old medication that he took before, Benzonatate. Called MD, made aware and obtained order for Benzonatate 100mg 1 cap orally 3x daily for 5 days for cough. Noted and carried out. Patient and caregiver made aware.” No evidence of any mention of this in a follow up visit or in the IDT notes. Communication Note dated 3/27/25 @ 1226pm, “Received call from PCG that patient had a slight temperature of 99.5 and complained of burning sensation when urinating. Called MD, made aware. Medication to be delivered STAT by pharmacy.” No evidence of any mention of this in a follow up visit or in the IDT notes. Patient #9 Resides in private board and care home. Communication Note dated 12/19/24 @ 1030 am, signed by Administrator, whom is not a licensed nurse: “Received call from med tech, Alejandro that patient has occasional cough. MD made aware and obtained order for Tussin DM syrup, give 20ml oral, every 6 hours as needed for cough. Order noted and carried out. Facility caregiver made aware.” No evidence of any mention of this in a follow up visit or in the IDT notes.”

    Rule L0674. Standard-level.

  • Content (42 CFR 418.104(a)(7))

    The inspectors’ words, 367 words

    “Upon patient client record review, 3 of 14 (Patient #1,3,4) did not evidence that each patient record contains SIGNED physician orders. Patient #1 ALL Admission orders for SOC 5/26/25 were not signed by the physician as of survey review 7/16/25. Patient #3 resides in private board and care home. Communication note dated 04/26/25 @ 1206 pm: “MD visited patient and ordered the following: 1) D/C Current Haloperidol order, 2) Start Haloperidol 2mg tablet, give 2 tabs =4mg orally at bedtime for agitation/restlessness, and 3) D/C alendronate. Noted and carried out. Patient’s son and facility made aware.” The medication orders were entered by the administrator and electronically signed stating she “Read back and verified order”. This order was not signed by physician as of survey. Patient #4 resides in a private board and care home. Communication Note dated 6/17/25 @0624pm (on call note) signed by Administrator, whom is not a licensed nurse: “Received call and photo from caregiver, Kite, that patient had an abscess on left side of face. Relayed to MD and received order for Doxycycline 100mg 1 tab orally 2x daily for 7 days for abscess. Noted and carried out. Facility caregiver made aware.” Also on 6/02/25, Administrator documented a phone order from the medical director for Macrobid 50mg, 1 tablet orally daily for 30 days, UTI prophylaxis. The medication orders were entered by the administrator and electronically signed stating she “Read back and verified order”. These orders were not signed by MD as of survey. Communication Note dated 3/27/25 @ 1226pm, signed by Administrator, whom is not a licensed nurse: “Received call from PCG that patient had a slight temperature of 99.5 and complained of burning sensation when urinating. Called MD, made aware and obtained order for Levaquin 500mg, one tab daily x 10 days. Noted and carried out. PCG made aware. Medication to be delivered STAT by pharmacy.” The medication order was entered by the administrator and electronically signed stating she “Read back and verified order”. No evidence of a nurse assessing this patient prior to MD being notified, nor any mention of this in a follow up visit or in the IDT notes. This order was not signed by physician as of survey.”

    Rule L0678. Standard-level.

  • Authentication (42 CFR 418.104(b))

    The inspectors’ words, 273 words

    “Upon patient client record review, 6 of 14 (Patient #1,2,3,4,5,6) did not have evidence that all entries are legible, clear, complete, and appropriately authenticated and dated in accordance with the organizations policies and procedures and currently accepted standards of practice. Electronic signatures are acceptable as long the hospice is following appropriate safeguards to prevent unauthorized access to the patient records. Numerous visit notes submitted by RN’s and LVN’s were not signed by the actual Skilled Nurse making the visit. They were electronically signed by the DPCS or the Administrator. Agency Administrator and DPCS explained that they “QA” the notes and then sign and submit. Education provided regarding the notes must be signed by the employee that actually makes the visit. Patient #1 RN visits dated 6/9/25 and 6/23/25 signed by Administrator 0n 7/16/25. LVN visits dated 5/28, 6/25, 7/3, 7/10 signed by Administrator on 7/16/25. LVN visits dated 6/4, 6/13, 6/18 signed by DPCS 6/25. Patient #2 RN visits dated 7/6, 6/29 signed by Administrator 7/16. RN visit dated 6/01 signed by DPCS 6/25. LVN visits dated, 7/12, 6/30, 6/25, 6,20 signed by Administrator 7/16. LVN visits dated 6/13 signed by DPCS 6/25. LVN visits dated 6/9, 6/4, 5/27, 5/21 signed by DPCS on 6/16. Patient #3 RN visits dated 7/13, 6/29, 6/1 signed by Administrator 7/16. LVN visits dated 7/17, 6/30, 6/25, 6/20 signed by Administrator 7/16. Patient #4 LVN visit dated 5/31 signed by Administrator on 6/11. Patient #5 RN Recert assessment dated 6/9 signed by administrator on 7/16. Patient #6 RN Recert assessment dated 6/21 signed by Administrator on 7/14. SCP visit note dated 11/8/24 signed by Administrator on 7/15/25.”

    Rule L0679. Standard-level.

  • Discharge or transfer of care (42 CFR 418.104(e))

    “Upon client record review, 1 of 14 (Patient #10) did not have evidence that the hospice forwarded a summary and a copy of the patient record, if requested, to a facility when transferring the patient to that facility. Patient #10 Transferred to another Hospice. No evidence of any records sent to receiving Hospice.”

    Rule L0682. Standard-level.

  • Discharge or transfer of care (42 CFR 418.104(e)(2))

    “Upon client record review, 1 of 14 (Patient #11) did not have evidence that if a patient revokes the election of hospice care or is discharged from hospice in accordance with §418.26, the hospice must forward to the patient’s attending physician: • A copy of the hospice discharge summary • The patient’s clinical record, if requested Patient #11 Revoked hospice, no evidence of a summary sent to a physician.”

    Rule L0683. Standard-level.

  • Ordering of drugs (42 CFR 418.106(b)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 261 words

    “Upon patient record review, 14 of 14 (Patient #1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14) did not have evidence that if a drug order is verbal or given via an electronic transmission, it is given to a Registered Nurse, Nurse Practitioner, pharmacist, physician or other licensed individuals as designated by state regulations. The person receiving the order records and signs it immediately and has the prescribing person sign it in accordance with state and federal regulations. All patients had various “physician orders” documented by the Administrator whom is not a licensed clinician that may take an order from a physician. The following were transcribed by the administrator and electronically signed in the signature space stating, “Phone order /Read back by”. Patients #2,3,4,5,6,11,12 All Admission orders for start of care were documented/transcribed and signed as “phone order / Read back by” administrator. Patient #1 on 6/4/25 for Tramadol and Gabapentin, 6/6/25 Paroxetine and Ondansetron. Patient #2 on 5/24/25 Temazepam. 6/2/25 Norco Patient #3 on 4/26/25 Haldol Patient #4 on 6/2/25 Macrobid, 6/17/25 Doxycycline, and 7/11/25 Norco Patient #5 on 4/4/25 Levaquin, 6/2/25 Macrobid Patient #6 on 4/18/25 D/C Vitamin A, D3, and Docusate, 5/10/25 D/C Captopril and Metoprolol Patient #7 on 6/29/24 Docusate, Tamsulosin, Omeprazole, 11/06/24 Lab orders, and 3/07/25 Levaquin Patient #8 on 4/21/25 Sertraline Patient #9 on 12/19/24 Tussin DM Patient # 10 on 10/09/24 Furosemide Patient #11 on 8/15/24 Wound care orders Patient #12 on 4/27/25 Preparation-H, 5/14/25 D/C Amlodipine and Losartan Patient #13 on 7/26/24 In /out Cath for U/A and C&S Patient #14 on 7/12/24 Cipro and Bactrim, and 7/21/24 Lorazepam and Morphine.”

    Rule L0690. Standard-level.

  • Criminal background checks (42 CFR 418.114(d)(1))

    “Upon personnel record review, 3 of 13 (Personnel #11,12,13) did not have evidence the hospice obtained a criminal background check on all contracted individuals who have direct patient care and access to patient records. This was corrected during survey. The contracted company provided the needed documentation while surveyor on site. However; there was documentation of the Physical Therapist (personnel #11) doing an evaluation on patient #8 on 1/22/25, prior to agency having criminal background or sex offender check on file.”

    Rule L0795. Standard-level.

All 2 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Sep 8, 2025Follow-up inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health CareNo deficiencies cited
Jul 18, 2025Reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care18 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since May 10, 2022.
  • CMS doesn’t list its type of ownership.
  • Cited at in the last three years: it didn’t meet a whole condition of Medicare’s rules.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 10.7 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 13.4% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 94.1% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 100% at home.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day10.7 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends13.4%
Visits near death94.1% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • 6 owners or officers are people: Bernadette Agustin (owns 5% or more directly, 100%); Bernadette Agustin (corporate officer, 100%); Bernadette Agustin (corporate director, 100%); Bernadette Agustin (managing employee (on the payroll), 100%); Bernadette Agustin (runs it (operational or managerial control), 100%); Jose J Guerra (managing employee (under contract), 0%).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What do families say?

  • CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 10 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 5Not rated
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold10 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 125 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 92841, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 8; this one had 18.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 8, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.