Hearth Record

Legacy of Tender Care Hospice, Inc.

A hospice in Glendale, California 91204

3643 San Fernando Rd, Suite B, Glendale, California 91204. (888) 551-4495.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026. We couldn’t read Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services’ list since Oct 27, 2026: qcor.cms.gov now refuses our reader. This record is as of then.

The last 24 months 14 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jun 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean2
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

14 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 151 hospices serving ZIP code 91204 had 4.

The last inspection on record was on Jun 12, 2025: a reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

14 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jun 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

14 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Jun 12, 2025: reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care14 deficiencies
  • Rights of the patient (42 CFR 418.52(c)(4))

    “Upon patient record review, 5 of 14 (Patient #3,6,7,8,9) did not have evidence that the patient chooses a health care provider, including an attending physician. Patient 3,6,7,8,9: Upon patient record review the Election statement section for “right to choose and attending physician” was left blank.”

    Rule L0515. Standard-level.

  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(6))

    The inspectors’ words, 120 words

    “Upon patient record review, 2 of 14 (Patient #6,7) did not have evidence in the patient record that a review was completed of all prescription and non-prescription medications, including herbal remedies that could affect drug therapy. This review includes, but is not limited to: • Effectiveness of drug therapy • Drug side effects • Actual or potential drug interactions • Duplicate drug therapy • Drug therapy currently associated with laboratory monitoring Patient #6: Upon observation the medication record on 9/14/24 Cephalexin 500 mg X 5 days. The medication remained active on the medication list. Patient #7: Upon observation the patient has a treatment order for O2 2-5L via NC as needed for SOB. Oxygen is not on the medication record.”

    Rule L0530. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 98 words

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 14 (Patient #3) did not have evidence in the patient record that the hospice has developed an individualized written plan of care for each patient. The plan of care must reflect patient/family goals and interventions based on the problems identified in the initial, comprehensive, and updated comprehensive assessments. The plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions. Patient #3: Upon observation the medication record indicates the patient is on Eliquis. The initial plan of care does not include bleeding precautions.”

    Rule L0545. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 14 (Patient #7) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including medications and treatments. Patient #7: Upon observation there is an order to evaluate and treatment Wound care on lower sacral area. There is not an order for wound care.”

    Rule L0549. Standard-level.

  • Counseling services (42 CFR 418.64(d)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 116 words

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 14 (Patient #13) did not have evidence the hospice offers bereavement counseling that includes: • Making bereavement services available to the family and other individuals in the bereavement plan of care up to 1 year following the death of the patient. Bereavement counseling also extends to residents of a SNF/NF or ICF/IID when appropriate and identified in the bereavement plan of care • Ensuring that bereavement services reflect the needs of the bereaved • Development of a bereavement plan of care that notes the kind of bereavement services to be offered and the frequency of service delivery Patient #13: Upon record review the was not a bereavement plan of care.”

    Rule L0596. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 183 words

    “Upon patient record review, 2 of 14 (Patient #6,10) did not have evidence in the patient record that hospice aide assignments and duties are: • Assigned to a specific patient by a registered nurse that is a member of the interdisciplinary group • Written patient care instructions for a hospice aide must be prepared by a Registered Nurse who is responsible for the supervision of a hospice aide as specified under paragraph (h) of 418.76 • There is evidence in the patient record that the plan of care; indicate what tasks are to be done by the Aide and the frequency of these tasks. The use of “PRN” or “per patient choice”, for any task, whether personal care or non-personal care tasks, are not acceptable Patient #6: Upon record review the patient initial plan of care contained seizure and aspiration precautions. The Aide Plan of care on admission did not contain seizure or aspiration precautions. Patient #10: Upon record review, the initial nursing assessment indicates “strict adherence to aspiration precautions. The aide plan of care does no indicate aspiration precautions when feeding snack.”

    Rule L0625. Standard-level.

  • Governing body and administrator (42 CFR 418.100(b))

    “Upon personnel record review, 1 of 12 (Personnel # 2) did not have evidence the alternate administrator’s personnel record verifies that: • The employee has appropriate education and experience requirements • There is a signed job description for this role • The employee has been orientated to this role Personnel #2: Upon observation there was not a signed Alternate Administrator job description. There was a signed Administrator’s job description. The agency provided a “correction” the Administrator’s job description with the title at the top changed to Administrator Designee.”

    Rule L0651. Standard-level.

  • Recertification of the terminal illness (42 CFR 418.102(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 98 words

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 14 (Patient #7) did not have evidence that before the recertification period for each patient, the medical director or physician designee must review the patient’s clinical information and provide written documentation that it is anticipated that the patient’s life expectancy is 6 months or less. Patient #7: Upon observation the physician narrative of the CTI for benefit period #7 states “Pt might be discharged soon due to prognosis being extended.” There is no clinical information in the written documentation that it is anticipated the patient’s life expectancy is 6 months or less.”

    Rule L0668. Standard-level.

  • Content (42 CFR 418.104(a)(2))

    “Upon patient client record review, 3 of 14 (Patient #3,8,10) did not have evidence that each patient record contains: • Signed copies of the notice of patient rights in accordance with 418.52 • Signed election statement in accordance with 418.24 Patient #3,8: Upon review of the election statement, there is no indication if the patient elected or declined to receive the Patient notification of Hospice non-covered items, services and drugs. Patient #10: Upon review of the election statement, the effective date of election was blank.”

    Rule L0673. Standard-level.

  • Authentication (42 CFR 418.104(b))

    “Upon patient client record review, 5 of 14 (Patient #1,2,4,5,7) did not have evidence that all entries are legible, clear, complete, and appropriately authenticated and dated in accordance with the organizations policies and procedures and currently accepted standards of practice. Electronic signatures are acceptable as long the hospice is following appropriate safeguards to prevent unauthorized access to the patient records. Patient 1,2,4,5,7: Upon observation of the election statement, the signature of the hospice employee is not legible and credentials are not legible.”

    Rule L0679. Standard-level.

  • Retrieval of clinical records (42 CFR 418.104(f))

    “Upon observation, there was no evidence the patient record, whether hard copy or in electronic form, is made readily available on request by an appropriate authority. Upon request, it took the agency three hours to produce the patient medical records. Additionally, the hospice consents were on paper and it took and additional hour to produce the paper files.”

    Rule L0685. Standard-level.

  • Written agreement (42 CFR 418.112(c)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 108 words

    “Upon SNF/NF contract review, 1 of 3 (Astoria nursing) did not have evidence that specifies the provision of hospice services in the facility, including: A provision that the SNF/NF or ICF/IID immediately notifies the hospice if: • A significant change in a patient’s physical, mental, social or emotional status occurs • Clinical complications appear that suggest a need to alter the plan of care • When a need to transfer a patient from the SNF/NF or ICF/MR arises, and the hospice makes arrangements for, and remains responsible for, any necessary continuous care or inpatient care necessary related to the terminal illness and related conditions • A patient dies”

    Rule L0765. Standard-level.

  • Written agreement (42 CFR 418.112(c)(3))

    “Upon SNF/NF contract review, 1 of 3 (Astoria nursing) did not have evidence of a provision stating that the hospice assumes responsibility for determining the appropriate course of hospice care, including the determination to change the level of services provided.”

    Rule L0766. Standard-level.

  • Written agreement (42 CFR 418.112(c)(8))

    “Upon SNF/NF contract review, 1 of 3 (Astoria nursing) did not have a provision stating that the hospice reports all alleged violations involving mistreatment, neglect, or verbal, mental, sexual, and physical abuse, including injuries of unknown source, and misappropriation of patient property by anyone unrelated to the hospice to the SNF/NF administrator within 24 hours of the hospice becoming aware of the alleged violation.”

    Rule L0771. Standard-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Jun 12, 2025Reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care14 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Mar 31, 2022.
  • CMS doesn’t list its type of ownership.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 12.3 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 14.2% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 100% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 100% at home.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day12.3 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends14.2%
Visits near death100.0% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • CMS’s ownership file has no owners listed for this hospice.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What do families say?

  • CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 7 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 5Not rated
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold7 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 151 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 91204, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 4; this one had 14.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 8, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.