Hearth Record

Hope Care Hospice, Inc.

A hospice in Placentia, California 92870

601 E Yorba Linda Blvd. Ste. 1-E, Placentia, California 92870. (714) 724-8033.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026. We couldn’t read Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services’ list since Oct 27, 2026: qcor.cms.gov now refuses our reader. This record is as of then.

The last 24 months 4 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jan 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean2
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

4 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 109 hospices serving ZIP code 92870 had 7.

The last inspection on record was on Jan 9, 2025: a reaccreditation inspection by the Community Health Accreditation Partner.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

4 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jan 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

4 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Jan 9, 2025: reaccreditation inspection by the Community Health Accreditation Partner4 deficiencies
  • Timeframe for completion of assessment (42 CFR 418.54(b))

    The inspectors’ words, 294 words

    “It is required that the hospice Interdisciplinary Group, in consultation with the individual’s attending physician (if any), completes an initial comprehensive assessment no later than five (5) calendar days after the election of hospice care, in accordance with CMS §418.24–the elements of the hospice care election statement. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review and interview. In 2 of 14 (14%) clinical records reviewed, the agency did not ensure that the hospice interdisciplinary group (IDG), completed an initial comprehensive assessment no later than five (5) calendar days after the election of hospice care. Clinical Record 3: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 04/06/2024. Clinical record review revealed the initial Social Worker visit and psychosocial assessment was dated 04/12/2024, six days after the election of hospice care and one day outstanding. There was no documented evidence in the clinical record that the initial psychosocial assessment was completed within five days of the election of the hospice benefit. Clinical Record 14: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 07/08/2023. Clinical record review revealed the initial Social Worker visit and psychosocial assessment was dated 07/15/2023, seven days after the election of hospice care and two days outstanding. There was no documented evidence in the clinical record that the initial psychosocial assessment was completed within five days of the election of the hospice benefit. During an interview on 01/09/2025, the Alternate Administrator/Licensed Vocational Nurse and the Director of Patient Care Services/Registered Nurse/Volunteer Coordinator agreed the members of the IDG did not complete an initial comprehensive assessment no later than 5-calendar days after the election of hospice care, or had documentation supporting the patient and/or family/caregiver refused or delayed social work services no later than five calendar days after the election of hospice care.”

    Rule L0523. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 236 words

    “It is required that each patient’s individualized written plan of care reflects patient, and family goals and identifies planned interventions based on problems identified in the initial and updated comprehensive assessments. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review and interview. In 2 of 14 (14%) clinical records reviewed, the agency did not ensure the individualized plan of care (POC) reflected patient and family goals and interventions based on problems identified in the initial and updated comprehensive assessments. Clinical Record 1: The initial nursing assessment dated 08/02/2024 included documentation that the patient had bladder incontinence with no indication that an indwelling foley catheter was present. The POC dated 08/02/2024 included the goal “Patient will not develop infection related to foley catheter use.” The goal on the POC was not individualized to the patient when the patient did not have a foley catheter. Clinical Record 2: The initial nursing assessment dated 09/02/2025 included documentation that the patient had bladder incontinence with no indication that an indwelling foley catheter was present. The POC dated 09/02/2024 included the goal “Patient/family will demonstrate understanding of catheter use.” The goal on the POC was not individualized to the patient when the patient did not have a foley catheter. During an interview on 01/10/2025, the Alternate Administrator/Licensed Vocational Nurse and the Director of Patient Care Services/Registered Nurse/Volunteer Coordinator agreed the plans of care did not include individualized patient goals.”

    Rule L0545. Standard-level.

  • Discharge or transfer of care (42 CFR 418.104(e)(1)(i))

    The inspectors’ words, 173 words

    “It is required that if the care of a hospice patient is transferred to a Medicare/Medicaid certified facility, the hospice forwards to the receiving facility a copy of the hospice discharge summary described in HCDT 40.I; and the patient’s record, if requested. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review and interview. In 1 of 1 (100%) clinical record reviewed for patients that transferred to the hospital and revoked the hospice benefit, the agency did not ensure a copy of the discharge summary was forwarded to the receiving facility (hospital). Clinical Record 7: Clinical record review revealed the patient revoked the hospice benefit on 12/20/2024 and transferred to the hospital to pursue aggressive treatment. There was no documented evidence in the clinical record that the discharge summary was sent to the receiving facility (hospital). During an interview on 01/10/2025, the Alternate Administrator/Licensed Vocational Nurse and the Director of Patient Care Services/Registered Nurse/Volunteer Coordinator agreed the clinical record did not include evidence that the discharge summary was sent to the hospital.”

    Rule L0682. Standard-level.

  • Discharge or transfer of care (42 CFR 418.104(e)(2)(i))

    The inspectors’ words, 286 words

    “It is required that if a patient revokes the election of hospice care or is discharged from hospice per hospice regulation §418.26 (i.e., no longer terminally ill), the hospice forwards to the patient’s attending physician a copy of the hospice discharge summary, and the patient’s record, if requested. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review and interview. In 4 of 5 (80%) clinical records reviewed for patients that revoked the hospice benefit, the agency did not ensure a copy of the discharge summary was forwarded to the patient’s attending physician. Clinical Record 7: The patient revoked the hospice benefit on 12/20/2024 to pursue aggressive treatment with the patient’s primary care provider (PCP). There was no documented evidence in the clinical record that the discharge summary was sent to the patient’s PCP. Clinical Record 8: The patient revoked the hospice benefit on 10/17/2024 to pursue aggressive treatment with the patient’s PCP. There was no documented evidence in the clinical record of the discharge summary being forwarded to the patient’s PCP. Clinical Record 9: The patient revoked the hospice benefit on 10/15/2024 to pursue aggressive treatment with the patient’s PCP. There was no documented evidence in the clinical record that the discharge summary was sent to the patient’s PCP. Clinical Record 14: The patient revoked the hospice benefit on 06/30/2024 to pursue aggressive treatment with the patient’s PCP. There was no documented evidence in the clinical record that the discharge summary was sent to the patient’s PCP. During an interview on 01/10/2025, the Alternate Administrator/Licensed Vocational Nurse and the Director of Patient Care Services/Registered Nurse/Volunteer Coordinator agreed the clinical records did not include evidence that the discharge summaries were sent to the receiving physician(s).”

    Rule L0683. Standard-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Jan 9, 2025Reaccreditation inspection by the Community Health Accreditation Partner4 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Feb 25, 2022.
  • CMS doesn’t list its type of ownership.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 11.7 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 6.9% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 54.5% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 91% at home, 9% in assisted living.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day11.7 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends6.9%
Visits near death54.5% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • CMS’s ownership file has no owners listed for this hospice.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What do families say?

  • CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 9 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 100% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 5Not rated
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold9 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 109 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 92870, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 7; this one had 4.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 8, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.