Hearth Record

Anthem Hospice Care, Inc.

A hospice in Woodland Hills, California 91364

20121 Ventura Blvd, Ste 303, Woodland Hills, California 91364. (818) 821-7005.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026. We couldn’t read Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services’ list since Oct 27, 2026: qcor.cms.gov now refuses our reader. This record is as of then.

The last 24 months 8 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jul 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean2
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

8 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 132 hospices serving ZIP code 91364 had 5.

The last inspection on record was on Jul 16, 2024: a reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

8 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jul 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

8 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Jul 16, 2024: reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care8 deficiencies
  • Rights of the patient (42 CFR 418.52(c)(4))

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 10 records reviewed (Patient #3) did not have evidence that the patient chooses a health care provider, including an attending physician. Patient #3: The record indicated there was a place for the patient to choose an attending physician for hospice. There was no evidence in the record the patient chose an attending physician for hospice evidenced by the form was blank.”

    Rule L0515. Standard-level.

  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c))

    “Upon patient record review 1 of 10 (Patient #1) did not have evidence in the patient record that the comprehensive assessment identifies the physical, psychosocial, emotional, and spiritual needs related to the terminal illness that must be addressed in order to promote the hospice patient’s well-being, comfort, and dignity throughout the dying process. Patient #1: The record indicated the start of care was on 10/20/23. There was no evidence of the comprehensive assessment for the spiritual assessment and psychosocial assessment being completed.”

    Rule L0524. Standard-level.

  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(6))

    The inspectors’ words, 189 words

    “Upon patient record review, 10 of 10 charts reviewed (Patient #1,#2,#3,#4,#5,#6,#7,#8,#9,#10) did not have evidence in the patient record that a review was completed of all prescription and non-prescription medications, including herbal remedies that could affect drug therapy. This review includes, but is not limited to: • Effectiveness of drug therapy • Drug side effects • Actual or potential drug interactions • Duplicate drug therapy • Drug therapy currently associated with laboratory monitoring Patient #1-#7: The record indicated medications on the medication administration record. The chart did not have evidence of that the effectiveness of drug therapy, actual or potential drug interactions, duplicate drug therapy and or drug therapy currently associated with laboratory monitory was being reviewed. Patient #8-#10: The record indicated medications on the medication administration record. The chart did not have evidence duplicate drug therapy and or drug therapy currently associated with laboratory monitory was being reviewed. Patient #1: The record indicated on the MAR Cromolyn Sodium 4% Ophthalmic Solution 2 drops ophthalmic 4 times daily as needed for eye allergies. There was no evidence as to which eye or eye(s) to put the drops in. COS.”

    Rule L0530. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 169 words

    “Upon patient record review, 2 of 10 records reviewed (Patient #2, #4) did not have evidence in the patient record that the hospice has developed an individualized written plan of care for each patient. The plan of care must reflect patient/family goals and interventions based on the problems identified in the initial, comprehensive, and updated comprehensive assessments. The plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions. Patient #2: The record indicated the patient tested positive for COVID on 7/31/22 with a plan of care for preventing COVID. There was no evidence of an individualized written plan of care that was necessary for the palliation and management of the COVID. Patient #4: The record indicated at the start of care on 12/27/22 the nursing assessment for imminent death included decreased level of consciousness, decreased food and fluid intake and decreased/absence of bowel/bladder functioning. There was no evidence of an individualized written plan of care for the imminent death.”

    Rule L0545. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))

    The inspectors’ words, 113 words

    “Upon patient record review, 2 of 10 medical records reviewed (Patient #1, #5) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including medications and treatments. Patient #1: The MD order indicated Cromolyn Sodium 4% Ophthalmic Solution 2 drops ophthalmic 4 times daily as needed for eye allergies. There was no evidence in the order as to which eye or eye(s) to put the drops in. COS. Patient #5: The record indicated an order for a 18 French Foley with a 10cc balloon. There was no evidence of what solution to use to inflate the balloon. COS.”

    Rule L0549. Standard-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(2))

    “Upon client record review, 1 of 10 records reviewed (Patient #1) did not have evidence that the IDG ensures that the care and services are provided in accordance with the plan of care. Patient #1: The record indicated an LVN visit 2 X W effective on 5/31/24. There was no evidence of a second nurse visit between 06/01/24 and 06/08/24.”

    Rule L0555. Standard-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(4))

    The inspectors’ words, 114 words

    “Upon patient record review, 2 of 10 records reviewed (Patient #1, #2) did not have evidence that the IDG documents the sharing of information between all disciplines providing care and services in all settings, whether the care and services are provided directly or under arrangement. Patient #1: The record indicated on 6/15/24 the patient requested a visit for high fever and a visit was made. There was no evidence that the IDG documented the sharing of this information between all disciplines providing care. Patient #2: The record indicated on 7/31/22 the patient tested positive for COVID. There was no evidence that the IDG documented the sharing of this information between all disciplines providing care.”

    Rule L0557. Standard-level.

  • Recertification of the terminal illness (42 CFR 418.102(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 101 words

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 10 (Patient #4) did not have evidence that before the recertification period for each patient, the medical director or physician designee must review the patient’s clinical information and provide written documentation that it is anticipated that the patient’s life expectancy is 6 months or less. Patient #4: The record indicated the 4th benefit CTI for 12/27/22 to 2/24/23 required a physician narrative immediately above the physician’s signature. There was no evidence on this CTI of the narrative as it had written in the space “CTI in Chart” and no narrative was written in this space.”

    Rule L0668. Standard-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Jul 16, 2024Reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care8 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Jul 29, 2021.
  • CMS doesn’t list its type of ownership.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • CMS hasn’t published nursing time from Medicare claims for this hospice.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 60% at home, 40% in assisted living.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • 3 owners or officers are people: Felicidad A. Isaga (owns 5% or more directly, 100%); Felicidad A. Isaga (corporate officer, 100%); Felicidad A. Isaga (managing employee (on the payroll), 100%).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What do families say?

  • CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
  • CMS gives no Hospice Care Index for this hospice.
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 132 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 91364, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 5; this one had 8.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

The 132 hospices CMS lists serving ZIP code 91364
PlaceDeficiencies, 3 years
Gibraltar Hospice, Inc.18
Wellspring HospiceNot given
Access HospiceNot given
Lakeshore Hospice, Inc.Not given
On Call Hospice Care, Inc.Not given
Silver Sky Hospice, Inc.Not given
Golden Age Hospice Care Inc.4
Quality Choice Hospice, Inc.5
Federal Hospice Care Inc.Not given
Wind Breeze Hospice, Inc.5
Anthem Hospice Care, Inc. This hospice8
Statim Care Hospice, Inc.10

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 8, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.