Hearth Record

First Priority Hospice, Inc.

A hospice in Van Nuys, California 91411

14545 Friar St, Suite 231, Van Nuys, California 91411. (818) 285-8844.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 32 deficiencies in 2 months of the last 36. Last cited Oct 2024. Most serious: Condition-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
Condition-level deficiency
For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual.

What did inspectors find?

32 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 153 hospices serving ZIP code 91411 had 5.5.

The last inspection on record was on Oct 16, 2024: a complaint inspection by the state.

3 deficiencies at condition level, the more serious of CMS’s two levels

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

32 deficiencies in 2 months of the last 36. Last cited Oct 2024. Most serious: Condition-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

32 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Oct 1, 2024: follow-up inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care4 deficiencies
  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(6))

    The inspectors’ words, 138 words

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 5 (Patient #5) did not have evidence in the patient record that a review was completed of all prescription and non-prescription medications, including herbal remedies that could affect drug therapy. This review includes, but is not limited to: • Effectiveness of drug therapy • Drug side effects • Actual or potential drug interactions • Duplicate drug therapy • Drug therapy currently associated with laboratory monitoring Patient 5: Medication list contains order for Calmoseptine ointment with instructions: 2Gm Apply thin layer 4 times daily to treat and prevent skin irritation. There is no evidence of application site for this medication. Medication list contains order for A and D ointment 2 Gm topical ointment with instructions: Apply topically twice daily PRN for dry skin. There is no evidence of application site for this medication.”

    Rule L0530. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))

    The inspectors’ words, 107 words

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 5 (Patient #5) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including medications and treatments. Patient 5: Plan of care contains order for Calmoseptine ointment with instructions: 2Gm Apply thin layer 4 times daily to treat and prevent skin irritation. There is no evidence of application site for this medication. Plan of care contains order for A and D ointment 2 Gm topical ointment with instructions: Apply topically twice daily PRN for dry skin. There is no evidence of application site for this medication.”

    Rule L0549. Standard-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(2))

    “Upon client record review, 1 of 5 (Patient 2) did not have evidence that the IDG ensures that the care and services are provided in accordance with the plan of care. Patient 2: Skilled nursing visit frequency order is weekly and 1 PRN. There is evidence of SN visit on 09/16/2024 and 09/17/2024. There is no evidence that either of these visits were PRN visits.”

    Rule L0555. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 143 words

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 5 (Patient 1) did not have evidence in the patient record that hospice aide assignments and duties are: • Assigned to a specific patient by a registered nurse that is a member of the interdisciplinary group • Written patient care instructions for a hospice aide must be prepared by a Registered Nurse who is responsible for the supervision of a hospice aide as specified under paragraph (h) of 418.76 • There is evidence in the patient record that the plan of care; indicate what tasks are to be done by the Aide and the frequency of these tasks. The use of “PRN” or “per patient choice”, for any task, whether personal care or non-personal care tasks, are not acceptable Patient 1: COS-Aide care plan written with the following task frequencies noted as PRN: change linen, make bed.”

    Rule L0625. Standard-level.

Aug 14, 2024: reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care28 deficiencies
  • Initial & comprehensive assessment of patient (42 CFR 418.54)

    “Condition of Participation: Initial and Comprehensive Assessment of the Patient.”

    Rule L0520. Condition-level.

  • IDG, care planning, coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56)

    “Condition of Participation: Interdisciplinary Group, Care Planning, and Coordination of Services. L536”

    Rule L0536. Condition-level.

  • Hospice aide and homemaker services (42 CFR 418.76)

    “Condition of Participation: Hospice Aide and Homemaker Services. L607”

    Rule L0607. Condition-level.

  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 94 words

    “Upon patient record review 12 of 14 (Patients #1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 11, 12, 14) did not have evidence in the patient record that the comprehensive assessment identifies the physical, psychosocial, emotional, and spiritual needs related to the terminal illness that must be addressed in order to promote the hospice patient’s well-being, comfort, and dignity throughout the dying process. Patient 1, 4, 5 no evidence of an initial psychosocial or spiritual assessment. Patient 2, 3, 6, 7, 8, 9, 11, 12, 14 no evidence of an initial psychosocial assessment.”

    Rule L0524. Standard-level.

  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(6))

    The inspectors’ words, 122 words

    “Upon patient record review, 6 of 14 (Patient #2, 3, 4, 5, 8, 9) did not have evidence in the patient record that a review was completed of all prescription and non-prescription medications, including herbal remedies that could affect drug therapy. This review includes, but is not limited to: • Effectiveness of drug therapy • Drug side effects • Actual or potential drug interactions • Duplicate drug therapy • Drug therapy currently associated with laboratory monitoring Patient 2, 3, 4 oxygen ordered as a treatment 2-5LPM NC. No evidence of oxygen on medication profile. Patient 5 Lidocaine patch 4% daily prn, no evidence of application site. Patient 8, 9 oxygen ordered 2-4 LPM NC no evidence of oxygen on the medication profile.”

    Rule L0530. Standard-level.

  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(7))

    The inspectors’ words, 162 words

    “Upon patient record review, 8 of 14 (Patient #1, 4, 5, 6, 9, 11, 12, 14) did not have evidence in the patient record that the comprehensive assessment includes a bereavement component which includes the needs of the patient’s family and other individuals focusing on the social, spiritual, and cultural factors that may impact their ability to cope with the patient’s death. Information gathered from the initial bereavement assessment is incorporated into the plan of care and is considered in the bereavement plan of care. Patient #1, 14 no evidence of an initial bereavement risk assessment. Patient 4 admitted 1/16/24, initial bereavement risk assessment completed on 7/17/24. Patient 5 admitted 4/23/24, initial bereavement risk assessment completed on 7/25/24. Patient 6 admitted 4/16/24, initial bereavement risk assessment completed on 7/18/24. Patient 9 admitted 2/22/24, initial bereavement risk assessment completed on 8/9/24. Patient 11 admitted 10/3/23, initial bereavement risk assessment completed on 6/1/24. Patient 12 admitted 2/13/24 initial bereavement risk assessment completed on 5/15/24.”

    Rule L0531. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 343 words

    “Upon patient record review, 10 of 14 (Patient #1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10) did not have evidence in the patient record that the hospice has developed an individualized written plan of care for each patient. The plan of care must reflect patient/family goals and interventions based on the problems identified in the initial, comprehensive, and updated comprehensive assessments. The plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions. Patient 1 RN visit 5/15/24 and additional visits document patient chokes easily, no evidence of aspiration precautions. Patient received IV infusions weekly for the first 8 weeks, no evidence of a care plan for the IV. PT ordered no evidence of a care plan for PT. Patient 2 nursing visits document patient as aspiration precautions & dysphagia, no evidence of aspiration precautions. Admitted with terminal diagnosis of Parkinson’s, oxygen orders, nebs ordered, fall risk, documented fall risk, nausea & vomiting, spiritual care, massage therapy and physical therapy are seeing the patient. No evidence goals and interventions for identified problems. Patient 3 terminal diagnosis of Lewy Bodies, oxygen ordered, high risk falls, dysphagia, high risk for skin impairment, incontinence, and dizziness. No evidence of goals and interventions for the identified problems. Patient 4 has Foley/suprapubic, oxygen ordered, PT ordered. No evidence of a care plan to address PT, respirator or oxygen safety. Patient 5 oxygen ordered, no care plan for respiratory or oxygen safety. Patient 6 spiritual care seeing patient monthly and PT ordered 2x week, no care plans for SC or PT. Patient 7 oxygen ordered, aspirin, and medications for constipation. No evidence of goals and interventions for identified problems. Patient 8 PT, spiritual care and massage therapy ordered, no evidence of goals and interventions for identified problems. Patient 9 ordered oxygen, suction, PT. No evidence of goals and interventions for identified problems. Patient 10 on aspirin, medications for constipation, suctioning, being seen by PT, MSW, SC and massage therapy. No evidence of goals and interventions for identified problems.”

    Rule L0545. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 91 words

    “Upon patient record review, 2 of 14 (Patient #7, 9) did not have evidence that the plan of care includes all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions which including interventions to manage pain and symptoms. Patient 7 initially admitted as inpatient level of care for anxiety continues on Ativan, on Morphine and Tylenol for pain, no evidence of a care plan for pain and/or anxiety. Patient 9 Morphine, Haldol and Ativan ordered, no evidence of a care plan to manage pain and/or anxiety.”

    Rule L0546. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 352 words

    “Upon patient record review, 10 of 14 (Patient #1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10) did not have evidence the plan of care must includes all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including the following: • A detailed statement of the scope and frequency of services necessary to meet the specific patient and family needs • The IDG demonstrates a proactive approach in developing each patient’s plan of care by planning ahead for anticipated patient changes and needs. Decisions should reflect the patient/family preferences rather than be solely a response to a crisis. Patient 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 IPOC included PT/OT/ST 2x week and initial admission ordered included PT 2x week. Patient 6, 7, 8, 10 IPOC included PT/OT/ST 1x week and initial admission ordered included PT 1x week. Patient 1 order 5/15/24 for SC 1x month and prn without a frequency. Patient 2 order 6/28/24 for SC 1x month and prn, SN 2x week and as needed without a frequency. Patient 6 order 7/15/24 SC 1x per period and prn, SN 1x week and prn without a frequency. Patient 7 IPOC SC declined and initial admission order has SC as 1x month and prn without a frequency. Order for massage therapy 1x week and as needed for comfort without a frequency. Patient 8 IPOC SC 1x month and 1 prn without a frequency, initial order SC 1x month and prn without a frequency. 6/23/24 recert POC orders PT/OT/ST 1x week, order is for PT only. Patient 9 IPOC SN 1x week and 1prn without a frequency. Aide states yes no frequency, SC 1x month and 1prn without a frequency. Volunteer 3x week and 1 prn without a frequency and PT/OT/ST eval and 1x week. Initial order SN, Aide and SC as 1x week and prn without a frequency. Volunteer as declined, PT as eval and 2x week. Patient 10 IPOC SW yes and no frequency, SC as declined, SN 1x week and 1prn. Initial order SN 1x week and prn without a frequency. SW/SC 1x per period and prn.”

    Rule L0547. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))

    The inspectors’ words, 345 words

    “Upon patient record review, 7 of 14 (Patient #2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 9) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including medications and treatments. Patient 2 volunteer frequency 2x week, all items on volunteer care plan are ordered as requested such as relief sitting, letter/book reading, friendly visit, companionship, caregiver respite, patient emotional support, family emotional support without indicator for PRN. Buspirone 5mg 2 tabs daily anxiety may repeat as needed during the night, no frequency for how often to repeat. Lorazepam 0.5mg 1 tab Q4H prn anxiety/sleep. Order does not specify when to take Buspirone or Lorazepam for anxiety. IPOC included Oxygen 2-5LPM NC prn, no indication for prn. Patient 3 IPOC included Oxygen 2-4LPM NC prn, no indication for prn. In addition, nursing visit 6/22/24 documents honey thickened liquids, no evidence of an order for honey thick liquids. Patient 4 IPOC included ordered for 16Fr foley with __ (blank) balloon change Q30 days and prn, no size of the balloon and no indication for prn changes. POC 7/14/24 included suprapubic change every 4 weeks monitor for S/S infection, order did not include size of catheter. Volunteer care plan 7/15/24 included all tasks as requested such as meals, housekeeping, relief sitting, companionship, caregiver respite, patient emotional support, caregiver emotional support, family emotional support, grocery and pharmacy errands without indicator for PRN. Patient 5 order 5/29/24 Lidocaine patch 4% daily prn pain, no location to apply the patch. Volunteer care plan 7/24/24 included tasks as requested such as light meal, housekeeping, chores, relief sitting, friendly visit, social support, companionship, caregiver respite, patient/caregiver/family emotional support without indicator for PRN. Patient 6 volunteer care plan included tasks as requested such as light meal, housekeeping, chores, relief sitting, friendly visit, shopping, pharmacy, companionship, caregiver respite, patient/caregiver/family emotional support without indicator for PRN. Patient 8, 9 Volunteer care plan 4/2/24 included all tasks as requested under the three sections meal/housekeeping, social support and grocery/pharmacy without an indicator for PRN,”

    Rule L0549. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(5))

    The inspectors’ words, 262 words

    “Upon patient record review, 9 of 14 (Patient #1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 9, 10) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including equipment and supply needs. Patient 1 aide care plan includes the use of a cane, no evidence of cane ordered as DME. Patient 2 utilizing Albuterol nebs, no evidence of a nebulizer ordered as DME. Nursing visits 6/25/24 and 7/1/24 document the use of a wheelchair, no evidence order for wheelchair DME. Nursing visit on 7/4/24 documents the use of a hospital bed, no evidence of DME order. Patient 3, 4 IPOC includes Oxygen, no evidence of an order for Oxygen DME. Patient 5 utilizing Albuterol nebs, no evidence of a nebulizer ordered as DME. Order for Oxygen 2-4LPM, no DME order for Oxygen. Patient 6 IPOC includes an order to suction the patient, no DME orders for suction. Nursing visit 7/11/24 documents use of OBT, no DME order for OBT. Patient 8 IPOC includes an order to suction the patient, no DME orders for suction. Order for Oxygen 2-4LPM, no DME order for Oxygen. Patient 9 IPOC includes an order to suction the patient, no DME orders for suction. Nursing visit 8/5/24 documents current DME including nebulizer, wheelchair, oxygen concentrator, no evidence of a DME order for these. Patient 10 IPOC includes an order to suction the patient, no DME orders for suction. Nursing visit on 6/28/24 documents bedside commode, no evidence of DME order for bedside commode.”

    Rule L0550. Standard-level.

  • Review of the plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(d))

    The inspectors’ words, 159 words

    “Upon patient record review, 5 of 14 (Patient #1, 4, 5, 6, 9) did not have evidence that a revised plan of care includes information from the patient’s updated comprehensive assessment and must note the patient’s progress towards outcome/goals from the plan of care. Patient 1 6/19/24 Ondansetron ordered, and Lasix change in dose to manage edema. Cardiac care plan did not address interventions for edema and no evidence of a care plan for N&V. Wound care being provided to patient, no evidence of a care plan for skin care or wound care. Patient 4 Docusate and Senna ordered, Lorazepam for anxiety, no evidence of a care plan to address constipation or anxiety. Patient 5 Nursing visits throughout July and August document constipation, no evidence of a care plan for constipation. Patient 6 massage therapy ordered 7/23/24, no evidence of a care plan for massage therapy. Patient 9 Zofran ordered 8/13/24, no evidence of a care plan for N&V.”

    Rule L0553. Standard-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 285 words

    “Upon client record review, 5 of 14 (Patient #1, 2, 3, 4, 6) did not have evidence that the IDG ensures that the care and services are provided in accordance with the plan of care. Patient 1 initial order, and order 7/8/24 orders PT as 2x week, PT visits were weekly from 5/11/24 to current. No evidence of an order to change the frequency. Initial orders included D5NS 500ml & MVL 10ml/500ml via PIV 1x week for 8 weeks D/C 7/6/24. Only nursing visit that documented D5NS IV infusion provided was on 5/22/24, 24g angio no evidence of an order for peripheral IV insertion. Nursing visit 5/15/24 documented inserted 24g angio L forearm for PIV Albumin infusion, no evidence of an order to place PIV. Nursing visit 5/30/24 documented wound care as clean with NS, applied calmoseptine, and applied form dressing. No evidence of an order for wound care or form dressing. Patient 2 6/28/24 volunteer frequency ordered 2x week, no evidence of visits from 6/28/24-7/8/24. Patient 3 IPOC included SN 0 x week 1 and then begin 1x week starting week 2. Nursing visit on 6/22/24 and there is not an order for this visit. Patient 4 Nursing visit on 6/25/24 documents suprapubic catheter changed and does not document how the patient tolerated the change. Order to change suprapubic every 4 weeks, no documented evidence the suprapubic was changed from 6/25/24 to current. DCPS stated it was changed on 7/13/24 however there was not a nursing visit completed on 7/13/24. Patient 6 initial order for wound care to cleanse with NS pat dry apply zinc oxide barrier daily. Nursing visit on 7/18/24 documented Mepilex applied to wound, no evidence of an order for Mepilex.”

    Rule L0555. Standard-level.

  • Program data (42 CFR 418.58(b)(3))

    “Upon observation, there was no evidence the board of directors/governing body approves the frequency and detail of the data collection.”

    Rule L0565. Standard-level.

  • Executive responsibilities (42 CFR 418.58(e)(1))

    “Upon observation, there was no evidence of involvement of the governing body and organizational leaders in the Quality Assessment/Performance Improvement (QAPI) program. The QAPI program did not include an annual evaluation.”

    Rule L0574. Standard-level.

  • Prevention (42 CFR 418.60(a))

    “Upon observation, there was no evidence the hospice follows acceptable standards of practice to prevent the transmission of infections and communicable diseases, including standard precautions Patient 2 during visit with the RN, she placed her notebook on the patient’s dresser without a barrier and without cleaning prior to placing the notebook on the dresser.”

    Rule L0579. Standard-level.

  • Counseling services (42 CFR 418.64(d)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 182 words

    “Upon patient record review, 2 of 14 (Patient #13, 14) did not have evidence the hospice offers bereavement counseling that includes: • Making bereavement services available to the family and other individuals in the bereavement plan of care up to 1 year following the death of the patient. Bereavement counseling also extends to residents of a SNF/NF or ICF/IID when appropriate and identified in the bereavement plan of care • Ensuring that bereavement services reflect the needs of the bereaved • Development of a bereavement plan of care that notes the kind of bereavement services to be offered and the frequency of service delivery Patient 13 bereavement plan of care states letters to be sent at 1, 3, 6, 12 months, along with calls and 1:1 support, it doesn’t specify the calls or 1:1 support. Visit completed on 9/13/23. Patient 14 bereavement plan of care stated bereavement would be provided as per policy. Policy stated that bereavement contact would be at 3, 6, 9, 12 months (doesn’t specify the contact). Cards were sent on 8/15/23, 9/14/23, 11/14/23 and 5/14/24, patient died 8/14/23.”

    Rule L0596. Standard-level.

  • Competency evaluation (42 CFR 418.76(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 175 words

    “Upon personnel record review, 1 of 16 (Personnel #6) did not have evidence in the personnel file that the following competency assessment was performed by the aide with a patient: (This standard applies to all Hospice Aides providing care/service who are directly employed by the hospice or through a contractual agreement.) ·Communication skills, including the ability to read, write, and verbally report clinical information to patients, caregivers, and other hospice staff. ·Reading and recording temperature, pulse, and respiration ·Safe transfer techniques and ambulation. ·Normal range of motion and positioning ·Appropriate and safe techniques in personal hygiene and grooming that include-- ·(A) Bed bath ·(B) Sponge, tub, and shower bath ·(C) Shampoo, sink, tub, and bed ·(D) Nail and skin care ·(E) Oral hygiene ·(F) Toileting and elimination The other subject areas in this section may be evaluated through written examination, oral examination or after observation of a Hospice Aide with a patient. Personnel 6 competency completed on 8/14/23 all tasks were verbally verified, no evidence that any of the tasks were completed with a patient.”

    Rule L0615. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 284 words

    “Upon patient record review, 7 of 14 (Patient #1, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 11) did not have evidence in the patient record that hospice aide assignments and duties are: • Assigned to a specific patient by a registered nurse that is a member of the interdisciplinary group • Written patient care instructions for a hospice aide must be prepared by a Registered Nurse who is responsible for the supervision of a hospice aide as specified under paragraph (h) of 418.76 • There is evidence in the patient record that the plan of care; indicate what tasks are to be done by the Aide and the frequency of these tasks. The use of “PRN” or “per patient choice”, for any task, whether personal care or non-personal care tasks, are not acceptable Patient 1 aide care plan included electric shave as needed. Patient 5 ordered oxygen, no evidence of oxygen on aide care plan. Aide care plan included the following tasks as requested: feed, setup, offer oral supplement, change linen, make bed, straighten room, laundry, and shopping. Patient 6 aide care plan included complete bed bath and assist bath chair both as every visit. Patient 7 aide care plan included clean and file nails as needed. Patient 8 ordered oxygen and identified as high risk for aspiration on care plan, no evidence of oxygen or aspiration precautions on aide care plan. Patient 9 on aspirin for blood thinner, no evidence of bleeding precautions on aide care plan. The following tasks were listed as requested: clean/file nails, make bed, straighten room, laundry, and shopping. Patient 11 aide care plan included several tasks as requested some including: shower, shampoo, dressing, mouth care, nail care, and peri care.”

    Rule L0625. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 116 words

    “Upon patient record review 1 of 14 (Patient #6) did not have evidence documentation in the patient record that a hospice aide provides services that are: • Ordered by the interdisciplinary group • Included in the plan of care • Permitted to be performed under state law by such hospice aide • Consistent with the hospice aide training Patient 6 aide visits documented NA for several tasks that were to be completed every visit. Visit on 7/5/24 NA for ambulation, meals, mouth care, nails. Visit on 7/8/24 NA for mouth care, nails, soak feet. Visit for 7/12/24 NA for meals, ambulation, mobility, activity. Visits on 8/1/24, 8/5/24, and 8/8/24 NA for ambulation, mobility, meals, and nails.”

    Rule L0626. Standard-level.

  • Supervision of hospice aides (42 CFR 418.76(h)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 99 words

    “Upon patient record review 2 of 14 (Patient #5, 8) did not have evidence documentation in the patient record that a Registered Nurse made an on-site visit to the patient’s home no less frequently than every 14 days to assess the quality of care and services provided by the hospice aide and to ensure that services ordered by the hospice interdisciplinary group meet the patient’s needs. Patient 5 no evidence of aide supervision on any visits from 7/1/24-8/12/24. Patient 8 aide supervisory visit completed on 6/19/24 and no evidence of supervision after that through the last visit on 7/31/24.”

    Rule L0629. Standard-level.

  • Supervision of hospice aides (42 CFR 418.76(h)(2))

    “Upon personnel record review, 1 of 16 (Personnel #6) did not have evidence in the hospice aide personnel file that a registered nurse made an annual on-site visit to the location where a patient is receiving care in order to observe and assess each aide while he or she is performing care.”

    Rule L0632. Standard-level.

  • Services (42 CFR 418.100(c))

    “Upon observation, there was no evidence the hospice is primarily engaged in providing the following care and services: • Short-term inpatient care The agency was utilizing one time letters of agreement for any patient that was in a SNF for GIP, Respite or Routine level of care. The agency did not have a contract with any agency for short term inpatient care. The agency obtained a SNF, GIP, Respite contract on day one of the survey that did meet the standards.”

    Rule L0652. Standard-level.

  • Training (42 CFR 418.100(g)(3))

    “Upon personnel record review, 5 of 14 (Personnel #5, 7, 8, 9, 12) did not have evidence that a skills competency assessment, specific to each discipline had been conducted for all personnel including volunteers initially during orientation. Personnel 5, 7, 8, 9, 12 had an initial competency completed however the staff member that completed the competency did not include their credentials to verify if the correct staff member completed the competency.”

    Rule L0663. Standard-level.

  • Content (42 CFR 418.104(a)(2))

    “Upon patient client record review, 14 of 14 (Patients #1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14) did not have evidence that each patient record contains: • Signed copies of the notice of patient rights in accordance with 418.52 • Signed election statement in accordance with 418.24 Patients #1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 all elected to receive the addendum/notice of non-covered items. No evidence that this was provided to the patients.”

    Rule L0673. Standard-level.

  • Authentication (42 CFR 418.104(b))

    The inspectors’ words, 99 words

    “Upon patient client record review, 2 of 14 (Patient #4, 10) did not have evidence that all entries are legible, clear, complete, and appropriately authenticated and dated in accordance with the organizations policies and procedures and currently accepted standards of practice. Electronic signatures are acceptable as long the hospice is following appropriate safeguards to prevent unauthorized access to the patient records. Patient 4 nursing visits completed 6/25/24 and 7/9/24 by KP, the electronic signature did not include the credentials. Patient 10 aide supervision documented on all nursing visits from 7/15/24-8/6/24, no evidence of any aide visits ordered or completed.”

    Rule L0679. Standard-level.

  • Personnel qualification (42 CFR 418.114(b)(5))

    “Upon personnel record review, 1 of 16 (Personnel #15) did not have evidence all Occupational Therapy Services are provided by a qualified licensed Occupational Therapist (OT) in accordance with the state’s Occupational Therapy Practice Act and the hospice’s policies and procedures and/or job descriptions.”

    Rule L0789. Standard-level.

  • Criminal background checks (42 CFR 418.114(d)(1))

    “Upon personnel record review, 2 of 16 (Personnel #15, 16) did not have evidence the hospice obtained a criminal background check on all contracted individuals who have direct patient care and access to patient records.”

    Rule L0795. Standard-level.

All 3 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Oct 16, 2024Complaint inspection by the stateNo deficiencies cited
Oct 1, 2024Follow-up inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care4 deficiencies cited
Aug 14, 2024Reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care28 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Oct 7, 2021.
  • CMS doesn’t list its type of ownership.
  • Cited at in the last three years: it didn’t meet a whole condition of Medicare’s rules.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 12.9 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 9.8% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 96.6% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 85% at home, 12% in assisted living, 4% in a skilled nursing facility.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day12.9 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends9.8%
Visits near death96.6% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • CMS’s ownership file has no owners listed for this hospice.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What do families say?

  • CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 8 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 50.98% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 5Not rated
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold8 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 153 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 91411, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 5.5; this one had 32.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.