Hearth Record

Comfort Nursing Care Hospice, Inc.

A hospice in Valley Village, California 91607

12500 Riverside Dr, Suite 204, Valley Village, California 91607. (747) 262-5888.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026. We couldn’t read Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services’ list since Oct 27, 2026: qcor.cms.gov now refuses our reader. This record is as of then.

The last 24 months 7 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Nov 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean2
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

7 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 152 hospices serving ZIP code 91607 had 5.

The last inspection on record was on Nov 7, 2024: a reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

7 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Nov 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

7 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Nov 7, 2024: reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care7 deficiencies
  • Rights of the patient (42 CFR 418.52(c)(4))

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 14 (Patient #4) did not have evidence that the patient chooses a health care provider, including an attending physician. Patient #4: The record indicates the patients name is listed in the section where the patient is to list their choice for attending physician. There was no evidence of a physician being indicated or declined for attending. Corrected on site.”

    Rule L0515. Standard-level.

  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(6))

    The inspectors’ words, 238 words

    “Upon patient record review, 5 of 14 (Patient #2,3,4,6,7) did not have evidence in the patient record that a review was completed of all prescription and non-prescription medications, including herbal remedies that could affect drug therapy. This review includes, but is not limited to: • Effectiveness of drug therapy • Drug side effects • Actual or potential drug interactions • Duplicate drug therapy • Drug therapy currently associated with laboratory monitoring Patient #2: The record indicates Triamcinolone acetonide 0.025% is ordered topically PRN. However, there is no evidence of a specified area of application noted on medication profile. Antifungal powder 1% is ordered topically PRN. However, there is no evidence of a specified area of application noted on medication profile. Corrected on site. Patient #3: The record indicates Clobetasol Propionate 0.05% is ordered topically PRN. However, there is no evidence of a specified area of application noted on medication profile. Corrected on site. Patient #4: The record indicates Calmoseptine is ordered topically PRN. However, there is no evidence of a specified area of application noted on medication profile. Corrected on site. Patient #6: The record indicates Voltaren is ordered topically PRN. However, there is no evidence of a specified area of application noted on medication profile. Corrected on site. Patient #7: The record indicates Hydrocortisone cream is ordered topically PRN. However, there is no evidence of a specified area of application noted on medication profile. Corrected on site”

    Rule L0530. Standard-level.

  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(7))

    The inspectors’ words, 105 words

    “Upon patient record review, 4 of 14 (Patient #1,#2,#4,#6) did not have evidence in the patient record that the comprehensive assessment includes a bereavement component which includes the needs of the patient’s family and other individuals focusing on the social, spiritual, and cultural factors that may impact their ability to cope with the patient’s death. Information gathered from the initial bereavement assessment is incorporated into the plan of care and is considered in the bereavement plan of care. Patient #1, #2, #4, #6: The record indicates the initial bereavement assessment was completed but did not identify the primary bereaved in the assessment. Corrected on site.”

    Rule L0531. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 343 words

    “Upon patient record review, 6 of 14 (Patient #2,#3,#4,#6,#7,#8) did not have evidence in the patient record that the hospice has developed an individualized written plan of care for each patient. The plan of care must reflect patient/family goals and interventions based on the problems identified in the initial, comprehensive, and updated comprehensive assessments. The plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions. Patient #2: The record indicates per nurse documentation that the patient has care needs related to high risk of skin impairment, sleep impairment, nutrition/diet, and incontinence. There is no evidence of goals or interventions related to these needs on plan of care. Corrected on site. Patient #3: The record indicates per nurse documentation that the patient has care needs related to incontinence, fall precautions, and nutrition/diet including cardiac and diabetic diet, NAS, low fat/cholesterol, controlled carbohydrate and Glucerna. There is no evidence of goals or interventions related to these needs on plan of care. Corrected on site. Patient #4: The record indicates per nurse documentation that the patient has care needs related to nutrition, aspiration precaution, incontinence and high risk of skin impairment. There is no evidence of goals or interventions related to these needs on plan of care. Corrected on site. Patient #6: The record indicates per nurse documentation that the patient has care needs related to psychosocial and incontinence. There is no evidence of goals or interventions related to these needs on plan of care. Corrected on site. Patient #7: The record indicates per nurse documentation that the patient has care needs related to nutrition/diet needs, diabetic diet and Glucerna. There is no evidence of goals or interventions related to these needs on plan of care. Corrected on site. Patient #8: The record indicates per nurse documentation that the patient has care needs related to education and use of Glucometer kit, monitoring blood sugar, and gout management. There is no evidence of goals or interventions related to these needs on plan of care. Corrected on site.”

    Rule L0545. Standard-level.

  • Review of the plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(d))

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 14 (Patient #3) did not have evidence that a revised plan of care includes information from the patient’s updated comprehensive assessment and must note the patient’s progress towards outcome/goals from the plan of care. Patient #3: The record indicates hospice physician ordered a podiatry visit for patient. There is no evidence of this visit being completed in the record and the plan of care was not updated. Corrected on site.”

    Rule L0553. Standard-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(2))

    “Upon patient record review, 2 of 14 (Patient #3,#7) did not have evidence that the IDG ensures that the care and services are provided in accordance with the plan of care. Patient #3: The record indicates frequency of visits for spiritual care is one time a month. There is no evidence of visit for April 2024. Corrected on site. Patient #7: The record indicates frequency of visit for MSW is for every recert. There is no evidence of MSW visit for recert period beginning June 2024. Corrected on site.”

    Rule L0555. Standard-level.

  • Authentication (42 CFR 418.104(b))

    The inspectors’ words, 101 words

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 14 (Patient #5) did not have evidence that all entries are legible, clear, complete, and appropriately authenticated and dated in accordance with the organizations policies and procedures and currently accepted standards of practice. Electronic signatures are acceptable as long the hospice is following appropriate safeguards to prevent unauthorized access to the patient records. Patient #5: The record indicates there is form in the chart that indicates Dr William as the choice for attending. On another form it is indicated Dr Benyamin as the choice for attending physician. Staff verified the incorrect form. Corrected on site.”

    Rule L0679. Standard-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Nov 7, 2024Reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care7 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Nov 5, 2021.
  • CMS doesn’t list its type of ownership.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 9.3 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 24.2% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 72.7% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 100% at home.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day9.3 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends24.2%
Visits near death72.7% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • CMS’s ownership file has no owners listed for this hospice.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What do families say?

  • CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 6 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 5Not rated
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold6 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 152 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 91607, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 5; this one had 7.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 8, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.