Skylar Hospice Care, Inc.
A hospice in Sherman Oaks, California 91403
15450 Ventura Blvd Suite 104, Sherman Oaks, California 91403. (818) 452-5655.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.
The short answer
Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026. We couldn’t read Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services’ list since Oct 27, 2026: qcor.cms.gov now refuses our reader. This record is as of then.
- 11 deficiencies cited in the last three years
- Not rated family caregiver rating
- Not available CMS’s Hospice Care Index
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean2
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
What did inspectors find?
11 deficiencies cited in the last three years
The middle of the 124 hospices serving ZIP code 91403 had 6.
The last inspection on record was on Dec 18, 2024: a reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
When those deficiencies happened
11 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Dec 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Nov | Dec | ||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each deficiency, as cited
Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Dec 18, 2024: reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care11 deficiencies
-
Plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(b))
The inspectors’ words, 147 words
“Upon patient record review, 1 of 14 (Patient #7) did not have evidence that each patient and family received education and training provided as appropriate to their responsibilities for the care and services identified in the plan of care. Patient #7: Feb 5, 12, 19, 27, March 5, 12, 19, RN initiated 500 ml weekly IV infusions for hydration as physician ordered. The RN educated patient caregiver (daughter) that once infusion is complete, for her to “remove needle and apply direct pressure and call RN if problem”. Requested policy/procedure regarding infusion and discontinuance, but not provided. Upon interview with RN, verified that intravenous catheter remained in place for infusion and no actual needle was to be removed. Other related infusion education was documented generally and no specifics to include bag positioning for gravity infusion and monitoring for signs/symptoms of possible infiltration when infusion continued after nurse exited.”
-
Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(2))
The inspectors’ words, 400 words
“Upon patient record review, 10 of 14 (Patient #1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10) did not have evidence the plan of care must includes all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including the following: • A detailed statement of the scope and frequency of services necessary to meet the specific patient and family needs • The IDG demonstrates a proactive approach in developing each patient’s plan of care by planning ahead for anticipated patient changes and needs. Decisions should reflect the patient/family preferences rather than be solely a response to a crisis. Patient #1: Initial and ongoing Volunteer frequency as needed for additional companion/assistance. 8/9/24 order for MSW frequency of visits as needed per patient/family request and re-cert for psychosocial needs. A discipline’s ordered visit frequency cannot include a PRN visit frequency, without a baseline frequency to support it. Patient #2: Initial and ongoing Volunteer frequency as needed for companionship and assistance MSW as needed and recert. A discipline’s ordered visit frequency cannot include a PRN visit frequency, without a baseline frequency to support it. Patient #3: 8/12/24 order Vol as needed. 8/12/24 MSW as needed and recert for psychosocial and emotional needs as well as additional resources. A discipline’s ordered visit frequency cannot include a PRN visit frequency, without a baseline frequency to support it. Patient #4,5: Vol as needed. MSW as needed per patient/family request and recert for psychosocial needs. A discipline’s ordered visit frequency cannot include a PRN visit frequency, without a baseline frequency to support it. Patient #6: Vol 1 as needed. MSW as needed and recert. A discipline’s ordered visit frequency cannot include a PRN visit frequency, without a baseline frequency to support it. Patient #7: 2/4/24 MSW services will provide as needed and recert. A discipline’s ordered visit frequency cannot include a PRN visit frequency, without a baseline frequency to support it. Patient #8: Vol as needed. MSW 1month and as needed. Patient #9: Vol services as needed. 4/15/24 MSW frequency of visit once/month and as needed. A discipline’s ordered visit frequency cannot include a PRN visit frequency, without a baseline frequency to support it. Patient #10: Vol services as needed. 8/10/24 MSW frequency as needed per patient request and recert for psychosocial needs. A discipline’s ordered visit frequency cannot include a PRN visit frequency, without a baseline frequency to support it.”
-
Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(2))
“Upon client record review, 1 of 14 (Patient #7) did not have evidence that the IDG ensures that the care and services are provided in accordance with the plan of care. Patient #7: LVN Visit 3/21/24 No evidence wound care was provided and no documented evidence assessed patient caregiver had provided and/or was compliant with daily wound care and/or education this visit.”
-
Prevention (42 CFR 418.60(a))
“Upon observation, there was no evidence the hospice follows acceptable standards of practice to prevent the transmission of infections and communicable diseases, including standard precautions. The LVN donned gloves to perform patient assessment, including skin checks and direct contact. He did not change gloves at end of assessment and proceeded to clean equipment and return equipment to nursing bag with same gloves”
-
Competency evaluation (42 CFR 418.76(c))
The inspectors’ words, 166 words
“Upon personnel record review, 1 of 15 (Personnel #14 ) did not have evidence in the personnel file that the following competency assessment was performed by the aide with a patient: (This standard applies to all Hospice Aides providing care/service who are directly employed by the hospice or through a contractual agreement.) ·Communication skills, including the ability to read, write, and verbally report clinical information to patients, caregivers, and other hospice staff. ·Reading and recording temperature, pulse, and respiration ·Safe transfer techniques and ambulation. ·Normal range of motion and positioning ·Appropriate and safe techniques in personal hygiene and grooming that include-- ·(A) Bed bath ·(B) Sponge, tub, and shower bath ·(C) Shampoo, sink, tub, and bed ·(D) Nail and skin care ·(E) Oral hygiene ·(F) Toileting and elimination The other subject areas in this section may be evaluated through written examination, oral examination or after observation of a Hospice Aide with a patient. Personnel #14: There is no specification for shampoo competency at sink, tub, bed.”
-
Professional management responsibility (42 CFR 418.100(e))
The inspectors’ words, 111 words
“Upon contract review, 1 of 5 (Wound Masters contract) did not have evidence the agreement to furnish any services under arrangement included that the hospice must retain administrative and financial management, and oversight of staff and services for all arranged services, to ensure the provision of quality care. Arranged care/services are supported by written contract/agreement that requires all care/services are: • Authorized by the hospice • Furnished in a safe and effective manner by qualified personnel • Delivered in accordance with the patient’s plan of care Wound Masters providing specialized wound care to Patient #7. There is no contractual arrangement in place and no documentation if wound was related or unrelated.”
-
Initial certification of terminal illness (42 CFR 418.102(b))
The inspectors’ words, 126 words
“Upon patient record review, 4 of 10 (Patient #2, 7, 8, 10) did not have evidence that the medical director or physician designee provides written certification that it is anticipated that the patient’s life expectancy is 6 months or less if the illness runs its normal course. The physician must consider the following when making this determination: • The primary terminal condition • Related diagnosis • Current subjective and objective medical findings • Current medication and treatment orders • Information about the medical management of any of the patient’s conditions unrelated to the terminal illness Patients #2, 7, 8, 10: Initial CTI is completed only by attending physician and not by hospice medical director or other hospice physician. (all admitted in 1st 90 day benefit period)”
-
Content (42 CFR 418.104(a)(2))
“Upon patient client record review, 3 of 14 (Patient #1, 2, 9) did not have evidence that each patient record contains: • Signed copies of the notice of patient rights in accordance with 418.52 • Signed election statement in accordance with 418.24 Patient #1, 2, 9: Patient chose to receive Hospice Items and Service Not Covered addendum. Addendums provided do not include non-covered medications as specified on medication profiles”
-
Authentication (42 CFR 418.104(b))
The inspectors’ words, 204 words
“Upon patient client record review, 4 of 14 (Patient #1, 2, 7, 9) did not have evidence that all entries are legible, clear, complete, and appropriately authenticated and dated in accordance with the organizations policies and procedures and currently accepted standards of practice. Electronic signatures are acceptable as long the hospice is following appropriate safeguards to prevent unauthorized access to the patient records. Patient #1: The POLST form dated 5/13/24 has X in Attempt CPR box, but has blackened/filled in Do not attempt resuscitation/DNR (allow natural death). in Section A. Patient #2: The POLST Form is signed by patient daughter 6/5/24, but by physician 7/18/24. Says form prepared 6/5/24. Patient #7: Documentation incomplete regarding weekly insertion of peripheral IV and specifics of wound care. There is no specific documentation regarding the insertion of peripheral IV by RN for weekly 500 ml IV hydration for visit dates: Feb 5, 12, 19, 27, March 5, 12, 19, but simply states “infusion on right arm” or “infusion on left arm” each visit note. Nurse interviewed understands should have been specific to procedure . Patient #9: Patient had order for SC monthly, but IDGs said SC declined in frequency section (Sept 13, 27, Oct 11, 25 meeting dates)”
-
Discharge or transfer of care (42 CFR 418.104(e))
“Upon client record review, 2 of 14 (Patient #7, 8) did not have evidence that the hospice forwarded a summary and a copy of the patient record, if requested, to a facility when transferring the patient to that facility. Patients #7, 8: Revocation forms identified reasons for revocation as “transfer to another hospice” and “transfer to home health respectively”. There was no documented evidence of agency’s coordination - or offer to coordinate - with receiving agency.”
-
Discharge or transfer of care (42 CFR 418.104(e)(3))
“Upon client record review, 4 of 14 (Patient #7, 8, 9, 10) did not have evidence that the discharge summary includes all required information. Patient #7, 8, 9, 10: Discharge summaries do not include comprehensive clinical review of the patient’s stay with hospice, including treatment, symptoms and pain management.”
The one inspection in the last three years
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 18, 2024 | Reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care | 11 deficiencies cited |
Is it certified?
- Medicare-certified hospice since Dec 28, 2021.
- CMS doesn’t list its type of ownership.
- No For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual. deficiency or CMS’s most serious finding: the place’s failure to meet a rule caused, or was likely to cause, serious injury, harm, impairment or death to someone in its care. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 489.3. on record in the last three years.
CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Has anything been proven against it?
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
- 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Who does the caring?
- CMS hasn’t published nursing time from Medicare claims for this hospice.
- Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 89% at home, 10% in assisted living, 2% in a skilled nursing facility.
CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Who owns it?
- 7 owners or officers are people: Marine Karagulyan (owns 5% or more directly, 100%); Marine Karagulyan (corporate officer, 100%); Marine Karagulyan (corporate director, 100%); Marine Karagulyan (managing employee (on the payroll), 100%); Yun Ju Shin (managing employee (on the payroll)); Shiva Shabnam (managing employee (under contract)); Kyoung Choi (managing employee (on the payroll)).
- No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
- No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.
What do families say?
- CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
- CMS gives no Hospice Care Index for this hospice.
- 100% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025).
CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
How does it compare nearby?
- Of the 124 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 91403, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 6; this one had 11.
CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Place | Deficiencies, 3 years |
|---|---|
| Mission Hospice South Bay | Not given |
| Sacred Life Hospice | 6 |
| Valley View Hospice, Inc. | 25 |
| Goldstar Hospice, Inc. | 8 |
| Platinum Hospice Care, Inc. | Not given |
| Aleve Hospice Care of Los Angeles, Inc. | 3 |
| Camarillo Hospice Care, Inc. | Not given |
| Miracle Hospice & Palliative Care, Inc. | 0 |
| Absolute Hospice Agency LLC | 5 |
| St Mary’s Hospice and Palliative Care, Inc. | Not given |
| Ha Decisions Hospice, Inc. | Not given |
| Community Health Care Hospice Inc. | Not given |
What the record doesn’t say
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
- Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
- CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
- Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.
Sources
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice General Information (yc9t-dgbk).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice Provider Data (252m-zfp9).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, CAHPS Hospice Survey (gxki-hrr8).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, QCOR hospice inspection reports (Hospice Survey Reports - Oct 2021 through Sep 2026.xlsx).
Released Oct 23, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice All Owners (e983965e-1603-4cb8-82b5-c40090e380d1).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice Enrollments (25704213-e833-4b8b-9dbc-58dd17149209).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice ZIP Data (95rg-2usp).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.
From the hospice
The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.