Hearth Record

Wellcare Specialist Hospice Incorporated

A hospice in Orange, California 92868

1745 W Orangewood Ave, Suite 101, Orange, California 92868. (714) 462-6205.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026. We couldn’t read Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services’ list since Oct 27, 2026: qcor.cms.gov now refuses our reader. This record is as of then.

The last 24 months 15 deficiencies in 2 months of the last 36. Last cited Jun 2024. Most serious: Condition-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
Condition-level deficiency
For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual.

What did inspectors find?

15 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 75 hospices serving ZIP code 92868 had 8.

The last inspection on record was on Jun 11, 2024: a follow-up inspection by The Joint Commission.

1 deficiency at condition level, the more serious of CMS’s two levels

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

15 deficiencies in 2 months of the last 36. Last cited Jun 2024. Most serious: Condition-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

15 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Jun 11, 2024: follow-up inspection by The Joint Commission2 deficiencies
  • Program data (42 CFR 418.58(b)(3))

    “Observed in Data Tracer. On review of the agency’s QAPI plan it was noted that the organization did not identify the frequency of the data collection for any of their goals and as a result the frequency had not been approved by the governing body. Reviewed and discussed this with agency leaders and how to correct this element.”

    Rule L0565. Standard-level.

  • Counseling services (42 CFR 418.64(d)(1)(iv))

    “Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 3 patient records reviewed the organization did not have a bereavement plan of care. On review of RRNHV #3, it was noted that the organization had done a risk assessment on admission but had not initial bereavement care plan. This was reviewed and discussed with agency leadership.”

    Rule L0596. Standard-level.

May 2, 2024: reaccreditation inspection by The Joint Commission13 deficiencies
  • Governing body and administrator (42 CFR 418.100(b))

    “Observed in Tracer Activities. Leaders did not review, approve, and manage the implementation of policies and procedures to guide and support patient care, treatment or services as evidenced by condition level findings at 418.56 for significant issues with the plan of care and care planning/coordination and 418.58 related to the effective quality assessment and performance improvement of hospice care/services. This was reviewed and verified with the Administrator-Designee.”

    Rule L0651. Condition-level.

  • Initial & comprehensive assessment of patient (42 CFR 418.54)

    The inspectors’ words, 120 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 2 of 10 patient records reviewed, the organization did not assess/reassess its patient by conducting and documenting a patient-specific comprehensive assessment/reassessment that defined the patient’s need for hospice, including physical, psychosocial, emotional, and spiritual care related to the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions. In RRHV#1, there was no spiritual care assessment completed/documented by the Spiritual Care Counselor as part of the patient’s initial comprehensive assessment. It was also noted that the patient’s pressure sore skin risk assessment per the Braden Scale was not completed/documented by the RN per the organization’s policy. In RRNHV#2, the spiritual care assessment was not completed/documented. This was reviewed and verified with the RN Care Manager.”

    Rule L0520. Standard-level.

  • Patient outcome measures (42 CFR 418.54(e)(2))

    “Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 10 patient records reviewed, the organization did not ensure the patient record was complete, promptly/accurately documented, readily accessible, and systematically organized to facilitate retrieval. In RRHV#1, the note of a visit completed by the Spiritual Care Counselor 29 days prior was not included/documented in the patient’s hospice record. This was reviewed and verified with the RN Care Manager.”

    Rule L0535. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 98 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 9 of 10 patient records reviewed, the organization did not plan the patient’s care by ensuring the plan of care included all services needed for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including a detailed statement of the scope and frequency of services necessary to meet the patient’s and family’s needs. In RRHV#1, RRHV#2, RRHV#3, RRNHV#1, RRNHV#2, RRNHV#3, RRNHV#4, RRNHV#5, and RRNHV#7, the plan of care did not include the interventions to be provided by the MSW and/or Spiritual Care Counselor. This was reviewed and verified with the Administrator-Designee.”

    Rule L0547. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))

    The inspectors’ words, 119 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 2 of 10 patient records reviewed, the plan of care did not include all services needed for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including medications and treatment necessary to meet the patient’s needs. In RRNHV#4, the RN noted the patient was on home oxygen at the initial assessment/admission visit. The patient’s hospice plan of care did not include the order for the patient’s oxygen. In RRNHV#5, the Ibuprofen 600mg order in the patient’s plan of care indicated dose frequency was 1 tablet 4 times day. It was confirmed with the RN that order was actually prn/as needed for pain. This was reviewed and verified with the RN Care Manager.”

    Rule L0549. Standard-level.

  • Review of the plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(d ))

    The inspectors’ words, 97 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 10 patient records reviewed, the organization did not plan the patient’s care by ensuring the interdisciplinary group, in collaboration with the physician, reviewed and updated the plan of care as indicated by the patient’s condition and at least every 15 calendar days. In RRHV#1, there was no evidence of participation in or documentation of plan of care reviews or updates by the MSW and Spiritual Care Counselor in the last two interdisciplinary group meeting notes (a period of 28 days). This was reviewed and verified with the RN Care Manager.”

    Rule L0552. Standard-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 93 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 10 patient records reviewed, the organization did not provide care, treatment, or services according to the patient’s individualized plan of care. In RRNHV#1, the plan of care for the patient with Type 2 Diabetes included parameters for blood glucose levels, with the patient/family to check levels twice daily utilizing a home blood glucose monitor. The skilled nurse visit notes indicated the patient’s blood sugars were elevated, but no reported blood glucose levels/readings were assessed or documented. This was reviewed and verified with the RN Care Manager.”

    Rule L0555. Standard-level.

  • Program scope (42 CFR 418.58(a)(1))

    “Observed in Data Session. Leaders did not establish priorities for performance improvement by ensuring the quality assessment and performance improvement (QAPI) program demonstrated improvement related to improved palliative outcomes and hospice services. During the Data Session it was noted the organization’s QAPI program included a measure and goal for pain management, but no data was compiled, trended, and evaluated by leaders for improvement. This was reviewed and confirmed with the Administrator-Designee.”

    Rule L0561. Standard-level.

  • Program data (42 CFR 418.58(b)(2)(i))

    “Observed in Data Session. The organization did not compile and analyze data. During the data session, it was noted the hospice had collected data that focused specifically on palliative outcomes for pain management, but the data was not used by the organization to determine if effectiveness and safety was achieved. This was reveiwed and verified with the Administrator-Designee.”

    Rule L0564. Standard-level.

  • Performance improvement projects (42 CFR 418.58(d)(1))

    “Observed in Data Session. The organization did not improve performance by ensuring the number and scope of annual performance improvement projects were based on the patient/organization needs and reflect the scope, complexity, and past performance of the organization’s services and operations. During the Data Session is was noted the organization had no documented Performance Improvement Projects for the past 3 years. This was reveiwed and confirmed with the Administrator-Designee.”

    Rule L0572. Standard-level.

  • Performance improvement projects (42 CFR 418.58(d)(2))

    “Observed in Data Session. The organization did not document what performance improvement projects were being conducted, the reason for the projects, and the measurable progress achieved on them. During the data session, it was noted there was no documentation of the organization’s performance improvement projects and measurable progress achieved. This was reveiwed and verified with the Administrator-Designee.”

    Rule L0573. Standard-level.

  • Discharge or transfer of care (42 CFR 418.104(e)(1)(i))

    “Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 2 patient records reviewed, the organization did not provide information regarding hospice care, treatment, and services to other providers upon the patient’s discharge. In RRDC#2, at the patient’s revocation and discharge from hospice and transfer to the hospital, the organization did not provide the receiving facility/provider a copy of the hospice discharge summary. This was reviewed and verified with the RN Care Manager.”

    Rule L0682. Standard-level.

  • Use and mintenance of equipment and supplies (42 CFR 418.106(f)(2))

    “Observed in Patient Home. In 3 of 3 home visits conducted, the organization did not provide patient education and training based on each patient’s needs and abilities, including procedures to follow if care, treatment, or services are disrupted by a natural disaster or emergency. In RRHV#1, RRHV#2, and RRHV#3, the patient’s individual emergency plan was documented in the hospice record, but the plan was not provided to the patient/family in the home. This was reveiwed and verified with the RN Care Manager.”

    Rule L0702. Standard-level.

All 2 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Jun 11, 2024Follow-up inspection by The Joint Commission2 deficiencies cited
May 2, 2024Reaccreditation inspection by The Joint Commission13 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Aug 5, 2021.
  • Ownership: for-profit.
  • Cited at in the last three years: it didn’t meet a whole condition of Medicare’s rules.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 11.5 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 26.5% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 66.7% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 96% at home, 4% in assisted living.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day11.5 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends26.5%
Visits near death66.7% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • CMS’s ownership file has no owners listed for this hospice.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What do families say?

  • CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 7 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 5Not rated
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold7 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 75 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 92868, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 8; this one had 15.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 8, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.