Hearth Record

Atena Hospice, Inc.

A hospice in Sherman Oaks, California 91403

15450 Ventura Blvd Suite 200, Sherman Oaks, California 91403. (818) 302-0026.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026. We couldn’t read Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services’ list since Oct 27, 2026: qcor.cms.gov now refuses our reader. This record is as of then.

The last 24 months 10 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Apr 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean2
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

10 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 124 hospices serving ZIP code 91403 had 6.

The last inspection on record was on Apr 18, 2024: a reaccreditation inspection by The Joint Commission.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

10 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Apr 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

10 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Apr 18, 2024: reaccreditation inspection by The Joint Commission10 deficiencies
  • Exercise of rights/respect for proprty/person (42 CFR 418.52(b)(1)(i))

    “Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 1 patient records reviewed, for extended prognosis, the organization failed to ensure the patient was able to exercise their rights as a patient of the hospice as evidenced by in review of RRDC#1 the hospice presented the Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage but the form was signed by the patient representative on the day of discharge and not 2 days prior to discharge as required. This observation was reviewed with the DPCS.”

    Rule L0505. Standard-level.

  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(5))

    The inspectors’ words, 102 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 3 of 10 patient records reviewed, the organization failed to conducts and documents a patient-specific comprehensive assessment and reassessment that identifies the patient’s need for hospice care and services. For example: on review of RRNHV#7 the patient was receiving IV fluids through a peripheral IV yet there was no documentation noted in the record of an assessment of the IV site. In RRNHV#6 and RRNHV#9 the patient’s had wounds and documentation of wound treatment yet no comprehensive wound assessment to include size, color, drainage, odor, and surrounding skin as required. These observations were reviewed with the DPCS.”

    Rule L0529. Standard-level.

  • Update of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(d))

    The inspectors’ words, 130 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 2 of 10 patient records reviewed, the organization failed to update the comprehensive assessment to consider changes that have taken place since the initial assessment as frequently as the patient condition requires but no less frequently than every 15 days, On review of RRHV#1 there was a 27 day gap in RN visits for comprehensive assessment and a 20 day gap in February. In RRNHV#4 there were also greater than 15 day gaps in RN comprehensive assessment noted in as there was a 28 day gap December to January and a 27 day gap from January to February. On discussion with the DPCS the organization had identified issues with comprehensive assessment greater than 15 days in February and have been working toward correcting the issue.”

    Rule L0533. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 220 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 9 of 10 patient records reviewed, the organization failed to ensure the individualized written plan of care included goals that were specific, measurable, and time-bound. On review of all clinical records reviewed there were examples of goals as part of the plan of care that failed to be specific, measurable, and realistically time-bound. For example in RRHV#1 example of goals were: Patient’s ADL needs will be met/anticipated daily until next review and Minimize complications due to bedbound status within the next IDT meeting and review every IDG date and revise if needed. In RRHV#2 examples were Minimize complications due to impaired mobility and Patient will drink adequate fluid and water and skin will be maintained good moisture during care. In RRHV#3 patient will remain free of preventable discomfort and/or complication due to impaired mobility within the next 2 weeks. revise if needed. In RRNHV#5 an example was Will minimize episode of anxiety and nervous daily and feels comfort during care. In RRNHV#8 examples were Patient able to express feeling and meet on a day to day basis as communicated during care and Patient will achieve optimum level of comfort thru pharmacological and nonpharmacological intervention daily until next review. Further examples can be seen throughout the records reviewed. These observations were reviewed with the DPCS. 

”

    Rule L0545. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 155 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 4 of 10 patient records reviewed, The organization failed to ensure the plan of care includes all services needed for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions. For example: on review of RRNHV#4 the patient was being seen monthly by the social worker (MSW) yet there was no psychosocial care plan established to guide the care being provided by the MSW. In review of RRNHV#5 the documentation noted a rash on the patient’s leg requiring Triamcinolone cream as treatment yet there was no care plan to reflect the care being provided. In RRNHV#9 there was documentation of the patient with diarrhea and adding Imodium to the medication profile yet the issue was not reflected in the care plan. In RRNHV#10 the patient was being seen by the MSW monthly yet no psychosocial care plan open to guide the care. These observations were reviewed with the DPCS.”

    Rule L0546. Standard-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(2))

    “Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 10 patient records reviewed, the organization failed to ensure care was provided according to the patient’s individualized plan of care. For example: on review of RRNHV#4 the patient had a wound documented to the finger with orders to cleanse with wound cleanser, pat dry, apply antibiotic ointment and leave open to air, however the SN documented on multiple occasions that the wound was covered with an oil immersion dressing inconsistent with the patient’s plan of care. This observation was reviewed with the DPCS.”

    Rule L0555. Standard-level.

  • Prevention (42 CFR 418.60(a))

    The inspectors’ words, 161 words

    “Observed in Patient Home. In 1 of 3 home visits conducted, the organization failed to implement its infection prevention and control activities when cleaning and performing disinfection of medical supplies and devices. For example: on home observation of RRHV#1 the RN was observed to utilize equipment for the comprehensive assessment such as blood pressure cuff, stethoscope, pulse oximeter, and thermometer yet did not disinfect the equipment prior to returning them to the nursing bag as required by policy. This observation was reviewed with the RN and organization leadership. Observed in Patient Home. In 1 of 3 patient records reviewed, the organization failed to follow accepted standards of practice to prevent the transmission of infections and communicable diseases. For example: on home observation of RRHV#1 the RN was observed to access the nursing bag after direct contact with the patient on multiple occasions without sanitizing hands prior to bag entry as required. This observation was reviewed with the RN and Organization Leadership.”

    Rule L0579. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 177 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 4 of 8 patient records reviewed, where aide services were elected, the organization to ensure the RN provide written patient care instructions for the hospice aide. For example: on review of RRNHV#6 and RRNHV#9 the patient had documentation of wounds with dressing treatments, however there were no specific instruction to the aide on how to handle the wound sites and dressings while providing care. In RRNHV#7 the patient had a peripheral IV with continuous fluids yet there were no instructions to the aide on how to handle the IV site while bathing the patient. In RRNHV#9 the patient had a foley catheter but there was no foley care assigned to the aide in the aide plan of care. In RRNHV#10 the patient’s plan of care noted that the patient’s oxygen was increased to 10 liters/minute continuous yet there was no update to the aide plan of care to note the change and whether or not oxygen shoud be removed or left in place for bathing. These observations were reviewed with the DPCS.”

    Rule L0625. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(2)(ii))

    The inspectors’ words, 129 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 3 of 8 patient records reviewed, where aide services were elected, the organization failed to ensure provided care in accordance with the orders on the plan of care. For example: on RRNHV#6 the aide care plan specified shower for the type of bath to be given yet the aide documented over the last month that a bed bath was provided instead of a shower. In RRNHV#8 the aide plan of care also specified a shower be given yet the aide documented on 3 occasions in March that a bed bath was given to the patient. In RRNHV#9 the aide documented that foley care was provided yet foley care was not assigned on the aide plan of care These observations were reviewed with the DPCS.”

    Rule L0626. Standard-level.

  • Retrieval of clinical records (42 CFR 418.104(f))

    The inspectors’ words, 165 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 3 of 10 patient records reviewed, the organization failed to ensure complete and accurate records. For example: on review of RRHV#1 there was documentation in the RN’s assessment that the patient’s pain was controlled with tramadol every 12 hours as needed yet on home observation discussion and discussion with the DPCS the patient was on gabapentin and Tylenol and was not taking Tramadol and the documentation was inaccurate and confused with another patient. In RRNHV#9 the patient had a stage 4 wound to the buttocks and another wound to the toe yet on documentation in a narrative by an LVN in April the LVN documented that the skin was intact. In RRNHV#10 the medication profile contained an order for oxygen at 2-5 liters yet the order conflicted with another updated order in the plan of care and also documented by the physician in the Certificate of Terminal Illness of 10 liters oxygen continuous. These observations were reviewed with the DPCS.”

    Rule L0685. Standard-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Apr 18, 2024Reaccreditation inspection by The Joint Commission10 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since May 19, 2021.
  • Ownership: for-profit.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 13.1 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 5.9% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 78.1% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 60% at home, 3% in assisted living, 37% in a skilled nursing facility.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day13.1 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends5.9%
Visits near death78.1% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • 6 owners or officers are people: Gevorg Demirchyan (owns 5% or more directly, 100%); Gevorg Demirchyan (managing employee (on the payroll), 100%); Gevorg Demirchyan (runs it (operational or managerial control), 100%); Yun Ju Shin (managing employee (on the payroll)); Frank Milton Choe (managing employee (under contract)); Kyoung Choi (managing employee (on the payroll)).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What do families say?

  • CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 10 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 91.3% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 5Not rated
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold10 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 124 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 91403, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 6; this one had 10.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 8, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.