Eternal Peace Hospice Inc.
A hospice in Anaheim, California 92808
160 S Old Springs Rd Suite 104, Anaheim, California 92808. (949) 705-6744.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.
The short answer
Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026. We couldn’t read Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services’ list since Oct 27, 2026: qcor.cms.gov now refuses our reader. This record is as of then.
- 8 deficiencies cited in the last three years
- Not rated family caregiver rating
- 5of 10 CMS’s Hospice Care Index
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean2
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
What did inspectors find?
8 deficiencies cited in the last three years
The middle of the 50 hospices serving ZIP code 92808 had 8.
The last inspection on record was on Aug 11, 2026: a complaint inspection by the state.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
When those deficiencies happened
8 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited May 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Nov | Dec | ||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each deficiency, as cited
Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
May 9, 2024: initial inspection by The Joint Commission8 deficiencies
-
Initial assessment (42 CFR 418.54(a))
The inspectors’ words, 138 words
“Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 12 patient records reviewed, During RRHV# 3’s patient record review it was noted the organization had not ensured the registered nurse completed the initial assessment of the patient to determine the immediate needs of the patient. For example: review of RRHV# 3’s patient record revealed a skilled nurse visit by the licensed vocation nurse (LVN) the same day as the election of benefit (EOB). Review of the LVN skilled nurse visit note revealed documentation of a pain assessment and vital signs. This was discussed with the Administrator that shared the registered nurse (RN) was not available on the day of the EOB and the LVN was sent to tuck in the patient by assessing for any immediate needs of RRHV# 3 until the RN could assess the patient the following day.”
-
Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(8))
“Observed in Record Review. In 12 of 12 patient records reviewed, During all the patient record review it was noted the organization had not ensured it assessed or reassessed the need for Volunteer services. For example: review of the patient records revealed no documentation the patient and family had been evaluated for or offered Volunteer services or a referral for Volunteer services had been implemented. This was reviewed, discussed, and validated with the Administrator.”
-
Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))
The inspectors’ words, 664 words
“Observed in Record Review. In 10 of 12 patient records reviewed, During RRHV# 1, RRHV# 2, RRHV# 3, RR# 1, RR# 2, RR# 3, RR# 5, RR# 7, D/C# 1, and D/C# 2’s’s patient records review it was noted the organization had not ensured the written plan of care was based on the patient’s goals and the time frames, and services required to meet those goals. For example: during RRHV# 1’s patient record review revealed a registered nurse (RN) start of care comprehensive assessment with documentation RRHV# 1 had a history of pain in two locations. The first location was the upper back with a pain history of 9/10 and the second location was in the right shoulder with a pain history of 5/10. In addition, the RN start of care comprehensive assessment revealed documentation RRHV# 1 was receiving oxygen continuously at 2 LPM via nasal cannula, and was a high fall risk. Review of the RRHV# 1’s plan of care and subsequent updates to the plan of care revealed no goal for pain, Falls, or oxygen/respiratory. Further review of the plan of care revealed the disciplines Chaplain and Medical Social Worker (MSW) with the same frequency to include one time a month visits, and home health aide (HHA) with a frequency of twice weekly. However, the initial plan of care and subsequent updates to the plan of care revealed no goals for Chaplain, MSW, or HHA. Review of RRHV# 2’s patient record revealed a RN start of care comprehensive assessment with documentation RRHV# 2 had three pressure ulcers, was receiving oxygen at 2 LPM as needed, was a high risk for fall. Review of RRHV# 2’s plan of care and subsequent updates to the plan of care and revealed a goal for integumentary that included the wound would decrease in size with no indication which wound(s) would decrease in size with no indication how to what a decrease in size would be. Further review of the plan of care and subsequent updates to the plan of care revealed the disciplines Chaplain and Medical Social Worker (MSW) with the same frequency to include one time a month visits, and home health aide (HHA) with a frequency of three visit a week. However, the initial plan of care and subsequent updates to the plan of care revealed no goals for Chaplain, MSW, or HHA. Review of RRHV# 2’s updated plan of care revealed RRHV# 2 had a foley placed for wound care and urine retention. Further review of the updated plans of care revealed the goal under Genitourinary that patient/caregiver would understand the medication for BPH [benign prostate hypertrophy] with no goals related to the indwelling foley catheter. In addition, RRHV# 2 had a diagnosis of Type 2 DM and receiving daily insulin. However, review of the plan of care revealed no goals for diabetes mellitus. Review of RRHV# 3’s patient record revealed documentation of being a fall risk and oxygen as needed. Review of RRHV# 3’s plan of care revealed Chaplain visit frequency of one time a month. Further review of RRHV# 3’s plan of care revealed no documentation of a Chaplain goal or goal for fall risk. Review of RR# 5’s patient record revealed RR# 5 was a fall risk. Review of the plan of care revealed Chaplain visit frequency of one time a month. Further review of RR# 5’s plan of care revealed no goals for the Chaplain or fall risk. Review of RR# 7’s record revealed documentation RR# 7 was a risk for falls. Review of RR# 7’s plan of care revealed no goal for fall risk. Review of RR# 1, RR# 2, RR# 3, D/C# 1 and D/C# 2’s patient records revealed documentation the patients were at risk for fall. Review of the plans of care revealed Chaplain visit frequency of one time a month. Further review of the plans of care revealed no goals for the Chaplain or fall risk. This was reviewed, discussed and validated with the Administrator.”
-
Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(2))
The inspectors’ words, 117 words
“Observed in Record Review. In 2 of 12 patient records reviewed, During RRHV# 2, RRHV# 3, ‘s patient records review it was noted the organization had not ensured the Chaplain and/or the Medical Social Worker (MSW) followed the plan of care. For example: review of RRHV# 2’s plan of care revealed the frequency of one time a month for the MSW. Review of RRHV# 2’s patient record revealed no visit by the MSW for March. Review of RRHV# 3’s plan of care revealed the frequency of once a month visits for the Chaplain. Review of RRHV# 3’s patient record reveal no Chaplain visit for the month of April. This was reviewed, discussed, and validated with the Administrator.”
-
Prevention (42 CFR 418.60(a))
The inspectors’ words, 99 words
“Observed in Patient Home. In 1 of 3 home visits conducted, During RRHV# 2’s home observation it was noted the organization had not ensured staff followed the organization policy Hand Hygiene that included performing hand hygiene after removing gloves and prior to putting gloves on. For example: during RRHV# 2’s home observation the registered nurse (RN) was observed performing foley catheter care and cleaning the penis. The RN then removed the gloves and put new gloves on without performing hand hygiene and continued to assess the patient and reposition the patient. This was discussed and validated with the RN/Administrator.”
-
Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(1))
The inspectors’ words, 149 words
“Observed in Record Review. In 2 of 7 patient records reviewed with hospice aide, During RRHV# 2 and RR# 5’s patient records review it was noted the organization had not ensured the registered nurse (RN) prepared complete written patient care instructions for the hospice aide. For example: review of RRHV# 2’s patient record revealed RRHV# 2 had multiple pressure ulcers with dressings and had an indwelling foley catheter placed approximately five months prior to the surveyor review of the record. Review of RRHV# 2’s hospice aide patient written instructions revealed no documentation of a wound or dressing or indwelling foley. During review of RR# 5’s patient record revealed a pressure ulcer Stage III on the coccyx with a dressing. Review of the hospice aide patient written instructions revealed no documentation of a wound or dressing. This was discussed with the Administrator and Director of Patient Care Services and approved.”
-
Serving the hospice patient and family (42 CFR 418.100(a)(1))
“Observed in Patient Home. In 1 of 3 home visits conducted, During RRHV# 2’s home observation it was noted the organization had not ensured it treated the patient in a dignified and respectful manner that supports the patient dignity. For example: during RRHV# 2’s home observation the registered nurse (RN) was observed providing foley catheter care with the front of the house window curtain open and people observed walking by. This was discussed and validated with the RN/Administrator.”
-
Content (42 CFR 418.104(a)(3))
The inspectors’ words, 267 words
“Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 12 patient records reviewed, During RRHV# 3’s patient record it was noted the organization had not ensured the patient record contained information that reflected the patient’s care, treatment, or services. For example: review of RRHV# 3’s patient record revealed an initial spiritual assessment with many assessment sections left blank or not assessed. This was reviewed, discussed, and validated with the RN/Administrator. Observed in Patient Home. In 2 of 2 home visits conducted with medication reconciliation, During RRHV# 1 and RRHV# 2’s home observation it was noted the organization had not ensured the patient record contained information that reflected the patient’s care, treatment, or services. For example: during RRHV# 2’s home observation the registered nurse (RN) was observed completing a medication reconciliation. Review of RRHV# 2’s medication profile revealed Humulin R 4-10 units subcutaneous three times a day. However, review of the insulin in the home revealed Lantus 10 units every am. RRHV# 2’s Son shared RRHV# 2 had been on Lantus for approximately six months prior to the home observation. During RRHV# 1’s home observation the RN was observed completing a medication reconciliation. Review of RRHV# 1’s medication profile revealed Furosemide tablet 20 mg daily. However, review of the medication revealed Furosemide 40 mg tablet daily. RRHV# 1’s family representative shared the 40 mg tablet was cut in half with the pill cutter she/he purchased. Further review of the medication profile revealed Vitamin C 500 mg chewable tablet daily. However, review of RRHV# 1’s medication revealed Vitamin C 500mg tablets. This was observed, reviewed, discussed, and validated with the RN/Administrator.”
All 2 inspections in the last three years
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| Aug 11, 2026 | Complaint inspection by the state | No deficiencies cited |
| May 9, 2024 | Initial inspection by The Joint Commission | 8 deficiencies cited |
Is it certified?
- Medicare-certified hospice since Mar 5, 2021.
- Ownership: for-profit.
- No For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual. deficiency or CMS’s most serious finding: the place’s failure to meet a rule caused, or was likely to cause, serious injury, harm, impairment or death to someone in its care. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 489.3. on record in the last three years.
CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Has anything been proven against it?
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
- 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Who does the caring?
- From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 17.9 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 3.9% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 100% of patients who died.
- Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 91% at home, 9% in assisted living.
CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | This provider |
|---|---|
| Nurse care minutes per routine home care day | 17.9 min |
| Skilled nursing minutes at weekends | 3.9% |
| Visits near death | 100.0% of patients who died |
Who owns it?
- 9 owners or officers are people: Jerome De Jesus (corporate officer, 100%); Jerome De Jesus (managing employee (on the payroll), 100%); Firouzeh Naimi Akbar (owns 5% or more directly, 80%); Firouzeh Naimi Akbar (corporate officer, 80%); Firouzeh Naimi Akbar (corporate director, 80%); Firouzeh Naimi Akbar (managing employee (on the payroll), 80%); Evangeline B Powell (owns 5% or more directly, 20%); Evangeline B Powell (corporate director, 10%); Sepehr Golboo (managing employee (under contract)).
- No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
- No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.
What do families say?
- CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
- CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 5 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
- 97.5% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025).
CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | Rating |
|---|---|
| Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 5 | Not rated |
| Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold | 5 of 10 |
How does it compare nearby?
- Of the 50 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 92808, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 8; this one had 8.
CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Place | Deficiencies, 3 years |
|---|---|
| Eternal Peace Hospice Inc. This hospice | 8 |
| Kind Heart Hospice and Palliative Care Incorporated | 27 |
| Providence at Home With Compassus Hospice Care Orange County | 5 |
| Fellowship Hospice Services Inc. | 15 |
| Karemore Hospice, Inc. | 3 |
| Golding Care Hospice Inc. | 39 |
| VNA of Greater Los Angeles, Inc. | Not given |
| Vitas Healthcare Corporation of California | 3 |
| Accentcare Hospice & Palliative Care of California | 3 |
| Pec Hospice | 20 |
| Bristol Hospice-Orange County | 8 |
| Silverado Hospice Inc. | 16 |
What the record doesn’t say
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
- Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
- CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
- Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.
Sources
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice General Information (yc9t-dgbk).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice Provider Data (252m-zfp9).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, CAHPS Hospice Survey (gxki-hrr8).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, QCOR hospice inspection reports (Hospice Survey Reports - Oct 2021 through Sep 2026.xlsx).
Released Oct 23, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice All Owners (e983965e-1603-4cb8-82b5-c40090e380d1).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice Enrollments (25704213-e833-4b8b-9dbc-58dd17149209).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice ZIP Data (95rg-2usp).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.
From the hospice
The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.