Hearth Record

Angelic Touch Hospice

A hospice in Van Nuys, California 91405

6931 Van Nuys Blvd Suite 331h, Van Nuys, California 91405. (818) 636-0941.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 17 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited May 2024. Most serious: Condition-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
Condition-level deficiency
For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual.

What did inspectors find?

17 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 315 hospices serving ZIP code 91405 had 4.

The last inspection on record was on Jul 2, 2024: an initial follow-up inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care.

2 deficiencies at condition level, the more serious of CMS’s two levels

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

17 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited May 2024. Most serious: Condition-level. The last 3 years, to Nov 5, 2026.

17 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 Dec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNov

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

May 10, 2024: initial inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care17 deficiencies
  • Initial & comprehensive assessment of patient (42 CFR 418.54)

    “Condition of Participation: Initial and Comprehensive Assessment of the Patient.”

    Rule L0520. Condition-level.

  • IDG, care planning, coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56)

    “Condition of Participation: Interdisciplinary Group, Care Planning, and Coordination of Services. L536”

    Rule L0536. Condition-level.

  • Primary/Alternate Means for Communication (42 CFR 418.113(c)(3))

    “Upon observation, there was no evidence the Emergency Plan communication plan must includes an alternate means for communicating with hospice’s employees and Federal, state, tribal, regional, and local emergency management agencies. Corrected on site.”

    Rule E0032. Standard-level.

  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c))

    “Upon patient record review 2 of 9 (Patient #2, #6) did not have evidence in the patient record that the comprehensive assessment identifies the physical, psychosocial, emotional, and spiritual needs related to the terminal illness that must be addressed in order to promote the hospice patient’s well-being, comfort, and dignity throughout the dying process. Patient #2: No evidence of a spiritual needs assessment as part of the comprehensive assessment. Patient #6: No evidence of a spiritual needs assessment as part of the comprehensive assessment.”

    Rule L0524. Standard-level.

  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(6))

    The inspectors’ words, 165 words

    “Upon patient record review, 3 of 9 (Patient #1, #3,#5) did not have evidence in the patient record that a review was completed of all prescription and non-prescription medications, including herbal remedies that could affect drug therapy. This review includes, but is not limited to: • Effectiveness of drug therapy • Drug side effects • Actual or potential drug interactions • Duplicate drug therapy • Drug therapy currently associated with laboratory monitoring Patient #1: Medication profile dated 5/7/2024 included Hydrocortisone cream 2.5% cream apply to affected area 2 x day. No evidence of an area to apply. Dated 5/7/2024 Nystatin cream 30 GM apply to affected area 2x day for skin infection. No evidence of an area to apply. Corrected on site. Patient #3: Medication profile dated 9/11/2023 included Diclofenac sodium 1% topical gel, apply to affected area 4 x day for pain. No application area identified. Patient #5: Medication profile dated 12/8/2023 included O2 2-5 L via NC for SOB, no evidence dosage parameters.”

    Rule L0530. Standard-level.

  • Update of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(d))

    The inspectors’ words, 193 words

    “Upon patient record review, 5 of 9 (Patient #2, #3, #4, #6, #7) did not have evidence in the patient record that the comprehensive assessment is updated including and by: • The hospice interdisciplinary group (in collaboration with the individual’s attending physician, if any) • Changes that have taken place since the initial assessment • Information on the patient’s progress toward desired outcomes • Reassessment of the patient’s response to care • The assessment update must be accomplished as frequently as the condition of the patient requires, but no less frequently than every 15 days Patient #2: RN comprehensive visits occurred only at recertification for each benefit period, SOC 2/27/2023, 5/22, 8/25, 10/23 and 12/23/2023. Live dc 1/26/2024. Patient #3: RN comprehensive visits occurred only at recertification for each benefit period. SOC 9/11/2023 and 12/9/2023, live dc 1/15/2024. Patient #4: RN comprehensive visits occurred only at recertification for each benefit period. SOC 9/4/2023 and 12/2/2023. Live dc 1/15/2024. Patient #6: RN comprehensive visits occurred only at recertification for each benefit period. SOC 3/2/2023, 5,27 and 8/22/2023. Live dc 9/20/2023. Patient #7: No evidence of RN comprehensive visits after SOC 9/11/2023. Live dc 10/18/2023.”

    Rule L0533. Standard-level.

  • Approach to service delivery (42 CFR 418.56(a)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 101 words

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 9 (Patient #2) did not have evidence that a Registered Nurse is designated to ensure continuous assessment of the patient and family’s needs and to coordinate activities with other members of the interdisciplinary group (IDG). The IDG must work together and is responsible for supervision of the care and service for each patient and family. Patient #2: Phone call to agency on 12/13/2023- patient was kicked out of home and was now homeless and looking for shelter. No evidence of RN visit to patient to supervise care and service to patient. Next RN visit 12/23/23.”

    Rule L0540. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 186 words

    “Upon patient record review, 7 of 9 (Patient #2, #3, #4, #5, #6, #7, #8) did not have evidence in the patient record that the hospice has developed an individualized written plan of care for each patient. The plan of care must reflect patient/family goals and interventions based on the problems identified in the initial, comprehensive, and updated comprehensive assessments. The plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions. Patient #2, #3, #4, #5, #6, #7: MSW on SOC assessment identified moderate anxiety and moderate psychosocial distress, with no mortuary/funeral planning in place. Documented resources discussed and provided, no evidence on POC for problems/goals and interventions for psychosocial distress/anxiety or mortuary/funeral planning. Patient #8: SN SOC identified Braden risk score of 12- high, and patient on O2. No evidence on POC for problems/goals/interventions for skin integrity or respiratory/oxygen. MSW on SOC assessment identified moderate anxiety and moderate psychosocial distress, with no mortuary/funeral planning in place. Documented resources discussed and provided, no evidence on POC for problems/goals and interventions for psychosocial distress/anxiety or mortuary/funeral planning.”

    Rule L0545. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 108 words

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 9 (Patient#4) did not have evidence the plan of care must includes all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including the following: • A detailed statement of the scope and frequency of services necessary to meet the specific patient and family needs • The IDG demonstrates a proactive approach in developing each patient’s plan of care by planning ahead for anticipated patient changes and needs. Decisions should reflect the patient/family preferences rather than be solely a response to a crisis. Patient #4: Vol orders were 3 PRN on each POC/IDG without a quantity defined.”

    Rule L0547. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))

    The inspectors’ words, 130 words

    “Upon patient record review, 3 of 9 (Patient #1, #3, #5) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including medications and treatments. Patient #1: Order dated 5/7/2024 included Hydrocortisone cream 2.5% cream apply to affected area 2 x day. No evidence of an area to apply. Dated 5/7/2024 Nystatin cream 30 GM apply to affected area 2x day for skin infection. No evidence of an area to apply. Corrected on site. Patient #3: Order dated 9/11/2023 included Diclofenac sodium 1% topical gel, apply to affected area 4 x day for pain. No application area identified. Patient #5: Order dated 12/8/2023 included O2 2-5 L via NC for SOB, no evidence dosage parameters.”

    Rule L0549. Standard-level.

  • Review of the plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(d))

    “Upon patient record review, 2 of 9 (Patient #2,#3) did not have evidence that a revised plan of care includes information from the patient’s updated comprehensive assessment and must note the patient’s progress towards outcome/goals from the plan of care. Patient #2: On 12/13/2023 patient became homeless and looking for shelter. New order for O2 dated 1/8/2024. No evidence on updated POCs of problems/goals/interventions for homelessness/shelter needs or oxygen therapy. Patient #3:New order for O2 dated 10/18/2023. No evidence on updated POCs of problems/goals/interventions for oxygen therapy.”

    Rule L0553. Standard-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 270 words

    “Upon client record review, 5 of 9 (Patient #2, #3, #4, #6, #7) did not have evidence that the IDG ensures that the care and services are provided in accordance with the plan of care. Patient #2: SOC 2/27/2023 and all POCs/IDGs identified SC visits monthly. There was no evidence of a SC visit throughout the service. Spiritual care note in IDG states declined in all notes but orders remained. Orders dated 2/27/2023 and on each POC/IDG throughout service included SN 1x week and 3 PRN (these weekly visits were done by LVN), no evidence of RN visits ordered. RN visits for recertification’s on 5/22, 8/25, 10/24 and 12/23/2023. Patient #3: Orders dated 9/11/2023 and on each POC/IDG throughout service included LVN 1x week and 3 PRN. There were no orders for RN visits. One RN visit occurred on 12/9/2023 for recertification. Patient #4: SOC and all POCs/IDGs identified Vol visits 3 PRN. There was no evidence of a volunteer visit. Orders dated 9/4/2023 and on each POC/IDG throughout service included SN 1x week and 3 PRN (these weekly visits were done by LVN), no evidence orders for RN visits. One RN visit occurred on 12/2/2023 for recertification. Patient #6: Orders dated 3/2/2023 and on each POC/IDG throughout service included SN 1x week and 3 PRN (these weekly visits were done by LVN). There were no orders for RN visits. RN visits occurred on 5/27/2023 and 8/22/2023 for recertification. Patient #7: Orders dated 9/11/2023 and on each POC/IDG throughout service included LVN 1x week and 2-3 PRN. There were no orders for RN visits. No RN visits after SOC 9/11/2023.”

    Rule L0555. Standard-level.

  • Counseling services (42 CFR 418.64(d))

    “Upon observation, there was no evidence Dietary counseling services is available to the patient and family to assist them in minimizing the stress and problems that arise from the terminal illness, related conditions and the dying process.”

    Rule L0595. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 164 words

    “Upon patient record review, 2 of 9 (Patient #5,#8) did not have evidence in the patient record that hospice aide assignments and duties are: • Assigned to a specific patient by a registered nurse that is a member of the interdisciplinary group • Written patient care instructions for a hospice aide must be prepared by a Registered Nurse who is responsible for the supervision of a hospice aide as specified under paragraph (h) of 418.76 • There is evidence in the patient record that the plan of care; indicate what tasks are to be done by the Aide and the frequency of these tasks. The use of “PRN” or “per patient choice”, for any task, whether personal care or non-personal care tasks, are not acceptable Patient #5: On SN SOC documented risk of aspiration and O2 use. No evidence on the aide assignment of risk or aspiration or precautions for O2. Patient #8: Patient on Plavix, no evidence on aide assignment of bleeding precautions.”

    Rule L0625. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(2))

    “Upon patient record review 1 of 9 (Patient #8) did not have evidence documentation in the patient record that a hospice aide provides services that are: • Ordered by the interdisciplinary group • Included in the plan of care • Permitted to be performed under state law by such hospice aide • Consistent with the hospice aide training Patient #8: Order 12/5/2023 aide visits 2x week. For week one, one aide visit documented with no evidence of a missed visit.”

    Rule L0626. Standard-level.

  • Retention of records (42 CFR 418.104(d))

    “There is no evidence that all patient records are retained for a minimum of 6 years from the date of the most recent discharge or death of the patient. Agency was purchased with a final CHOW dated 11/22/2022. No records from previous owner/agency are available.”

    Rule L0681. Standard-level.

  • Discharge or transfer of care (42 CFR 418.104(e)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 107 words

    “Upon client record review, 4 of 9 (Patient #5, #6, #7, #8) did not have evidence that if a patient revokes the election of hospice care or is discharged from hospice in accordance with §418.26, the hospice must forward to the patient’s attending physician: • A copy of the hospice discharge summary • The patient’s clinical record, if requested Patient #5: No evidence of a discharge summary sent to attending physician. Patient #6: No evidence of a discharge summary sent to attending physician. Patient #7: No evidence of a discharge summary sent to attending physician. Patient #8: No evidence of a discharge summary sent to attending physician.”

    Rule L0683. Standard-level.

All 2 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Jul 2, 2024Initial follow-up inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health CareNo deficiencies cited
May 10, 2024Initial inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care17 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Nov 9, 2020.
  • Ownership: for-profit.
  • Cited at in the last three years: it didn’t meet a whole condition of Medicare’s rules.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • CMS hasn’t published nursing time from Medicare claims for this hospice.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 100% at home.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • 5 owners or officers are people: Jennelyn Limbo (owns 5% or more directly, 100%); Jennelyn Limbo (corporate officer, 100%); Jennelyn Limbo (corporate director, 100%); Jennelyn Limbo (managing employee (on the payroll), 100%); John S Burns (managing employee (under contract), 0%).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What do families say?

  • CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
  • CMS gives no Hospice Care Index for this hospice.
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 315 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 91405, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 4; this one had 17.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Nov 5, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.