Hospice of St. Clare, Inc.
A hospice in Glendale, California 91206
144 N Glendale Ave, Suite #303, Glendale, California 91206. (818) 508-8500.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.
The short answer
Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026. We couldn’t read Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services’ list since Oct 27, 2026: qcor.cms.gov now refuses our reader. This record is as of then.
- 16 deficiencies cited in the last three years
- Not rated family caregiver rating
- 9of 10 CMS’s Hospice Care Index
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean3
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
- Condition-level deficiency
- For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual.
What did inspectors find?
16 deficiencies cited in the last three years
The middle of the 206 hospices serving ZIP code 91206 had 4.
The last inspection on record was on Nov 4, 2024: an initial follow-up inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care.
2 deficiencies at condition level, the more serious of CMS’s two levels
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
When those deficiencies happened
16 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Sep 2024. Most serious: Condition-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Nov | Dec | ||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each deficiency, as cited
Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Sep 12, 2024: initial inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care16 deficiencies
-
Core services (42 CFR 418.64)
The inspectors’ words, 215 words
“Upon observation, there was no evidence the hospice that is using contract personnel for core services met the following exception: The hospice may use contracted personnel, if necessary, to supplement hospice personnel in order to meet the needs of patients under extraordinary or other non-routine circumstances. A hospice may also enter into a written arrangement with another Medicare certified hospice program for the provision of core services to supplement hospice personnel to meet the needs of patients. Circumstances under which a hospice may enter into a written arrangement for the provision of core services include: unanticipated periods of high patient loads, staffing shortages due to illness or other short-term temporary situations that interrupt patient care; and temporary travel of a patient outside of the hospice’s service area. Patients #2, 3: Patients have active wounds with wound care provided by outside staff of WCWC group, although there is no documented contract. There is no specialized care provided. Hospice nurses, SNF staff and or PCG perform same care other days. Patient #2: 8/12/24 order for Wound care evaluation.... (with progress note to revisit weekly on Thursdays - subsequent visits 8/29, 8/30, 9/5/24.) Patient #3: 9/3/24 order for Wound care evaluation and treatment ... (with subsequent visit 9/6/24 with progress note for WCWC to visit one time weekly.)”
-
Organizational environment (42 CFR 418.100)
“Condition of Participation: Organization and Administration of Services.”
-
Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(7))
“Upon patient record review, 2 of 14 (Patient #5, 6) did not have evidence in the patient record that the comprehensive assessment includes a bereavement component which includes the needs of the patient’s family and other individuals focusing on the social, spiritual, and cultural factors that may impact their ability to cope with the patient’s death. Information gathered from the initial bereavement assessment is incorporated into the plan of care and is considered in the bereavement plan of care. Patient #5, 6: No documented initial bereavement assessment.”
-
Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(2))
The inspectors’ words, 140 words
“Upon client record review, 1 of 14 (Patient #12) did not have evidence that the IDG ensures that the care and services are provided in accordance with the plan of care. Patient #12: 2/2/24 Physician order: Left buttocks pressure injury - cleanse with normal saline. Pat dry, apply triple antibiotic ointment, cover with bordered dressing daily. PCG to change dressing in between hospice nurse visits. LVN visit documentation for March 29, April 5, 12, 18, 2024 includes: integumentary assessed no issues. No evidence of wound care provided or coordinated with PCG to ensure performed. 3/25/24 CTI physician documentation notes no change in left buttocks stage II ulcer. 4/12 RN supervisory visit Braden risk assessment documented , but no specific wound description and no mention of wound care. No order to DC wound care. Wound still present according to DC summary.”
-
Competency evaluation (42 CFR 418.76(c))
“Upon personnel record review, 1 of 12 (Personnel #5) did not have evidence in the personnel file that the following competency assessment was performed by the aide with a patient: (This standard applies to all Hospice Aides providing care/service who are directly employed by the hospice or through a contractual agreement.) ·(C) Shampoo, sink, tub, and bed Personnel #5: The form competency form utilized by hospice does not include specifics of sink, tub, bed for shampoo types, but only shampoo.”
-
Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(1))
The inspectors’ words, 209 words
“Upon patient record review, 3 of 14 (Patient #1, 3, 5) did not have evidence in the patient record that hospice aide assignments and duties are: • Assigned to a specific patient by a registered nurse that is a member of the interdisciplinary group • Written patient care instructions for a hospice aide must be prepared by a Registered Nurse who is responsible for the supervision of a hospice aide as specified under paragraph (h) of 418.76 • There is evidence in the patient record that the plan of care; indicate what tasks are to be done by the Aide and the frequency of these tasks. The use of “PRN” or “per patient choice”, for any task, whether personal care or non-personal care tasks, are not acceptable Patient #1: Plan of Care includes Oxygen 2L/min prn. There is no reference to this on Hospice Aide assignment sheet. Oxygen section left blank. 8/16/24 SN visit assessment related to altered skin integrity of penis. Hospice Aide assignment not updated to include skin breakdown. Patient #3: POC includes Oxygen 2L/min prn. There is no reference to this on Hospice Aide assignment sheet. Patient #5: Plan of Care includes Oxygen 3L/min prn. There is no reference to this on Hospice Aide assignment sheet.”
-
Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(2))
The inspectors’ words, 106 words
“Upon patient record review 1 of 14 (Patient #6) did not have evidence documentation in the patient record that a hospice aide provides services that are: • Ordered by the interdisciplinary group • Included in the plan of care • Permitted to be performed under state law by such hospice aide • Consistent with the hospice aide training Patient #6: 6/7/24 order for Hospice Aide 2x/wk. All visits after 7/15/24 are blank with no tasks documented as completed. There was no staff signature. (July 17, 19, 26, 28, Aug 2, 5, 7, 9, 14, 16, 19, 2024). Notes completed, signed and filed by the next day.”
-
Governing body and administrator (42 CFR 418.100(b))
“Upon observation, there was no evidence the hospice is directed by a Board of Directors/governing body which assumes full legal authority and responsibility for the operation of the hospice. Agency is using outside wound care co. for routine wound care without documentation if wound is or is not related to hospice diagnoses and does not have a contract with this company. Part B Medicare is being billed by wound care co.”
-
Professional management responsibility (42 CFR 418.100(e))
The inspectors’ words, 109 words
“Upon contract review, the agency did not have evidence of an agreement with wound care provider to furnish any services under arrangement included that the hospice must retain administrative and financial management, and oversight of staff and services for all arranged services, to ensure the provision of quality care. Arranged care/services are supported by written contract/agreement that requires all care/services are: • Authorized by the hospice • Furnished in a safe and effective manner by qualified personnel • Delivered in accordance with the patient’s plan of care The medical record did not contain documentation if wound was unrelated and is being billed to Medicare part B for each patient.”
-
Training (42 CFR 418.100(g)(2))
“Upon personnel record review, 3 of 12 (Personnel # 2, 6,7 ) did not have evidence that the hospice employees have received orientation on their specific job requirements. Personnel #2: There was no signed job description for Alt DPCS. Personnel #6: There was no signed job description for Bereavement Coordinator. Personnel #7: There was no signed job description for spiritual counselor. All were provided the following day.”
-
Training (42 CFR 418.100(g)(3))
“Upon personnel record review, 2 of 12 (Personnel # 1, 6) did not have evidence that a skills competency assessment, specific to each discipline had been conducted for all personnel including volunteers initially during orientation. Personnel #1: There is no competency for Volunteer Coordinator. Personnel #6: There is no competency for Bereavement Coordinator. Both were provided the following day.”
-
Content (42 CFR 418.104(a)(2))
“Upon patient client record review, 4 of 14 (Patient #1, 4, 5, 11) did not have evidence that each patient record contains: • Signed copies of the notice of patient rights in accordance with 418.52 • Signed election statement in accordance with 418.24 Patient #1, 4: Effective date of election is blank. Patient #5, 11: Requested notice of non-covered items addendum. The forms were provided but were not completed. Only included “See medication sheet””
-
Content (42 CFR 418.104(a)(5))
“Upon patient client record review, 1 of 14 (Patient #8) did not have evidence that each patient record contains Physician certification and recertification of terminal illness. Patient #8: CTI for Benefit #4 (8/18-10/16/24) is not signed by MD within 48 hours and no verbal authorization is documented.”
-
Authentication (42 CFR 418.104(b))
The inspectors’ words, 180 words
“Upon patient client record review, 4 of 14 (Patient #2, 3, 12,13) did not have evidence that all entries are legible, clear, complete, and appropriately authenticated and dated in accordance with the organizations policies and procedures and currently accepted standards of practice. Electronic signatures are acceptable as long the hospice is following appropriate safeguards to prevent unauthorized access to the patient records. Patient #2: Patient/SNF Resident admitted 7/9/24 with Foley catheter in place. The last documented catheter change was noted in 7/25 LVN note as occurring 3 days prior according to patient’s report to nurse. Documentation was unclear who changed the catheter- facility or hospice staff. There was no documentation regarding Foley catheter changes month of August by hospice or facility staff. Also, Wound Care Provider notes 9/6/24 for Patient #3 inadvertently uploaded to patient #2 EMR. Patient #3 inadvertently uploaded to patient #2 EMR. Patient #12: RN supervisory visit 3/29/24 “Still noted wound on the left buttock. No signs of infection at this time. Wound care done.” Patient #13: The initial bereavement assessment is not signed by any staff.”
-
Hospice plan of care (42 CFR 418.112(d)(1))
The inspectors’ words, 115 words
“Upon client record review, 1 of 14 (Patient #2) did not have evidence that the hospice plan of care identifies the care and services that are needed and specifically identify which provider (nursing facility or hospice) is responsible for performing the respective functions that have been agreed upon and included in the hospice plan of care. Patient #2: Patient/SNF Resident admitted with Foley catheter in place. The IDG Care Plan did not delineate responsibility between SNF and hospice staff. (The last documented change was noted 7/25/24 LVN visit, as occurring 3 days prior according to patient’s report to nurse. There was no documentation regarding Foley catheter changes month of August by hospice or facility staff.)”
-
Orientation and training of staff (42 CFR 418.112(f))
“Upon observation, there was no evidence the hospice provides orientation to personnel of a SNF/NF or ICF/IID regarding the policies and procedures of the provision of care/service including all required content. The hospice reported providing orientation/training regularly, but were unable to present documented evidence during survey.”
All 2 inspections in the last three years
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| Nov 4, 2024 | Initial follow-up inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care | No deficiencies cited |
| Sep 12, 2024 | Initial inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care | 16 deficiencies cited |
Is it certified?
- Medicare-certified hospice since Nov 7, 2014.
- Ownership: for-profit.
- Cited at For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual. in the last three years: it didn’t meet a whole condition of Medicare’s rules.
CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Has anything been proven against it?
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
- 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Who does the caring?
- From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 12.4 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 12.1% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 84.2% of patients who died.
- Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 92% at home, 8% in a skilled nursing facility.
CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | This provider |
|---|---|
| Nurse care minutes per routine home care day | 12.4 min |
| Skilled nursing minutes at weekends | 12.1% |
| Visits near death | 84.2% of patients who died |
Who owns it?
- 6 owners or officers are people: Steve Lloyd (corporate officer, 100%); Steve Lloyd (runs it (operational or managerial control), 100%); Steve Lloyd (owns 5% or more directly, 50%); Elisa Barretta-Lloyd (owns 5% or more directly, 50%); Dolly Singh (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); Louis Benjamin Flores (managing employee (under contract), 0%).
- No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
- No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.
What do families say?
- CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
- CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 9 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
- 74.07% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 5.3% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | Rating |
|---|---|
| Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 5 | Not rated |
| Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold | 9 of 10 |
How does it compare nearby?
- Of the 206 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 91206, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 4; this one had 16.
CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Place | Deficiencies, 3 years |
|---|---|
| St Anthony Hospice | 3 |
| Hospice of St. Clare, Inc. This hospice | 16 |
| Cb Homecare Hospice | 0 |
| Easy Care Hospice, Inc. | 3 |
| Purview Hospice and Palliative Care, Inc. | 4 |
| Dignicare Hospice Services, LLC | Not given |
| Like Family Hospice and Palliative Care Inc. | Not given |
| Solid Hospice Care, Inc. | 7 |
| Medline Quality Hospice, Inc. | 35 |
| Quad Care Hospice Incorp | 3 |
| A to Z Hospice, Inc. | 4 |
| Reality Care Hospice, Inc. | 5 |
What the record doesn’t say
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
- Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
- CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
- Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.
Sources
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice General Information (yc9t-dgbk).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice Provider Data (252m-zfp9).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, CAHPS Hospice Survey (gxki-hrr8).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, QCOR hospice inspection reports (Hospice Survey Reports - Oct 2021 through Sep 2026.xlsx).
Released Oct 23, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice All Owners (e983965e-1603-4cb8-82b5-c40090e380d1).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice Enrollments (25704213-e833-4b8b-9dbc-58dd17149209).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice ZIP Data (95rg-2usp).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.
From the hospice
The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.