Hearth Record

Bright Horizon Hospice Services

A hospice in Fresno, California 93710

3649 West Beechwood Ave Suite 106-A, Fresno, California 93710. (559) 443-0303.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 19 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Aug 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean2
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

19 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 29 hospices serving ZIP code 93710 had 5.

The last inspection on record was on Aug 22, 2025: a reaccreditation inspection by The Joint Commission.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

19 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Aug 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Nov 5, 2026.

19 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 Dec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNov

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Aug 22, 2025: reaccreditation inspection by The Joint Commission19 deficiencies
  • EP Training Program (42 CFR 418.113(d)(1)(ii))

    “Observed in Tracer Activities. the hospice surveyor observed there was no initial EM training for volunteer staff HR #11. This was reviewed and validated with the COO.”

    Rule E0037. Standard-level.

  • EP Training Program (42 CFR 418.113(d)(1)(iii))

    “Observed in Tracer Activities. the hospice surveyor observed that the volunteer HR #11 was not retrained on Emergency Management. This was reviewed and validated with the COO.”

    Rule E0037. Standard-level.

  • Exercise of rights/respect for proprty/person (42 CFR 418.52(b)(1)(i))

    “Observed in Regulatory Review. In 1 of 2 patient records reviewed, the hospice surveyor noted that the agencies’ revocation form did not include time and the reason for the revocation as required by their Revocation of Hospice Benefit Election Policy 2-068.1. The supervisor did update the form to meet the policy during the survey. This was reviewed and validated with the DON.”

    Rule L0505. Standard-level.

  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(5))

    The inspectors’ words, 304 words

    “Observed in Patient Home. In 1 of 4 home visits conducted, the RN failed to assess the patient’s pain during the home visit. The patient grimaced and moaned a number of times during the home visit and the RN never asked the patient if she had pain per the Pain Assessment Policy 1-032.1 which states that the RN will assess pain with each visit. This was reviewed and validated with the DON. Observed in Record Review. In 4 of 16 patient records reviewed, the agency process required wounds to be measured weekly, but they were not done monthly or only with recertification. In HOSRRHV #2 there were no wound measurements for the last 3 months. In HOSRRHV #4 the RN completed one wound measurement one month after admission. In HOSRRNHV #8, and HOSRRNHV #9 there were no measurements done for 8 months. This was reviewed and validated with the DON. Observed in Record Review. In 8 of 16 patient records reviewed, the organization failed to assesses and reassess the patients pain per their policy. In HOSRRHV #1, HOSRRHV #2, HOSRRHV #3, HOSRRHV #4 , and HOSRRNHV #10 an observational pain tool was used and per the organizational Pain Assessment 2-032.1 if the patient is unable to communicate pain using the rating scale, is cognitively impaired, the clinician will assess behavioral factors that signal pain or discomfort and include this information in the assessment. In all five patients the nurse documented that the patient will have an acceptable level for pain, this was not assessed in any of the patients as the observational tool was used. In HOSRRNHV #4, HOSRRNHV #7 and HOSRRNHV #8 pain was not assessed per the organizational Pain Assessment Policy. Pain care plan states that patient will have an acceptable level of pain. This was reviewed and validated with the DON.”

    Rule L0529. Standard-level.

  • Patient outcome measures (42 CFR 418.54(e)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 224 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 7 of 16 patient records reviewed, the organization’s records included discrepancies regarding hospice covered medications in patient records. In HOSRRHV #3 the Patient Notification of Hospice Non-Covered Items, Services, and Drugs the RN documented that the Atorvastatin, and Plavix were not related to the terminal illness and would not be covered. The medication list states they are both covered items. The nurse leaders thought the organization was not covering the medications. In HOSRRHV #4 the Addendum states that Losartan would not be covered as it was not related to the terminal illness but on the medication list it shows that it is covered. In HOSRRNHV #2 the Glucagon is not covered on the addendum but it is covered on the medication list. In HOSRRNHV #5 the Addendum states Propranolol was not covered but on the Medication list it states it is covered. In HOSRRNHV #6 Toprol is not covered in the Addendum but it is covered in the Medication List. In HOSRRNHV #7 the Memantine, Ketoconazole shampoo, Calcium, and Donepezil were not covered on the Medication List and not listed on Addendum as not covered. In HOSRRNHV #10 the Addendum states that Dorzolamide, Latanoprost, Folic Acid, Losartan, Metoprolol, and Clopidogrel are not covered but on the Medication list they are covered. This was reviewed and validated with the DON.”

    Rule L0535. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 127 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 3 of 16 patient records reviewed, the organization failed to plan the patient’s care. The hospice nurse surveyor noted that in HOSRRHV #1, HOSRRHV #2, and HOSRRHV #3 where an observational tool was used to assess pain but the Plan of Care included a verbal descriptor was used. Per the agency policy Pain Assessment 2-032.1 if the patient is unable to communicate pain using the rating scale, is cognitively impaired, the clinician will assess behavioral factors that signal pain or discomfort and include this information in the assessment. In all three patients the nurse document that the patient will have an acceptable level for pain, this was not assessed as both patient’s are nonverbal. This was reviewed and validated with the DON.”

    Rule L0545. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 194 words

    “Observed in Patient Home. In 2 of 4 home visits conducted, the medication list did not contain all required elements such as dose, strength, frequency, and route. The Hospice nurse surveyor observed in HOSRRHV #1 that the patient had an order for Jevity 1 can four times per day via G tube with a 50 ml water flush, before and after feeding. Per the patient’s daughter she is using a 30 ml flush before and after feeding. This patient has severe dysphagia and is unable to swallow so she receives all of her medications via her G tube. She was just ordered Amoxicillin-Pot Clavulanate 875-125 mg twice daily for 10 days and the route was per mouth. The daughter states that she crushed the antibiotic and gave it to the patient via the G tube. In HOSRRHV #2 the patient had an order for Gentamycin Sulfate ophthalmic drops and in the route it states 2 drops to the affected eye, the drops were for the right eye only. This patient also had an order for senna plus and Hyoscyamine Sulfate 0.125 mg with no route entered. This was reviewed and validated with the DON.”

    Rule L0546. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(3))

    The inspectors’ words, 140 words

    “Observed in Tracer Activities. In 8 of 16 patient records reviewed, the surveyor noted that in HOSRRHV #3 that the patient was on Plavix 75 mg and ASA 81 mg daily and the aide care plan did not include safety precautions such as bleeding. Additionally, this patient was deemed a fall risk and this too was missing from the aide care plan. In HOSRRNHV # 1, HOSRRNHV #5, HOSRRNHV #7 and HOSRRNHV #9 the patient is on ASA 81 mg and there is no bleeding precaution in the Home Health Aide care plan. In HOSRRNHV #6 the patient is on Clopidogrel and there is no bleeding precaution aide care plan. In HOSRRNHV #3 and HOSRRNHV #8 the patient has seizures and there is no seizure precautions listed for the Home Health Aide. This was reviewed and validated with the DON.”

    Rule L0548. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))

    The inspectors’ words, 358 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 3 of 16 patient records reviewed, there were no foley change orders obtained by the nurse. In HOSRRHV #2 the patient has had a foley catheter for three years. The patient has gone from a 16 French to a 26 French catheter and there are only two orders for foley catheter changes . One was in 2022 for a 16 French and the other was June 2025 for a change from a 22 French to a 26 French catheter. Both the RN and the DON state that the patient has progressed up to the 26 French catheter, from a 18 French, 20, and 22 French catheter.. There were no orders found for these catheter changes or the type of fluid and amount to instill in the balloon. In HOSRRHV #8 the patient has a wound to the bilateral heels and shins and there is no wound care order. This patient also has a foley catheter and there is no order for catheter changes, what to instill in the balloon, or any securement device. In HOSRRNHV #9 the patient had a wound to the right trochanter and there are no orders for the dressing change. This was reviewed and validated with the DON. Observed in Record Review. In 9 of 16 patient records reviewed, the organization failed to plan the patient’s care. In HOSRRHV #3 the patient was on Plavix 75 mg and ASA 81 mg every day. The RN did not include a bleeding risk care plan. This patient was also on Oxygen 3 Liter via nasal cannula continuous, titrate to 5 Liters as needed. The RN failed to document when the caregiver should use 3, 4, or 5 liters of oxygen. HOSRRNHV #1, HOSRRNHV #5, HOSRRNHV #7, and HOSRRNHV #9 patient on ASA 81 mg no care plan for bleeding precautions for RN. In HOSRRNHV #6 and HOSRRNHV #10 the patient is on Clopidogrel 75 mg, no bleeding precautions care plan. In HOSRRNHV #3 and HOSRRNHV #8 the patient was diagnosed with seizures and on medications and there was no seizure precaution care plan. This was reviewed and validated with the DPCS.”

    Rule L0549. Standard-level.

  • Prevention (42 CFR 418.60(a))

    The inspectors’ words, 110 words

    “Observed in Patient Home. In 1 of 4 home visits conducted, the Hospice surveyor observed that the home health aide performed a bed bath on HOSRRHV #3. The home health aide used the same pair of gloves for washing the perineal and she then dressed the patient with the same gloves. This was reviewed and validated with the DON. Observed in Patient Home. In 1 of 4 home visits conducted, the nurse failed to follow the manufacturer’s guidelines for equipment cleaning. In HOSRRHV #2 the nurse cleansed the pulse oximeter with a Caviwipe which is not an approved cleaner per manufacture’s guidelines. This was reviewed and validated with the DON.”

    Rule L0579. Standard-level.

  • Education (42 CFR 418.60(c))

    “Observed in Tracer Activities. the hospice surveyor observed that the volunteer HR #11 did not receive education on Blood Borne Pathogens. This was reviewed and validated with the COO.”

    Rule L0582. Standard-level.

  • Counseling services (42 CFR 418.64(d)(1)(iv))

    “Observed in Record Review. In 3 of 3 patient records reviewed, the bereavement care plans were the same for all families no matter what risk level was assessed. In HOSRRBRV #1, HOSRRBRV #2, and HOSRRBRV #3 all of the care plans were the same for each of the families as a template was used. All three families were low risk but the Bereavement Coordinator conceded that the same care plan template is used for all levels of risk. This was reviewed and validated with the Bereavement Coordinator.”

    Rule L0596. Standard-level.

  • In-service training (42 CFR 418.76(d))

    “Observed in Tracer Activities. Staff did not participate in twelve months of ongoing education and training. The hospice survey noted during tracer activity that there were between 9 to 13 home health aides who were employed by the organization. In one calendar year there were 122 staff that should have attended in-service training. The surveyor noted that only 83 staff completed training. Staff did not participate in twelve months of ongoing education and training. This was reviewed and validated with the RN supervisory.”

    Rule L0620. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(1))

    “Observed in Pharmacy. In 1 of 4 home visits conducted, where the home health aide services were provided the organization failed to provide treatment or services. In HOSRRHV #4 the home health aide care plan states shower to be provided and when talking with the patient’s daughter in law she states the patient is unable to ambulate and the aide performed a bed bath only with the patient. This was reviewed and validated with the DON.”

    Rule L0625. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(2)(ii))

    “Observed in Patient Home. In 1 of 4 HR files reviewed, the aide failed to provide care as instructed in the POC. In HOSRRHV #3 the patient had orders for oral hygiene and denture care, nail care, and to comb her hair with each visit. These services were not offered or provided by the home health aide. This was reviewed and validated with the DON.”

    Rule L0626. Standard-level.

  • Training (42 CFR 418.100(g)(3))

    “Observed in Tracer Activities. The Hospice surveyor noted that the organization did not define competencies for the Volunteer Coordinator and the Bereavement Coordinator. This was reviewed and validated with the COO.”

    Rule L0663. Standard-level.

  • Content (42 CFR 418.104(a)(7))

    The inspectors’ words, 144 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 2 of 16 patient records reviewed, treatments performed such as dressing changes or foley catheter changes were not fully described in the record. In HOSRRHV #2 the patient has been on service for 3 years and the foley catheter change and the wound care provided were not fully described in the medical record. The staff documented that wound care was provided as ordered and the foley catheter change was documented as foley catheter changed per order. The nurse did not document the size of the foley catheter used, the amount or type of fluid used to inflate the balloon or if a securement device was used. In HOSRRHV #4 the patient had wound care performed and in the last 2 months of visits the RN documented wound care provided per orders. This was reviewed and validated with the DON”

    Rule L0678. Standard-level.

  • Discharge or transfer of care (42 CFR 418.104(e)(1)(i))

    “Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 2 patient records reviewed, the deemed hospice did not provide a discharge summary to the receiving facility when the patient was transferred. In HOSRRDC #1 the patient was transferred to another hospice agency and the organization failed to send a discharge summary to the receiving organization. The organization failed to follow their policy Transfer Information 2.070.1. This was reviewed and validated with the DON.”

    Rule L0682. Standard-level.

  • Discharge or transfer of care (42 CFR 418.104(e)(2)(i))

    “Observed in Record Review. the hospice deemed organization failed to provide the PCP with a discharge summary. In HOSRRDC #2 the patient revoked from hospice and the organization failed to send the community provider a discharge summary. The organization failed to follow the Revocation of Hospice Election Policy 2-068.1. This was reviewed and validated with the DON.”

    Rule L0683. Standard-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Aug 22, 2025Reaccreditation inspection by The Joint Commission19 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Jul 7, 2010.
  • Ownership: for-profit.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 14.2 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 4.5% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 75.4% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 42% at home, 26% in assisted living, 33% in a skilled nursing facility.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day14.2 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends4.5%
Visits near death75.4% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • 4 owners or officers are people: Brigitte Le (managing employee (on the payroll)); Manouk Bashian (owns 5% or more directly); Dickran H Gulesserian (corporate director); Harutyun Srmayan (owns 5% or more directly).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What do families say?

  • CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
  • In CMS’s survey of family caregivers (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 66% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 61% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 9 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 94.19% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 8.1% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 5Not rated
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold9 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 29 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 93710, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 5; this one had 19.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Nov 5, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.