VNA Health
A hospice in Santa Barbara, California 93103
512 East Gutierrez Street Suite A, Santa Barbara, California 93103. (805) 965-5555.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.
The short answer
Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026. We couldn’t read Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services’ list since Oct 27, 2026: qcor.cms.gov now refuses our reader. This record is as of then.
- 13 deficiencies cited in the last three years
- 4of 5 family caregiver rating
- 10of 10 CMS’s Hospice Care Index
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean4
- Star ratings
- CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
- Condition-level deficiency
- For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual.
What did inspectors find?
13 deficiencies cited in the last three years
The middle of the 7 hospices serving ZIP code 93103 had 4.5.
The last inspection on record was on Dec 18, 2023: a follow-up inspection by The Joint Commission.
2 deficiencies at condition level, the more serious of CMS’s two levels
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
When those deficiencies happened
1 visit on record, nothing cited. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Nov | Dec | ||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each deficiency, as cited
Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Oct 27, 2023: reaccreditation inspection by The Joint Commission13 deficiencies
-
Governing body and administrator (42 CFR 418.100(b))
“Observed in Leadership Session. There was no evidence that the governing body and leadership had established requirements to support patient care treatment and services as evidenced by condition level deficiency with 418.116.”
-
Federal, state, local laws & regulations (42 CFR 418.116)
The inspectors’ words, 94 words
“Observed in Individual Tracer. the Hospice did not notify patients in writing of covered services. The form titled - ‘Medicare Hospice Notice of Election’ reflected under assignment of benefits section- I will receive the hospice services set forth in my care plan, which may include- then it lists all of the hospice services. The section titled -financial responsibility, indicated that patients wound be financially liable for uncovered services. RR#1-RR#23 were not notified in writing upon admission to the hospice of what services were covered by the hospice. This observation was discussed with the director.”
-
Notice of rights and responsibilities (42 CFR 418.52(a)(1))
The inspectors’ words, 105 words
“Observed in Record Review. In 23 of 23 patient records reviewed, the Hospice did not notify patients in writing of covered services. The form titled - ‘Medicare Hospice Notice of Election’ reflected under assignment of benefits section- I will receive the hospice services set forth in my care plan, which may include- then it lists all of the hospice services. The section titled -financial responsibility of this form indicated that patients wound be financially liable for uncovered services. RR#1-RR#23 were not notified in writing upon admission to the hospice of what services wound be covered by the hospice. This observation was discussed with the director.”
-
Initial & comprehensive assessment of patient (42 CFR 418.54)
The inspectors’ words, 96 words
“Observed in Individual Tracer. In 23 of 23 patient records reviewed, the Hospice did not have a process in place to routinely evaluate the need for volunteer services. RR#1-RR#3 did not have documentation in the record of the need for volunteer service. This observation was based on review of the social work, chaplain, and RN initial assessments as well as a review of the initial IDT(s). Per the director, volunteer services were placed as needed however there was no process in place to routinely document the assessment of the need for volunteer services for each admission.”
-
Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(6)(iv))
The inspectors’ words, 105 words
“Observed in Individual Tracer. In 2 of 6 home visits conducted, the RN did not reassess compliance with medication. Based on the review of the medication administration record (MAR) of RR#3, the patient was placed on an antibiotic which was not included on the Hospice medication record. Similarly, the MAR of RR#2 reflected that the patient was given an eye drop utilized to treat glaucoma. This eyedrop was not listed on the Hospice medication profile. These medications hav been given to the patient over the course of weeks and the hospice RN visited these patients at least weekly. This observation was discussed with the director.”
-
Update of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(d))
The inspectors’ words, 185 words
“Observed in Individual Tracer. In 6 of 23 patient records reviewed, the comprehensive assessment was not updated by all members of the core group, specifically the MD. Based on discussions with the director and review of the records, the physician was present during the IDT(s) however there was no clinical summary completed by the physician. There was no summary statement and or documentation of collaboration that was patient specific for RR#1- RR#3. Based on discussions with the director, although present for the IDT(s), the MD did not typically write a narrative as part of the IDT update. RR#4 developed a wound after admission to the hospice and the IDT immediately following the implementation of wound care did not reflect the change in condition and or the effectiveness of treatment. Additionally, the contents of the subsequent IDT (for nursing) was exactly the same as the previous and also did not include an update on the status of the wound. Both RR#9 and RR#11 had volunteer services and none of the IDT’s included updates to the assessments from this discipline. This observation was discussed with the director.”
-
Plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(b ))
The inspectors’ words, 161 words
“Observed in Individual Tracer. In 4 of 23 patient records reviewed, the comprehensive care plan(s) did not have measurable goals. The care plan for RR#1 did not reflect any target dates to achieve goals listed for mobility and wound care. Additionally, while pain was identified as an issue, there was no associated goal on the care plan. Similarly, based on the assessment, RR#2 was a fall risk, had a wound, and mobility and cardiac issues. All of the goals associated with these problems had the same target dates , which was xx/xx/xxxxx or by the end of the certification period. RR#3 had dysphagia, and was a fall risk. The comprehensive care plan for RR#3 did not include goals related to aspiration or falls. Additionally, the goal that addressed medication education did not have a target date. RR#13 had a foley and the comprehensive care plan did not include any goals related to the foley. This observation was discussed with the director.”
-
Prevention (42 CFR 418.60(a))
“Observed in Patient Home. In 1 of 6 patient records reviewed, the Hospice did not follow the hand hygiene policy. The hospice aide in RR#1 was observed drying her hands off with the patient’s terry cloth towel. This observation was discussed with the director.”
-
Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(1))
The inspectors’ words, 145 words
“Observed in Individual Tracer. In 4 of 5 patient records reviewed, that had hospice aides, the aide care plans did not comprehensively include required precautions based on the nursing assessment.. RR#1 was at risk for falls and had a wound and the aide care plan did not include instructions/precautions related to these issues. RR#2 had a Hoyer lift and the aide care plan did not include instructions related to the use of this device. Based on the assessment RR#4 was on aspiration precautions and had a wound. Neither wound or aspiration precautions were included on the hospice aide care plan. RR#7 was oxygen dependent and the HHA care plan did not reflect oxygen precautions. RR#13 had a foley catheter and was oxygen dependent and the hospice aide care plan did not include any precautions related to these interventions. This observation was discussed with the director.”
-
Content (42 CFR 418.104(a)(3))
“Observed in Individual Tracer. In 1 of 23 patient records reviewed, the hospice record did not reflect accurate documentation. RR#12’s nursing assessment reflected that the patient had a condom catheter, this patient was a female, and had a foley which was indicated on the care plan. This observation was discussed with the director.”
-
Discharge or transfer of care (42 CFR 418.104(e)(1)(i))
The inspectors’ words, 106 words
“Observed in Individual Tracer. In 2 of 2 patient records reviewed, that were transferred to another Medicare/Medicaid facility the hospice did not send summary to the next provider. RR#17 was transferred to another hospice and there was no documentation that the discharge summary was sent to the receiving Hospice. RR#18 was transferred to the hospital and there was no documentation that the transfer/discharge summary was sent to the receiving hospital. Per the director, documentation is sent to the receiving facility as it is requested. There was no process in place at the time of the survey to routinely send the summary form to the receiving facility.”
-
Label dispose storage drugs (42 CFR 418.106(e)(2)(ii))
The inspectors’ words, 161 words
“Observed in Tracer Activities. During the Inpatient Unit Medication Tracer the surveyor was accompanied by a hospice staff registered nurse. During the tracer the surveyor and nurse noted that within the locked storage unit designated for injectable controlled substances ready for use, there was an opened (plastic lid removed) vial of hydromorphone 2mg/ml injection. The vial still contained a small amount of clear liquid and was in a clear plastic bag labeled with a patient name. The staff nurse was able to check medication administration records and determined that a 0.5 mg/0.25 ml dose of hydromorphone had been withdrawn from the vial and administered on October 11th (fourteen days prior to the Inpatient Medication Tracer). In discussion with the IPU Director it was confirmed that proper wasting and disposal of the hydromorphone had not occurred according to policy (immediately after administration and involving two staff members). The remaining contents of the vial were wasted properly while the surveyor was present. 
”
-
Use and mintenance of equipment and supplies (42 CFR 418.106(f)(2))
“Observed in Individual Tracer. In 3 of 23 patient records reviewed, the Hospice did not provide an individual emergency management plan. Based on review of the home chart of RR#1 did not have an individual emergency management plan. Additionally, based on a review of the record, the emergency plan was incomplete. RR#2 and RR#3 did not have individual emergency management plans. Both of these patients resided in a nursing home. This observation was discussed with the Director.”
All 2 inspections in the last three years
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 18, 2023 | Follow-up inspection by The Joint Commission | No deficiencies cited |
| Oct 27, 2023 | Reaccreditation inspection by The Joint Commission | 13 deficiencies cited |
Is it certified?
- Medicare-certified hospice since Dec 2, 1988.
- Ownership: non-profit.
- Cited at For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual. in the last three years: it didn’t meet a whole condition of Medicare’s rules.
CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Has anything been proven against it?
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
- 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Who does the caring?
- From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 14.5 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 14.2% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 98.1% of patients who died.
- Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 81% at home, 11% in assisted living, 5% in a skilled nursing facility, 2% elsewhere.
CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | This provider |
|---|---|
| Nurse care minutes per routine home care day | 14.5 min |
| Skilled nursing minutes at weekends | 14.2% |
| Visits near death | 98.1% of patients who died |
Who owns it?
- 22 owners or officers are people: Joann Mack (corporate officer); Joann Mack (runs it (operational or managerial control)); Neil D Levinson (corporate director); Christie Lynne Glanville (corporate director); Dusty Keegan (corporate officer); Dusty Keegan (runs it (operational or managerial control)); Pamela Dillman Haskell (corporate director, 0%); Ben Phillips (corporate director); Katherine S Schomer (corporate director); Karen M Wallace (corporate officer, 0%); Karen M Wallace (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); Alex W Craigie (corporate director); Eusebio Cordova (corporate director); Kenneth Lee Kraus (corporate director, 0%); Mark J Mattingly (corporate director); Frederick C Kass (corporate director); Paul Jaconette (corporate director); Michael C Bordofsky (corporate director, 0%); Kieran Shah (corporate officer); Kieran Shah (runs it (operational or managerial control)); Christopher John Thrash (corporate director, 0%); Karen Handy (corporate director).
- No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
- No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.
What do families say?
- Family caregivers rate it 4 of 5 in CMS’s survey (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 84% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 92% would definitely recommend it.
- CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 10 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
- 99.25% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 65.9% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | Rating |
|---|---|
| Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 5 | 4 of 5 |
| Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold | 10 of 10 |
How does it compare nearby?
- Of the 7 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 93103, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 4.5; this one had 13.
CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Place | Deficiencies, 3 years |
|---|---|
| VNA Health This hospice | 13 |
| Santa Barbara Hospice and Palliative Care Inc. | 1 |
| Assisted Home Hospice | 3 |
| Central Coast Home Health, Inc. | 5 |
| Aceso Hospice, Inc. | 30 |
| Diamond Key Hospice, Inc. | Not given |
| Yan Hospice Inc. | 4 |
What the record doesn’t say
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
- Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
- CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
- Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.
Sources
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice General Information (yc9t-dgbk).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice Provider Data (252m-zfp9).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, CAHPS Hospice Survey (gxki-hrr8).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, QCOR hospice inspection reports (Hospice Survey Reports - Oct 2021 through Sep 2026.xlsx).
Released Oct 23, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice All Owners (e983965e-1603-4cb8-82b5-c40090e380d1).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice Enrollments (25704213-e833-4b8b-9dbc-58dd17149209).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice ZIP Data (95rg-2usp).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.
From the hospice
The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.