Savior Hospice
A hospice in Surprise, Arizona 85374
14780 W Mountain View Blvd Ste 206, Surprise, Arizona 85374. (605) 210-1254.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.
The short answer
Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.
- 8 deficiencies cited in the last three years
- 3of 5 family caregiver rating
- 5of 10 CMS’s Hospice Care Index
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean3
- Star ratings
- CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
What did inspectors find?
8 deficiencies cited in the last three years
The middle of the 91 hospices serving ZIP code 85374 had 5.
The last inspection on record was on Dec 13, 2024: a reaccreditation inspection by The Joint Commission.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
When those deficiencies happened
8 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Dec 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Nov | Dec | ||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each deficiency, as cited
Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Dec 13, 2024: reaccreditation inspection by The Joint Commission8 deficiencies
-
EP Training Program (42 CFR 418.113(d)(1)(i))
“Observed in Tracer Activities. In 2 of 2 volunteer records reviewed, there was no documentation indicating that the volunteers had received training in emergency management that was consistent with their role and responsibility in an emergency. This finding was discussed with the volunteer coordinator at the time of discovery.”
-
Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(5))
“Observed in Individual Tracer. In 1 of 4 Individual Tracers, it was noted that the organization did not ensure that the comprehensive assessment update included all requirements. For example, during home visit activities for RRHV#1, it was noted that the clinician did not assess the skin integrity at the back or buttocks area of the patient’s body. This observation was reviewed with agency leadership.”
-
Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))
The inspectors’ words, 198 words
“Observed in Record Review. In 2 of 14 patient records, it was noted that the plan of care did not include all required information. For example, a review of the medical record for RRHV#1 revealed that the patient had a history of a ground level fall with head trauma 20 days prior to the start of care date. The Morse falls risk assessment indicated the patient was at high risk for falls. The plan of care did not include a goal statement to evaluate the response to care, treatment and services related to fall prevention interventions. 

Example #2: A review of the medical record for RRNHV#1, revealed that the clinician documented the presence of a stage 2 wound at the Left Shin. The plan of care did not include a goal statement to evaluate the response to care, treatment, and services related to Left Shin wound. 

Example #3: A review of the medical record for RRNHV#3, revealed that the patient’s terminal illness diagnosis was Alzheimer’s Dementia disease. The plan of care did not include a goal statement to evaluate the response to care, treatment, and services related to Alzheimer’s Dementia disease. This observation was reviewed with agency Leadership.
”
-
Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(1))
The inspectors’ words, 190 words
“Observed in Record Review. In 2 of 14 patient records, it was noted that the plan of care did not include interventions based on the problems identified in the comprehensive assessment. For example, a review of the medical record for RRHV#1 revealed that the patient had a history of a ground level fall with head trauma 20 days prior to the start of care date. The Morse falls risk assessment indicated the patient was at high risk for falls. The plan of care did not include interventions to maintain patient safety, and strategies to prevent injury. 

Example #2: A review of the medical record for RRNHV#1, revealed that the clinician documented the presence of a stage 2 wound at the Left Shin. The plan of care did not include interventions related to the care, and treatment of the Left Shin wound. 

Example #3: A review of the medical record for RRNHV#3, revealed that the patient’s terminal illness diagnosis was Alzheimer’s Dementia disease. The plan of care did not include interventions related to the care, treatment, and services of the patient’s terminal illness diagnosis. This observation was reviewed with agency Leadership.”
-
Prevention (42 CFR 418.60(a))
The inspectors’ words, 184 words
“Observed in Individual Tracer. In 1 of 4 Individual Tracers, it was noted that the organization did not implement its infection prevention and control activities to minimize, reduce or eliminate the risk of infection. For example, during the home visit activity for RRHV#1, it was noted that when the clinician moved from assessing the patient’s feet with irritated skin and healing blistered areas the clinician moved to assessing the patient’s right eye without removing gloves and performing hand hygiene. This observation was reviewed with agency leadership. Observed in Individual Tracer. In 1 of 4 Individual Tracers, it was noted that the organization did not ensure its planned infection prevention and control activities to eliminate the risk of infection were implemented. For example, during home visit activity for RRHV#1, it was noted that after equipment cleaning was completed the clinician did not place the equipment on a clean barrier. In addition, the organization’s bag technique policy indicated that a 70% alcohol spray should be used for equipment cleaning. The clinician used Sani-Cloth germicidal disposable wipes for equipment cleaning. This observation was reviewed with agency leadership.”
-
Supervision of hospice aides (42 CFR 418.76(h)(2))
“Observed in HR File Review. In 1 of 1 hospice aide competency files reviewed, an annual on-site performance evaluation at the patient’s home or site of care had not been conducted. The aide participated in a skills fair at the office, but a site of care evaluation was not done. This finding was discussed with the leaders of the organization at the time of the survey.”
-
Supervision of hospice aides (42 CFR 418.76(h)(3)(ii))
The inspectors’ words, 92 words
“Observed in Record Review. In 3 of 4 patient records, for patients receiving Hospice Aide services it was noted that the supervisory visit did not address all requirements: For example, a review of the medical record for RRHV#3, RRHV#4, and RRNHV#3 revealed that the following information was not addressed in the supervisory visit: (a) Creating successful interpersonal relationships with the patient and family, (b) Demonstrating competence with assigned tasks, (c) Complying with infection control policies and procedures, and (d) Reporting changes in the patient’s condition. This observation was reviewed with agency leadershipl”
-
Discharge or transfer of care (42 CFR 418.104(e)(3)(i))
The inspectors’ words, 98 words
“Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 2 patient records reviewed, for patients discharged or transferred from the organization, it was noted that the discharge/transfer summary did not include all required information. For example, a review of the discharge/transfer summary for RRDC#2, did not include a summary of the patient’s stay, including treatments, symptoms, and pain management; the patient’s current plan of care; the patent’s latest physician orders; and any other documentation that will assist in post-discharge continuity of care or that is requested by the attending physician or receiving provider. This observation was reviewed with agency leadership.

”
The one inspection in the last three years
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 13, 2024 | Reaccreditation inspection by The Joint Commission | 8 deficiencies cited |
Is it certified?
- Medicare-certified hospice since Jan 18, 2022.
- Ownership: for-profit.
- No For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual. deficiency or CMS’s most serious finding: the place’s failure to meet a rule caused, or was likely to cause, serious injury, harm, impairment or death to someone in its care. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 489.3. on record in the last three years.
CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Has anything been proven against it?
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
- 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Who does the caring?
- From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 2.7 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 2.5% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 41.9% of patients who died.
- Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 78% at home, 10% in assisted living, 3% in a skilled nursing facility, 1% in a hospital, 8% elsewhere.
CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | This provider |
|---|---|
| Nurse care minutes per routine home care day | 2.7 min |
| Skilled nursing minutes at weekends | 2.5% |
| Visits near death | 41.9% of patients who died |
Who owns it?
- Savior Healthcare Holdings, LLC owns 100% directly since Dec 12, 2023.
- Savior Healthcare Holdings, LLC runs it.
- 9 owners or officers are people: Jeffrey L Smith (owns 5% or more through other companies, 15.94%); Debjoti Sensharma (managing employee (under contract)); Debjoti Sensharma (runs it (operational or managerial control)); Jon E Santemma (corporate officer); Cynthia Lynn Richardson (managing employee (on the payroll)); Cynthia Lynn Richardson (runs it (operational or managerial control)); Stephen J Larkin (corporate officer); Stephen J Larkin (managing employee (on the payroll)); Stephen J Larkin (runs it (operational or managerial control)).
- No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
- No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Organisation | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hospice Intermediate LLC | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 100% | Jul 31, 2026 |
| Hospice Management LLC | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 100% | Jul 31, 2026 |
| Hospice Topco I LLC | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 100% | Jul 31, 2026 |
| Savior Healthcare Holdings, LLC | Owns 5% or more directly | 100% | Dec 12, 2023 |
| Rhcp-Hospice Holdings LP | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 72.32% | Jul 31, 2026 |
| Rhcp-IV Qp LP | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 63.66% | Jul 31, 2026 |
| Los Angeles County Employees Retirement Assoication | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 17.78% | Jul 31, 2026 |
| Comfort CARE Holdings 2 Inc. | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 15.94% | Jul 31, 2026 |
| Jeffrey L. Smith Living Trust | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 15.16% | Jul 31, 2026 |
| South Carolina Retirement Systems Group Trust | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 8.89% | Jul 31, 2026 |
| Rhcp-IV B LP | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 7.88% | Jul 31, 2026 |
| Rhcp-Hospice Blocker LLC | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 7.86% | Jul 31, 2026 |
| Pleasant BAY Capital Partners LLC | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 6.64% | Jul 31, 2026 |
| Savior Healthcare Holdings, LLC | Runs it (operational or managerial control) | Dec 12, 2023 |
What do families say?
- Family caregivers rate it 3 of 5 in CMS’s survey (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 78% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 75% would definitely recommend it.
- CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 5 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
- 93.51% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 15.5% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | Rating |
|---|---|
| Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 5 | 3 of 5 |
| Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold | 5 of 10 |
How does it compare nearby?
- Of the 91 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 85374, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 5; this one had 8.
CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Place | Deficiencies, 3 years |
|---|---|
| Savior Hospice This hospice | 8 |
| Lilycare of Arizona LLC | Not given |
| Agave Hospice and Palliative Care | Not given |
| Copper Sky Hospice LLC | 4 |
| Expert Hospice Care Inc. | 38 |
| Pristine Hospice LLC | 4 |
| Otium Hospice Inc. | 48 |
| Golden Rose Hospice Care Inc. | Not given |
| Supportive Hands Hospice Inc. | 4 |
| Arizona Professional Hospice Care | 4 |
| Rd Hospice | Not given |
| Arizona Hospice Care Inc. | Not given |
What the record doesn’t say
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
- Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
- CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
- Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.
Sources
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice General Information (yc9t-dgbk).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice Provider Data (252m-zfp9).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, CAHPS Hospice Survey (gxki-hrr8).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, QCOR hospice inspection reports (Hospice Survey Reports - Oct 2021 through Sep 2026.xlsx).
Released Oct 23, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice All Owners (e983965e-1603-4cb8-82b5-c40090e380d1).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice Enrollments (25704213-e833-4b8b-9dbc-58dd17149209).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice ZIP Data (95rg-2usp).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.
From the hospice
The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.