Desert Valley Hospice LLC
A hospice in Phoenix, Arizona 85027
20045 North 19th Avenue, Building 9 Suite 162, Phoenix, Arizona 85027. (602) 999-0960.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.
The short answer
Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.
- 20 deficiencies cited in the last three years
- 4of 5 family caregiver rating
- 9of 10 CMS’s Hospice Care Index
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean4
- Star ratings
- CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
- Condition-level deficiency
- For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual.
What did inspectors find?
20 deficiencies cited in the last three years
The middle of the 72 hospices serving ZIP code 85027 had 4.
The last inspection on record was on Aug 4, 2025: a follow-up inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care.
3 deficiencies at condition level, the more serious of CMS’s two levels
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
When those deficiencies happened
20 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jun 2025. Most serious: Condition-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Nov | Dec | ||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each deficiency, as cited
Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Jun 5, 2025: reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care20 deficiencies
-
Initial & comprehensive assessment of patient (42 CFR 418.54)
“Condition of participation: Initial and Comprehensive assessment of the patient The hospice must conduct and document in writing a patient-specific comprehensive assessment that identifies the patient’s need for hospice care and services, and the patient’s need for physical, psychosocial, emotional, and spiritual care. This assessment includes all areas of hospice care related to the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions.”
-
IDG, care planning, coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56)
“Condition of participation: Interdisciplinary group, care planning, and coordination of services. The hospice must designate an interdisciplinary group or groups as specified in paragraph (a) of this section which, in consultation with the patient’s attending physician, must prepare a written plan of care for each patient. The plan of care must specify the hospice care and services necessary to meet the patient and familyspecific needs identified in the comprehensive assessment as such needs relate to the terminal illness and related conditions.”
-
Hospice aide and homemaker services (42 CFR 418.76)
“Condition of participation: Hospice aide and homemaker services. All hospice aide services must be provided by individuals who meet the personnel requirements specified in paragraph (a) of this section. Homemaker services must be provided by individuals who meet the personnel requirements specified in paragraph (j) of this section.”
-
Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(4))
“Upon patient record review, 14 of 19 (Patient #1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14) did not have evidence in the patient record that the comprehensive assessment takes into consideration the imminence of death. Patient 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14: The comprehensive assessment did not include evidence that imminence of death was assessed. The assessment area on form was blank and there was no evidence of assessing imminence of death in the narrative.”
-
Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(6))
The inspectors’ words, 369 words
“Upon patient record review, 7 of 19 (Patient #2,3,4,5,8,9,11) did not have evidence in the patient record that a review was completed of all prescription and non-prescription medications, including herbal remedies that could affect drug therapy. This review includes, but is not limited to: Patient 2: Upon home visit finding, the agency medication profile contains Refresh tears 2 drops daily in am with no directions for which eye. Miralax powder 17 g 1 dose orally daily PRN with no dose amount details and no dose dilutant noted. Corrected on site. Patient 3: Upon home visit, facility medication profile contains orders for Ketoconazole shampoo and Bacitracin ointment order PRN with treatment plan to apply topically to open area PRN daily after cleaning area with wound cleanser/NS and Nonstick dressing. Ketoconazole shampoo was not on agency med profile and the wound care treatment had been discontinued in agency orders. Corrected on site. Patient 4: Upon home visit, noted on agency medication list contains Miralax powder 17 gms dose powder daily PRN with no dose and no dilutant and Nystatin 100,000u/g dose 1 apply topically under both breasts BID until rash resolved. POC on 4/25/25 contains a treatment for Rash under breast apply antifungal powder 2x /day until rash resolved with no clear directions for dose. The Assisted living medication profile contains an order for Ondansetron Oral tablet 4mg every 8 hr PRN not present on the agency medication profile. Corrected on site. Patient 5: The medication profile contains an order for Miralax with no diluent. Corrected on site. Patient 8: The medication profile contains Fluoxetine 1 “Ablet” oral daily. Corrected on site. Patient 9: The medication profile contains Miralax with no diluent. Morphine sulfate ordered 20mg every 8 hour as needed with no reason. Tylenol is ordered 500mg two tabs three times daily routine and 325mg 2 tabs every 6 hours as needed there is no maximum allowable amount daily. Corrected on site. Patient 11: The medication profile contains Lidocaine top cream dose 4% apply to knees every 8h prn with No dose amount specified. There is evidence in SN documentation on 4/30/25, “Pt uses CPAP for sleep apnea at night.” There is no evidence of CPAP orders. Corrected on site.”
-
Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(7))
The inspectors’ words, 100 words
“Upon patient record review, 2 of 19 (Patient #17, 19) did not have evidence in the patient record that the comprehensive assessment includes a bereavement component which includes the needs of the patient’s family and other individuals focusing on the social, spiritual, and cultural factors that may impact their ability to cope with the patient’s death. Information gathered from the initial bereavement assessment is incorporated into the plan of care and is considered in the bereavement plan of care. Patient 17: There was no evidence of initial bereavement assessment. Patient 19: There was no evidence of an initial bereavement assessment.”
-
Approach to service delivery (42 CFR 418.56(a)(1))
The inspectors’ words, 95 words
“Upon patient record review, 1 of 19 (Patient #7) did not have evidence that a Registered Nurse is designated to ensure continuous assessment of the patient and family’s needs and to coordinate activities with other members of the interdisciplinary group (IDG). The IDG must work together and is responsible for supervision of the care and service for each patient and family. Patient 7: SN documented 4/26/25 “caregiver reports patient may have wax impaction in her ear canals affecting her hearing. RNCM to follow up next week.” There is no evidence of follow up by RN”
-
Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))
The inspectors’ words, 210 words
“Upon patient record review, 3 of 19 (Patient #5,7,11) did not have evidence in the patient record that the hospice has developed an individualized written plan of care for each patient. The plan of care must reflect patient/family goals and interventions based on the problems identified in the initial, comprehensive, and updated comprehensive assessments. The plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions. Patient 5: The SN documented on 4/30/25, 5/21/25 “She is a high fall risk”. There is no nursing care plan for risk of falls with goals or interventions on the POC. Corrected on site. Patient 7: The Medical director documented on the CTI 4/16/25 that patient “has increasing dysphagia with swallowing and eating and has increased coughing episodes”. There was no care plan with goals and interventions put in place for risk of aspiration. Corrected on site. Patient 11: The SN documented pt has dysphagia on the comprehensive assessment 1/22/25. The 5/29/25 has a diet order for diet as tolerated with thin liquids related to dysphagia. Aspiration precautions continue to be ordered on the Aide POC but there is no risk for aspiration care plan with goals and interventions on the POC. Corrected on site.”
-
Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))
The inspectors’ words, 524 words
“Upon patient record review, 8 of 19 (Patient #2,3,4,5,8,9,11,12) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including medications and treatments. Patient 2: POC 5/7/25 Miralax powder 17 g 1 dose orally daily PRN with no dose amount details and no dose dilutant noted. Corrected on site. Patient 3: The POC does not contain orders found at assisted living facility medication profile including orders for Ketoconazole shampoo and Bacitracin ointment order PRN with treatment plan to apply topically to open area PRN daily after cleaning area with wound cleanser/NS and Nonstick dressing. Ketoconazole shampoo was not on agency med profile and the wound care treatment had been discontinued in agency orders. The medical record contains evidence pt has skin tear wounds. There was no wound care plan orders on the POC. Corrected on site. The IDG note 5/29/25 the SN documented pt using Tubi grips for compression and a SN note on 4/18/25 the SN documented pt using Tubi grips for compression. There is no directive in the order for how long the patient is to where them daily they are only mentioned in IDG by the RN. The POC has not been updated to include these orders. Patient 4: The POC on 4/25/25 contains Nystatin 100,000u/g dose 1 apply topically under both breasts BID until rash resolved. POC on 4/25/25 contains a treatment for Rash under breast apply antifungal powder 2x/day until rash resolved with no clear directions for dose. There is evidence of skin tear treatment order at the facility including Bacitracin to skin tear and no evidence of skin care treatment noted at hospice agency record. Corrected on site. Patient 5: the POC 1/29/25 contains an order for Miralax with no diluent. Corrected on site. Patient 8: The POC contains Fluoxetine 1 “Ablet” oral daily. Corrected on site. Patient 9: The POC 11/4/24 contains Miralax with no diluent. Morphine sulfate ordered 20mg every 8 hour as needed with no reason. Tylenol is ordered 500mg two tabs three times daily routine and 325mg 2 tabs every 6 hours as needed there is no directive for maximum allowable amount. Corrected on site. Patient 11: The POC 5/29/25 contains Lidocaine top cream dose 4% apply to knees every 8h prn No dose specified. There is evidence in SN documentation on 4/30/25, “Pt uses CPAP for sleep apnea at night.” There are no CPAP orders on the POC. Corrected on site. Patient 12: The POC 2/13/25 contains the following wound orders “#1, Open Hip-left stage 11 wound existing*************** Cleanse with wound wash and pat dry. Apply composite dressing to area. SN to complete weekly. GH PRN if dressing is soiled/removed. Sacral wound ***********keep sacral wound area dry/clean. Apply Calmoseptine topical ointment dose 1 application once daily and as needed. To be completed by SN and GH staff. Abrasion/excoriation, groin abrasion**********Keep abrasion area dry/clean. Apply Calmoseptine to affected area once daily and PRN. To be completed by SN and GH staff.” The wound orders do no contain clear directions and contain use of non approved abbreviations. Corrected on site.”
-
Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(5))
“Upon patient record review, 1 of 19 (Patient #1) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including equipment and supply needs. Patient 1: The POC 5/29/25 contains an order for Ipratropium Bromide/Albuterol solution for inhalation and Albuterol 0.083% solution for inhalation. There is not order for a nebulizer on the POC. Corrected on site.”
-
Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(2))
The inspectors’ words, 309 words
“Upon client record review, 7 of 19 (Patient #1,3,4,5,7,8,14) did not have evidence that the IDG ensures that the care and services are provided in accordance with the plan of care. Patient 1: 4/24/25 The volunteer documented “I brought patient a chicken sandwich, he loved it.” The Volunteer instructions do not include delivering meals or any diet orders. Patient 3: The POC contains an order for SN once per week and 2 PRN. The SN has made 5 prn visits from 4/18-5/22/25 to the patient this certification period for increased edema and has not updated the POC to include increasing nursing visits to twice weekly or increased orders for PRN visits completed. They have orders for 2 prn visits. Patient 4: The POC 4/3/25 contains an order for “RN once per week” and the LVN saw the patient 4/10/25. There were no orders for the LVN to see the pt. Patient 5: The SN documented on 5/8/25 “Pt has multiple skin tears to arms. Areas clean and left open to air per staff request.” There is no evidence the SN informed the MD about these new skin tears until the IDG note on 5/15/25 the SN documented pt has skin tears to arms. There is no evidence of orders for care of skin tear. Patient 7: The SN documented on 4/29/25 “instructed patient to apply cold compress 15min on and 15 min off to foot alternating until comfort achieved.” There is no evidence of an order for this modality. Patient 8: The SN documented on 4/15/25 “urine dipstick was obtained with positive nitrates and leukocytes today. Dr notified”. There is no evidence of an order for a urine dipstick to be performed. Patient 14: The volunteer documented “Took chocolates. She didn’t want it but left it anyway.” on 4/8/25. Delivering meals/food is not ordered on the volunteer task sheet.”
-
Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(3))
The inspectors’ words, 185 words
“Upon patient record review 1 of 19 (Patient #7) did not have evidence that the IDG ensures that the care and services provided are based on all assessments of the patient and family needs. Patient 7: SN note 4/28/25 SN note “inquired about triage call regarding anxiety over verbal conflict regarding patient and neighbor”. Communication note 4/29/25 caregiver states “pt having pain in her foot and would like a visit.” Inquired as to future plans for when pt is total care and NWB and needing 24/7 care/supervision. POA stated “no idea, I figured hospice would help” Caregiver indicated she cannot give patient 24/7 care. The hospice documented they “referred to the social worker to reach out that day to discuss future plans.” The SN documented on 5/7/25 “reviewed need for custodial care 24/7 for safety concerns w pt alone 90% of the time. POA states she is talking w SW re: options.” The social worker did not visit until 5/28/25 and there was no evidence of discussion about future plans for needed 24/7 care. There is no evidence of this information being discussed at IDG.”
-
Counseling services (42 CFR 418.64(d)(1))
“Upon patient record review, 1 of 19 (Patient #19) did not have evidence the hospice offers bereavement counseling that includes: Patient 19: There was no evidence of bereavement POC at death.”
-
Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(1))
The inspectors’ words, 192 words
“Upon patient record review, 9 of 19 (Patient #1,2,3,5,6,7,8,9,10) did not have evidence in the patient record that hospice aide assignments and duties are: Patient 1: Aide POC 2/14/25 has Assist with feeding and change linens with no frequency. Corrected on site. Patient 2: Aide POC 7/29/24 has change pt linens with no instruction for frequency. Corrected on site. Patient 3: Aide POC 4/2/25 has change linens with no frequency. Corrected on site. Patient 5: The Aide POC 3/10/25 contains an order to change patient Linens with no frequency. Corrected on site. Patient 6 : Aide POC 4/17/25 has change pt linens with no frequency. Corrected on site. Patient 7: Aide POC 4/16/25 has change pt linens with no frequency. Corrected on site. Patient 8: Aide POC 11/19/24 has change pt linens with no frequency. Corrected on site. Patient 9: Aide POC 2/12/15 has change pt linens with no frequency. Corrected on site. Patient 10: Aide POC 4/24/25 contains turn and reposition and change patient linens with no frequencies. The aide POC 4/24/25 contains a directive for bleeding precautions, there is no evidence of bleeding precautions on the POC. Corrected on site.”
-
Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(2))
The inspectors’ words, 152 words
“Upon patient record review 3 of 19 (Patient #2,6,10) did not have evidence documentation in the patient record that a hospice aide provides services that are: Patient 2: Aide visit documentation not completed on 7/31/24 indicating no tasks were completed. There was a narrative note at the bottom that “shower was refused and pt was Shaved per HHA” with no ordered task for shaving noted on aide POC. There was no evidence of any of the other ordered tasks being refused. Patient 6: The POC 4/17/25 contains an order for aides twice weekly. The aide did not see the patient until 4/22/25. There is no evidence of refusal or missed visit documentation. Patient 10: The POC 4/25/25 contains an order for aides twice a week. The aide did not make the first visit until 4/29/25 there was no visits made the week of 4/25/25. There was not missed visit documentation or refusal.”
-
Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(4))
“Upon patient record review 1 of 19 (Patient #5) did not have evidence in the patient record that the hospice aides report: Patient 5: On aide visits 5/16,5/19,5/22/25 The aide documented pt was combative and trying to bite and hit the aide. There is no evidence the aide updated the SN regarding this behavior after these visits.”
-
Authentication (42 CFR 418.104(b))
The inspectors’ words, 395 words
“Upon patient client record review, 10 of 19 (Patient #1,2,5,7,9,10,11,12,18,19) did not have evidence that all entries are legible, clear, complete, and appropriately authenticated and dated in accordance with the organizations policies and procedures and currently accepted standards of practice. Electronic signatures are acceptable as long the hospice is following appropriate safeguards to prevent unauthorized access to the patient records. Patient 1: The SN documented on 6/2/25 “AAOx3” Per agency approved abbreviations policy the correct abbreviation for this would be A&Ox3. Also documented was “BBS diminished”. This is not approved.5/19/25 the SN documented “VSS”. This is not an approved abbreviation. Patient 2: The SN documented on 5/30/25 “Prn senna and Miralax given” There is no evidence of what dose was given. On 5/28/25 the SN documented “Tylenol given during visit.” There is no evidence of dose was given. Patient 5: The SN documented on 1/29/25 “GH will transfer pt bed/chair.” GH is not an approved abbreviation. The SC documented on 5/19/25 “GHO”. This is not an approved abbreviation. On 5/8/25 the SN documented “dtr” this is not an approved abbreviation. Patient 7: The SN documented 5/7/25 “approp”, “skin CSI/pale”, “w”, “admin med”, “verb”, “Avail”. 5/21/25 SN documents “w”, “b/b”. These are not approved abbreviations. Patient 9: The SN documented on 5/21/25 “LS are CTA bilaterally” 5/28/25 The SN documented “lungs are CTA bilaterally. AP is regular.” These are not approved abbreviations. Patient 10: The MSW documented on 4/28/25 “GHO and GH” these are not approved abbreviations. The SN documented 5/13/25 “CTA bilaterally. AP regular” “CG”. These are not approved abbreviations. The SN documented on 5/2/25 “dtr” updated on visit. This is not an approved abbreviation. Patient 11: The SN documented “d/t” and “w/”, in the narrative on 5/30/25. This is not an approved abbreviation. On 5/27/25 the SN documented “BGL”. Patient 12: SN documents on 4/22, 4/29, 5/6/25 “wound care provided per orders” It is noted that wound to left hip is documented resolved 4/15/25. Patient 18: The SN documented on 5/30/24 “verb understanding”, “VSS”, “w”, “avail”. 6/3/25 The SN documented “liq”, “C2 for Oxy for today delivery” SN doc on 6/3/24 use of unofficial abbreviations including no interaction since Saturday…reviewed ‘gone from my sight’ booklet. Lungs CTA, skin CDI…currently NO MOTTLING OBSERVED….reviewed EOL. These are not approved abbreviations. Patient 19: The SN documented on 6/10/24 “AAOx1”, “BBS shallow”, “PCG”, these are not approved abbreviations.”
-
Discharge or transfer of care (42 CFR 418.104(e)(2))
“Upon client record review, 1 of 19 (Patient #15) did not have evidence that if a patient revokes the election of hospice care or is discharged from hospice in accordance with §418.26, the hospice must forward to the patient’s attending physician: Patient 15: Upon record review, did not have evidence of communication of the following information being sent to physician including a copy of the hospice discharge summary and clinical records.”
-
Discharge or transfer of care (42 CFR 418.104(e)(3))
The inspectors’ words, 179 words
“Upon client record review, 2 of 19 (Patient #15,16) did not have evidence that the discharge summary includes all required information. Patient 15: The discharge summary did not contain evidence that the following required information was provided to the emergency room when patient revoked hospice for more aggressive treatment: A summary of the patient’s stay, including treatments, symptoms and pain management, The patient’s current plan of care, The patient’s latest physician orders, Any other documentation that will assist in post-discharge continuity of care or that is requested by the attending physician or receiving facility. Patient 16:The discharge summary did not contain the following required information when patient moved out of the area: A summary of the patient’s stay, including treatments, symptoms and pain management, The patient’s current plan of care, The patient’s latest physician orders, Any other documentation that will assist in post-discharge continuity of care or that is requested by the attending physician or receiving facility. There is evidence that agency did have a PIP addressing the discharge process that was closed one day prior to this discharge.”
-
Hospice plan of care (42 CFR 418.112(d))
The inspectors’ words, 95 words
“Upon client record review, 1 of 19 (Patient #11) did not have evidence that a written hospice plan of care is established and maintained in consultation with SNF/NF or ICF/IID representatives. All hospice care provided is in accordance with this hospice plan of care. Patient 11: The volunteer documented bringing the patient burger, fries and a milkshake on 5/28/25, and a milkshake on 5/21/25. Delivering meals is not ordered on the Volunteer task sheet. Pt is a risk for aspiration with a thinned liquid order and this was not included on the volunteer task list.”
All 2 inspections in the last three years
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| Aug 4, 2025 | Follow-up inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care | No deficiencies cited |
| Jun 5, 2025 | Reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care | 20 deficiencies cited |
Is it certified?
- Medicare-certified hospice since Jun 21, 2019.
- Ownership: for-profit.
- Cited at For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual. in the last three years: it didn’t meet a whole condition of Medicare’s rules.
CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Has anything been proven against it?
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
- 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Who does the caring?
- From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 13.3 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 3.5% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 94.5% of patients who died.
- Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 29% at home, 63% in assisted living, 4% in a nursing facility, 2% in a skilled nursing facility, 2% elsewhere.
CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | This provider |
|---|---|
| Nurse care minutes per routine home care day | 13.3 min |
| Skilled nursing minutes at weekends | 3.5% |
| Visits near death | 94.5% of patients who died |
Who owns it?
- 9 owners or officers are people: Patrick Salvatore Sciara (managing employee (under contract), 51.5%); Patrick Salvatore Sciara (owns 5% or more directly, 51.5%); Vicente Figueroa-Diaz (managing employee (under contract), 41.5%); Vicente Figueroa-Diaz (owns 5% or more directly, 41.5%); Patrick Salvatore Sciara (runs it (operational or managerial control), 40%); Vicente Figueroa-Diaz (runs it (operational or managerial control), 35%); Gerges Makar (owns 5% or more directly, 5%); Cody Cowan (managing employee (under contract), 0%); Cody Cowan (corporate director).
- No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
- No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.
What do families say?
- Family caregivers rate it 4 of 5 in CMS’s survey (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 87% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 88% would definitely recommend it.
- CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 9 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
- 96.76% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 57.5% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | Rating |
|---|---|
| Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 5 | 4 of 5 |
| Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold | 9 of 10 |
How does it compare nearby?
- Of the 72 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 85027, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 4; this one had 20.
CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Place | Deficiencies, 3 years |
|---|---|
| Hospice of the West | 12 |
| Dignity Hospice | 15 |
| Desert Valley Hospice LLC This hospice | 20 |
| Stillwater Hospice | 4 |
| United Hospice & Palliative Care of Arizona | 4 |
| Bliss Hospice LLC | 0 |
| Passion Hospice | 2 |
| Golden Year Hospice Care Inc. | Not given |
| Agave Hospice and Palliative Care | Not given |
| Copper Sky Hospice LLC | 4 |
| Supportive Hands Hospice Inc. | 4 |
| Arizona Professional Hospice Care | 4 |
What the record doesn’t say
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
- Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
- CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
- Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.
Sources
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice General Information (yc9t-dgbk).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice Provider Data (252m-zfp9).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, CAHPS Hospice Survey (gxki-hrr8).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, QCOR hospice inspection reports (Hospice Survey Reports - Oct 2021 through Sep 2026.xlsx).
Released Oct 23, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice All Owners (e983965e-1603-4cb8-82b5-c40090e380d1).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice Enrollments (25704213-e833-4b8b-9dbc-58dd17149209).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice ZIP Data (95rg-2usp).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.
From the hospice
The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.