Hearth Record

Faith Hospice

A hospice in Phoenix, Arizona 85008

426 North 44th Street, Suite 405, Phoenix, Arizona 85008. (602) 476-2047.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 8 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jul 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

8 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 55 hospices serving ZIP code 85008 had 4.5.

The last inspection on record was on Jul 18, 2025: a reaccreditation inspection by The Joint Commission.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

8 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jul 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

8 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Jul 18, 2025: reaccreditation inspection by The Joint Commission8 deficiencies
  • Update of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(d))

    “Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 14 patient records reviewed, for active patients, it was noted by the nurse surveyor that for RRNHV#1 the RN did not visit the hospice patient no less than 15 days to conduct an assessment. The patient had a missed RN visit which resulted in 16 days between RN assessments. Finding was verified by the Director of Clinical Services.”

    Rule L0533. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 92 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 14 of 14 patient records reviewed, for all active records, the nurse surveyor noted that the goals were not measurable or individualized. For example, RRHV#2, “Patient will continue to maintain edema or show decreased edema in 2 weeks and while on hospice services.” There were no short-term goals at start of care to address issues of immediate needs such as understanding medication management, symptom management, pain management, or safety. Finding was verified with the Director of Clinical Services, the Regional Director of Operations, and the QAPI Director.”

    Rule L0545. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))

    The inspectors’ words, 380 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 5 of 14 patient records reviewed, for active patients it was noted by the nurse surveyor that orders were not clear or complete. For RRHV#1, RRHV#3, and RRNHV#6 the oxygen orders were for Oxygen 2 to 4 liters per minute binasal cannula as needed. Orders did not include parameters for titration or where the liter flow was to start. For RRNHV#1, the oxygen dosage orders were for 3.5 liters oxygen per minute continuously but it did not indicate the route, the instructions were 2-4 liters per minute via nasal canula continuously. Additionally, RRHV#3, the patient had two medications for pain (Acetaminophen and Hydrocodone APAP), but the orders did not indicate when to take which pain medication. RRNHV#1 the patient had four medications ordered for inhalation therapy, only two of the medication orders indicated that they were to be administered via the nebulizer. For RRNHV#4, the patient had two pain medications, Acetaminophen 325mg, 2 tabs every four hours for pain and Oxycodone HCl 5mg tab ordered both for pain with no indication of when to take which one. Findings were discussed with the Director of Clinical Services and the Regional Director of Operations. it was noted by the nurse surveyor that orders were not clear or complete. For RRHV#1, RRHV#3, and RRNHV#6 the oxygen orders were for Oxygen 2 to 4 liters per minute binasal cannula as needed. Orders did not include parameters for titration or where the liter flow was to start. For RRNHV#1, the oxygen dosage orders were for 3.5 liters oxygen per minute continuously but it did not indicate the route, the instructions were 2-4 liters per minute via nasal canula continuously. Additionally, RRHV#3, the patient had two medications for pain (Acetaminophen and Hydrocodone APAP), but the orders did not indicate when to take which pain medication. RRNHV#1 the patient had four medications ordered for inhalation therapy, only two of the medication orders indicated that they were to be administered via the nebulizer. For RRNHV#4, the patient had two pain medications, Acetaminophen 325mg, 2 tabs every four hours for pain and Oxycodone HCl 5mg tab ordered both for pain with no indication of when to take which one. Findings were discussed with the Director of Clinical Services and the Regional Director of Operations.”

    Rule L0549. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(5))

    “Observed in Patient Home. In 1 of 2 home visits conducted, for patients with oxygen, it was noted by the surveyor that needed equipment was not available. For RRHV#3, the patient had and oxygen concentrator and was on continuous oxygen but did not have a backup oxygen tank in her group home for emergency use. Finding was verified by the Director of Clinical Services who was present on the home visit. A back up oxygen tank was immediately ordered before we left the home.”

    Rule L0550. Standard-level.

  • Prevention (42 CFR 418.60(a))

    The inspectors’ words, 134 words

    “Observed in Patient Home. In 1 of 4 home visits conducted, it was noted by the nurse surveyor that the staff failed to follow acceptable practice and agency policy when performing patient care. During RRHV#4, the registered nurse, hand sanitized, then set up his barriers, nursing bag and equipment, then gloved without hand sanitizing. He doffed and donned gloves during the visit another time without hand sanitizing and went in and out of his bag several times with his dirty gloves on to get alcohol wipes to clean his equipment. The patient had an abscess on his rectum that was draining with visible soiled linens and pillows all around the patient’s bedroom. Findings were discussed with the nurse on site and then later with the Clinical Director who had been present on the visit.”

    Rule L0579. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 137 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 4 of 13 patient records reviewed, for patients with a hospice aide, it was noted by the nurse surveyor that the hospice aide care plan did not contain all the necessary or current information. The organization’s EMR used a “task list” to assign duties to the hospice to provide care to the patient. For RRHV#1, RRHV#3, and RRNHV#1 the patient had continuous oxygen yet the “task list” did not include any mention of the oxygen or what the aide should do with it during the patient’s shower. For RRNHV#4, the patient had a feeding tube and wounds with no instruction as to what the aide should do. Additionally, there were no instructions as to when the hospice aide should notify the nurse Findings were discussed with the Director of Clinical Services and”

    Rule L0625. Standard-level.

  • Supervision of hospice aides (42 CFR 418.76(h)(1)(i))

    “Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 13 patient records reviewed, for active patients, it was noted by the nurse surveyor that hospice aide supervisory visits were not documented no less frequently than every fourteen days. For RRHV#2, and RRHV#3, hospice aide supervisory visits have not been documented for the last three months. For RRNHV#1, hospice aide supervisory visits have not been documented since the patient’s admission almost two months ago. Findings were verified with the Director of Clinical Services.”

    Rule L0629. Standard-level.

  • Use and mintenance of equipment and supplies (42 CFR 418.106(f)(2))

    “Observed in Patient Home. In 1 of 2 home visits conducted, it was noted by the nurse surveyor that for RRHV#2 six backup E-tanks were stored in the patient’s unventilated closed closet in the hallway between the bedroom and the bathroom. Finding was verified by the Clinical Director present on the visit and the closet door was opened and instruction was provided to the caregivers/family.”

    Rule L0702. Standard-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Jul 18, 2025Reaccreditation inspection by The Joint Commission8 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Mar 24, 2010.
  • Ownership: for-profit.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 11.5 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 6.8% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 93.6% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 50% at home, 33% in assisted living, 1% in a nursing facility, 10% in a skilled nursing facility, 7% elsewhere.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day11.5 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends6.8%
Visits near death93.6% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • Faith Hospice of AZ, LLC owns 99.5% directly since Mar 15, 2017.
  • 5 owners or officers are people: April M Bolles (owns 5% or more through other companies, 74.62%); April M Bolles (managing employee (on the payroll), 74.62%); April M Bolles (runs it (operational or managerial control), 74.62%); Adam King (owns 5% or more through other companies, 24.88%); Heather King (owns 5% or more through other companies, 24.88%).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Faith Hospice of AZ, LLCOwns 5% or more directly99.5%Mar 15, 2017

What do families say?

  • Family caregivers rate it 4 of 5 in CMS’s survey (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 84% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 87% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 10 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 95% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 56.5% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 54 of 5
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold10 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 55 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 85008, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 4.5; this one had 8.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.