Hearth Record

Gentiva II

A hospice in Green Valley, Arizona 85622

275 W Continental Rd Ste 195, Green Valley, Arizona 85622. (520) 499-3072.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 20 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jun 2024. Most serious: Condition-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean4
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
Condition-level deficiency
For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual.

What did inspectors find?

20 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 22 hospices serving ZIP code 85622 had 4.5.

The last inspection on record was on Aug 5, 2024: a follow-up inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care.

1 deficiency at condition level, the more serious of CMS’s two levels

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

20 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jun 2024. Most serious: Condition-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

20 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Jun 13, 2024: reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care20 deficiencies
  • Phys, occupnl therapy & speech-lang pathology (42 CFR 418.72)

    “Upon observation, there was no evidence the hospice ensures that Speech-Language Pathology is provided to hospice patients and their families according to applicable laws and regulations. The agency had a national contract that stated SLP is able to be provided, however the agency confirmed that the local providing agency does not have any employed speech pathologists and they did not have a waiver or contract with another individual or agency.”

    Rule L0603. Condition-level.

  • EP Testing Requirements (42 CFR 418.113(d)(2))

    “Upon observation, there was no evidence the agency has conducted exercises to test the emergency plan every two years. There was no evidence the agency engaged in community-based exercise or recorded an actual event within the last two years.”

    Rule E0039. Standard-level.

  • Timeframe for completion of assessment (42 CFR 418.54(b))

    The inspectors’ words, 104 words

    “Upon patient record review 3 of 19 (Patients #8,#9,#14) did not have evidence in the patient record that the hospice interdisciplinary group, in consultation with the individual’s attending physician (if any), completed the comprehensive assessment no later than 5 calendar days after the election of hospice care. Patient 8: The medical record contained an initial comprehensive spiritual assessment completed 11/20/23 with a start of care 11/9/23. Patient 9: The medical record contained an initial comprehensive spiritual assessment completed 4/30/24 with a start of care 4/24/24. Patient 14: The medical record contained an initial comprehensive spiritual assessment completed 12/27/23 with a start of care 12/21/23.”

    Rule L0523. Standard-level.

  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(6))

    The inspectors’ words, 234 words

    “Upon patient record review, 6 of 19 (Patients #1,#3,#8,#11,#12,#14) did not have evidence in the patient record that a review was completed of all prescription and non-prescription medications. Patient 1: The medical record contained nursing documentation identifying oxygen in the home starting 4/23/24. There was no evidence of oxygen included on the medication profile. Patient 3: The hospice medication profile did not match facility’s medication list to included PRN orders for Tylenol, Pepto-Bismol, and Immodium. Patient 8: The medication profile contained ciclopirox and silicone topical creams with no area defined for administration, and fleet enema and Tussin DM with no time allowance determined between PRN doses. The topical creams and fleet enema were corrected on site. Patient 11: The medication profile contained azithromycin for 5 days ordered 4/18/24 and polytrim eye drops for 10 days ordered 4/25/24 still active on the profile. Corrected on site. Patient 12: The medical record contained nursing documentation identifying patient use of Tylenol and Salonpas patches for pain 4/24/24 and 6/10/24, and Miralax 6/10/24. There was no evidence of the Tylenol, Salonpas, and Miralax included on the medication profile. The profile also contained nystatin oral suspension for thrush 3/25/24 that was still active on the medication list. Corrected on site. Patient 14: The medical record contained nursing documentation upon admission and 5/6/24 identifying patient use of oxygen. There was no evidence of the oxygen listed on the medication profile.”

    Rule L0530. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 257 words

    “Upon patient record review, 4 of 19 (Patients #2,#4,#8,#9) did not have evidence in the patient record that the hospice has developed an individualized written plan of care for each patient. The plan of care must reflect patient/family goals and interventions based on the problems identified in the initial, comprehensive, and updated comprehensive assessments. The plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions. Patient 2: The medical record contained nursing documentation since admission identifying patient as a high risk for falls and a diagnosis of senile degeneration of the brain. There was no evidence of problems, goals, and interventions related to fall safety and neurological dysfunction included in the plan of care. Patient 4: The medical record contained nursing documentation since admission identifying patient as a high risk for falls, risk of skin impairment, and dyspnea with oxygen use. There was no evidence of problems, goals, and interventions related to fall safety, risk for skin impairment, and respiratory dysfunction included in the plan of care. Patient 8: The medical record contained nursing documentation since admission identifying patient as a high risk for falls. There was no evidence of problems, goals, and interventions related to fall safety included in the plan of care. Patient 9: The medical record contained nursing documentation since admission identifying patient as a high risk for falls and issues with dysphagia. There was no evidence of problems, goals, and interventions related to fall safety and dysphagia included in the plan of care.”

    Rule L0545. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))

    The inspectors’ words, 229 words

    “Upon patient record review, 5 of 19 (Patients #1,#7,#8,#12,#14) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including medications and treatments. Patient 1: The medical record contained nursing documentation 4/23/24 oxygen in home. There was no evidence of an order for oxygen dose, frequency, and delivery method. The medical record also contained an order for wound supplies 5/21/24. There was no evidence of an order for wound care. Patient 7: The medical record contained nursing documentation since admission identifying patient use of an indwelling catheter. There was no evidence of an order for catheter type, size, change frequency, and maintenance. Patient 8: The medical record contained orders for ciclopirox and silicone topical cream no area defined for administration, and orders for PRN fleet enema and Tussin DM with no time allowance determined between PRN dose administration. Topical creams and fleet enema were corrected on site. Patient 12: The medical record contained nursing documentation identifying patient use of Tylenol and Salonpas patches for pain 4/24/24 and 6/10/24, and Miralax 6/10/24. There was no evidence of orders for the Tylenol, Salonpas, and Miralax. Patient 14: The medical record contained nursing documentation upon admission and 5/6/24 identifying patient use of oxygen. There was no evidence of an order for oxygen dose, frequency, and delivery method.”

    Rule L0549. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(5))

    The inspectors’ words, 146 words

    “Upon patient record review, 3 of 19 (Patients #1,#4,#14) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including equipment and supply needs. Patient 1: The medical record contained nursing documentation since 4/23/24 identifying patient possession of an oxygen concentrator. There was no evidence of an order for the equipment included in the plan of care. Patient 4: The medical record contained nursing documentation since admission identifying patient use of a nebulizer, hospital bed, bedside table, wheelchair, and specialty mattress. There was no evidence of orders for the equipment included in the plan of care. Corrected on site. Patient 14: The medical record contained nursing documentation since admission identifying patient use of oxygen. There was no evidence of an order for the oxygen concentrator included in the plan of care.”

    Rule L0550. Standard-level.

  • Review of the plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(d))

    The inspectors’ words, 116 words

    “Upon patient record review, 2 of 19 (Patients #1,#11) did not have evidence that a revised plan of care includes information from the patient’s updated comprehensive assessment and must note the patient’s progress towards outcome/goals from the plan of care. Patient 1: The medical record contained nursing documentation 5/21/24 identifying patient developed a wound. There was no evidence the plan of care was updated to include problems, goals, and interventions related to skin breakdown. Patient 11: The medical record contained nursing documentation 5/13/24 identifying patient has history of falls, unsteady gait, and high risk for falls. There was no evidence the plan of care was updated to included problems, goals, and interventions related to fall safety.”

    Rule L0553. Standard-level.

  • Counseling services (42 CFR 418.64(d)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 205 words

    “Upon patient record review, 3 of 19 (Patients #15,#16,#17) did not have evidence the hospice offers bereavement counseling that includes: • Making bereavement services available to the family and other individuals in the bereavement plan of care up to 1 year following the death of the patient. Bereavement counseling also extends to residents of a SNF/NF or ICF/IID when appropriate and identified in the bereavement plan of care • Ensuring that bereavement services reflect the needs of the bereaved • Development of a bereavement plan of care that notes the kind of bereavement services to be offered and the frequency of service delivery Patient 15: There was no evidence the bereavement care plan tasks for sending sympathy card, letters at 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 9 months, memorial service invitation, support group invitation, and holiday letter were completed as assigned. Patient 16: There was no evidence the bereavement care plan tasks for sending memorial service invitation, support group invitation, and holiday letter were completed as assigned. Patient 17: There was no evidence the bereavement care plan tasks for sending sympathy card, letters at 3 months, 6 months, and 9 months, memorial service invitation, support group invitation, and holiday letter were completed as assigned.”

    Rule L0596. Standard-level.

  • In-service training (42 CFR 418.76(d))

    The inspectors’ words, 93 words

    “Upon personnel record review, 1 of 19 (Personnel #7) did not have evidence in the personnel file that the hospice aide had received at least l2 hours of in-service training during each 12-month period. In-service training may occur while an aide is furnishing care to a patient. Personnel 7: There was evidence of 9 hours of in-service training provided within the last 12 months. There was no evidence of training provided in October 2023, November 2023, and May 2024 and no evidence of additional training completed to make up for the missing months.”

    Rule L0620. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 104 words

    “Upon patient record review, 5 of 19 (Patients #3,#4,#8,#11,#14) did not have evidence in the patient record that hospice aide assignments and duties are specific to meet patient needs. Patient 3: The aide care plan did not contain instructions for transfer assistance needed. Patient 4: The aide care plan did not contain instructions for transfer and ambulation assistance needed. Patient 8: The aide care plan did not contain instructions for ambulation assistance needed. Corrected on site. Patient 11: The aide care plan did not contain instructions for ambulation assistance needed. Patient 14: The aide care plan did not contain instructions for ambulation assistance needed.”

    Rule L0625. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 188 words

    “Upon patient record review 5 of 19 (Patients #4,#7,#8,#9,#12) did not have evidence documentation in the patient record that a hospice aide provides services that are: • Ordered by the interdisciplinary group • Included in the plan of care • Permitted to be performed under state law by such hospice aide • Consistent with the hospice aide training Patient 4: The medical record contained an ordered aide frequency of twice weekly. There was no evidence of second visits completed the weeks of 5/12/24 and 5/19/24. Patient 7: The medical record contained an ordered aide frequency of twice weekly. There was no evidence of visits completed the week of 5/26/24. Patient 8: The medical record contained an ordered aide frequency of twice weekly. There was no evidence of a second visit completed the week of 5/26/24. Patient 9: The medical record contained an ordered aide frequency of twice weekly. There was no evidence of a second visit completed the week of 5/26/24. Patient 12: The medical record contained an ordered aide frequency of four times weekly. There was no evidence of a fourth visit completed the week of 5/19/24.”

    Rule L0626. Standard-level.

  • Training (42 CFR 418.100(g)(1))

    “Upon personnel record review, 2 of 15 (Personnel #14,#15) did not have evidence the hospice employees and contract employees have received orientation on the hospice philosophy. Personnel 14,15: There was no evidence of orientation on the hospice philosophy.”

    Rule L0661. Standard-level.

  • Training (42 CFR 418.100(g)(2))

    “Upon personnel record review, 1 of 15 (Personnel #6) did not have evidence that the hospice employees have received orientation on their specific job requirements. Personnel 6: There was no evidence of orientation to the employee’s job requirements.”

    Rule L0662. Standard-level.

  • Training (42 CFR 418.100(g)(3))

    “Upon personnel record review, 1 of 15 (Personnel #6) did not have evidence that a skills competency assessment, specific to each discipline had been conducted for all personnel including volunteers initially during orientation. Personnel 6: There was no evidence of an initial skills competency.”

    Rule L0663. Standard-level.

  • Content (42 CFR 418.104(a)(7))

    “Upon patient client record review, 2 of 19 (Patients #18,#19) did not evidence that each patient record contains physician orders. Patient 18: There was no evidence of an order to discharge due to transfer per agency policy. Patient 19: There was no evidence of an order to discharge due to extended prognosis.”

    Rule L0678. Standard-level.

  • Discharge or transfer of care (42 CFR 418.104(e))

    “Upon client record review, 1 of 19 (Patient #18) did not have evidence that the hospice forwarded a summary and a copy of the patient record, if requested, to a facility when transferring the patient to that facility. Patient 18: There was no evidence the agency forwarded a transfer summary to the receiving hospice agency.”

    Rule L0682. Standard-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.112(e)(3))

    “Upon patient record review, 2 of 19 (Patients #3,#4) did not have evidence that the hospice provided the following information: • Hospice election form • Physician certification and recertification of the terminal illness specific to each patient Patient 3: There was no evidence of a signed hospice election form at the facility. Patient 4: There was no evidence of a signed hospice election form and CTI at the facility.”

    Rule L0781. Standard-level.

  • Criminal background checks (42 CFR 418.114(d)(1))

    “Upon personnel record review, 2 of 15 (Personnel #14,#15) did not have evidence the hospice obtained a criminal background check on all contracted individuals who have direct patient care and access to patient records. Personnel 14,15: There was no evidence of a criminal background check.”

    Rule L0795. Standard-level.

  • Criminal background checks (42 CFR 418.114(d)(2))

    “Upon personnel record review, 1 of 15 (Personnel #5) did not have evidence of criminal background checks being obtained in accordance with state requirements. In the absence of state requirements, criminal background checks are obtained within three months of the date of employment for all states that the individual has lived or worked in the past 3 years. Personnel 5: There was no evidence of a criminal background check.”

    Rule L0796. Standard-level.

All 2 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Aug 5, 2024Follow-up inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health CareNo deficiencies cited
Jun 13, 2024Reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care20 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Jun 8, 1993.
  • Ownership: for-profit.
  • Cited at in the last three years: it didn’t meet a whole condition of Medicare’s rules.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 11.1 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 6.1% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 93.5% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 56% at home, 34% in assisted living, 3% in a nursing facility, 5% in a skilled nursing facility, 2% elsewhere.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day11.1 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends6.1%
Visits near death93.5% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • 7 owners or officers are people: Ronald C Lazas (corporate officer, 0%); David Robinson Arnold (corporate officer); Thomas Joseph Dolan (corporate officer, 0%); David Allen Causby (corporate officer, 0%); Frances Richardson (corporate officer); Frances Richardson (managing employee (on the payroll)); Janet L Combs (corporate officer, 0%).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Ch Services Midco Holdings Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Feb 5, 2015
Curo Health Services Holdings, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Jun 6, 2012
Charlotte Midco, LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Aug 11, 2022
Falcon Hospice, LPOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Aug 11, 2022
Charlotte Buyer, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Jul 11, 2018
Curo Health Services LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Jun 1, 2012
Kah Hospice Company, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Mar 1, 2022
Ch Services Group Holdings Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Feb 5, 2015
Ch Services Holdings Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Feb 5, 2015
Cd&r Falcon Holdings, LPOwns 5% or more through other companies60%Aug 11, 2022
Kentucky Homecare Parent Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies40%Aug 11, 2022
Humana Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies40%Aug 11, 2022
Centerwell Health Services Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies40%Dec 22, 2022

What do families say?

  • Family caregivers rate it 4 of 5 in CMS’s survey (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 80% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 85% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 10 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 95.1% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 60.3% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 54 of 5
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold10 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 22 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 85622, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 4.5; this one had 20.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.