Hearth Record

St Joseph Hospice of South Alabama LLC

A hospice in Mobile, Alabama 36607

23 Midtown Park W, Unit B, Mobile, Alabama 36607. (251) 675-7555.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 12 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jun 2026. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

12 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 12 hospices serving ZIP code 36607 had 5.

The last inspection on record was on Jun 5, 2026: a reaccreditation inspection by The Joint Commission.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

12 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jun 2026. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

12 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Jun 5, 2026: reaccreditation inspection by The Joint Commission12 deficiencies
  • Exercise of rights/respect for proprty/person (42 CFR 418.52(b)(1)(i))

    “Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 1 patient records reviewed, for discharge with extended prognosis, the organization failed to respect the patient’s rights to participate in decisions about their care, treatment, and services. On review of RRDC#1 who was discharged for extended prognosis there no documentation of a Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) signed prior to patient discharge. There was a signed Advance Beneficiary Notice (ABN) form but no NOMNC with the discharge date and required appeal information. This observation was reviewed with the DON and Executive Director.”

    Rule L0505. Standard-level.

  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(5))

    “Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 14 patient records reviewed, the organization failed to conduct a patient-specific comprehensive assessment and reassessment that identified the patient’s need for hospice care and services. On review of RRNHV#6 there was documentation on the initial comprehensive assessment that there was a skin tear identified with treatment however there was no wound assessment documented to note details of the wound such as size, character, drainage as required. This observation was reviewed with the Director of Nursing, Clinical Supervisor, and Executive Director.”

    Rule L0529. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 230 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 8 of 14 patient records reviewed, the organization failed to ensure the plan of care reflect patient and family goals based on problems identified in the initial, comprehensive and updated comprehensive assessment that were Specific, Measurable, and time-bound. On review of RRHV#1 there were goals established that were not specific and measurable such as Patient/caregiver will verbalize understanding of effects of urinary (date), and Patient/caregiver will verbalize/demonstrate understanding of managing cardiopulmonary symptoms within constraints of the disease by (date). In RRHV#2 an example of a non-specific, not measurable goal was Medications will be managed appropriately as evidenced by steady symptom control. In RRHV#3 a goal was Blood glucose level is obtained and any applicable action taken and in RRHV#4 a goal was Patient exhibits reduction/relief of any cardiopulmonary symptoms. In RRNHV#6 an example of a goal was Patient/caregiver will understand measures to cope with depression. Patient’s depression will be reduced AEB symptoms controlled by (date). Further examples of non specific, not measurable goals could be seen in RRNHV#9, and RRNHV#11. In RRNHV#12 an example of a goal that had a target/achieve by date that was not individualized to the goal was Patient/caregiver will verbalize/demonstrate how to use oxygen safely and effectively by (Mid August) yet the goal was established in May. These observations were reviewed with the Executive Director, Director of Nursing, and Clinical Supervisor.”

    Rule L0545. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(3))

    The inspectors’ words, 178 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 7 of 14 patient records reviewed, the organization failed to ensure the plan of care include all services needed for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions. On review of RRHV#1 there was documentation of issues with edema, shortness of breath, cough and diarrhea with multiple medication adjustments to address the issues however the issues were not addressed nor updated in the care plans to guide the care. In RRNHV#5, RRNHV#6, RRNHV#10, and RRNHV#12 there was documentation of the patient’s difficulty with swallowing and aspiration risk yet there was no care plan related to aspiration precautions to guide the care. In RRNHV#9 the documentation noted a focus of the patient was nerve pain yet the care plan for pain was not specific to the patient’s focus on nerve pain and did not address the issue. In RRNHV#13 there was documentation of weight loss and falls yet the issues were not addressed on the care plan. These observations were reviewed with the Executive Director, Director of Nursing and Clinical Supervisor.”

    Rule L0548. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))

    The inspectors’ words, 355 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 3 of 14 patient records reviewed, the organization failed to ensure the plan of care include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions. On review of RRNHV#5 there was an order for IV fluids that read Sodium Chloride 0.9% IV solution 1000ml weekly in the vein> The order was incomplete as there was no further instruction as to how to administer such as where and what type of line, who to administer, and over how much time. In RRNHV#6 there was documentation a skin tear but no orders for treatment noted on the record. In RRNHV#10 the documentation noted the patient was admitted with a foley catheter and the documentation showed the foley was changed in May yet there were no orders for the catheter or catheter changes on the record. These observations were reviewed with the Director of Nursing, and Executive Director. Observed in Record Review. In 13 of 14 patient records reviewed, the organization failed to ensure the plan of care include all services needed for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions. On review of RRHV#4 there were medications with range orders without detailed explanations for when to give what dose for what situation . Examples were: Morphine concentrate 100mg/5ml oral solution. give 0.5 - 1 ml hourly PRN for pain/dyspnea/restlessness, and Tramadol 50 mg tablet give 1 - 2 tab PO Q6H PRN. Further, there were 3 pain medications ordered as needed, Tramadol was noted for mild pain, Hydrocodone was for Moderate pain, and Morphine was noted simply As needed for Pain/Dyspnea/Restlessness without further instruction. Throughout all the records reviewed (except RRNHV#14 in a SNF) there were further examples of medications with ranges without instruction on when to give what dose as all patients had the same Morphine order (as above) from the comfort kit (or oxycodone range for RRNHV#12). Multiple pain medications without instructions for which medication to give for which situation could be seen in RRHV#2, RRHV#3, RRNHV#5, RRNHV#7, and RRNHV#11. These observations were reviewed with the Executive Director and Clinical Supervisor.”

    Rule L0549. Standard-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 112 words

    “Observed in Patient Home. In 1 of 14 patient records reviewed, The organization failed to provide care, treatment, or services according to the patient’s individualized plan of care. In RRNHV#5 the patient medication profile noted orders for IV fluids weekly, however there was no documentation noted in the record of the fluid being administered per the plan of care. Upon discussion with the Director of Nursing it was noted the fluid were never initiated yet there was no documentation in the record to explain why the fluids were not started nor was the medication profile updated to reflect the change. These observations were reviewed with the Director of Nursing and Executive Director.”

    Rule L0555. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 162 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 3 of 11 patient records reviewed, with aide services provided, the organization failed to ensure written patient care instructions for the hospice aide were prepared the Hospice Aide by the Registered Nurse. On review of RRHV#3 there was no instructions on the Aide plan of care for mobility. On home observation the patient was bed bound and unable to assist with bed mobility or transfers yet there was no indication if the patient was one or two person assist. Further, there was a hoyer lift noted in the home yet the lift was not list on the aide plan of care. In RRHV#1 the patient had a foley catheter, yet there were no instructions on how the aide was to handle the foley catheter wile providing perineal care. In RRNHV#9 the patient was anticoagulants yet the aide plan of care failed to address bleeding precautions. These observations were reviewed with the Executive Director and the Clinical Supervisor.”

    Rule L0625. Standard-level.

  • Training (42 CFR 418.100(g)(3))

    “Observed in HR File Review. In 1 of 10 HR files reviewed, The organization failed to assess and document the skills and competence of volunteers furnishing services as part of orientation. On review of HR#1 for the volunteer, there was no documentation of a competency assessment as part of the orientation. This observation was reviewed with the Volunteer Coordinator, Executive Director and Director of Nursing.”

    Rule L0663. Standard-level.

  • Content (42 CFR 418.104(a)(3))

    The inspectors’ words, 91 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 14 patient records reviewed, the organization failed to ensure the patient record contain information that reflected the patient’s care, treatment, and/or services. On review of RRNHV#9 the patient was admitted in the Skilled Nursing Facility (SNF) and then was transitioned to home, yet there was no documentation in the record besides a address change to note that the patient was no longer residing in the SNF and the details surrounding the transition. These observations were reviewed with the Director of Nursing, and Executive Director.”

    Rule L0674. Standard-level.

  • Content (42 CFR 418.104(a)(7))

    The inspectors’ words, 201 words

    “Observed in Patient Home. In 2 of 4 home visits conducted, the organization failed to ensure the patient record contain all information to reflect the patient’s care, treatment and services. On home observation for RRHV#1 during medication reconciliation there were multiple medications that were ordered per the plan of care yet the patient was no longer taking and not in the patient home. The patient was not taking Ativan, Morphine, Aleve, Ipratropium/Albuterol, and Omeprazole. Per the patient’s wife the patient had not taken the medications for quite some time which she described as up to a year. The medication profile ordered Mucinex 600mg extended release yet the medication in the home was 1200 mg/Dextromethorphan 60 mg. Further, In RRHV#4 home medication reconciliation, the hydrocodone/acetaminophen on the medication profile was 5mg/325mg yet in the home the bottle was for 7.5 mg (the bottle had been filled in March). Hydroxyzine HCL 25 mg tablet was ordered 1 tab PO Q6H PRN but the bottle in the home read Q4h PRN. For Vitamin B12 the order was for 1 tablet daily yet the caregiver confirmed she gave it 3 times a week. These observations were reviewed with the RN, Executive Director, and Clinical Supervisor.”

    Rule L0678. Standard-level.

  • Use and mintenance of equipment and supplies (42 CFR 418.106(f)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 116 words

    “Observed in Patient Home. In 1 of 2 home visits conducted, with oxygen in place, the organization failed to ensure the patient as well as family and/or other caregivers receive instruction in the safe use of oxygen and supplies. On home observation for RRHV#1 there was an unsecured e-tank standing upright in the room. The patient’s wife noted the tank along with a secured tank had been delivered for a storm in 2025 and had been stored since that time and had not ever been used. When inquired about the unsecured tank the wife stated she was not aware the upright tank was a hazard. This observation was reviewed with the Executive Director and Clinical Supervisor.”

    Rule L0702. Standard-level.

  • Criminal background checks (42 CFR 418.114(d)(1))

    “Observed in Competency Session. In 1 of 4 contracts reviewed, the organization failed to ensure the written agreement with an outside agency providing contracted services for the hospice included a stipulation that the outside agency will complete criminal background checks on contracted employees who provide direct patient care or have access to patient records. On review of the contract for Therapy services there was no documentation that the contract included a stipulation for background checks. This observation was reviewed with the Executive director and Director of Nursing.”

    Rule L0795. Standard-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Jun 5, 2026Reaccreditation inspection by The Joint Commission12 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Oct 31, 2014.
  • Ownership: for-profit.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 11.6 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 4.9% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 92.9% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 89% at home, 2% in assisted living, 8% in a nursing facility, 1% in a hospital.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day11.6 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends4.9%
Visits near death92.9% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • Pcm Hospice Enterprises LLC owns 98.93% directly since Nov 10, 2022.
  • 10 owners or officers are people: Patrick Thomas Mitchell (runs it (operational or managerial control), 100%); Kelly Mitchell (other role (CMS gives no detail), 25.3%); Emily Holleman (other role (CMS gives no detail), 25.3%); Catherine Ross Mitchell (other role (CMS gives no detail), 15.83%); Eleanor Holleman (other role (CMS gives no detail), 9.5%); John Holleman (other role (CMS gives no detail), 9.5%); Wilton Holleman (other role (CMS gives no detail), 9.5%); Mark S Crowson (owns 5% or more directly, 1.07%); Craig M Dowden (runs it (operational or managerial control)); Sophie Montgomery Plotniak (runs it (operational or managerial control)).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Pcm Hospice Enterprises LLCOwns 5% or more directly98.93%Nov 10, 2022
Ptm 2018 Family TrustOwns 5% or more through other companies97.94%Dec 31, 2022

What do families say?

  • Family caregivers rate it 4 of 5 in CMS’s survey (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 88% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 89% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 8 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 100% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 73.1% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 54 of 5
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold8 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 12 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 36607, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 5; this one had 12.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.