Hearth Record

Expect Care Hospice

A hospice in Hoover, Alabama 35255

501 Riverchase Parkway East, Suite 200, Hoover, Alabama 35255. (205) 444-0126.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 6 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Aug 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

6 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 2 hospices serving ZIP code 35255 had 4.5.

The last inspection on record was on Aug 2, 2024: a reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

6 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Aug 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

6 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Aug 2, 2024: reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care6 deficiencies
  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(6))

    The inspectors’ words, 310 words

    “Upon patient record review, 8 of 19 (Patient #3,5,6,8,11,12,13,14) did not have evidence in the patient record that a review was completed of all prescription and non-prescription medications, including herbal remedies that could affect drug therapy. This review includes, but is not limited to: • Effectiveness of drug therapy • Drug side effects • Actual or potential drug interactions • Duplicate drug therapy • Drug therapy currently associated with laboratory monitoring Patient 3: On patient’s medication profile: fentanyl patch 25mcg/hr transdermal patch. Instructions read to apply one patch transdermal every 72 hours; rotate sites. There is no evidence of instructions to remove old patch when placing a new one. Patient 5: On patient’s medication profile: 1: biofreeze menthol 4 percent topical gel. Apply to affected area(s) as needed for mild to moderate pain. There is no evidence of application site. 2: Diclofenac 1 percent topical gel. Apply 4 grams to affected area 4 times daily. There is no evidence of application site. Patient 6: On patient’s medication profile: 1: Benadryl 2 percent topical gel. Apply one inch to affected area twice daily as needed for rash. There is no evidence of application site. 2: Trulicity 1.5mg/0.5mL subcutaneous injector. Inject 0.5mL once a week on Wednesday. There is no evidence of instruction to rotate injection sites. Patient 8,11,12: On patient’s medication profile: Miralax 17 grams/dose powder. Give 17 grams by mouth daily. There is no evidence of reconstitution instructions. Patient 13: On patient’s medication profile: Nystatin 100,000 units/gram topical powder. Apply to affected area 4 times daily as needed. There is no evidence of application site. Patient 14: On patient’s medication profile: Scopolamine patch 1mg. apply one patch transdermal every 72 hours as needed for nausea/vomiting. There is no evidence of instructions to remove old patch when placing a new one. There is no evidence of instruction to rotate application sites.”

    Rule L0530. Standard-level.

  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(7))

    The inspectors’ words, 150 words

    “Upon patient record review, 4 of 19 (Patient #1,2,3,17) did not have evidence in the patient record that the comprehensive assessment includes a bereavement component which includes the needs of the patient’s family and other individuals focusing on the social, spiritual, and cultural factors that may impact their ability to cope with the patient’s death. Information gathered from the initial bereavement assessment is incorporated into the plan of care and is considered in the bereavement plan of care. Patient 1: Patient’s start of care date was 09/03/2023. There is no evidence of bereavement assessment until 12/01/2023. Patient 2: Patient’s start of care date was 01/31/2024. There is no evidence of bereavement assessment until 02/07/2024. Patient 3: Patient’s start of care date was 11/17/2023. There is no evidence of bereavement assessment until 11/28/2023. Patient 17: Patient’s start of care date was 11/17/2023. There is no evidence of bereavement assessment until 12/12/2023.”

    Rule L0531. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))

    The inspectors’ words, 276 words

    “Upon patient record review, 8 of 19 (Patient #3,5,6,8,11,12,13,14) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including medications and treatments. Patient 3: In patient’s plan of care: fentanyl patch 25mcg/hr transdermal patch. Instructions read to apply one patch transdermal every 72 hours; rotate sites. There is no evidence of instructions to remove old patch when placing a new one. Patient 5: In patient’s plan of care: 1: biofreeze menthol 4 percent topical gel. Apply to affected area(s) as needed for mild to moderate pain. There is no evidence of application site. 2: Diclofenac 1 percent topical gel. Apply 4 grams to affected area 4 times daily. There is no evidence of application site. Patient 6: In patient’s plan of care: 1: Benadryl 2 percent topical gel. Apply one inch to affected area twice daily as needed for rash. 2: Trulicity 1.5mg/0.5mL subcutaneous injector. Inject 0.5mL once a week on Wednesday. There is no evidence of instruction to rotate injection sites. Patient 8,11,12: In patient’s plan of care: Miralax 17 grams/dose powder. Give 17 grams by mouth daily. There is no evidence of reconstitution instructions. Patient 13: In patient’s plan of care: Nystatin 100,000 units/gram topical powder. Apply to affected area 4 times daily as needed. There is no evidence of application site. Patient 14: In patient’s plan of care: Scopolamine patch 1mg. apply one patch transdermal every 72 hours as needed for nausea/vomiting. There is no evidence of instructions to remove old patch when placing a new one. There is no evidence of instruction to rotate application sites.”

    Rule L0549. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(5))

    “Upon patient record review, 3 of 19 (Patient #12,13,14) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including equipment and supply needs. Patient 12, 13, 14: There is a physician’s order for oxygen. There is no evidence of oxygen in the DME plan of care.”

    Rule L0550. Standard-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 111 words

    “Upon client record review, 2 of 19 (Patient #5,14) did not have evidence that the IDG ensures that the care and services are provided in accordance with the plan of care. Patient 5: Ordered visit frequency for volunteer visits is twice monthly. There is evidence of volunteer visits made outside this frequency. Patient was seen by volunteer once in June 2024. Visit dates in July 2024 were 7/2, 7/8, 7/19, 7/26. Patient 14: Ordered visit frequency for volunteer visits is monthly. There is evidence of volunteer visits made outside this frequency. Patient was seen by volunteer twice in May 2024 and twice in July 2024. Visit dates: 5/28, 5/29, 7/30, 7/31.”

    Rule L0555. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 427 words

    “Upon patient record review, 9 of 19 (Patient #1,2,3,4,5,6,7,12,14) did not have evidence in the patient record that hospice aide assignments and duties are: • Assigned to a specific patient by a registered nurse that is a member of the interdisciplinary group • Written patient care instructions for a hospice aide must be prepared by a Registered Nurse who is responsible for the supervision of a hospice aide as specified under paragraph (h) of 418.76 • There is evidence in the patient record that the plan of care; indicate what tasks are to be done by the Aide and the frequency of these tasks. The use of “PRN” or “per patient choice”, for any task, whether personal care or non-personal care tasks, are not acceptable Patient 1: There is no evidence of oxygen, fall precautions on the aide care plan, despite both being on the plan of care. Patient 2: There is no evidence of wound precautions on the aide care plan, despite being on the plan of care. Shaving is an assigned task on the aide care plan. Frequency states every visit per caregiver request. There is no evidence of a statement that the caregiver has cognitive ability to make this choice. Patient 3: There is no evidence of fall, oxygen, aspiration precautions on the aide care plan, despite being on the plan of care. Patient 4: Assigned tasks on the aide care plan: transfer bed/chair, change linen, assist to bedside commode. Frequency states every visit per patient request. There is no evidence of a statement that the patient has cognitive ability to make this choice. Patient 5: There is no evidence of aspiration precautions on the aide care plan, despite being on the plan of care. Nail care, shampoo are assigned tasks on the aide care plan. Frequency states every visit per patient/caregiver request. There is no evidence of a statement that the patient/caregiver has cognitive ability to make this choice. Patient 6: There is no evidence of fall, aspiration, wound precautions on the aide care plan, despite being on the plan of care. Patient 7: Change linen, bed bath are assigned tasks on the aide care plan. Frequency states every visit per caregiver request. There is no evidence of a statement that the caregiver has cognitive ability to make this choice. Patient 12: There is no evidence of fall precautions on the aide care plan, despite being on the plan of care. Patient 14: There is no evidence of fall, aspiration precautions on the aide care plan, despite being on the plan of care.”

    Rule L0625. Standard-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Aug 2, 2024Reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care6 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Nov 2, 2005.
  • Ownership: for-profit.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 11 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 6% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 96.6% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 66% at home, 4% in assisted living, 29% in a nursing facility, 1% in a skilled nursing facility.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day11.0 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends6%
Visits near death96.6% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • 3 owners or officers are people: Michael Osborn (owns 5% or more directly, 100%); William E Kirby (managing employee (under contract), 1%); Michael Osborn (runs it (operational or managerial control)).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What do families say?

  • Family caregivers rate it 4 of 5 in CMS’s survey (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 89% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 91% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 10 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 92.62% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 64% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 54 of 5
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold10 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 2 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 35255, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 4.5; this one had 6.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

The 2 hospices CMS lists serving ZIP code 35255
PlaceDeficiencies, 3 years
Expect Care Hospice This hospice6
Amedisys Hospice of Birmingham3

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.