Hearth Record

Southerncare New Beacon - Jasper

A hospice in Northport, Alabama 35473

3835 Watermelon Road, Ste’s B&c, Northport, Alabama 35473. (205) 387-9339.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 13 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Nov 2023. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

13 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 13 hospices serving ZIP code 35473 had 7.

The last inspection on record was on Nov 17, 2023: a reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

13 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Nov 2023. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

13 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Nov 17, 2023: reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care13 deficiencies
  • Timeframe for completion of assessment (42 CFR 418.54(b))

    “Upon patient record review 2 of 19 (Patient #3, #12) did not have evidence in the patient record that the hospice interdisciplinary group, in consultation with the individual’s attending physician (if any), completed the comprehensive assessment no later than 5 calendar days after the election of hospice care. Patient #3-The patient was admitted on 09/23/23 and a spiritual assessment was not performed until 11/12/23. Patient #12-The patient was admitted 08/01/23 and a spiritual assessment was not performed until 11/03/23”

    Rule L0523. Standard-level.

  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(6))

    The inspectors’ words, 222 words

    “Upon patient record review, 4 of 19 (Patient #1, #2, #5, #9) did not have evidence in the patient record that a review was completed of all prescription and non-prescription medications, including herbal remedies that could affect drug therapy. Patient #1-On 10/17/23 a comfort call was placed to the patient and the writer documents the patient states Ativan is helping with sleep. Ativan is not listed on the medication profile. On 10/26/23 the nurse documents in IDG the patient had recently been treated with an antibiotic for cellulitis. An antibiotic is not listed as an active or discontinued medication on the medication profile. (corrected on site) Patient #2- On 11/08/23 the nurse documents the patient has prn Oxygen orders for dyspnea. Oxygen is not listed on the medication profile. (corrected on site) Patient #5-The medication profile includes the following medications ordered as needed for pain without differentiation/parameters for administration: Alleve 220 mg 1 -2 capsules q4h prn pain; Hydrocodone 5 mg-Acetaminophen 325 mg tab 1 tab q6h prn pain; Morphine 20 mg/ml .25-.5 ml po q4h prn pain and Tylenol Extra Strength 500 mg 1 tab q6h prn pain. (corrected on site) Patient #9-The medication profile includes Mecobalamin (vitamin B12) 10,000mcg solution, 1000mcg subQ monthly. Upon interview this is an error as the patient is not on this medication. (corrected on site)”

    Rule L0530. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 180 words

    “Upon patient record review, 2 of 19 (Patient #1, #3) did not have evidence in the patient record that the hospice has developed an individualized written plan of care for each patient. The plan of care must reflect patient/family goals and interventions based on the problems identified in the initial, comprehensive, and updated comprehensive assessments. The plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions. Patient #1- On 09/28/23 the nurse documents the patient has sacral redness. On 10/23/23 the nurse documents the patient has a rash groin and on 11/06/23 documentation includes cellulitis to the right arm. The plan of care does not include goals/interventions for altered skin integrity. (corrected on site) Patient #3-The 09/23/23 plan of care includes goals and interventions which are not applicable to the patient regarding ventilator management and actions to take in a hemorrhagic event. The patient is not on a ventilator. The record does not include medications or assessments to indicate patient is at risk for a hemorrhagic event. (corrected on site)”

    Rule L0545. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))

    The inspectors’ words, 329 words

    “Upon patient record review, 7 of 19 (Patient #1, #2, #3, #5, #6, #9, #11) did not have evidence the plan of care includes all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including specific orders for all medications and treatments. Patient #1-On 10/17/23 a comfort call was placed to the patient and the writer documents the patient states Ativan is helping with sleep. Ativan is not listed on the plan of care. On 10/26/23 the nurse documents in IDG the patient had recently been treated with an antibiotic for cellulitis. The plan of care does not include orders for an antibiotic. (corrected on site) Patient #2- On 11/08/23 the nurse documents the patient has prn Oxygen orders for dyspnea. Oxygen is not ordered on the plan of care. (corrected on site) Patient #3-Orders received 09/25/23 to update the plan of care read: Cleanse wound with VASHE, Pat dry with 4x4. Apply Xeroform and wrap with gauze. Change daily. The orders do not include the wound location(s). (corrected on site) Patient #5-The 11/07/23 plan of care includes the following medications ordered as needed for pain without differentiation/parameters for administration: Alleve 220 mg 1 -2 capsules q4h prn pain; Hydrocodone 5 mg-Acetaminophen 325 mg tab 1 tab q6h prn pain; Morphine 20 mg/ml .25-.5 ml po q4h prn pain and Tylenol Extra Strength 500 mg 1 tab q6h prn pain. (corrected on site) Patient #6-The plan of care includes orders for the Hospice nurse or Facility nurse to perform pulse oximetry prn dyspnea. The patient does not reside in a facility. (corrected on site) Patient #9-The 09/17/23 plan of care includes Mecobalamin (vitamin B12) 10,000mcg solution, 1000mcg subQ monthly. Upon interview this is an error as patient was not on the injection at the time of admission. (corrected on site) Patient #11-The patient was admitted 08/17/23 with a cast to the left arm. The plan of care does not address management of the cast.”

    Rule L0549. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(5))

    The inspectors’ words, 103 words

    “Upon patient record review, 2 of 19 (Patient #2, #7) did not have evidence the plan of care includes all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including equipment and supply needs. Patient #2-The 11/09/23 IDG indicates the patient has a 02 concentrator and hospital bed. The plan of care does not include a hospital bed or Oxygen as part of the equipment. (corrected on site) Patient #7-The 10/03/23 IDG indicates the patient has a 02 concentrator, hospital bed, CPAP machine, and overbed table. The plan of care does not include the equipment. (corrected on site)”

    Rule L0550. Standard-level.

  • Review of the plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(d))

    The inspectors’ words, 191 words

    “Upon patient record review, 3 of 19 (Patient #2, #3, #6) did not have evidence that a revised plan of care includes information from the patient’s updated comprehensive assessment and must note the patient’s progress towards outcome/goals from the plan of care. Patient #2-The revised plan of care/IDG documentation 09/28/23, 10/11/23, and 10/25/23 do not address the nursing progress towards outcome/goals from the plan of care. Each of the updates from the nurse only documents no significant change in the past 2 weeks. Patient #3- The Social worker visited the patient and developed a plan of care on 09/27/23. On 10/04/23 the revised plan of care/IDG documentation states the social worker has not seen the patient yet. The 10/18/23 IDG documentation only states the patient was not seen in the past 2 weeks. The initial assessment findings and goals/expected outcomes were not documented. Patient #6-The Chaplain visited the patient and developed a plan of care on 08/14/23 to visit the patient 1m1 2m2. The 08/23/23 revised plan of care/IDG documentation did not document the Chaplain findings from the initial comprehensive assessment. The Chaplain documented the patient declined in the IDG notes.”

    Rule L0553. Standard-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 157 words

    “Upon patient record review, 4 of 19 (Patient #1, #7, #8, #9) did not have evidence that the IDG ensures that the care and services are provided in accordance with the plan of care. Patient #1-On 09/28/23 the nurse documents the patient has redness on the sacrum and Mepilex was applied. There are no orders on record for Mepilex. Patient #7-On 09/21/23 orders were received for the patient to receive Oxygen at 3 liters per minute continuously. The record also includes orders for the nurse to assess the appropriateness of the patients Oxygen. On 10/25/23 and 11/01/23 the nurse documented the patient is utilizing Oxygen at 4 lpm. Patient #8-On 08/23/23 the social worker was ordered to visit 1q2m2 (once every 2 months). The Social Worker visited monthly on 08/25, 09/11 and 10/06/23. Patient #9-On 09/17/23 the social worker is ordered to visit 1q2m2 (once every 2 months). The Social Worker visited monthly on 09/19 and 10/11/23”

    Rule L0555. Standard-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(3))

    The inspectors’ words, 196 words

    “Upon patient record review 2 of 19 (Patient #1 and #6) did not have evidence that the IDG ensures that the care and services provided are based on all assessments of the patient and family needs. Patient #1-The patient’s history and physical, plan of care dated 08/21/23 and medication profile document the patient is allergic to Acetaminophen/Hydrocodone(Norco) and Tramadol. The medications result in itching. On 09/09/23 the patient was ordered Tramadol for pain. On 10/11/23 the patient was ordered Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen for pain. There is no documentation to indicate when the nurse reported the patients pain and received the medication orders that Allergies were identified and the physician was made aware that the patient had allergies to the prescribed medications. (late entry clarification/correction on site) Patient #6-The patients plan of care 08/10/23 and medication profile document the patient is allergic to Morphine which causes hallucinations. On 08/22/23 the nurse documented the patient has a hard area to the left side of the neck. The finding was reported to the physician and Morphine was prescribed. There is no documentation to indicate the nurse identified or discussed the the patients Allergy with the physician. (late entry clarification/correction on site)”

    Rule L0556. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 132 words

    “Upon patient record review, 3 of 19 (Patient #1, #3, #10) did not have evidence in the patient record that hospice aide assignments and duties are: • Complete written patient care instructions prepared by a Registered Nurse who is responsible for the supervision of a hospice aide as specified under paragraph (h) of 418.76. Patient #1-The Aide care plan does not include Aspiration Precautions which were applicable to the patients plan of care. (corrected on site) Patient #3-The Aide care plan does not include Fall Precautions which were applicable to the patients plan of care. (corrected on site) Patient #10-The Aide care plan does not include aspirations precautions, fall precautions, skin breakdown precautions, R BKA or sacral wound dressing to be left in place which are applicable to the plan of care.”

    Rule L0625. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 144 words

    “Upon patient record review, 2 of 19 (Patient #2, #7) did not evidence documentation in the patient record that a hospice aide provides services that are: • Ordered by the interdisciplinary group and included in the plan of care. Patient #2- On 09/17/23 the Aide was ordered to visit twice weekly. Visits were performed five times weekly between 09/18/23-09/22/23 and 09/24/23-09/29/23. The Aide is assigned to perform a shave and shampoo weekly. The Aide documented performing a shave and shampoo on all visits between 09/17/23 and 09/29/23. Patient #7-The Aide is ordered to visit the patient twice weekly. The week of 10/15/23-10/21/23 the Aide visited once on 10/18. On 10/19 a missed visit is documented as “could not find home”. There is no documentation the Aide coordinated with the other team members to re-attempt a visit during the week. (late entry correction on site)”

    Rule L0626. Standard-level.

  • Content (42 CFR 418.104(a)(7))

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 19 (Patient #15) did not evidence that each patient record contains all required physician orders. Patient #15-The patient was discharged 08/16/23 due to no longer being terminally ill. An order is not on record from the Medical Director to discharge the patient.”

    Rule L0678. Standard-level.

  • Authentication (42 CFR 418.104(b))

    The inspectors’ words, 116 words

    “Upon patient record review, 3 of 19 (Patient #1, #2, #4) did not have evidence that all entries are clear, accurate and complete. Patient #1- On 10/25/23 the Social Worker documented the patient has DNR and FA. FA is not an agency approved abbreviation. Patient #2- The MD narrative on the 09/16/23 CTI documents patient on service because of a “pad a sailor” (unclear) carcinoma has mets to the lungs. (corrected on site) Patient #4- On 08/11/23 the nurse documents the patient takes Lasix and HCTZ for edema. HCTZ is not included in the plan of care. Upon interview, HCTZ was a documentation error as the patient was never prescribed HCTZ. (late entry clarification/correction on site)”

    Rule L0679. Standard-level.

  • Discharge or transfer of care (42 CFR 418.104(e)(3))

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 19 (Patient #15) did not have evidence that the discharge summary includes all required information. Patient #15-The patient was discharged 08/16/23. The Discharge summary indicates the patient was discharged as the patients clinical condition has plateaued per IDG review. The patient is independent in the home. The discharge summary does not include a summary of the patient’s stay, including treatments, symptoms and pain management”

    Rule L0684. Standard-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Nov 17, 2023Reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care13 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Nov 19, 1986.
  • Ownership: for-profit.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 11 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 6.5% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 94.6% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 64% at home, 3% in assisted living, 22% in a nursing facility, 11% in a skilled nursing facility, 1% in a hospital.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day11.0 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends6.5%
Visits near death94.6% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • Regency Healthcare Group LLC owns 100% directly since Jul 1, 2006.
  • 10 owners or officers are people: Jordan Marie Fanelli (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); Ronald C Lazas (corporate officer, 0%); David Robinson Arnold (corporate officer, 0%); David Robinson Arnold (runs it (operational or managerial control), 0%); Jennifer Elizabeth Tyler (corporate officer); Thomas Joseph Dolan (corporate officer, 0%); Michael A Rosemore (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); David Allen Causby (corporate officer, 0%); Amy Ray (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); Jamie Sanford (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Ch Services Midco Holdings Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Feb 5, 2015
Curo Health Services Holdings, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Nov 9, 2011
Charlotte Midco, LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Aug 11, 2022
Falcon Hospice, LPOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Aug 11, 2022
Regency Healthcare Holdings LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Jun 6, 2014
Charlotte Buyer, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Jul 11, 2018
Curo Health Services LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Jun 1, 2012
Kah Hospice Company, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Mar 1, 2022
Regency Healthcare Group LLCOwns 5% or more directly100%Jul 1, 2006
Ch Services Group Holdings Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Feb 5, 2015
Ch Services Holdings Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Feb 5, 2015
Cd&r Falcon Holdings, LPOwns 5% or more through other companies60%Aug 11, 2022
Kentucky Homecare Parent Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies40%Aug 11, 2022
Kentucky Homecare Holdings, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies40%Aug 11, 2022
Humana Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies40%Aug 11, 2022
Centerwell Health Services Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies40%Dec 22, 2022

What do families say?

  • Family caregivers rate it 4 of 5 in CMS’s survey (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 87% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 89% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 9 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 99.34% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 68.8% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 54 of 5
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold9 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 13 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 35473, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 7; this one had 13.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.