Hearth Record

Hospice Family Care

A hospice in Huntsville, Alabama 35803

10000 Serenity Lane Southeast, Huntsville, Alabama 35803. (256) 650-1212.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 5 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Oct 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

5 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 14 hospices serving ZIP code 35803 had 4.

The last inspection on record was on Nov 25, 2025: a recertification inspection by the state.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

5 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Oct 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

5 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Oct 9, 2025: recertification inspection by the state5 deficiencies
  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(7))

    The inspectors’ words, 238 words

    “Based on review of medical records (MR), agency policy and procedure, and interview it was determined the agency failed to ensure an Initial Bereavement Risk Assessment was completed for each patient and family. This affected eight of 26 MRs reviewed, including Home Visit (HV) # 5, MR # 5, MR # 6 MR # 8, MR # 11, MR # 19, HV # 1, HV # 6, and had the potential to negatively affect all patients and families served by the hospice agency.Findings include:Agency Policy: Initial Bereavement AssessmentPolicy Number: 9012Date Revised: 10/31/21Purpose:To provide guidelines for the assessment and reassessment of the bereavement needs of families or caregivers.Policy:...Information obtained from the initial bereavement assessment shall be incorporated into the plan of care and in the bereavement plan of care.Procedure:On admission, the hospice social worker or spiritual counselor shall complete a Bereavement Risk Assessment. Review of the initial assessments completed by the social worker and the chaplain revealed no documentation of an initial bereavement risk assessments for HV # 5, MR # 5, MR # 6 MR # 8, MR # 11, MR # 19, HV # 1, HV # 6, per the agency’s policy.An interview was conducted on 10/9/25 at 5:30 PM with Employee Identifier # 1, Director of Operations, who confirmed there was no documentation the initial bereavement risk assessment was obtained and incorporated into the bereavement plan of care for patients and families per the agency’s policy.”

    Rule L0531. Standard-level.

  • Plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(b))

    The inspectors’ words, 361 words

    “Based on review of medical records (MR), agency policy and procedure, and staff interviews, it was determined the agency failed to ensure staff obtained a return demonstration from the patient/caregiver (pt/cg) for wound care and blood glucose monitoring, per the physician’s order.This affected MR # 16 in one of one MRs reviewed with orders for pt/cg education and return demonstration for wound care and obtaining the blood glucose level.Findings include: Agency Policy: Patient Education ProcessPolicy Number:9201Date Revised: 10/31/21Policy:The assessed needs of pt, family, cg will determine the scope of teaching and the medical plan of care.Procedure:...Unless specifically ordered by a physician, the pt, family, or cg shall receive verbal, and when appropriate written instructions, when indicated in:...Prescribed treatments, ...Safe and effective use of equipment and supplies......Documentation of pt, family, cg education shall consist of:Describing patient teaching...describing patient’s response to teaching...The hospice shall assess the pt, family, cg’s knowledge, skills, and behaviors during the home visit....provide re-education as needed. 1. MR # 16 was admitted to the agency on 6/26/25 with a primary diagnosis of Sarcopenia.Review of the Physician’s Orders/Plan of Care dated 6/26/25 to 9/23/25 revealed the following orders:Skilled Nurse (SN) to teach pathophysiology, care, and treatment of stage two sacral pressure ulcer dated 6/26/25. Wound care to be provided to stage two sacral pressure ulcer as follows: cleanse site with wound cleanser, gently pat dry with gauze. Cover wound with adhesive bordered foam dressing. Dressing to be changed every seven days or as needed if soiled/dislodged. SN to perform wound care during visits, family to provide at all other times after adequate education and return demonstration.SN order dated 6/26/25-Fingerstick blood sugar (FSBS) checks as needed for signs/symptoms of hyperglycemia or hypoglycemia. To be performed by SN or pt/cg after adequate return demonstration.Review of the SN Initial Visit Note dated 6/26/25 and SN Routine Visit Note dated 7/2/25 revealed no documentation of a return demonstration from the pt/cg for wound care or FSBS monitoring.An interview was conducted on 10/9/25 at 4:36 PM with EI # 1, Director of Operations, who confirmed staff failed to ensure a return demonstration was obtained for wound care and blood glucose monitoring, per the physician’s order.”

    Rule L0544. Standard-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 544 words

    “Based on review of medical records (MR) and staff interviews, it was determined the agency failed to ensure staff provided wound care per the physician’s orders.This affected three of eight MRs reviewed with wound care ordered, including MR # 20, MR # 16, and Home Visit (HV) # 6, and had the potential to negatively affect all patients served by the agency. Findings include: 3. HV # 6 was admitted to hospice services on 7/8/25 with a primary diagnosis of Senile Degeneration of Brain, Not Elsewhere Classified.Review of Supplemental Orders dated 7/29/25 revealed care and treatment orders for a third degree burn to the left lateral ankle as follows:Cleanse site with wound cleanser, gently pat dry with gauze. Apply Hydrofiber Ag (Aguacel Ag) to wound bed to decrease microbial load, assist with debridement, promote healing and assist with excessive draining. Cover with bordered foam dressing. Dressing to be changed every other day or prn (as needed) if soiled/dislodged. SN to perform wound care during visits, family to provide at all other times after adequate education and return demonstration.Review of 14 routine SN visit notes from 7/31/25 to 9/18 25 revealed the SN documented the following:Dressing Changed this Visit: “Yes, per orders, see Care Plan.” There was no documentation of the treatment performed. An interview was conducted on 10/9/25 at 5:00 PM with EI # 1 who confirmed the SN failed to document the wound care provided per hospice policy and procedure. 2. MR # 16 was admitted to the agency on 6/26/25 with a primary diagnosis of Sarcopenia.Review of the Physician’s Orders/Plan of Care from 6/26/25 to 9/23/25 revealed orders for Wound Care to be provided by the Skilled Nurse (SN) to Stage 2 sacral pressure ulcer as follows:Cleanse site with wound cleanser, gently pat dry with gauze. Cover wound with adhesive bordered foam dressing. Dressing to be changed every seven days or as needed if soiled or dislodged. SN to perform wound care during visits, family to provide at all other times after adequate education and return demonstration.Review of the SN Visit Note (VN) dated 6/26/25 revealed the SN failed to document the wound care provided.Review of the SN VN dated 6/27/25 revealed the SN documented the dressing was not changed.An interview was conducted on 10/9/25 at 4:36 PM with EI # 1, who confirmed staff failed to perform wound care per the physician’s order. 1. MR # 20 was admitted to the hospice on 9/24/25 with a primary diagnosis of Sarcopenia.Review of the physician’s wound care orders dated 9/24/25 revealed for the Skilled Nurse (SN) to provide wound care as follows to the Stage II Pressure Ulcer to right hip, Skin Tear to right shin, Trauma wound to right leg, Skin Tear to right lower leg:Remove old dressing. Cleanse site with soap and water, pat dry with gauze, apply bordered gauze, or adhesive dressing. Dressing to be changed every five days and when soiled or dislodged.Review of the On call/ Unscheduled visit notes dated 9/29/25 and 9/30/25 revealed no documentation the SN provided wound care every five days per the physician’s orders.An interview was conducted on 10/9/25 at 5:31 PM with Employee Identifier (EI) # 1, Director of Operations, who confirmed the SN failed to provide wound care per the physician’s orders.”

    Rule L0555. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(4))

    The inspectors’ words, 861 words

    “Based on review of medical records (MR), hospice policy, and staff interviews it was determined the agency failed to ensure the hospice aide (HA) notified the Registered Nurse (RN) with changes in the patient’s condition or need for changes in the Plan of Care (POC). This deficiency was identified on the prior recertification survey dated 2/2/23.This affected three of 21 MRs reviewed with aide services ordered, including MR # 8, MR # 12, and MR # 14, and had the potential to negatively affect all patients served by the agency.Findings include:Hospice Policy: Hospice Aide ServicesPolicy Number: 9107Revised: 10/31/21Purpose: To specify the role of the Hospice Aide. Policy: Hospice Aide services shall include personal care and non-skilled services provided by the trained Hospice Aides. …The core skills include: Monitoring pain and symptom management and reporting to the RN…Routine care shall include Hospice Aide services for personal care as needed. Hospice Aide shall provide services such as giving a bath… 3. MR # 14 was admitted to the in patient hospice on 10/3/25 with primary diagnosis of Second Malignant Neoplasm of Unspecified site. Review of the Hospice POC with start of care date 10/3/25 revealed orders for Aide frequency visits for one visit times one week.Review of the Change Aide Care Plan Order dated 10/7/25 revealed orders for Aide to perform a bed bath every other day and prn (as needed).Review of six Aide Regular Visits dated 10/3/25 to 10/8/25 revealed no bed bath was performed and no documentation the RN was notified. An interview was conducted on 10/9/25 at 4:40 PM with EI # 1, who confirmed the HA failed to notify the RN the interventions were not completed which required a change to the patient’s POC. 1. MR # 8 was admitted to the agency on 9/5/25 with a primary diagnosis of Cerebrovascular Disease.Review of the Hospice POC for Certification Period 8/31/25 to 10/29/25 revealed orders for HA visits once weekly for one week, then twice weekly for four weeks.Review of the Team Care Plans dated 9/3/25, 9/16/25, and 9/30/25 revealed HA Interventions as follows:Incontinence/diapers, Complete bed bath, hair care, notify RN if no bowel movement (BM) in 3 days or hasn’t voided in 12 hours, oral hygiene/mouth swab every visit and shave patient and change bedding per caregiver request.Review of the Visit Record (VR) dated 9/3/25 revealed the HA documented the complete bed bath, shaving, bedding change, and oral hygiene were not completed.Review of the VR dated 9/8/25 revealed the HA documented the complete bed bath, shaving, assist with dressing, and bedding change were not completed.Review of the VR dated 9/10/25 revealed the HA documented the complete bed bath, shaving, and bedding change were not completed.Review of the VR dated 9/15/25 revealed the HA documented the complete bed bath, notify RN if no BM in 3 days or hasn’t voided in 12 hours, and bedding change were not completed.Review of the VR dated 9/17/25 revealed the HA documented the complete bed bath, shaving, and bedding change were not completed.Review of the VR dated 9/24/25 revealed the HA documented the incontinence/diapers and shaving were not complete.Review of the VR dated 9/29/25 revealed the HA documented the complete bed bath, shaving, assist with dressing, and bedding change were not completed.There was no documentation the HA notified the RN the interventions were not completed, which required a change to the POC.An interview was conducted on 10/9/25 at 4:34 PM with Employee Identifier (EI) # 1, Director of Operations, who confirmed the HA failed to notify the RN the interventions were not completed, which required a change in the patient’s POC.2. MR # 12 was admitted to the agency on 9/7/25 with a primary diagnosis of Malignant Neoplasm of Unspecified Ovary.Review of the Hospice POC for Certification Period 9/7/25 to 12/5/25 revealed orders for HA visits once weekly for one week, then twice weekly for nine weeks.Review of the Team Care Plans dated 9/16/25, 9/30/25, and 10/7/25 revealed the following HA Interventions were added to the Care Plan on 9/2/25:Shower, Assist with dressing, Notify RN if no BM for 3 days or hasn’t voided in 12 hours, Incontinent/Diapers, Change bedding,Review of the Aide Care Plan dated 10/1/25 to Current revealed HA tasks as follows:Apply deodorant, Apply lotion to all extremities, Assist with dressing, Brush teeth with toothbrush and toothpaste, change linens, clean finger nails, Comb or brush hair, Document last BM, Perineal Care, Shower, all to be done every visit, and Wash hair weekly and as needed at patient or caregiver request.Review of the VRs dated 9/7/25, 9/11/25, and 9/16/25 revealed the HA documented the bedding change was not completed.Review of the VRs dated 9/18/25, 9/23/25, 9/25/25, and 9/30/25 revealed the HA documented the shower and bedding change were not completed.Review of the Aide Regular Visit on 10/2/25 revealed the HA documented the patient refused the bedding change.There was no documentation the HA notified the RN of interventions that were not completed, which required a change in the POC.An interview was conducted on 10/9/25 at 4:35 PM with EI # 1, who confirmed the HA failed to notify the RN of interventions that were not completed, which required a change in the patient’s POC.”

    Rule L0628. Standard-level.

  • Label dispose storage drugs (42 CFR 418.106(e)(2)(i)(C))

    The inspectors’ words, 248 words

    “Based on review of medical records (MR), hospice policies and procedures, and staff interview, it was determined the hospice nurse failed to document the disposal of all medications per the hospice policies and procedures. This affected one of three death records, including MR # 17, and had the potential to negatively impact all patients.Findings include:Hospice Policy: Death at HomePolicy Number: 9118Revised: 10/31/21Purpose:To establish the process to follow when a patient dies at home while receiving care from hospice...Procedure:…The hospice skilled nurse (SN) shall instruct the family how to dispose of all medications, including controlled substances, per local and state regulations. The SN documents the medications disposed in the clinical record.Hospice Policy: Controlled Drug Disposal In The HomePolicy Number: 7012Revised: 10/31/21Policy:… The staff member that oversees the disposal of the controlled drugs will document the following in the clinical record:1. Name of drug2. Amount disposed3. Method of disposal4. Name of the person destroying the medication(s)5. Name of the staff witness6. … Date and time MR # 17 was admitted to the hospice on 9/1/24 with primary diagnosis of Malignant Neoplasm of Vulva Unspecified.Review of the On-call/Unscheduled (Death) visit dated 10/16/24 revealed no documentation of the method of disposal, name of the person destroying the medication(s), name of witness, and date and time the controlled drugs were disposed. An interview was conducted on 10/9/25 at 4:43 PM with Employee Identifier # 1, Director of Operations, who confirmed the nurse failed to document the disposal of medications per the agency policy.”

    Rule L0697. Standard-level.

All 3 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Nov 25, 2025Recertification inspection by the stateNo deficiencies cited
Oct 9, 2025Recertification inspection by the state5 deficiencies cited
Oct 8, 2025Recertification inspection by the stateNo deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Oct 30, 1986.
  • Ownership: non-profit.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 16.4 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 11% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 98.4% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 71% at home, 7% in assisted living, 5% in a nursing facility, 11% in a skilled nursing facility, 4% in an inpatient hospice, 2% elsewhere.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day16.4 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends11%
Visits near death98.4% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • Hh Health System - Caring for Life owns an unstated share directly since Aug 1, 2017.
  • 7 owners or officers are people: Carisa Lyman (corporate director, 100%); Carisa Lyman (managing employee (on the payroll), 100%); Alan Stephen Baggett (managing employee (under contract), 0%); Robert Crawford (corporate director); Robert Crawford (managing employee (on the payroll)); Tracy Doughty (corporate director); Tracy Doughty (managing employee (on the payroll)).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What do families say?

  • Family caregivers rate it 4 of 5 in CMS’s survey (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 89% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 89% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 10 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 99.43% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 86.2% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 54 of 5
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold10 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 14 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 35803, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 4; this one had 5.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.