Hearth Record

Johnson County Healthcare Center Home Health Agency

A home health agency in Buffalo, Wyoming 82834

497 West Lott, Buffalo, Wyoming 82834. (307) 684-5521.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 21, 2026.

The last 24 months 4 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Mar 2026. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean2
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Mar 26, 2026: a recertification inspection.

4 deficiencies cited in the last three years.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

4 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Mar 2026. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 24, 2026.

4 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Mar 26, 2026: recertification inspection4 deficiencies
  • Infection Prevention

    The inspectors’ words, 502 words

    “Infection Prevention CFR(s): 484.70(a) Standard: Infection Prevention. The HHA must follow accepted standards of practice, including the use of standard precautions, to prevent the transmission of infections and communicable diseases. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on observation, staff interview, and policy and procedure review, the agency failed to ensure infection prevention guidelines for wound care were followed during 2 of 3 client home visits (#2, #3). The findings were: 1. Observation during the home visit for client #2 on 3/25/26 at 9 AM showed RN #1 failed to do hand hygiene prior to donning gloves. She placed the barrier under the client’s legs, then pulled supplies out of her bag. She cleaned the right 2nd toe, then got a dressing out of a storage bag. She cleaned the right shin and left shin. She then went through three different supply bags (still wearing the same gloves) looking for different supplies. She pulled a pair of scissors from her work bag, cut optifoam dressing, then placed the dressing on the 2nd right toe. At this point she doffed her gloves and performed hand hygiene. 2. Observation during the home visit for client #3 on 3/24/26 at 11 AM with RN #1 showed the nurse failed to do hand hygiene prior to donning gloves. She placed a barrier down under the client left leg and donned gloves. She pulled her scissors out of her work bag and cut off the old dressing. The wound had sutures and staples still in place from a great toe amputation. The nurse searched through a supply bag for supplies. She went out to her truck and came in and doffed gloves and performed hand hygiene. She did multiple other tasks such as taking vitals, taking photographs, documenting on her laptop. She then donned gloves, cleaned the wound, opened dressing packets and cut dressings. She placed the new dressing over the wound and dressed the wound. At that point she doffed her gloves. 3. Interview with RN #1 on 3/25/26 at 10:20 AM revealed that it was her normal routine when doing wound care. 4. Interview with the administrator on 3/25/26 at 4:05 PM revealed it was the expectation for staff to perform “hand hygiene, don gloves, do the dirty, then doff gloves. The staff would then perform hand hygiene don new gloves, and dress the wound, doff gloves, and perform hand hygiene. 5. Review of the policy “Wound Assessment & Documentation” hand delivered on 3/26/26 at 9 AM by the administrator showed “…6. Infection Control Principles Perform hand hygiene before and after wound care…” 6. Review of the policy “Hand Hygiene” hand delivered on 3/26/26 at 9 AM by the administrator showed “…Procedures Hand Hygiene Indications…When moving from a dirty procedure to a clean procedure…Before donning any personal protective equipment (PPE) and after doffing any PPE…Before and after contact with non-intact skin…Glove Use…Remove gloves and perform hand hygiene at the appropriate indication (e.g., after exposure to body fluids and before a clean procedure) …””

    Rule G0682. Standard-level.

  • Hha Administrator Contact Information

    The inspectors’ words, 175 words

    “HHA administrator contact information CFR(s): 484.50(a)(1)(ii) (ii) Contact information for the HHA administrator, including the administrator’s name, business address, and business phone number in order to receive complaints. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on observation, review of the patient handbook, and staff interview the agency failed to ensure the correct business address was provided for clients to contact the administrator. The findings were: 1. Observation on 3/23/26 at 1:40 PM revealed the building of the Home Health Agency failed to show it was the location of the Home Health Agency and the administrator. There was no signage showing the agency name, nor the hours of business. 2. Review of the “Home Health Patient & Family Handbook” showed the address of the hospital and not the location of the Home Health Agency and the Home Health Agency administrator. 2. Interview with the administrator on 3/23/26 at 2:25 PM confirmed the building was not identified as the Home Health Agency, and was not the location given to the clients to contact the administrator.”

    Rule G0414. Element-level.

  • Rn Performs Assessment

    The inspectors’ words, 363 words

    “RN performs assessment CFR(s): 484.55(a)(1) A registered nurse must conduct an initial assessment visit to determine the immediate care and support needs of the patient; and, for Medicare patients, to determine eligibility for the Medicare home health benefit, including homebound status. The initial assessment visit must be held either within 48 hours of referral, or within 48 hours of the patient’s return home, or on the physician or allowed practitioner - ordered start of care date. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on client medical record review, staff interview, and policy review the agency failed to ensure the initial assessment visit was held either within 48 hours of referral, or on the physician or allowed practitioner ordered start of care date for 2 of 7 clients (#3, #6). The findings were: 2. Review of client # 6 medical records showed the physician ordered SOC on 2/26/26. The agency’s initial assessment was completed on 3/2/26, which showed the SOC was 4 days after the ordered date. Further review showed there was no order by the physician for the delay of services. a. Interview with the administrator on 3/25/26 at 11:40 AM confirmed the delay of care. 1. Review of client #3 medical records showed the physician ordered the Start of Care (SOC) on 3/12/26. The agency initial assessment was done on 3/17/26 showing the SOC was 5 days after the ordered date. Further, review showed there was no order by the physician for the delay of services. 2. Client # 6 (Christine) 3. Interview with the administrator on 3/24/26 at 2 PM revealed the agency did not get the physician order for the delay of services. He stated the agency did delay the SOC. 4. Review of policy “Acceptance of Patients HH/Hospice” hand delivered by the administrator on 3/25/26 at 12:20 PM showed “...Responsibilities...Registered Nurse and/or Qualified Therapist (home Health) Perform the initial assessment to determine home health eligibility, service needs, and whether the agency can meet the patient’s needs in the home environment.” The policy failed to include the need for the assessment to be within 48 hours, or the need for the physician order for the delay in SOC.”

    Rule G0514. Element-level.

  • Onsite Supervisory Visit Every 14 Days

    The inspectors’ words, 500 words

    “Onsite supervisory visit every 14 days CFR(s): 484.80(h)(1)(i) (1)(i) If home health aide services are provided to a patient who is receiving skilled nursing, physical or occupational therapy, or speech language pathology services— (A) A registered nurse or other appropriate skilled professional who is familiar with the patient, the patient’s plan of care, and the written patient care instructions described in paragraph (g) of this section, must complete a supervisory assessment of the aide services being provided no less frequently than every 14 days; and (B) The home health aide does not need to be present during the supervisory assessment described in paragraph (h)(1)(i)(A) of this section. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on medical record review and staff interview the agency failed to ensure supervisory visits were provided in no less then every 14 days for 2 of 7 clients reviewed (#1, #7). The findings were: 1.Review of client #1’s plan of care for the certification period of 2/7/26 through 4/7/26 showed the skilled nursing frequency was once every 60 days, and the CNA frequency was 3 times a week. Further review showed no supervisory visits had been completed between 2/7/26 through 3/11/26 ( 32 days).Interview with the administrator on 3/24/26 at 2:45 PM revealed supervision visits were not being conducted every 14 days on clients with veteran benefits. 4. Review of the policy titled “Home Health / Hospice Aid Training, Assignment, Supervision and Documentation Guidelines” n.d. hand delivered on 3/24/26 at 3:20 PM by the administrator showed “…5. Aids are Supervised by an RN or other qualified professional in accordance with federal hospice and home health conditions of participation, Wyoming requirements, and applicable payer expectations…” 1. Review of client #1’s plan of care for the certification period of 2/7/26 through 4/7/26 showed the skilled nursing frequency was once every 60 days, and the CNA frequency was 3 times a week. Further review showed no supervisory visits had been completed between 2/7/26 through 3/11/26 (32 days).Interview with the administrator on 3/24/26 at 2:45 PM revealed supervision visits were not being conducted every 14 days on clients with veteran benefits. 2. Review of client #7 plan of care for the certification period from 1/24/26 through 3/24/26 showed the skilled nurse frequency was 1 time a week, and the CNA frequency was 2 times a week. Further review showed the CNA went 34 days without a supervisory visit (1/25/26 - 2/25/26). Then went 19 days without a supervisory visit (2/25/26 - 3/13/26). 3. Interview with the administrator on 3/25/26 at 4:05 PM revealed the supervisory visits on the 2 clients were not done every 14 days, and confirmed they were missed. 4. Review of the policy titled “Home Health / Hospice Aid Training, Assignment, Supervision and Documentation Guidelines” n.d. hand delivered on 3/24/26 at 3:20 PM by the administrator showed “…5. Aids are Supervised by an RN or other qualified professional in accordance with federal hospice and home health conditions of participation, Wyoming requirements, and applicable payer expectations…””

    Rule G0808. Element-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Mar 26, 2026Recertification inspection4 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified home health agency since Sep 19, 1984.
  • Ownership: government operated.
  • No deficiency on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Who does the caring?

  • Offers nursing care, physical therapy, occupational therapy, speech pathology, medical social services and home health aide services.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for home health agencies.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • Johnson County Hospital District owns 100% directly since Nov 15, 1992.
  • Johnson County Memorial Hospital runs it.
  • 8 owners or officers are people: Cristella Kinghorn (corporate director); Thomas Berry (corporate director); Alecia Kozisek (corporate director); Laurie Hansen (other role (CMS gives no detail)); Luke Senden (managing employee (on the payroll)); Luke Senden (runs it (operational or managerial control)); Tom Holt (corporate director); Mark S Schueler (corporate director).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Agency All Owners and Home Health Agency Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Johnson County Hospital DistrictOwns 5% or more directly100%Nov 15, 1992
Johnson County Memorial HospitalRuns it (operational or managerial control)May 30, 1984

How do patients fare?

  • CMS gives no : “The number of patient episodes for this measure is too small to report.”
  • CMS gives no : “Zero, or very few, patients met the survey’s rules for inclusion.”
  • CMS compares it with the national rate: discharged to the community, worse; potentially preventable hospital stays, the same; potentially preventable readmissions after discharge, the same.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies and Home Health Patient Survey. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Quality of patient care ratingCMS star rating, 1 to 5 in half starsNot rated
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the agency’s patients, 1 to 5Not rated
Discharged to the communityCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate50.41% (worse than the national rate)
Potentially preventable hospital staysCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate8.86% (same as the national rate)
Potentially preventable readmissions after dischargeCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate4.12% (same as the national rate)

How does it compare nearby?

  • CMS gives this agency no quality of patient care rating to compare.
Source:

CMS, Home Health ZIP Codes and Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

1 compared
PlaceQuality rating
Johnson County Healthcare Center Home Health Agency This home health agencyNot given

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • QCOR says some of its home health reports are accurate or available only through May 19, 2021, because of a systems migration.
  • Many home health agencies are inspected by a private accrediting organisation instead of the state, and QCOR’s home health file doesn’t appear to include those inspections: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 24, 2026.

From the agency

The public record above comes first. Anything the agency adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the agency will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the agency”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.