Hearth Record

Almost Family

A home health agency in Eau Claire, Wisconsin 54703

3615 N. Hastings Way, Suite 100a, Eau Claire, Wisconsin 54703. (715) 831-0631.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 21, 2026.

The last 24 months 2 deficiencies in 2 months of the last 36. Last cited Jul 2026. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Jul 30, 2026: a complaint inspection.

2 deficiencies cited in the last three years.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

2 deficiencies in 2 months of the last 36. Last cited Jul 2026. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 24, 2026.

2 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Jul 30, 2026: complaint inspection1 deficiency
  • Document Complaint And Resolution

    The inspectors’ words, 476 words

    “Document complaint and resolution CFR(s): 484.50(e)(1)(ii) (ii) Document both the existence of the complaint and the resolution of the complaint; and This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview, the agency failed to document complaint and resolution of allegations of abuse, neglect or misappropriation in 1 of 1 allegation of misappropriation (Patient #1) in a total of 1 complaint reviewed. Findings Include: Review of facility policy titled, “Incident/Event Reporting” dated 08/01/2025 revealed, “…Procedure: Definitions: 1. Incident report: Incident reports are used to document unexpected or safety and risk related events which may occur. Incident reports are used in ongoing monitoring, evaluation and improvement activities related to patient care and safety…2. Unexpected event: …Examples of unexpected events include but are not limited to: …d. Damage, theft or loss of property belonging to a patient, visitor, employee…3. Once notified and incident reports are reviewed, the Risk Management Department will be required to make notification…Reporting Patient, Affiliate, Contractor, and Visitor Occurrences: 1. Any employee who discovers and occurrence involving a patient…is responsible for completing an incident report…and notifying his/her supervisor regarding the incident…2. All incidents should be entered into the online incident reporting system within 72 hours of the incident or from the identification of the incident…3. The Executive Director, Assistant Executive Director, or Clinical Director must assess the situation and recommend follow up action as appropriate. For significant patient occurrences, the attending physician must be notified of the occurrence in a timely manner. 4. The Executive Director or Clinical Director must also review the incident report, document additional findings and corrective action(s) taken, and perform the manager review complete function in the online reporting system no later than 30 days from the date or identification of the incident.” Review of the online complaint #3065547 revealed Complainants A, B and C alleged Caregiver G was holding Patient #1’s debit and food share cards and this was reported to the agency’s Director on 06/19/2026 via telephone. There was no evidence the phone call was documented by the agency as a complaint or incident, no investigation was completed or documented, and no actions or resolution was documented. There was no evidence the agency followed it’s policy and procedure for investigating and following up on complaints and adverse events. During an interview on 07/30/2026 at 12:33 PM Pt. #1 stated, “[Supportive Caregiver G ] helps some…she’s had them [debit cards and food share cards] for a year, I believe she went into my wallet and got them. I didn’t know she took them.” Pt. #1 stated he asked for them back and Supportive Caregiver G stated she was busy. During an interview with Director D on 07/30/2026 at 2:31 PM Director D stated she thought the report from APS was regarding another client. Director D stated there was nothing more that was completed for the investigation.”

    Rule G0484. Element-level. From a complaint.

May 8, 2024: recertification inspection1 deficiency
  • Infection Prevention

    The inspectors’ words, 361 words

    “Infection Prevention CFR(s): 484.70(a) Standard: Infection Prevention. The HHA must follow accepted standards of practice, including the use of standard precautions, to prevent the transmission of infections and communicable diseases. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on observation, record review and interview, agency staff failed to follow standard precautions regarding sharps (needle) safety in 1 of 1 home visit observation where a needle was used, out of a total of 3 home visit observations (Registered Nurse A). During an interview with Clinical Leader B and Administrator C 05/08/2024 at 12:40 PM, the above findings were reviewed. When asked what the expectation would be regarding sharps use and disposal, Clinical Leader B replied, “Bring the sharps container to the area providing care.” Administrator C replied, “If it didn’t have a guard, she shouldn’t have recapped it. It is standard practice. I don’t know why she would have done that.” Findings include: Review of policy number 8.002 “Standard Precautions” last revised 10/01/2022 revealed in part, “Staff will follow guidelines for protection from infectious disease based on Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) and Centers for Disease Control (CDC) guidelines for Standard Precautions.” Further review revealed “e. Sharps Safety. ii. Never recap used needles, or otherwise manipulate them using both hands, or use any other technique that involves directing the point of the needle toward any part of the body.” A visit was conducted at the home of Patient #3 on 5/8/2024 at 7:55 a.m. to observe Registered Nurse (RN) A provide care. After administering an insulin injection subcutaneously, RN A then attempted to recap the needle by sliding it into the cap which was on Patient #3’s chair-side table. When this was unsuccessful, RN A then placed the end of his/her finger on the top of the cap and slid the needle inside until the cap snapped into place. During an interview with Clinical Leader B on 05/08/2024 at 12:40 PM, Clinical Leader B stated, RN A, “was nervous.” During an interview with Administrator C on 05/08/2024 at 12:45 PM, Administrator C stated, that the expectation of staff was to not recap needles and to use a designated sharps container.”

    Rule G0682. Standard-level.

All 2 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Jul 30, 2026Complaint inspection1 deficiency cited
May 8, 2024Recertification inspection1 deficiency cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified home health agency since Mar 18, 2003.
  • Ownership: proprietary (for profit).
  • No deficiency on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • 1 deficiency cited in the last three years came from an inspection that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Who does the caring?

  • Offers nursing care and home health aide services.
  • Doesn’t offer physical therapy, occupational therapy, speech pathology and medical social services.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for home health agencies.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • National Health Industries, Inc. owns 100% directly since Jun 18, 2016.
  • 6 owners or officers are people: Kimberly Seymour (corporate officer); Joni Babineaux (corporate officer, 0%); Joshua Lee Proffitt (corporate officer, 0%); Joshua Lee Proffitt (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); Amy Cormier (corporate director, 0%); Janelle Hintz (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Agency All Owners and Home Health Agency Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Unitedhealth Group IncorporatedOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Feb 22, 2023
LHC Group Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Apr 1, 2018
Almost Family, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Jun 18, 2016
National Health Industries, Inc.Owns 5% or more directly100%Jun 18, 2016

How do patients fare?

  • CMS rates its quality of patient care 2 of 5.
  • Patients rate it 3 of 5 in CMS’s patient survey (51 surveys completed): 90% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 79% would definitely recommend it.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies and Home Health Patient Survey. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Quality of patient care ratingCMS star rating, 1 to 5 in half stars2 of 5
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the agency’s patients, 1 to 53 of 5

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 8 agencies CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 54703, where this agency’s office is, 7 have a quality of patient care rating; the middle one is 3 of 5, and this one is rated 2 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Home Health ZIP Codes and Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

The 8 agencies CMS lists serving ZIP code 54703
PlaceQuality rating
Mayo Clinic Health System in Eau Claire3.5
Almost Family This home health agency2
Aveanna Home Health4
North Shore at Home3
Compassus Home Health4.5
Interim Healthcare of Western Wisconsin3
Lakeland Home Healthcare3
North Shore at HomeNot given

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • QCOR says some of its home health reports are accurate or available only through May 19, 2021, because of a systems migration.
  • Many home health agencies are inspected by a private accrediting organisation instead of the state, and QCOR’s home health file doesn’t appear to include those inspections: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 24, 2026.

From the agency

The public record above comes first. Anything the agency adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the agency will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the agency”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.