Hearth Record

Interim Healthcare of Wausau

A home health agency in Wausau, Wisconsin 54401

327 N 17th Ave, Suite 7, Wausau, Wisconsin 54401. (715) 842-7707.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 21, 2026.

The last 24 months 2 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Nov 2023. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Nov 8, 2023: a recertification inspection.

2 deficiencies cited in the last three years.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

2 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Nov 2023. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 24, 2026.

2 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Nov 8, 2023: recertification inspection2 deficiencies
  • Conformance With Physician Orders

    The inspectors’ words, 346 words

    “Conformance with physician orders CFR(s): 484.60(b) Standard: Conformance with physician or allowed practitioner orders. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview, the agency staff failed to assess the patient’s wound to include wound measurements in accordance with physician orders and agency policy in 2 of 3 wound patients (Patient #6 and #10) in a total of 10 patient records reviewed. Findings include: Review of the agency policy, titled “Developing a Plan to Meet Patient/Client Needs,” dated 4/21/2021, revealed: “Wound: The clinician measures the wound(s) weekly and documents the results.” Record review of Patient #6’s “Home Health Certification and Plan of Care” orders (dated 10/11/2023 to 12/09/2023) revealed in part, “SN (Skilled Nurse): 2 times a week for 8 weeks. SN to perform assessments with emphasis on wound care (right buttock) and heart failure. SN indicated for wound care management based on physician orders due to the inherent complexity of wound. SN to assess wound progression or decline.” Record review of Patient #6’s SN visits from 10/11/2023 to 11/06/2023 revealed two visits were made the week of 10/15/2023, with no documented evidence of measurement of the buttock wound. Record review of Patient #10’s “Home Health Certification and Plan of Care” orders (dated 08/15/2023 to 10/03/2023) revealed in part, “SN (Skilled Nurse): 1 time a week for 9 weeks. SN to perform complete physical assessment each visit with emphasis on wound care to left great toe. SN indicated for wound care management based on physician orders due to the inherent complexity of wound. SN to assess wound progression or decline.” Record review of Patient #10’s SN visits from 08/15/2023 to 10/03/2023 revealed the weeks of 08/20/2023 and 08/27/2023, two visits were made each week (08/22/2023, 08/25/2023, 08/29/2023, and 09/01/2023) and no evidence of documented measurement of the left great toe wound. During an interview on 11/07/2023 from 1:45-2:15 PM, Administrator A stated, “Wound measurements should be done weekly.” Record review findings for Patients #1 through #10 were reviewed and confirmed with Administrator A on 11/07/2023 from 1:45 PM to 2:15 PM.”

    Rule G0578. Standard-level.

  • A Review Of All Current Medications

    The inspectors’ words, 1,094 words

    “A review of all current medications CFR(s): 484.55(c)(5) A review of all medications the patient is currently using in order to identify any potential adverse effects and drug reactions, including ineffective drug therapy, significant side effects, significant drug interactions, duplicate drug therapy, and noncompliance with drug therapy. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review, observation and interview, the agency failed to maintain an accurate medication list as compared to what the patient is taking and/or ordered in 3 of 4 patient home visits observed (Patient #1, #3, and #4) in a total of 10 home health patient records reviewed. Findings include: Review of agency policy and procedure titled “Initial Comprehensive Assessment” dated 04/02/2021 revealed in part, “Policy: Initial comprehensive assessments are conducted in accordance with applicable law and regulation. Procedure: Assessment of Adult Patients Requiring Skilled Care: 2. The RN (Registered Nurse), PT (Physical Therapist), OT (Occupational Therapist) or SLP (Speech Language Pathologist) documents the findings of the initial comprehensive assessment on paper or electronically in standardized format. a) includes the elements of the following documents: i) the Medication Profile.” Record review of Patient #1’s “Home Health Certification and Plan of Care” medication orders dated 09/27/2023 – 11/25/2023 revealed “Metoprolol Succinate 50mg (milligrams) oral capsule 1 tablet daily by mouth. Amlodipine 5mg oral 1 tablet daily by mouth.” A home visit for Patient #1 was conducted at the patient’s residence on 11/06/2023 from 1:20 PM to 1:55 PM. During the home visit, observed RN B ask Patient #1 if there were medication changes. Patient #1 replied, “No.” Upon cessation of home visit at 1:55 PM, writer asked Patient #1 to review the agency medication list as compared to what Patient #1 is taking. RN B remained in the home to review. Patient #1 stated, “I am taking Metoprolol 100mg. It changed when my blood pressure was getting high awhile back. I am not taking Amlodipine. Haven’t been taking that for a few weeks.” Record review of Patient #1’s record 09/27/2023 – 11/05/2023 revealed Patient #1 had an RN visit 3 times per week for a total of 6 weeks, and there were no documented order update or reconciliation of changes in the agency medication profile for Metoprolol or Amlodipine. A home visit for Patient #3 was conducted at the patient’s residence on 11/06/2023 from 3:35 PM to 3:55 PM with PTA (Physical Therapist Assistant) D. PTA D did not remain in the home. Upon cessation of home visit at 3:55 PM, writer asked Patient #3 to review the agency medication list as compared to what Patient #3 is taking and observed Patient #3 take out a box of medications currently taking. Patient #3 removed a medication bottle that read “Potassium Chloride 10 meq (milliequivalent) take 1 tablet by mouth twice daily. Order date 10/02/2023.” Patient #3 stated, “Oh yeah, I take Potassium.” Patient #3 Daughter G stated, “[Patient #3] takes Potassium twice a day since beginning of October.” Writer reviewed the medication list and Patient #3 Daughter G confirmed Potassium was not on the medication list. When asked how often the nurse reviews medications, Patient #3 Daughter G replied, “[RN B] reviews medications weekly.” Record review of Patient #3’s “Home Health Certification and Plan of Care” medication orders dated 10/04/2023 – 12/02/2023 and review of “Medication Profile” (showing current medication orders and printed effective 11/07/2023) revealed Potassium Chloride was not listed as an active medication on this agency’s medication profile. During the timeframe of 10/04/2023 – 11/06/2023, an RN conducted a visit 1 time per week for a total of 5 weeks, and there were no documented order updates or reconciliation changes in the agency medication profile that Patient #3 had been taking Potassium Chloride. A home visit for Patient #4 was conducted at the ALF (Assisted Living Facility) where Patient #4 resides on 11/07/2023 from 9:00 AM to 9:45 AM with RN E. Writer did not observe RN E ask about Patient #4’s medications with ALF Staff F during this time. Upon cessation of home visit, RN E did not remain in the ALF. At 9:50 AM, writer asked ALF Staff F for the ALF’s MAR (Medication Administration Record) to compare the medication lists. Record review of the ALF MAR for month of November for Patient #4 revealed “Potassium Chloride 20 meq: Discontinued.” Record review of Patient #4’s “Home Health Certification and Plan of Care” medication orders dated 08/15/2023 – 10/13/2023 and 10/14/2023 – 12/12/2023, and review of “Medication Profile” (showing current medication orders and printed effective 11/07/2023) revealed “Potassium Chloride (Klor-Con 20) 1 tablet once daily by mouth” which did not match the medication profile for the ALF in which Patient #4 resides. During an interview with ALF Staff F on 11/07/2023 at 9:50 AM, when asked about Patient #4’s Potassium and if Patient #4 is taking this medication, ALF Staff F replied, “No, Patient #4 does not take Potassium. I don’t know when it was discontinued.” Record review of Patient #4’s RN visit documentation on 11/07/2023 under “Health Management” did not reveal any medication assessment or review completed (the agency’s software system has check boxes for ‘medication reconciled’, ‘new/changed medications in the home,’ ‘medication issues.’” During an interview with Administrator A on 11/07/2023 at 1:10 PM, when asked about the agency’s process and expectations for medication review and reconciliation, Administrator A replied, “On the first visit, we look at the bottles of medications and also compare their medication list to the facility list (if that is where they reside) and compare to referral information. On subsequent visits, we ask if there was a doctor appointment or any medication changes. They can add medications or change orders and send off for signed orders. If at a facility, they could talk to the facility nurse and review.” When asked if the agency had anything more specific regarding staff expectations for medication review to ensure patients and the agency have a most accurate list, Administrator A replied, “This is all we have. Nothing more specific.” Review of home visit findings were reviewed and confirmed with Administrator A on 11/07/2023 from 1:45 PM to 2:15 PM. During an interview with Administrator A on 11/07/2023 at 2:45 PM, in a follow up for Patient #4’s medication discrepancies, Administrator A stated, “Our Nurse Practitioner has Potassium on the list, but in looking at some communication notes, it shows the patient went to the cardiologist and Potassium was discontinued.” Record review for Patient #4’s Cardiology visit orders dated back on 08/15/2023 revealed, “Stop KCL (Potassium). Spoke with facility manager to discuss new orders.””

    Rule G0536. Element-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Nov 8, 2023Recertification inspection2 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified home health agency since Jun 30, 1993.
  • Ownership: proprietary (for profit).
  • No deficiency on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Who does the caring?

  • Offers nursing care, physical therapy, occupational therapy, speech pathology, medical social services and home health aide services.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for home health agencies.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • Great Lakes Health Partners LLC owns 100% directly since Apr 18, 2022.
  • 8 owners or officers are people: Preston Lucas (corporate officer, 100%); Angela Oujiri (managing employee (on the payroll), 100%); James R Wesner (owns 5% or more through other companies, 45%); James R Wesner (runs it (operational or managerial control), 45%); Steven J Alessandro (owns 5% or more through other companies, 45%); Steven J Alessandro (corporate officer, 45%); Steven J Alessandro (runs it (operational or managerial control), 45%); Preston Lucas (owns 5% or more through other companies, 10%).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Agency All Owners and Home Health Agency Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Great Lakes Health Partners LLCOwns 5% or more directly100%Apr 18, 2022

How do patients fare?

  • CMS rates its quality of patient care 3.5 of 5.
  • Patients rate it 3 of 5 in CMS’s patient survey (85 surveys completed): 78% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 72% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS compares it with the national rate: discharged to the community, the same; potentially preventable hospital stays, the same; potentially preventable readmissions after discharge, the same.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies and Home Health Patient Survey. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Quality of patient care ratingCMS star rating, 1 to 5 in half stars3.5 of 5
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the agency’s patients, 1 to 53 of 5
Discharged to the communityCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate82.16% (same as the national rate)
Potentially preventable hospital staysCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate14.36% (same as the national rate)
Potentially preventable readmissions after dischargeCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate4.16% (same as the national rate)

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 8 agencies CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 54401, where this agency’s office is, 6 have a quality of patient care rating; the middle one is 3.5 of 5, and this one is rated 3.5 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Home Health ZIP Codes and Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

The 8 agencies CMS lists serving ZIP code 54401
PlaceQuality rating
Aspirus at Home3.5
Interim Healthcare of Wausau This home health agency3.5
North Shore at Home3
Compassus Home Health4.5
Maxim Healthcare ServicesNot given
Interim Healthcare of Wisconsin3.5
Transitions Home Health of Central Wisconsin2
North Shore at HomeNot given

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • QCOR says some of its home health reports are accurate or available only through May 19, 2021, because of a systems migration.
  • Many home health agencies are inspected by a private accrediting organisation instead of the state, and QCOR’s home health file doesn’t appear to include those inspections: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 24, 2026.

From the agency

The public record above comes first. Anything the agency adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the agency will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the agency”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.