Hearth Record

Adoray Home Health and Hospice

A home health agency in Baldwin, Wisconsin 54002

990 Main St, Suite 1, Baldwin, Wisconsin 54002. (715) 629-1888.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 21, 2026.

The last 24 months 2 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jul 2026. Most serious: Element-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Jul 21, 2026: a recertification inspection.

2 deficiencies cited in the last three years.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

2 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jul 2026. Most serious: Element-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 24, 2026.

2 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Jul 21, 2026: recertification inspection2 deficiencies
  • Patient’S Or Legal Representative’S Signature

    The inspectors’ words, 197 words

    “Patient’s or legal representative’s signature CFR(s): 484.50(a)(2) Obtain the patient’s or legal representative’s signature confirming that he or she has received a copy of the notice of rights and responsibilities. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview, the agency failed to document written acknowledgement that patients received their rights in 13 of 13 patients (Patient #1 - #13) medical records reviewed. Findings include: Record review of agency policy titled “Patient Rights and Responsibilities” (dated 09/04/2021) revealed “Procedures: 1. At the time of admission, and prior to initiating care, each patient will receive in writing a copy of the Patient Rights and Responsibilities Statement. 4. A signature will be secured, documenting receipt, and understanding of the Rights and Responsibilities.” Record review of Patient #1 - #13 admission paperwork revealed no evidence of written acknowledgement of receiving the Patient Rights and Responsibilities. During an interview with Administrator A on 07/20/2026 at 3:30 PM, when asked about written documentation of receipt of patient rights, Administrator A replied, “We used to have a disclaimer on the bottom (of the service agreement) they received the rights. Somewhere along the way with revisions that fell off.””

    Rule G0418. Element-level.

  • Integrate All Services

    The inspectors’ words, 860 words

    “Integrate all services CFR(s): 484.60(d)(3) Integrate services, whether services are provided directly or under arrangement, to assure the identification of patient needs and factors that could affect patient safety and treatment effectiveness and the coordination of care provided by all disciplines. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview, the agency therapy services failed to evaluate the patient within a standardized timeframe to meet the safety and physical needs of the patient based off of initial physician orders in 8 of 13 patient (Patient #2, #3, #4, #6, #8, #9, #10, and #11) medical records reviewed. Findings include: Record review of agency policy “Admission Criteria” (dated 09/14/2021) revealed “Procedure: 2. Adoray has necessary resources, adequate staff available and staff with skills required to safely carry out orders and plan of treatment prepared by the attending physician.” Record review of agency policy “Acceptance to Home Health Services” (dated 12/20/2024) revealed “Policy: Acceptance to Home Health Services will be based on assessment of the prospective patient’s need, the organization capacity to meet those needs. Procedure: 5. Documentation: All assessments, decisions, communications regarding acceptance or denial of services will be documented in the patient’s referral record.” Record review for Patient #2 with start of care 06/01/2026 revealed per initial physician orders dated 06/01/2026, “Physical Therapy to Assess and Evaluate.” The initial Physical Therapy evaluation was conducted 06/11/2026, 10 days past the referral orders, with no documented explanation/reason for delay or documentation of communication and collaboration with the patient and physician regarding reason for delay. Record review for Patient #3 with start of care 06/24/2026 revealed per initial physician orders dated 06/24/2026, “Physical Therapy to Assess and Evaluate. Occupational Therapy to Assess and Evaluate.” The initial Physical Therapy and Occupational Therapy evaluations were conducted 06/30/2026, 6 days past the referral orders, with no documented explanation/reason for delay or documentation of communication and collaboration with the patient and physician regarding reason for delay. Record review for Patient #4 with start of care 06/25/2026 revealed per initial physician orders dated 06/25/2026, “Speech Therapy to Assess and Evaluate.” On 07/02/2026, Patient #4 transferred into the hospital and transferred back home with a Resumption of Care nursing visit conducted 07/09/2026. A new Speech Therapy order was written 07/09/2026 to evaluate. The initial Speech Therapy evaluation was conducted 07/21/2026, 12 days past the referral orders, with no documented explanation/reason for delay or documentation of communication and collaboration with the patient and physician regarding reason for delay. Record review for Patient #6 with start of care 06/02/2026 revealed a physician order on 06/08/2026, “Occupational Therapy to Assess and Evaluate.” The initial Occupational Therapy evaluation was conducted 06/19/2026, 11 days past the referral orders, with no documented explanation/reason for delay or documentation of communication and collaboration with the patient and physician regarding reason for delay. Record review for Patient #8 with start of care 05/05/2026 revealed per initial physician orders dated 05/05/2026, “Physical Therapy to Assess and Evaluate. Occupational Therapy to Assess and Evaluate.” The initial Physical Therapy and Occupational Therapy evaluations were conducted 05/20/2026, 15 days past the referral orders, with no documented explanation/reason for delay or documentation of communication and collaboration with the patient and physician regarding reason for delay. Record review for Patient #9 with start of care 06/12/2026 revealed per initial physician orders dated 06/12/2026, “Physical Therapy to Assess and Evaluate.” The initial Physical Therapy evaluation was conducted 06/24/2026, 12 days past the referral orders, with no documented explanation/reason for delay or documentation of communication and collaboration with the patient and physician regarding reason for delay. Record review for Patient #10 with start of care 05/21/2026 revealed per initial physician orders dated 05/21/2026, “Physical Therapy to Assess and Evaluate. Occupational Therapy to Assess and Evaluate.” The initial Physical Therapy evaluation was conducted 06/01/2026, 11 days past the referral orders. The initial Occupational Therapy evaluation was conducted 05/28/2026, 7 days past the referral orders, with no documented explanation/reason for delay or documentation of communication and collaboration with the patient and physician regarding reason for delay. Record review for Patient #11 with start of care 04/22/2026 revealed a physician order on 04/22/2026, “Occupational Therapy to Assess and Evaluate.” The initial Occupational Therapy evaluation was conducted 04/30/2026, 8 days past the referral orders, with no documented explanation/reason for delay or documentation of communication and collaboration with the patient and physician regarding reason for delay. During an interview with Administrator A on 07/20/2026 at 4:00 PM, when asked about the delay in therapy services evaluating patients, Administrator A stated there was an issue with a Physical Therapist on leave. When asked what the expectation would be for added services post admission, Administrator A replied, “Expectations would be 5 days.” On 07/21/2026 at 10:20 AM, Administrator A stated, “Patients are aware of delays. We may not clearly document that and maybe could be better about that. We don’t have it in our policy but best practice is 5 days. At 10:45 AM, Administrator A added, “I talked to the Intake Coordinator, and it is an expectation that it is documented in there (referring to patient record) the days out for therapy and we weren’t doing that.””

    Rule G0606. Element-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Jul 21, 2026Recertification inspection2 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified home health agency since Dec 11, 1984.
  • Ownership: non-profit.
  • No deficiency on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Who does the caring?

  • Offers nursing care, physical therapy, occupational therapy, speech pathology, medical social services and home health aide services.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for home health agencies.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • Baldwin Area Medical Center Inc. owns 81.38% directly since Apr 1, 1994; St. Croix Regional Medical Center owns 18.62% directly since Sep 1, 2014.
  • 4 owners or officers are people: Christa Walz (corporate officer, 0%); Christa Walz (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); David M Dobosenski (corporate director); Jeanne Curtis (corporate director).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Agency All Owners and Home Health Agency Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Baldwin Area Medical Center Inc.Owns 5% or more directly81.38%Apr 1, 1994
St. Croix Regional Medical CenterOwns 5% or more directly18.62%Sep 1, 2014

How do patients fare?

  • CMS rates its quality of patient care 4 of 5.
  • Patients rate it 4 of 5 in CMS’s patient survey (217 surveys completed): 87% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 86% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS compares it with the national rate: discharged to the community, better; potentially preventable hospital stays, the same; potentially preventable readmissions after discharge, the same.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies and Home Health Patient Survey. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Quality of patient care ratingCMS star rating, 1 to 5 in half stars4 of 5
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the agency’s patients, 1 to 54 of 5
Discharged to the communityCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate92.31% (better than the national rate)
Potentially preventable hospital staysCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate8.66% (same as the national rate)
Potentially preventable readmissions after dischargeCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate3.60% (same as the national rate)

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 8 agencies CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 54002, where this agency’s office is, 7 have a quality of patient care rating; the middle one is 3.5 of 5, and this one is rated 4 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Home Health ZIP Codes and Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

The 8 agencies CMS lists serving ZIP code 54002
PlaceQuality rating
Adoray Home Health and Hospice This home health agency4
Accentcare Fairview Home Health - West, LLC3
Accentcare Fairview Home Health - East LLC3.5
Lakeview Homecare4.5
International Quality Homecare2
Avera at Home Marshall3.5
Aurora Community HealthNot given
Interim Healthcare of Western Wisconsin3

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • QCOR says some of its home health reports are accurate or available only through May 19, 2021, because of a systems migration.
  • Many home health agencies are inspected by a private accrediting organisation instead of the state, and QCOR’s home health file doesn’t appear to include those inspections: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 24, 2026.

From the agency

The public record above comes first. Anything the agency adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the agency will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the agency”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.