Beyondfaith Homecare & Rehab of Houston
A home health agency in Richmond, Texas 77469
300 Jackson Street, Richmond, Texas 77469. (832) 774-3000.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.
The short answer
Record last released by CMS on Oct 21, 2026.
- 4.5of 5 quality of patient care rating
- 2of 5 patient survey rating
- 2 deficiencies cited in the last three years
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean3
- Star ratings
- CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
What did inspectors find?
The last inspection on record was on Mar 19, 2026: a complaint inspection.
2 deficiencies cited in the last three years.
CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.
When those deficiencies happened
2 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Mar 2026. Most serious: Element-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 24, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Nov | Dec | ||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each deficiency, as cited
Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.
CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.
Mar 19, 2026: complaint inspection2 deficiencies
-
Integrate All Services
The inspectors’ words, 1,075 words
“Integrate all services CFR(s): 484.60(d)(3) Integrate services, whether services are provided directly or under arrangement, to assure the identification of patient needs and factors that could affect patient safety and treatment effectiveness and the coordination of care provided by all disciplines. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview, the agency failed to ensure coordination of care/services with other providers involved in the care of the patients for 2 of 5 patients (Patient #4 and #5), whose records were reviewed in that: The agency failed to coordinate the schedule of visits with the Physical Therapist and Occupational Therapist to optimize client care in 2 of 5 (Patient #4 and #5) records reviewed. Failure of the agency to not coordinate care with other services could place the patients at risk of further decline in the patient’s mobility, health, and possible hospitalization when care was not provided as ordered. Findings Include: Review of the agency’s policy titled “Monitoring Patient/Client Care/ Coordination of Care/Services” last reviewed date 01/01/26 revealed in part... “ Policy: II. The agency will collaborate with other organizations providing services (i.e, medical equipment, other home health agencies, outpatient clinics, etc.), the patient/client, and their representative (if applicable) to ensure appropriate coordination of care/services. Procedure: I. The agency will: C. Integrate services, whether services are provided directly or under arrangement, to assure the identification of patient/client needs and factors that could affect patient/client safety and treatment and the coordination of care/services provided by all disciplines. Patient #4 Record review of Patient #4’s ECR revealed a POC with a SOC date of 09/12/25 for a certification period from 01/24/2026 to 03/24/2026 diagnosis included: after care following joint replacement (removes and replaces damaged or arthritic joint parts with artificial prostheses to relieve pain and restore mobility, commonly for knees, hips, and shoulders). Risk Profile: Patient #4 had multiple risk factors, including history of two or more falls leading to hip replacement, and recent multiple hospitalizations. Orders and Treatments: SN 1w10 (1 time a week for 10 weeks), PT 1w1(1 time a week for 1 week) to evaluate & treat week of 1/25/26, OT 1w1(1 time a week for 1 week) to eval & treat week of 1/25/26. Record review of ECR document for Patient # 4, titled “OASIS-E1 Start of Care” revealed in part … Patient Care Preferences: Patient # 4 and FM expressed willingness to participate in recommended home health services, including skilled nursing visits and physical therapy. Patient # 4 is motivated for recovery and rehabilitation following hip replacement surgery. Signed by RN A and dated 01/24/26. Record review of documentation titled “RN-Skilled Nursing Visit “revealed in part… Coordination Plan: Missing PT/OT evaluations and coordination of therapy services for Patient # 4. The document was signed by RN B and dated 01/29/24. Record review did not reveal that the agency provided Patient # 4 with PT evaluation and OT evaluation during certification period of 01/24/2026 - 03/24/2026. Patient # 5 Record review of Patient #5’s ECR revealed a POC with a SOC date of 08/01/2025 for a certification period from 08/01/2025 -09/29/2025 diagnosis included: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (an ongoing lung condition caused by damage to the lungs) and history of falling. Orders and Treatments: SN: 1W9 (1 time a week for 9 weeks), PT: Eval and treat, OT:1w1(1 time a week 1 week) effective week of 8/3/25. Further record review of a document titled, ‘Referral” revealed in part…OT to eval and treat. The document was signed by Staff I and dated 08/04/25. Record review of a document titled, ‘Communication Note’ revealed in part, “ COTA-‘Communication Note for Patient #5-Therapist unable to see Patient #5 due to being sick (food poisoning) SSS/pts notified and dated 08/15/25. COTA-Therapist unable to see Patient #5 due to being sick (food poisoning) SSS/pts notified and dated 08/16/25. COTA-Schedule conflict dated 09/05/25, and 09/11/25. Record review of a document titled, ‘Communication Note’ revealed in part, “ Patient #5’s FM called and was requesting for a new OT that she has requested for, CM explained to Patient #5’s FM that we (the agency) are yet to find someone else that will provide the care for Patient #5 and we have informed the MD for transfer to another agency. The document was signed by RN H and dated 09/25/25. Record review of Patient #5’s ECR revealed a POC with a SOC date of 08/01/2025 for a certification period from 01/28/2026 - 03/28/2026 diagnosis included: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (an ongoing lung condition caused by damage to the lungs) and history of falling. Orders and Treatments: SN: effective 02/01/26 2m2 (2 times a month for 2 months), PT: 2w3 (2 times a week for 3 weeks), 1w6 (1 time a week for 6 weeks). Record review of a document titled, ‘Complaint Received’ revealed in part, “ Patient #5’s FM contacted the agency regarding concerns about therapy services. FM reported that Patient #5’s therapy had been delayed despite visits approved by insurance. The document was signed by the Adm/DON and dated 01/27/26. Record review of a document titled, ‘Communication Note’ revealed in part, “Spoke with Patient #5’s FM regarding PT Re-Evaluation. Patient #5’s FM voiced frustration with this process as Patient #5 has not had previous re-evaluations. FM reported previous PT was not seeing Patient #5 every 30 days. Discussed re-evaluation were required to re-evaluation every 30 days to complete supervisory visit and Patient #5’s progress per therapy practice acts. The document was signed by the Adm/DON and dated 02/12/26. Attempts made on 03/19/26 to interview the following staff members: PT, PTA, COTA C, RN A and RN B, no return calls received before exit. During an interview on 03/19/26 at 2:03 p.m. with the Adm/DON the surveyor presented the above findings. The Adm/DON stated, “that scheduling patient visits are overseen by the CM and DON but there had been some oversight issues with scheduling because the agency was still looking to hire a new schedular for patient care visits. The Adm/DON stated the agency had identified issues with Agency G due to staff not making scheduled visits and that the agency had also found failures with Agency G evaluations not being completed, patient service failures and problems with communications from Agency G staff for not calling patients to arrange visits. The Adm/DON stated the risk of staff not coordinating physician ordered plans of care and services was a decline in patient health and the potential for being hospitalized.”
-
Provide Services In The Plan Of Care
The inspectors’ words, 1,109 words
“Provide services in the plan of care CFR(s): 484.75(b)(3) Providing services that are ordered by the physician or allowed practitioner as indicated in the plan of care; This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview, the agency failed to provide services as ordered by the physician or allowed practitioner as indicated in the plan of care for 2 of 5 patients (Patient #4 and #5), whose records were reviewed in that: Physical Therapy (PT) services were not provided to Patients #4 and #5 as ordered by the physician in the written plan of care. Occupational Therapy (OT) services were not provided to Patients #4 and #5 as ordered by the physician in the written plan of care. Failure of the agency to conform with physician orders could place the patients at risk of harm due to not receiving care as ordered. Findings Include: Review of the agency’s policy titled “Plan of Care” last reviewed date 01/01/26 revealed in part... “ Policy: I. The agency will use data/information gathered during patient/client assessments in the care planning process which involves the identification of patient/client goals, actions or interventions that will resolve or alleviate the patient’s/client’s problems and or needs. Procedure: I. The appropriate licensed professional staff member, with physician or allowed practitioner participation, is responsible for developing the Plan of Care within three to five days of the initial assessment. B. A registered physical therapist initiates the Plan of Care for PT care and for physical therapy assistant care provided as an extension of PT services. C. A registered occupational therapist initiates the plan of Care for OT care and for OTA care provided as an extension of OT services. Patient #4 Record review of Patient #4’s ECR revealed a POC with a SOC date of 09/12/25 for a certification period from 01/24/2026 to 03/24/2026 diagnosis included: after care following joint replacement (removes and replaces damaged or arthritic joint parts with artificial prostheses to relieve pain and restore mobility, commonly for knees, hips, and shoulders). Risk Profile: Patient #4 had multiple risk factors, including history of two or more falls leading to hip replacement, and recent multiple hospitalizations. Orders and Treatments: SN 1w10 (1 time a week for 10 weeks), PT 1w1(1 time a week for 1 week) to evaluate & treat week of 1/25/26, OT 1w1(1 time a week for 1 week) to eval & treat week of 1/25/26. Record review of ECR document for Patient # 4, titled “OASIS-E1 Start of Care” revealed in part … Patient Care Preferences: Patient # 4 and FM expressed willingness to participate in recommended home health services, including skilled nursing visits and physical therapy. Patient # 4 is motivated for recovery and rehabilitation following hip replacement surgery. Signed by RN A and dated 01/24/26. Record review of documentation titled “RN-Skilled Nursing Visit “revealed in part… Coordination Plan: Missing PT/OT evaluations and coordination of therapy services for Patient # 4. The document was signed by RN B and dated 01/29/24. Record review did not reveal that the agency provided Patient # 4 with PT evaluation and OT evaluation during certification period of 01/24/2026 - 03/24/2026. Patient # 5 Record review of Patient #5’s ECR revealed a POC with a SOC date of 08/01/2025 for a certification period from 08/01/2025 -09/29/2025 diagnosis included: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (an ongoing lung condition caused by damage to the lungs) and history of falling. Orders and Treatments: SN: 1W9 (1 time a week for 9 weeks), PT: Eval and treat, OT:1w1(1 time a week 1 week) effective week of 8/3/25. Further record review of a document titled, ‘Referral” revealed in part…OT to eval and treat. The document was signed by Staff I and dated 08/04/25. Record review of a document titled, ‘Communication Note’ revealed in part, “ COTA-‘Communication Note for Patient #5-Therapist unable to see Patient #5 due to being sick (food poisoning) SSS/pts notified and dated 08/15/25. COTA-Therapist unable to see Patient #5 due to being sick (food poisoning) SSS/pts notified and dated 08/16/25. COTA-Schedule conflict dated 09/05/25, and 09/11/25. Record review of a document titled, ‘Communication Note’ revealed in part, “ Patient #5’s FM called and was requesting for a new OT that she has requested for, CM explained to Patient #5’s FM that we (the agency) are yet to find someone else that will provide the care for Patient #5 and we have informed the MD for transfer to another agency. The document was signed by RN H and dated 09/25/25. Record review of Patient #5’s ECR revealed a POC with a SOC date of 08/01/2025 for a certification period from 01/28/2026 - 03/28/2026 diagnosis included: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (an ongoing lung condition caused by damage to the lungs) and history of falling. Orders and Treatments: SN: effective 02/01/26 2m2 (2 times a month for 2 months), PT: 2w3 (2 times a week for 3 weeks), 1w6 (1 time a week for 6 weeks). Record review of a document titled, ‘Complaint Received’ revealed in part, “ Patient #5’s FM contacted the agency regarding concerns about therapy services. FM reported that Patient #5’s therapy had been delayed despite visits approved by insurance. The document was signed by the Adm/DON and dated 01/27/26. Record review of a document titled, ‘Communication Note’ revealed in part, “Spoke with Patient #5’s FM regarding PT Re-Evaluation. Patient #5’s FM voiced frustration with this process as Patient #5 has not had previous re-evaluations. FM reported previous PT was not seeing Patient #5 every 30 days. Discussed re-evaluation were required to re-evaluation every 30 days to complete supervisory visit and Patient #5’s progress per therapy practice acts. The document was signed by the Adm/DON and dated 02/12/26. Attempts made on 03/19/26 to interview the following staff members: PT, PTA, COTA C, RN A and RN B, no return calls received before exit. During an interview on 03/19/26 at 2:03 p.m. with the Adm/DON the surveyor presented the above findings. The Adm/DON stated, “that scheduling patient visits are overseen by the CM and DON but there had been some oversight issues with scheduling because the agency was still looking to hire a new schedular for patient care visits. The Adm/DON stated the agency had identified issues with Agency G due to staff not making scheduled visits and that the agency had also found failures with Agency G evaluations not being completed, patient service failures and problems with communications from Agency G staff for not calling patients to arrange visits. The Adm/DON stated the risk of staff not coordinating physician ordered plans of care and services was a decline in patient health and the potential for being hospitalized.”
All 2 inspections in the last three years
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 19, 2026 | Complaint inspection | 2 deficiencies cited |
| Dec 12, 2025 | Recertification inspection | No deficiencies cited |
Is it certified?
- Medicare-certified home health agency since Dec 20, 2019.
- Ownership: proprietary (for profit).
- No For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual. deficiency on record in the last three years.
CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.
Has anything been proven against it?
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
- 2 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.
Who does the caring?
- Offers nursing care, physical therapy, occupational therapy, speech pathology, medical social services and home health aide services.
- CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for home health agencies.
CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Who owns it?
- Juniper Hospice, LLC runs it.
- 5 owners or officers are people: Nidhu Narayan Kurup (owns 5% or more directly, 100%); Nidhu Narayan Kurup (managing employee (on the payroll), 50%); Veronica Ann Esqueda (managing employee (on the payroll)); Sheila Anne Walton (managing employee (on the payroll)); James M Douthitt (corporate officer).
- No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
- No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
CMS, Home Health Agency All Owners and Home Health Agency Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Organisation | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| Juniper Hospice, LLC | Runs it (operational or managerial control) | 100% | Dec 2, 2024 |
How do patients fare?
- CMS rates its quality of patient care 4.5 of 5.
- Patients rate it 2 of 5 in CMS’s patient survey (47 surveys completed): 67% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 46% would definitely recommend it.
- CMS compares it with the national rate: discharged to the community, worse; potentially preventable hospital stays, the same; potentially preventable readmissions after discharge, the same.
CMS, Home Health Care Agencies and Home Health Patient Survey. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | Rating |
|---|---|
| Quality of patient care ratingCMS star rating, 1 to 5 in half stars | 4.5 of 5 |
| Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the agency’s patients, 1 to 5 | 2 of 5 |
| Discharged to the communityCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate | 68.32% (worse than the national rate) |
| Potentially preventable hospital staysCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate | 11.85% (same as the national rate) |
| Potentially preventable readmissions after dischargeCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate | 3.99% (same as the national rate) |
How does it compare nearby?
- Of the 199 agencies CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 77469, where this agency’s office is, 142 have a quality of patient care rating; the middle one is 3 of 5, and this one is rated 4.5 of 5.
CMS, Home Health ZIP Codes and Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Place | Quality rating |
|---|---|
| C & L Home Healthcare Agency | 1.5 |
| Enhabit Home Health | 2.5 |
| Ameuro Home Health Inc. | Not given |
| C.n.g. Home Health, Inc. | 1 |
| Evening Star Healthcare Inc. | Not given |
| Texas Human Healthcare Services | Not given |
| Care and Comfort Home Health | Not given |
| Gracefaith Healthcare Services, Inc. | Not given |
| Quality Caregivers Health Care Inc. | Not given |
| Goodwill Healthcare Services Inc. | Not given |
| Beyondfaith Homecare & Rehab of Houston This home health agency | 4.5 |
| Raphahealth | Not given |
What the record doesn’t say
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
- Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
- QCOR says some of its home health reports are accurate or available only through May 19, 2021, because of a systems migration.
- Many home health agencies are inspected by a private accrediting organisation instead of the state, and QCOR’s home health file doesn’t appear to include those inspections: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.
Sources
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Home Health Care Agencies (6jpm-sxkc).
Released Oct 21, 2026 and checked Oct 24, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Home Health Patient Survey (ccn4-8vby).
Released Oct 21, 2026 and checked Oct 24, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, QCOR home health inspection reports (HHA_2567s_2018_to_2026YTD.xlsx).
Released Oct 20, 2026 and checked Oct 24, 2026. Updated monthly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Home Health Agency All Owners (fc009b2d-7846-44b1-b4a1-692f0c143879).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Oct 24, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Home Health Agency Enrollments (15f64ab4-3172-4a27-b589-ebd67a6d28aa).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Oct 24, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Home Health ZIP Codes (m5eg-upu5).
Released Oct 21, 2026 and checked Oct 24, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Oct 24, 2026.
From the agency
The public record above comes first. Anything the agency adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the agency will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the agency”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.