Hearth Record

Salud Health Care Services Inc.

A home health agency in Rio Grande City, Texas 78582

2544 Central Palm Drive Ste 106, Rio Grande City, Texas 78582. (956) 487-5025.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 21, 2026.

The last 24 months 1 deficiency in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Mar 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Mar 11, 2025: a recertification inspection.

1 deficiency cited in the last three years.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

1 deficiency in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Mar 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 24, 2026.

1 deficiency by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Mar 11, 2025: recertification inspection1 deficiency
  • Infection Control Education

    The inspectors’ words, 1,456 words

    “Infection control education CFR(s): 484.70(c) Standard: Education. The HHA must provide infection control education to staff, patients, and caregiver(s). This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview, the agency failed to enforce its written policies to provide Bloodborne pathogen training as required by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), 29 CFR1910.1030 and Appendix A relating to Bloodborne pathogens for 10 of 13 personnel record review (RN A, LVN B, LVN C, LVN D, LVN F, RN G, LVN H, LVN I, LVN J, LVN K ) whose personnel records were reviewed for 2022, 2023 and 2024. This failure could place staff and agency’s current clients at risk for exposure to communicable and/or infectious diseases. The findings include: Review of the OSHA 29 CFR 1910.1030 revealed in part, “ ... The employer shall train each employee with occupational exposure in accordance with the requirements of this section... Training shall be provided as follows: At the time of initial assignment to tasks where occupational exposure may take place; at least annually thereafter...Annual training for all employees shall be provided within one year of their previous training...” Record review of agency’s policy “Infection Control Program”, dated 05/31/16, quoted in part, “Policy, Agency’s infection control program will be based on the following criteria ...4. CDC guidelines ...5. communicable disease prevention and control act, Health and safety code, chapter 81 ...6. current federal/state/local laws and regulations ...H. Education of Employee 1. Upon hire and annually thereafter, all agency employees will be educated regarding the policies and procedures related to: Infection control program, exposure control program, Bloodborne/Airborne/HIV Pathogen Program.” 1. Review of the RN A personnel record revealed an employment application was completed, signed, and dated 07/19/17. Agency roster listed RN A’s date of hire as 07/019/17. Review of the RN A personnel record included an agency form titled “Annual Employee Training “ that revealed last performed Bloodborne pathogen training for RN A dated as 08/03/21. Further review of the RN A’s personnel record failed to reveal it contained evidence on annual Bloodborne Pathogen trainings were conducted for the year 2022, 2023, and 2024. 2. Review of the LVN B personnel record revealed an employment application was completed, signed, and dated 05/15/14. Agency roster listed LVN B’s date of hire as 012/3/2014. Review of the LVN B personnel record included an agency form titled “Annual Employee Training “ that revealed last performed Bloodborne pathogen training for LVN B dated as 08/13/21. Further review of the LVN B’s personnel record failed to reveal it contained evidence on annual Bloodborne Pathogen trainings were conducted for the years 2022, 2023, and 2024. 3. Review of the LVN C personnel record revealed an employment application was completed, signed, and dated 10/10/13. Agency roster listed LVN C’s date of hire as 08/01/2014. Review of the LVN C personnel record included an agency form titled “Annual Employee Training “ that revealed last performed Bloodborne pathogen training for LVN C dated as 08/13/21. Further review of the LVN C’s personnel record failed to reveal it contained evidence on annual Bloodborne Pathogen trainings were conducted for the years 2022, 2023, and 2024. 4. Review of the LVN D personnel record revealed an employment application was completed, signed, and dated 09/12/23. Agency roster listed LVN D’s date of hire as 09/20/2023. Review of the LVN D personnel record included an agency form titled “Orientation Guidelines With all questions answered “ that revealed Initial Bloodborne pathogen training for LVN D dated as 09/21/23. Further review of the LVN D’s personnel record failed to reveal it contained evidence on annual Bloodborne Pathogen trainings were conducted for the year 2024. 5. Review of the LVN F personnel record revealed an employment application was completed, signed, and dated 03//04/22. Agency roster listed LVN F’s date of hire as 03/07/2022. Review of the LVN F personnel record included an agency form titled “ Orientation Guidelines With all questions answered “ that revealed Initial Bloodborne pathogen training for LVN F dated as 03/04/22. Further review of the LVN F’s personnel record failed to reveal it contained evidence on annual Bloodborne Pathogen trainings were conducted for the year, 2023, and 2024. 6. Review of the RN G personnel record revealed an employment application was completed, signed, and dated 04/21/14. Agency roster listed RN G’s date of hire as 12/03/14. Review of the RN G personnel record included an agency form titled “Annual Employee Training “ that revealed last performed Bloodborne pathogen training for RN G dated as 08/03/21. Further review of the RN G’s personnel record failed to reveal it contained evidence on annual Bloodborne Pathogen trainings were conducted for the year 2022, 2023, and 2024. 7. Review of the LVN H personnel record revealed an employment application was completed, signed, and dated 09/15/21. Agency roster listed LVN H’s date of hire as 09/15/21. Review of the LVN H personnel record included an agency form titled “ Orientation Guidelines With all questions answered “ that revealed Initial Bloodborne pathogen training for LVN H dated as 09/15/21. Further review of the LVN H’s personnel record failed to reveal it contained evidence on annual Bloodborne Pathogen trainings were conducted for the year 2022, 2023, and 2024. 8. Review of the LVN I personnel record revealed an employment application was completed, signed, and dated 09/29/21. Agency roster listed LVN I’s date of hire as 09/29/21. Review of the LVN I personnel record included an agency form titled “ Orientation Guidelines With all questions answered “ that revealed Initial Bloodborne pathogen training for LVN I dated as 09/29/21. Further review of the LVN I’s personnel record failed to reveal it contained evidence on annual Bloodborne Pathogen trainings were conducted for the year 2022, 2023, and 2024. 9. Review of the LVN J personnel record revealed an employment application was completed, signed, and dated 10/13/23. Agency roster listed LVN J’s date of hire as 10/13/23. Review of the LVN J personnel record included an agency form titled “ Orientation Guidelines With all questions answered “ that revealed Initial Bloodborne pathogen training for LVN J dated as 10/13/23. Further review of the LVN J’s personnel record failed to reveal it contained evidence on annual Bloodborne Pathogen trainings were conducted for the year 2024. 10. Review of the LVN K personnel record revealed an employment application was completed, signed, and dated 12/18/23. Agency roster listed LVN K’s date of hire as 12/18/23. Review of the LVN K personnel record included an agency form titled “ Orientation Guidelines With all questions answered “ that revealed Initial Bloodborne pathogen training for LVN K dated as 12/18/23. Further review of the LVN K’s personnel record failed to reveal it contained evidence on annual Bloodborne Pathogen trainings were conducted for the year 2024. Interview with Alternate Administrator/ Director on Nurses, Alternate Director of Nurses and the Human resources Representative on 03/11/25 at 4:30, the surveyor presented the above findings and surveyor asked what the agency’s policy on Bloodborne Pathogen trainings was. Alternate Administrator stated “Bloodborne pathogen training are done upon hire and annually for all staff”. Alternate Administrator confirmed that there are no Bloodborne pathogens trainings for several employees for the year 2022, 2023 and 2024. Surveyor asked why no bloodborne pathogen trainings were conducted for the years of 2022, 2023 and2024 for the Employees. Alternate Administrator stated that “Our Previous Human resource representative left from one day to the next, we thought she had been doing the trainings and thought that the former HR representative had put them somewhere else, but we can’t find anything “.Alternate Administrator confirmed the Human resource department was responsible for bloodborne pathogen trainings and by not doing annual bloodborne pathogen trainings, can lead to the spread of infections to themselves and patients. Nurse Surveyor asked Director of Nurses if the annual blood borne Pathogen trainings kept in the personnel file or in another Binder, She Replied, “the initial one is in the employee file and after that there are kept in another binder.” Human Resource Representative was asked by surveyor when was her employment start date, she stated that she started 12/06/2024 and the Previous Human Resource Representative left in March of last year, Surveyor asked the current Human resource Representative if she was aware of the failure to conduct the Bloodborne pathogen training She stated” I did conduct an audit and notified the administrator. Per the information from the Alternate Administrator there was no action taken to rectify the situation Administrator unavailable for Interview due to Out on medical leave for Medical Procedure The agency did not dispute the surveyor’s findings. The agency was afforded the opportunity to provided additional policy information upon exit on 03/11/25 at 5:19 pm. No additional documents provided by agency.”

    Rule G0686. Standard-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Mar 11, 2025Recertification inspection1 deficiency cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified home health agency since Dec 8, 2011.
  • Ownership: proprietary (for profit).
  • No deficiency on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Who does the caring?

  • Offers nursing care and physical therapy.
  • Doesn’t offer occupational therapy, speech pathology, medical social services and home health aide services.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for home health agencies.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • Salud HCS Holding Inc. owns 100% directly since Apr 5, 2013.
  • 5 owners or officers are people: Alvaro Pena (owns 5% or more through other companies, 50%); Alvaro Pena (corporate director, 50%); Maria Branco (owns 5% or more through other companies, 50%); Maria Branco (corporate director, 50%); Argentina Guerra (runs it (operational or managerial control), 0%).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Agency All Owners and Home Health Agency Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Salud HCS Holding Inc.Owns 5% or more directly100%Apr 5, 2013

How do patients fare?

  • CMS rates its quality of patient care 1 of 5.
  • CMS gives no : “Fewer than 70 patients completed the survey.”
  • CMS compares it with the national rate: discharged to the community, worse; potentially preventable hospital stays, the same.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies and Home Health Patient Survey. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Quality of patient care ratingCMS star rating, 1 to 5 in half stars1 of 5
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the agency’s patients, 1 to 5Not rated
Discharged to the communityCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate29.38% (worse than the national rate)
Potentially preventable hospital staysCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate16.99% (same as the national rate)

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 57 agencies CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 78582, where this agency’s office is, 44 have a quality of patient care rating; the middle one is 2 of 5, and this one is rated 1 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Home Health ZIP Codes and Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • QCOR says some of its home health reports are accurate or available only through May 19, 2021, because of a systems migration.
  • Many home health agencies are inspected by a private accrediting organisation instead of the state, and QCOR’s home health file doesn’t appear to include those inspections: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 24, 2026.

From the agency

The public record above comes first. Anything the agency adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the agency will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the agency”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.