Heavenly Nurses Home Health LLC
A home health agency in Laredo, Texas 78041
201 W Hillside Rd, Suite 14a, Laredo, Texas 78041. (956) 726-9700.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.
The short answer
Record last released by CMS on Oct 21, 2026.
- 1.5of 5 quality of patient care rating
- Not rated patient survey rating
- 2 deficiencies cited in the last three years
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean3
- Star ratings
- CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
What did inspectors find?
The last inspection on record was on Aug 28, 2025: a recertification inspection.
2 deficiencies cited in the last three years.
CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.
When those deficiencies happened
2 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Aug 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 24, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Nov | Dec | ||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each deficiency, as cited
Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.
CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.
Aug 28, 2025: recertification inspection2 deficiencies
-
Encoding And Transmitting Oasis
The inspectors’ words, 444 words
“Encoding and transmitting OASIS CFR(s): 484.45(a) Standard: An HHA must encode and electronically transmit each completed OASIS assessment to the CMS system, regarding each beneficiary with respect to which information is required to be transmitted (as determined by the Secretary), within 30 days of completing the assessment of the beneficiary. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on interview and record review, the agency failed to code and electronically transmit each completed OASIS assessment to the CMS system within thirty days of completing the assessment of the beneficiary for 72 of 285 (25.26%) records submitted from 02/18/25 to 08/15/25. The agency did not code and electronically submit 72 patient’s OASIS data to IQIES within 30 days to track and evaluate changes in the patient’s health while admitted to home health services to help ensure quality healthcare for patients. This failure prevented the agency’s patient OASIS data from being made available to CMS for analysis of patient care performance The Findings Included: Record review of an iQIES Error Summary Report dated 08/01/24 to 08/01/25 indicated the agency failed to code and electronically transmit 147 OASIS assessments data to the CMS system within thirty days of completing the assessment of the beneficiary. During a record review and interview on 08/26/25 at 11:56 a.m., with the Adm/DON and Office Manager the above findings were presented. The Adm/DON stated that the Alt Adm/ADON, RN G and herself do all the admissions and completed the OASIS within 5 days. The Adm/DON stated that the Office Manager submitted the OASIS. The Office Manager acknowledge that she was responsible for the submission of the OASIS. The Office Manager stated, “I have no excuse (for late OASIS submissions). I was sick and in and out of work. I wanted to make sure the information was correct.” The Adm/DON then stated, “it would affect everything. It impacts our payments and patient care.” The Adm/DON also stated that the agency wouldn’t get accurate information like ADLs, pain, etc. from quarterly reports they receive.” Review of the agency’s policy manual included a policy titled “Timelines” IM. 35 with a revised date of 07/01/25. The policy revealed, in part: “…III. All completed and encoded OASIS data will be transmitted via electronic communication software that is available from CMS or software that conforms to CMS electronic record layout, edit specifications and data dictionary, and that includes the required OASIS data set and the CMS-assigned branch identifications number, as applicable. It will be transmitted using electronic communications software that complies with Federal Information Processing Standard (FIPS 140-2, issued May,2021) from the Agency contactor to the CMS collection site within 30 days of the M0090 date.” …”
-
Verbal Orders
The inspectors’ words, 894 words
“Verbal orders CFR(s): 484.60(b)(3)(4) (3) Verbal orders must be accepted only by personnel authorized to do so by applicable state laws and regulations and by the HHA’s internal policies. (4) When services are provided on the basis of a physician or allowed practitioner’s verbal orders, a nurse acting in accordance with state licensure requirements, or other qualified practitioner responsible for furnishing or supervising the ordered services, in accordance with state law and the HHA’s policies, must document the orders in the patient’s clinical record, and sign, date, and time the orders. Verbal orders must be authenticated and dated by the physician or allowed pracitioner in accordance with applicable state laws and regulations, as well as the HHA’s internal policies. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview, the agency failed to ensure verbal orders were documented in the patient’s clinical record with signature, date and time order was written for 2 of 5 Active Patients (#1 & # 5) whose records were review in that: 1. LVN B received orders to discontinue Farxiga (helps improve blood sugar control) and increase Tresiba (helps lower blood sugar) from 8 units SQ daily to 10 units SQ daily effective 06/26/25 for Patient #1 and failed to write the order. 2. LVN C received orders to discontinue Acyclovir ointment (used to treat and prevent viral infection) effective 06/02/25 for Patient #5 and failed to write the order. This failure could place the agency’s patients at risk of receiving improper care and services that could result in negative health outcomes. 1. Review of Patient #1’s electronic record revealed a form titled, “Home Health Certification and Plan of Care” for the Certification Period of 06/24/25 to 08/22/25 with a primary diagnosis of “Type 2 diabetes mellitus (condition where the insulin your pancreas makes can’t work properly or can’t make enough insulin, causing high blood sugar levels) with diabetic neuropathy (weakness, pain and numbness that occurs to the hands and feet from nerve damage).” SN frequency of 2 visits a week for 1 week, then 3 visits a week for 8 weeks. Continued review of Patient #1’s electronic record revealed a SN note signed and dated 06/27/25by LVN B that read in part… “patient consulted with his primary care provider Dr. X yesterday. New verbal medication orders were received to discontinue Farxiga and increase Tresiba from 8 units SQ daily to 10 units SQ daily effective 06/26/25.” Review of Patient #1’s electronic record revealed the medication profile had been reviewed and was signed on 06/27/25 by the LVN B. Further review of Patient #1’s electronic record failed to contain documented evidence of a written verbal order to discontinue Farxiga and to increase Tresiba from 8 units to 10 units SQ daily. During a record review and interview on 08/27/25 1:53 p.m. with the Adm/DON and LVN B the above findings were presented. The Surveyor asked who was responsible for writing orders to discontinue medications. LVN B stated that she was responsible because she got the order and clarified it. The Surveyor then asked if there was an order to discontinue Farxiga and increase of Tresiba. LVN B stated, “no, not an actual order. I didn’t think we had to write an order for it (changes and discontinuation of medication).” The Surveyor then asked what the consequences could be if the patient continued taking Farxiga and increase does of Tresiba. LVN B stated that the patient’s blood sugar could drop, and he might get a hypoglycemic (low blood sugar causing confusion, shaking, etc. or very low blood sugar causing possible life-threatening conditions) episode leading to hospitalization. 2. Review of Patient #5’s electronic record revealed a form titled, “Home Health Certification and Plan of Care” for the Certification Period of 05/22/25 to 07/20/25 with a primary diagnosis of “Type 2 diabetes mellitus without complications.” SN frequency of 1 visit a week for 8 weeks. Continued review of Patient #5’s electronic record revealed a SN note signed and dated 06/19/25 by LVN C that read in part… “Upon review of medications patient had Acyclovir discontinued on 06/02/25 when patient had appointment with Dr. Y.” Review of Patient #5’s electronic record revealed the medication profile had been reviewed and Acyclovir was discontinued on 06/02/25. Further review of Patient #5’s electronic record failed to contain documented evidence of a written verbal order to discontinue Acyclovir. During a record review and interview on 08/27/25 5:00 p.m. with the Adm/DON the above findings were presented. The Surveyor asked if there was an order to discontinue Acyclovir on 06/19/25. Adm/DON stated, “no, I don’t know why he (LVN C) didn’t write the order. (LVN C is no longer employed at agency). The Adm/DON then stated that the Topical Acyclovir could cause more harm because she a had a biopsy that day (06/02/25).” Review of the agency’s policy manual included a policy titled “Orders for Care” PC.30 with a reviewed date of 11/01/20. The policy revealed, in part: “…The Agency will obtain orders and provide care with physician’s and/or non-physician practitioner’s orders. .... Orders may be accepted and put into writing by personnel authorized do so…. I. All orders are kept current and renewed or updates as appropriate when: A. Changes in the patient’s/ client’s condition occurs. B. The ordered care is ineffective. C. Changes in diagnosis, treatment (including procedures and medications) …” …”
The one inspection in the last three years
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| Aug 28, 2025 | Recertification inspection | 2 deficiencies cited |
Is it certified?
- Medicare-certified home health agency since Jul 30, 2010.
- Ownership: proprietary (for profit).
- No For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual. deficiency on record in the last three years.
CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.
Has anything been proven against it?
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
- 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.
Who does the caring?
- Offers nursing care, physical therapy, occupational therapy, speech pathology and medical social services.
- Doesn’t offer home health aide services.
- CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for home health agencies.
CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Who owns it?
- 4 owners or officers are people: Pauline Vaquez (corporate officer, 100%); Pauline Vaquez (managing employee (on the payroll), 100%); Pauline Vaquez (owns 5% or more directly, 50%); Pauline Vaquez (runs it (operational or managerial control), 50%).
- No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
- No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
CMS, Home Health Agency All Owners and Home Health Agency Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.
How do patients fare?
- CMS rates its quality of patient care 1.5 of 5.
- CMS gives no CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.: “Zero, or very few, patients met the survey’s rules for inclusion.”
- CMS compares it with the national rate: discharged to the community, worse; potentially preventable hospital stays, the same.
CMS, Home Health Care Agencies and Home Health Patient Survey. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | Rating |
|---|---|
| Quality of patient care ratingCMS star rating, 1 to 5 in half stars | 1.5 of 5 |
| Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the agency’s patients, 1 to 5 | Not rated |
| Discharged to the communityCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate | 38.09% (worse than the national rate) |
| Potentially preventable hospital staysCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate | 18.27% (same as the national rate) |
How does it compare nearby?
- Of the 49 agencies CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 78041, where this agency’s office is, 39 have a quality of patient care rating; the middle one is 1.5 of 5, and this one is rated 1.5 of 5.
CMS, Home Health ZIP Codes and Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Place | Quality rating |
|---|---|
| Nursing From the Heart Home Care Inc. | 3.5 |
| Nursing Services and Consultants of Laredo | 1.5 |
| Pro-Health Nursing Inc. | 1.5 |
| Excellent Nursing Care, P.C. | Not given |
| Community Home Care Inc. | 2.5 |
| Torres Home Health Services, Lc | 1.5 |
| Amistad Home Health Inc. | 1 |
| Healing Hands Home Health Care LLC | 3 |
| Inspira Home Health Services | 4.5 |
| Brightstar Care | 1.5 |
| Star of Life Home Care | 1.5 |
| Las Palmas Health Services | Not given |
What the record doesn’t say
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
- Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
- QCOR says some of its home health reports are accurate or available only through May 19, 2021, because of a systems migration.
- Many home health agencies are inspected by a private accrediting organisation instead of the state, and QCOR’s home health file doesn’t appear to include those inspections: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.
Sources
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Home Health Care Agencies (6jpm-sxkc).
Released Oct 21, 2026 and checked Oct 24, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Home Health Patient Survey (ccn4-8vby).
Released Oct 21, 2026 and checked Oct 24, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, QCOR home health inspection reports (HHA_2567s_2018_to_2026YTD.xlsx).
Released Oct 20, 2026 and checked Oct 24, 2026. Updated monthly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Home Health Agency All Owners (fc009b2d-7846-44b1-b4a1-692f0c143879).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Oct 24, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Home Health Agency Enrollments (15f64ab4-3172-4a27-b589-ebd67a6d28aa).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Oct 24, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Home Health ZIP Codes (m5eg-upu5).
Released Oct 21, 2026 and checked Oct 24, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Oct 24, 2026.
From the agency
The public record above comes first. Anything the agency adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the agency will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the agency”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.