Hearth Record

Home Health Associates LLC

A home health agency in Greenville, Texas 75401

4216 Wesley St, Ste 200, Greenville, Texas 75401. (903) 886-0612.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 21, 2026.

The last 24 months 2 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Apr 2025. Most serious: Element-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Apr 22, 2025: a recertification inspection.

2 deficiencies cited in the last three years.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

2 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Apr 2025. Most serious: Element-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 24, 2026.

2 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Apr 22, 2025: recertification inspection2 deficiencies
  • Plan Of Care Must Include The Following

    The inspectors’ words, 1,474 words

    “Plan of care must include the following CFR(s): 484.60(a)(2)(i-xvi) The individualized plan of care must include the following: (i) All pertinent diagnoses; (ii) The patient’s mental, psychosocial, and cognitive status; (iii) The types of services, supplies, and equipment required; (iv) The frequency and duration of visits to be made; (v) Prognosis; (vi) Rehabilitation potential; (vii) Functional limitations; (viii) Activities permitted; (ix) Nutritional requirements; (x) All medications and treatments; (xi) Safety measures to protect against injury; (xii) A description of the patient’s risk for emergency department visits and hospital re-admission, and all necessary interventions to address the underlying risk factors. (xiii) Patient and caregiver education and training to facilitate timely discharge; (xiv) Patient-specific interventions and education; measurable outcomes and goals identified by the HHA and the patient; (xv) Information related to any advanced directives; and (xvi) Any additional items the HHA or physician or allowed practitioner may choose to include. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on interview and record review, the agency failed to ensure the individualized plan of care included the types of services required for 1 of 7 patient records reviewed for plans of care. (Patient #2 Patient #2’s POC did not include an order for aide services. This failure could place patients at risk of not receiving necessary services to meet the patient’s needs. Findings included: Record review of a RN Oasis Recertification assessment for Patient #2 dated 03/21/25 indicated patient had limited mobility and had to use his left hand to maneuver right arm. Patient was right side dominant making it difficult for patient to manage his activities of daily living and care independently. Patient had no range of motion of right shoulder due to shoulder injury which made ambulating with walker more difficult… patient required increased assistance with activities of daily living, grooming, showering, toileting, meals, housekeeping, and medications. Record review of Patient #2’s POC dated 03/26/25 to 05/24/25 indicated a SOC date of 09/27/24, and indicated he was 87 years old with diagnoses including type 2 diabetes (body either doesn’t produce enough insulin, or it resists insulin) with diabetic neuropathy (nerve damage), orthostatic hypotension (sudden drop in blood pressure when transitioning from a lying or sitting position to standing and can lead to dizziness, lightheadedness, and fainting), hypertension (high blood pressure), repeated falls, dementia (loss of memory), anxiety (feelings of worry), major depressive disorder (persistent low mood), and chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder (lung disease that makes it difficult to breathe). The POC indicated Patient #7 was ordered skilled nursing visits 2 times a week for 2 weeks then 1 time a week for 7 weeks, and physical therapy 1 time a week for 1 week for evaluation. The POC did not include orders for home health aide services. Review of a Master Calendar for Patient #2 dated 03/26/25 to 05/24/25 indicated home health aide visits were scheduled twice a week on Tuesday’s and Thursdays from 03/26/25 to 05/24/25. Review of an Aide Care Plan for Patient #2 dated 03/26/25 to 05/24/25 indicated “activity” included assist with ambulation each visit. Further review indicated “personal care” each visit included assist to dress, comb hair, foot care, nail care, shampoo hair, shave, skin care, shower, and universal precautions. During a home visit/interview on 04/22/25 at 9:05 a.m., Patient #2 said he had been on the agency’s services for 1 year “this time”. He said he currently received an aide 2 times a week for a shower. He said he received aide services the whole time he had been with the agency. During an interview on 04/22/25 at 9:17 a.m., RN D said she thought Patient #2’s aide services were off and on, but she was not sure. During an interview on 04/22/25 at 10:39 a.m., RN D said Patient #2 was on aide services during the previous certification period. She said the aide services with the frequency should be on the POC. During an interview on 04/22/25 at 11:50 a.m., the RN Administrator/Supervising Nurse said sometimes there was a separate order for aide services if it was ordered after and not on the POC. She said she would look in Patient #2’s electronic medical record to see if there was an order for aide services. During an interview on 04/22/25 at 11:58 a.m., the RN Administrator/Supervising Nurse said she spoke to the RN Alternate Supervising/QA Nurse, and she was not seeing it (aide order) on the POC either. The Administrator said there was an aide care plan that was signed by the doctor and asked if that would count as an order. The Administrator said the consultant said that was why the aide POC was signed was because it counted as a physician’s order. The Administrator said the POC went through QA. During an interview on 04/22/25 at 12:31 p.m., the RN Alternate Supervising/QA Nurse said she was the assistant director of nursing and did QA also. She said she audited all POCs and looked for orders, frequencies, made sure the POC was signed by the doctor, made sure teaching matched diagnosis, and had lab orders if needed. She said the POC was developed by the nurses but sometimes the PRN nurses didn’t know how to develop the POC so she would do the POC when she QA’d the OASIS. She said once the OASIS was done the POC prepopulated, and some nurses didn’t know how to do it so she would do it for them. The RN Alternate Supervising/QA Nurse said the POC was updated with any changes, changes in frequency, and changes in orders. She said the POC was also updated on recertification or if the patient had been in hospital. She said she didn’t do Patient #2’s recertification but did the POC. The RN Alternate Supervising/QA Nurse said Patient #2 was on aide services. She said aide services required a physician order. She said the agency consultant said if the aide care plan was signed that was sufficient as an order. She said she noticed the aide care plan did not have the frequency so that would not work. The RN Alternate Supervising/QA Nurse said when she QA’d Patient #2’s POC she must have missed putting an order on there. She said the POC was supposed to have aide services and frequency. The RN Alternate Supervising/QA Nurse said since the agency’s consultant said the aide care plan would work, she thought it would, but the order was not covered since the aide frequency was not included on aide care plan. She said the services and frequency were supposed to be on the POC. The RN Alternate/Supervising/QA Nurse said by aide services not being on the POC the patient was not supposed to be getting aide services because there was no order for the aide to be there. She said it was an overlook on her part. During an interview on 04/22/25 at 2:08 p.m., the RN Administrator/Supervising Nurse said POCs were developed normally by the person who did the recertification. She said she and the RN Alternate Supervising Nurse had helped with some POCs if there was a new nurse or they were teaching on how to do it. She said POCs were generated from the OASIS and updated at every recertification. The RN Administrator/Supervising Nurse said aide services required a physician order and frequency and it was supposed to be on the POC. She said all POCs were audited by the RN Alternate Supervising/QA Nurse. The RN Administrator/Supervising Nurse said if aide services were not on the POC, there would be a separate order. She said if aide services were not on the POC, services could be missed even if visits were scheduled. She said if there was no order and services were not on the POC then the agency did not have an order and the aide was not supposed to be going. She said the POC policy indicated the frequency and services had to be on the POC for every discipline and frequency. Record review of a Plan of Care policy dated 05/02/24 indicated “…Ill. Each patient/client must receive an individualized written Plan of Care, including any revisions or additions. The individualized Plan of Care must specify the care and services necessary to meet the patient/client-specific needs as identified in the comprehensive assessment… A. The individualized Plan of Care must include the following… 3. The types of services, supplies, and equipment required… 4. The frequency and duration of visits to be made…VI. The individualized Plan of Care must be reviewed and revised by the physician and/or non-physician practitioner who is responsible for the home health Plan of Care and the Agency as frequently as the patient’s/client’s condition or needs require, but no less frequently than once every 60 days, beginning with the start of care date… VIII. Drugs, services, and treatments are administered only as ordered by a physician and/or non­physician practitioner…””

    Rule G0574. Element-level.

  • Only As Ordered By A Physician

    The inspectors’ words, 1,474 words

    “Only as ordered by a physician CFR(s): 484.60(b)(1) Drugs, services, and treatments are administered only as ordered by a physician or allowed practitioner. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on interview and record review, the agency failed to ensure services were administered only as ordered by a physician for 1 of 7 patient records reviewed. (Patient #2) Patient #2 received home health aide services/visits without a physician’s order. This failure could place patients at risk of receiving services not approved by a physician. Findings included: Record review of a RN Oasis Recertification assessment for Patient #2 dated 03/21/25 indicated patient had limited mobility and had to use his left hand to maneuver right arm. Patient was right side dominant making it difficult for patient to manage his activities of daily living and care independently. Patient had no range of motion of right shoulder due to shoulder injury which made ambulating with walker more difficult… patient required increased assistance with activities of daily living, grooming, showering, toileting, meals, housekeeping, and medications. Further review indicated discontinued interventions were home health aide frequency 2 times a week for assistance with activities of daily living. Record review of Patient #2’s POC dated 03/26/25 to 05/24/25 indicated a SOC date of 09/27/24, and indicated he was 87 years old with diagnoses including type 2 diabetes (body either doesn’t produce enough insulin, or it resists insulin) with diabetic neuropathy (nerve damage), orthostatic hypotension (sudden drop in blood pressure when transitioning from a lying or sitting position to standing and can lead to dizziness, lightheadedness, and fainting), hypertension (high blood pressure), repeated falls, dementia (loss of memory), anxiety (feelings of worry), major depressive disorder (persistent low mood), and chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder (lung disease that makes it difficult to breathe). The POC indicated Patient #7 was ordered skilled nursing visits 2 times a week for 2 weeks then 1 time a week for 7 weeks, and physical therapy 1 time a week for 1 week for evaluation. The POC did not include orders for home health aide services. Review of a Master Calendar for Patient #2 dated 03/26/25 to 05/24/25 indicated home health aide visits were completed on 03/27/25, 04/01/25, 04/03/25, 04/08/25, 04/10/25, 04/15/25 and 04/17/25. The calendar indicated home health aide visits were scheduled for 04/22/25, 04/24/25, 04/29/25, 05/01/25, 05/06/25, 05/08/25, 05/13/25, 05/15/25, 05/20/25, and 05/22/25. The calendar indicated home health aide visits were scheduled twice a week on Tuesday’s and Thursdays from 03/26/25 to 05/24/25. Review of an Aide Care Plan for Patient #2 dated 03/26/25 to 05/24/25 indicated “activity” included assist with ambulation each visit. Further review indicated “personal care” each visit included assist to dress, comb hair, foot care, nail care, shampoo hair, shave, skin care, shower, and universal precautions. Review of Patient #2’s clinical record did not include an order for home health aide services/visits for the certification period of 03/26/25 to 05/24/25. During a home visit/interview on 04/22/25 at 9:05 a.m., Patient #2 said he had been on the agency’s services for 1 year “this time”. He said he currently received an aide 2 times a week for a shower. He said he received aide services the whole time he had been with the agency. During an interview on 04/22/25 at 9:17 a.m., RN D said she thought Patient #2’s aide services were off and on, but she was not sure. During an interview on 04/22/25 at 10:39 a.m., RN D said Patient #2 was on aide services during the previous certification period. She said the aide services with the frequency should be on the POC. During an interview on 04/22/25 at 11:50 a.m., the RN Administrator/Supervising Nurse said sometimes there was a separate order for aide services if it was ordered after and not on the POC. She said she would look in Patient #2’s electronic medical record to see if there was an order for aide services. During an interview on 04/22/25 at 11:58 a.m., the RN Administrator/Supervising Nurse said she spoke to the RN Alternate Supervising/QA Nurse, and she was not seeing it (aide order) on the POC either. The Administrator said there was an aide care plan that was signed by the doctor and asked if that would count as an order. The Administrator said the consultant said that was why the aide POC was signed was because it counted as a physician’s order. The Administrator said the POC went through QA. During an interview on 04/22/25 at 12:31 p.m., the RN Alternate Supervising/QA Nurse said she was the assistant director of nursing and did QA also. She said she audited all POCs and looked for orders, frequencies, made sure the POC was signed by the doctor, made sure teaching matched diagnosis, and had lab orders if needed. She said the POC was developed by the nurses but sometimes the PRN nurses didn’t know how to develop the POC so she would do the POC when she QA’d the OASIS. She said once the OASIS was done the POC prepopulated, and some nurses didn’t know how to do it so she would do it for them. The RN Alternate Supervising/QA Nurse said the POC was updated with any changes, changes in frequency, and changes in orders. She said the POC was also updated on recertification or if the patient had been in hospital. She said she didn’t do Patient #2’s recertification but did the POC. The RN Alternate Supervising/QA Nurse said Patient #2 was on aide services. She said aide services required a physician order. She said the agency consultant said if the aide care plan was signed that was sufficient as an order. She said she noticed the aide care plan did not have the frequency so that would not work. The RN Alternate Supervising/QA Nurse said when she QA’d Patient #2’s POC she must have missed putting an order on there. She said the POC was supposed to have aide services and frequency. The RN Alternate Supervising/QA Nurse said since the agency’s consultant said the aide care plan would work, she thought it would, but the order was not covered since the aide frequency was not included on aide care plan. She said the services and frequency were supposed to be on the POC. The RN Alternate/Supervising/QA Nurse said by aide services not being on the POC the patient was not supposed to be getting aide services because there was no order for the aide to be there. She said it was an overlook on her part. During an interview on 04/22/25 at 2:08 p.m., the RN Administrator/Supervising Nurse said POCs were developed normally by the person who did the recertification. She said she and the RN Alternate Supervising Nurse had helped with some POCs if there was a new nurse or they were teaching on how to do it. She said POCs were generated from the OASIS and updated at every recertification. The RN Administrator/Supervising Nurse said aide services required a physician order and frequency and it was supposed to be on the POC. She said all POCs were audited by the RN Alternate Supervising/QA Nurse. The RN Administrator/Supervising Nurse said if aide services were not on the POC, there would be a separate order. She said if aide services were not on the POC, services could be missed even if visits were scheduled. She said if there was no order and services were not on the POC then the agency did not have an order and the aide was not supposed to be going. She said the POC policy indicated the frequency and services had to be on the POC for every discipline and frequency. Record review of an Orders for Care policy dated 05/01/24 indicated “…The Agency will obtain orders and provide care in accordance with physician’s and/or non-physician practitioner’s orders which are established prior to initiating patient/client care and reviewed/revised by the physician and/or non-physician practitioner every sixty (60) days and as needed.…” Record review of a Plan of Care policy dated 05/02/24 indicated “…Ill. Each patient/client must receive an individualized written Plan of Care, including any revisions or additions. The individualized Plan of Care must specify the care and services necessary to meet the patient/client-specific needs as identified in the comprehensive assessment… A. The individualized Plan of Care must include the following… 3. The types of services, supplies, and equipment required… 4. The frequency and duration of visits to be made…VI. The individualized Plan of Care must be reviewed and revised by the physician and/or non-physician practitioner who is responsible for the home health Plan of Care and the Agency as frequently as the patient’s/client’s condition or needs require, but no less frequently than once every 60 days, beginning with the start of care date… VIII. Drugs, services, and treatments are administered only as ordered by a physician and/or non­physician practitioner…””

    Rule G0580. Element-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Apr 22, 2025Recertification inspection2 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified home health agency since May 24, 2010.
  • Ownership: proprietary (for profit).
  • No deficiency on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Who does the caring?

  • Offers nursing care, physical therapy, occupational therapy, speech pathology, medical social services and home health aide services.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for home health agencies.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • 6 owners or officers are people: Janantik Pandya (owns 5% or more directly, 100%); Janantik Pandya (corporate director, 100%); Nabina Bhandari (runs it (operational or managerial control), 25%); Kripa Shrestha (runs it (operational or managerial control), 25%); Janantik Pandya (managing employee (on the payroll), 25%); Surta J Pandya (runs it (operational or managerial control), 25%).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Agency All Owners and Home Health Agency Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

How do patients fare?

  • CMS rates its quality of patient care 2 of 5.
  • CMS gives no : “No survey results are available for this period.”
  • CMS compares it with the national rate: discharged to the community, worse; potentially preventable hospital stays, the same.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies and Home Health Patient Survey. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Quality of patient care ratingCMS star rating, 1 to 5 in half stars2 of 5
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the agency’s patients, 1 to 5Not rated
Discharged to the communityCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate63.80% (worse than the national rate)
Potentially preventable hospital staysCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate12.68% (same as the national rate)

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 72 agencies CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 75401, where this agency’s office is, 59 have a quality of patient care rating; the middle one is 3.5 of 5, and this one is rated 2 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Home Health ZIP Codes and Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • QCOR says some of its home health reports are accurate or available only through May 19, 2021, because of a systems migration.
  • Many home health agencies are inspected by a private accrediting organisation instead of the state, and QCOR’s home health file doesn’t appear to include those inspections: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 24, 2026.

From the agency

The public record above comes first. Anything the agency adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the agency will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the agency”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.