Hearth Record

Mga Home Health Plus Services Inc.

A home health agency in Cedar Hill, Texas 75104

1109 N Hwy 67 Suite # 4, Cedar Hill, Texas 75104. (972) 293-8555.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 21, 2026.

The last 24 months 1 deficiency in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Oct 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Oct 30, 2024: a recertification inspection.

1 deficiency cited in the last three years.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

1 deficiency in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Oct 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 24, 2026.

1 deficiency by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Oct 30, 2024: recertification inspection1 deficiency
  • Encoding And Transmitting Oasis

    The inspectors’ words, 814 words

    “Encoding and transmitting OASIS CFR(s): 484.45(a) Standard: An HHA must encode and electronically transmit each completed OASIS assessment to the CMS system, regarding each beneficiary with respect to which information is required to be transmitted (as determined by the Secretary), within 30 days of completing the assessment of the beneficiary. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview, the agency failed to transmit completed OASIS assessments (Outcome and Assessment Information Set - used to collect patient information to measure outcomes and quality improvement) within 30 days of completing the OASIS assessments to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) system for 15 of 131 OASIS assessments transmitted between 10/24/2023 to 10/25/2024. The failure made the agency’s data unavailable to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services to evaluate the agency’s provision of patient care. Review of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) OASIS-E (Outcome and Assessment Information Set - tool used by CMS to collect patient information to measure outcomes and quality improvement) Guidance Manual, updated 1/1/2024, read in part; “Chapter 1: OASIS Guidance Manual Introduction…1.5.5.1 General OASIS Item Conventions…14…M0090- Date Assessment Completed, is the last date that information used to complete the comprehensive assessment and determine OASIS coding was gathered by the assessing clinician and documentation of the specific information/responses was completed…” Review of the “OASIS Error Detail Report” taken from the Internet Quality Improvement and Evaluation System (IQIES) on 10/25/2024 indicated that 15 assessments contained the error number -3330, which indicated that the OASIS Assessments were submitted more than 30 days after the assessment completion date between 10/24/2023 and 10/25/2024. Review of the agency’s “OASIS Agency Final Validation” report taken from the Internet Quality Improvement and Evaluation System on 10/25/2024 indicated that the agency submitted 131 OASIS assessments between 10/24/2023 to 10/25/2024. During an interview on 10/30/2024 at approximately 12:50 p.m. with the Administrator, Supervising Nurse, and the Quality Assurance Reviewer, the surveyor discussed the OASIS Error Detail Report; the report indicated that the agency had 15 OASIS assessments that were transmitted to the CMS system more than 30 days after the OASIS assessments had been completed. The surveyor asked why the OASIS assessments were transmitted late and what the OASIS assessment transmissions process was. The Administrator informed the surveyor that they used (software). The surveyor asked when the agency transmitted the OASIS assessments. The Administrator stated, “As soon as the OASIS comes through the system. The surveyor asked who was responsible for completing the OASIS assessments. The Administrator informed the surveyor that the Supervising Nurse would be responsible for completing the assessments. The surveyor asked what was the time frame that the agency required that OASIS assessment be turned in to the agency. The Supervising Nurse stated, “Within 3 days, 5 days maximum.” The surveyor asked what the next step was after the OASIS assessment had been turned into the agency by the clinician. The Supervising Nurse informed the surveyor that the Quality Assurance Reviewer would sometimes review, but not all the time. The Quality Assurance Reviewer informed the surveyor that the OASIS would be sent to be pre-approved to another agency, Review Agency. Review Agency would send the OASIS back. The Quality Assurance Reviewer informed the surveyor that sometimes the Review Agency would send it back because the Review Agency could not see all the pages. The Review Agency would send it back to the agency. The agency would send whatever the Review Agency returned. The Administrator informed the surveyor that the agency used the pre-approved method with CMS and the agency would send everything to Review Agency. The surveyor asked who would receive the OASIS when it came back to the agency from the review agency. The Administrator stated that it would go to Quality Assurance Reviewer and then it would go into the Administrator’s “hot Box”(in the software System) when it was ready for the Administrator to transmit. The Administrator stated, “I did not know there were more than a couple that were late.” Review of the agency’s policy titled “Timelines,” labeled IM.35,” and last revised on 5/02/2024. The policy read in part; “Purpose To establish timely parameters for all medical record information. Policy The Agency will ensure timely provision of care and services to meet the patient’s/client’s needs in compliance with all federal and state laws and regulations...Procedure...II. All completed and encoded OASIS data will be transmitted via electronic communication software that is available from CMS or software that conforms to CMS electronic record layout, edit specifications, and data dictionary, and that includes the required OASIS data set and the CMS-assigned branch identification number, as applicable. It will be transmitted using electronic communications software that complies with the Federal Information Processing Standard (FIPS 140-2, issued May 25, 2001) from the Agency or the Agency contractor to the CMS collection site within thirty (30) days of the M0090 date...””

    Rule G0372. Standard-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Oct 30, 2024Recertification inspection1 deficiency cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified home health agency since Feb 2, 2010.
  • Ownership: proprietary (for profit).
  • No deficiency on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Who does the caring?

  • Offers nursing care, physical therapy, occupational therapy, speech pathology, medical social services and home health aide services.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for home health agencies.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • 17 owners or officers are people: Vivian Abazie (managing employee (on the payroll)); Marcel Osuji (owns 5% or more directly); Marcel Osuji (corporate director); Marcel Osuji (managing employee (on the payroll)); Catrina Allen (managing employee (on the payroll)); Godson Gabriel (owns 5% or more directly); Godson Gabriel (corporate officer); Godson Gabriel (corporate director); Godson Gabriel (managing employee (on the payroll)); Godson Gabriel (runs it (operational or managerial control)); Florence Osuji (owns 5% or more directly); Florence Osuji (corporate director); Florence Osuji (managing employee (on the payroll)); Akunna N Ukanwoke (owns 5% or more directly); Akunna N Ukanwoke (corporate officer); Akunna N Ukanwoke (corporate director); Akunna N Ukanwoke (managing employee (on the payroll)).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Agency All Owners and Home Health Agency Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

How do patients fare?

  • CMS rates its quality of patient care 1 of 5.
  • CMS gives no : “No survey results are available for this period.”
  • CMS compares it with the national rate: discharged to the community, the same.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies and Home Health Patient Survey. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Quality of patient care ratingCMS star rating, 1 to 5 in half stars1 of 5
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the agency’s patients, 1 to 5Not rated
Discharged to the communityCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate73.34% (same as the national rate)

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 195 agencies CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 75104, where this agency’s office is, 144 have a quality of patient care rating; the middle one is 2.5 of 5, and this one is rated 1 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Home Health ZIP Codes and Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • QCOR says some of its home health reports are accurate or available only through May 19, 2021, because of a systems migration.
  • Many home health agencies are inspected by a private accrediting organisation instead of the state, and QCOR’s home health file doesn’t appear to include those inspections: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 24, 2026.

From the agency

The public record above comes first. Anything the agency adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the agency will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the agency”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.