Hearth Record

Alliance Homehealth Care

A home health agency in The Colony, Texas 75056

5205 Aztec Drive, The Colony, Texas 75056. (972) 325-4492.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 21, 2026.

The last 24 months 2 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Nov 2024. Most serious: Element-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Nov 1, 2024: a recertification inspection.

2 deficiencies cited in the last three years.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

2 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Nov 2024. Most serious: Element-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 24, 2026.

2 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Nov 1, 2024: recertification inspection2 deficiencies
  • Written Notice For Non-Covered Care

    The inspectors’ words, 666 words

    “Written notice for non-covered care CFR(s): 484.50(c)(8) Receive proper written notice, in advance of a specific service being furnished, if the HHA believes that the service may be non-covered care; or in advance of the HHA reducing or terminating on-going care. The HHA must also comply with the requirements of 42 CFR 405.1200 through 405.1204. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview, the agency failed to ensure the patient’s right to receive the NOMNC written notice at least two days in advance of terminating on-going care in 3 (Patient #8, #9, and #10) of 3 discharged records reviewed whose reason for discharge was “goals met.” The failure of the agency to protect the rights of the patient by informing in advance of their right to appeal the discontinuation of home health services prevented the identified patient from exercising their right to appeal the discharge decision, if they chose to appeal. Findings include: On 10/28/24 at 12:25 pm the Administrator/Supervising Nurse/RN provided the surveyor with a discharge roster. The discharge roster indicated that Patient #8, #9, and #10 were discharged with “goals met.” An interview was conducted on 10/31/24 at 9:45 am with the Administrator/Supervising Nurse/RN. The surveyor requested discharge charts for Patient #8, #9, and #10. The Administrator/Supervising Nurse/RN stated, “I might as well tell you, I have the 5 day discharge, but I do not have the Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage. Me and RN A forgot about giving the NOMNC notice.” The surveyor asked the Administrator/Supervising Nurse/RN who was responsible for providing the NOMNC. The Administrator/Supervising Nurse/RN said, “For those 3 patients, it was RN A. The surveyor asked the Administrator/Supervising Nurse/RN how not providing the NOMNC could affect the patients. The Administrator/Supervising Nurse/RN said, “They would not know they could appeal the discharge.” Patient 8: Record review of the contained a POC dated 7/15/24-9/12/24 with a SOC date of 1/17/24. The record contained a discharge OASIS assessment dated 9/12/24 and signed by RN A. The record failed to contain a NOMNC. Patient 9: Record review of the contained a POC dated 3/31/24-5/29/24 with a SOC date of 8/4/24. The record contained a discharge OASIS assessment dated 5/29/24 and signed by RN A. The record failed to contain a NOMNC. Patient 10: Record review of the contained a POC dated 6/26/24-8/24/24 with a SOC date of 3/4/23. The record contained a discharge OASIS assessment dated 8/20/24 and signed by RN A. The record failed to contain a NOMNC. An interview was conducted on 11/1/24 at 10:21 am with RN A. The Surveyor reviewed the discharge chart findings in that Patient #8, #9, and #10 charts failed to include the NOMNC with RN A. RN A said, “I give the 5 day discharge notice, I forgot about that notice (NOMNC)” The surveyor asked RN A who was responsible for providing the NOMNC. RN A said, “Me.” The surveyor asked RN A how not providing the NOMNC could affect the patients. RN A said, “They couldn’t appeal the discharge. Agency Policy: PE.6 Patient Discharge/Discharge Planning revised 7/1/21 read in part:… Purpose…To allow patient to appeal the Agency’s decisions to discharge…Policy…J. Agency will deliver the generic CMS notice NOMNC (Notice of Medicare Non Coverage) to the patient (or authorized representative), no less than two (2) days prior to the day of anticipated discharge, or as soon as the Agency determines coverage will end.”… According to OMG Form Instructions 10123-NOMNC: The NOMNC must be delivered at least two calendar days before Medicare covered services end or the second to last day of service if care is not being provided daily. Note: The two-day advance requirement is not a 48 hour requirement. This notice fulfills the requirement at 42 CFR 405.1200(b)(1) and (2) and 42 CFR 422.624(b)(1) and (2). Additional guidance for Original Medicare and Medicare Advantage can be found, respectively, at Chapter 4, Section 260 of the Medicare Claims Processing Manual and Chapter 13, Sections 90.2-90.9 of the Medicare Managed Care Manual.”

    Rule G0442. Element-level.

  • Plan Of Care Must Include The Following

    The inspectors’ words, 879 words

    “Plan of care must include the following CFR(s): 484.60(a)(2)(i-xvi) The individualized plan of care must include the following: (i) All pertinent diagnoses; (ii) The patient’s mental, psychosocial, and cognitive status; (iii) The types of services, supplies, and equipment required; (iv) The frequency and duration of visits to be made; (v) Prognosis; (vi) Rehabilitation potential; (vii) Functional limitations; (viii) Activities permitted; (ix) Nutritional requirements; (x) All medications and treatments; (xi) Safety measures to protect against injury; (xii) A description of the patient’s risk for emergency department visits and hospital re-admission, and all necessary interventions to address the underlying risk factors. (xiii) Patient and caregiver education and training to facilitate timely discharge; (xiv) Patient-specific interventions and education; measurable outcomes and goals identified by the HHA and the patient; (xv) Information related to any advanced directives; and (xvi) Any additional items the HHA or physician or allowed practitioner may choose to include. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview, the agency failed to ensure the plan of care included patient specific interventions. In 2 (Patient 2 and 3) of 3 records reviewed where the Patients had a diagnosis of heart failure, the plan of care failed to include specific interventions for the skilled nurse to assess for fluid retention with abnormal parameters to report to the physician. This failure placed the Patients at risk of not receiving adequate care, exacerbation of heart failure and possible hospitalization. Findings include: Patient 2: The record included a plan of care for episode 7/14/24 through 9/11/24 with a start of care date of 11/17/23. The plan of care included a diagnosis of hypertensive heart disease with heart failure (a serious condition that occurs when high blood pressure [hypertension] damages the heart and causes it to weaken and fail) and chronic systolic (congestive) heart failure (a type of heart failure that occurs when the left ventricle of the heart is weak and enlarged, making it unable to pump enough oxygenated blood throughout the body.) The plan of care was signed and dated by Administrator/Supervising Nurse/RN on 7/11/24. The plan of care did not include appropriate interventions for the skilled nurse to assess for fluid retention with abnormal parameters to report to the physician.[RG(1] Patient 3: The record included a plan of care for episode 8/26/24 through 10/24/24 with a start of care date of 3/5/23. The plan of care included a diagnosis of chronic systolic (congestive) heart failure chronic systolic (congestive) heart failure (a type of heart failure that occurs when the left ventricle of the heart is weak and enlarged, making it unable to pump enough oxygenated blood throughout the body.) The plan of care was signed and dated by RN A on 8/21/24. The plan of care did not include appropriate interventions for the skilled nurse to assess for fluid retention with abnormal parameters to report to the physician. An interview was conducted on 10/29/24 at 12:15 pm with the Administrator/Supervising Nurse/RN. The surveyor reviewed Client #2’s and 3’s plan of care with the diagnosis of heart failure with no interventions to assess for fluid retention and parameters for reporting to the physician. The Administrator/Supervising Nurse/RN said, “I must have missed that, I’m usually very careful about that.” The surveyor asked the Administrator/Supervising Nurse/RN who was responsible for ensuring the interventions and parameters for heart failure were included in the plan of care. The Administrator/Supervising Nurse/RN said, ‘I am.” The surveyor asked the Administrator/Supervising Nurse/RN how the plan[RG(2] of care not including the interventions to monitor for heart failure/fluid retention could affect the patient. The Administrator/Supervising Nurse/RN said, “The patient could end up in the hospital with and exacerbation of heart failure.” An interview was conducted on 10/30/24 at 8:30 am via phone with RN A. The Surveyor reviewed Patient #2’s and 3’s plan of care in that both had a diagnosis of heart failure, but their plans of care did not include interventions to monitor for fluid retention or parameters for reporting to the physician. RN A said, “I missed making sure the interventions and parameters were included in the plan of care.” The surveyor asked RN A who was responsible for the plan of care to include all interventions necessary to care for the patients. RN A said, “I am.” The surveyor asked how the plan of care not including interventions to monitor for fluid retention with parameters for reporting to the physician could affect the patients. RN A said, “The patient could go back into the hospital.” According to, https://heart-failure.net/symptoms/swelling, worsening signs and symptoms of heart failure that should be reported to the physician include a weight gain of 2-3 pounds in a single day or 5+ pound in one week, increased swelling in the feet or ankles or swelling or pain in the abdomen. Agency policy: TX.6 Plan of Care last revised 12/29/22 read in part:…” Purpose To develop an individualized plan of care which specifies the care and services necessary to meet the patient specific needs and according to state and federal regulations… Policy A. Each patient will receive an individualized written plan of care…Procedure…C. The individualized Plan of Care will specify the care and services necessary to meet the patient specific needs…The POC will contain he following elements:…14. Patient-specific interventions and education…””

    Rule G0574. Element-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Nov 1, 2024Recertification inspection2 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified home health agency since Dec 16, 2009.
  • Ownership: proprietary (for profit).
  • No deficiency on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Who does the caring?

  • Offers nursing care, physical therapy, occupational therapy, speech pathology, medical social services and home health aide services.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for home health agencies.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • 5 owners or officers are people: Ernest Mwangi (owns 5% or more directly, 50%); Ernest Mwangi (general partner, 50%); Catherine Kariuki (owns 5% or more directly, 50%); Catherine Kariuki (general partner, 50%); Catherine Kariuki (managing employee (on the payroll)).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Agency All Owners and Home Health Agency Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

How do patients fare?

  • CMS rates its quality of patient care 3.5 of 5.
  • CMS gives no : “No survey results are available for this period.”
  • CMS compares it with the national rate: discharged to the community, worse; potentially preventable hospital stays, the same.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies and Home Health Patient Survey. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Quality of patient care ratingCMS star rating, 1 to 5 in half stars3.5 of 5
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the agency’s patients, 1 to 5Not rated
Discharged to the communityCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate8.97% (worse than the national rate)
Potentially preventable hospital staysCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate8.84% (same as the national rate)

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 172 agencies CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 75056, where this agency’s office is, 143 have a quality of patient care rating; the middle one is 3 of 5, and this one is rated 3.5 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Home Health ZIP Codes and Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • QCOR says some of its home health reports are accurate or available only through May 19, 2021, because of a systems migration.
  • Many home health agencies are inspected by a private accrediting organisation instead of the state, and QCOR’s home health file doesn’t appear to include those inspections: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 24, 2026.

From the agency

The public record above comes first. Anything the agency adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the agency will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the agency”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.