1st Aid Healthcare Corp
A home health agency in Richardson, Texas 75080
2011 N Collins Blvd Suite 607, Richardson, Texas 75080. (972) 618-8001.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.
The short answer
Record last released by CMS on Oct 21, 2026.
- Not rated quality of patient care rating
- Not rated patient survey rating
- 1 deficiencies cited in the last three years
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean2
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
What did inspectors find?
The last inspection on record was on May 22, 2026: a recertification inspection.
1 deficiency cited in the last three years.
CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.
When those deficiencies happened
1 deficiency in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited May 2026. Most serious: Element-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 24, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Nov | Dec | ||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each deficiency, as cited
Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.
CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.
May 22, 2026: recertification inspection1 deficiency
-
Plan Of Care Must Include The Following
The inspectors’ words, 1,372 words
“Plan of care must include the following CFR(s): 484.60(a)(2)(i-xvi) The individualized plan of care must include the following: (i) All pertinent diagnoses; (ii) The patient’s mental, psychosocial, and cognitive status; (iii) The types of services, supplies, and equipment required; (iv) The frequency and duration of visits to be made; (v) Prognosis; (vi) Rehabilitation potential; (vii) Functional limitations; (viii) Activities permitted; (ix) Nutritional requirements; (x) All medications and treatments; (xi) Safety measures to protect against injury; (xii) A description of the patient’s risk for emergency department visits and hospital re-admission, and all necessary interventions to address the underlying risk factors. (xiii) Patient and caregiver education and training to facilitate timely discharge; (xiv) Patient-specific interventions and education; measurable outcomes and goals identified by the HHA and the patient; (xv) Information related to any advanced directives; and (xvi) Any additional items the HHA or physician or allowed practitioner may choose to include. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interviews with agency staff, the agency failed to ensure the plan of cares were developed, implemented, and updated to include all pertinent diagnoses; the frequency and duration of visits to be made; rehabilitation potential; patient and caregiver education and training; patient-specific interventions and education; and measurable outcomes and goals in five of nine patient records (Patient #1, 3, 5, 6, and 7) in that: In two of nine records reviewed (Patient 1 and 5), the plan of cares did not include all pertinent diagnoses. In two of nine records reviewed (Patient 5 and 7), the plan of cares did not include the frequency and duration of visits to be made. In one of nine records reviewed (Patient 3), the plan of care did not include rehabilitation potential. In two of nine records reviewed (Patient 1 and 3), the plan of cares did not include patient and caregiver education and training. In one of nine records reviewed (Patient 1), the plan of care did not include patient-specific interventions and education related to wound care. In two of nine records reviewed (Patient 6 and 7), the plan of cares did not include measurable outcomes and goals.This failure could result in inconsistent care, unmet patient needs, and negative patient outcomes. Findings include: Patient 1: Record review of Patient 1’s active record included a POC dated 3/27/26 with a start of care date of 3/27/26. The physician ordered skilled nursing visits twice a week for eight weeks to provide wound care. The record included an incorrect diagnosis. Patient 1’s POC had a diagnosis of pressure ulcer (areas of damaged skin and tissue caused by sustained pressure that reduces blood flow to vulnerable areas of the body) of the elbow. However, Patient 1 was being treated for a pressure ulcer of the coccyx/sacral area (two distinct but interconnected bony structures at the very base of your spine). Patient 1’s POC was also missing patient/family specific education/interventions related to pressure ulcers and wound care. During an interview with RN A on 5/21/2026 at 1:15pm, Surveyor 2 asked why Patient 1’s POC had an incorrect diagnosis. RN A replied that she completed the start of care and that she noticed yesterday that it was incorrect. She continued to state, “that was an error on my part”. Additionally, Surveyor 2 asked why the POC was missing patient/family specific education/interventions related to pressure ulcer and wound care. RN A replied that it should have been on there and she wasn’t sure why it wasn’t on the plan of care. Surveyor 2 asked why agency policies were not followed and RN A stated, “I’m not sure. It was just missed.” During an interview with the DON on 5/21/2026 at 2:00pm, Surveyor 2 asked why Patient 1’s POC would have the incorrect diagnosis. The DON replied “It may have been transcribed incorrectly. A typo or something.” In response to Surveyor 2 asking why the POC would be missing patient specific education, the DON responded “I’m not sure why that information is not on there. It should be.” Patient 3: Review of Patient 3’s record included a POC dated 4/17/2026 with a start of care date 4/17/26. The POC included the diagnoses of Parkinson’s disease (a progressive neurological disorder caused by the death of dopamine-producing brain cells), iron deficiency anemia (a common blood condition that occurs when your body lacks sufficient iron to produce hemoglobin), and constipation. The physician ordered for the patient to be admitted to skilled services, to perform a 60 day recertification if needed, and for physical therapy to evaluate and treat per protocol. Record review revealed the plan of care was missing the patient’s rehab potential, and patient and caregiver education and training. During an interview with RN A 5/21/2026 at 12:57pm, Surveyor 2 asked why the above elements were missing from the POC. RN A responded, “They should have been on there. I am still learning OASIS [Outcome and Assessment Information Set (a standardized data set that measures quality and outcomes of home health patients)]. I do complete everything you’re supposed to. The program usually clues you in on what is required, I had zero errors and warning, so I had no idea about the emergency risk.” Patient 5: Review of Patient 5’s record included a POC dated 4/30/2026 with a start of care of 4/30/2026. Patient 5 had diagnoses of essential hypertension (the most common form of high blood pressure) and localized edema (the accumulation of fluid in a specific part of the body, such as a single limb, joint, or the face). Record review revealed the POC was missing the diagnoses of cognitive change and B12 deficiency, as well as the frequency of skilled nursing visits. During an interview with DON on 5/21/26 at 145pm Surveyor 1 asked why the POC was missing the above elements. DON replied that they should have been on there. During an interview with RN A on 5/21/26 at 2pm, Surveyor 1 asked why the POC was missing the above elements. RN A replied “I’m still learning and it was overlooked.” Patient 6: Review of Patient 6’s record included a POC dated 3/10/26 with a start of care of 3/10/2026. The POC had the diagnoses of aftercare following joint replacement surgery (replaces damaged joint surfaces with artificial implants to relieve pain and restore mobility). Record review reviewed the POC was missing patient specific goals related to pain. Patient 7: Review of Patient 7’s record included a POC dated 8/15/25 with a start of care date of 6/16/25. The POC had the diagnoses of Atherosclerotic heart disease of native coronary artery without angina pectoris (a condition where plaque builds up in the heart’s original blood vessels, restricting blood flow but causing no chest pain or discomfort) and hypertensive disease without heart failure (refers to structural or functional cardiac change, such as an enlarged heart muscle caused by long-term high blood pressure, prior to the development of heart failure), and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (group of progressive lung diseases that block airflow and make breathing difficult). The POC was missing the frequency of skilled nursing visits, and patient specific goals. During an interview with the DON on 5/21/26 at 1:52pm, the DON stated that the patient goals should have been on the POC. During an interview with the DON 5/21/2026 at 1:55pm, Surveyor 1 asked why the above elements were missing from all the POCs mentioned above and why agency policies were not followed? DON replied, “the only reason I can come up with is miscommunication.” During an interview with Adm and Alt Adm on 5/22/2026 at 1:27pm, Surveyor 2 questioned why the above mentioned POCs had incorrect or missing diagnoses, were missing the additional required elements mentioned above, and why policies weren’t followed. Adm replied, “It was a new nurse, and I’m very disappointed. Extremely disappointed and frustrated. I don’t know why the policies weren’t followed. It’s embarrassing and unacceptable.” Agency policy PC.35 titled, “Plan of Care”, revised 1/1/26, reads in part… “Procedure III…A. The individualized plan of care must include the following…All pertinent diagnoses; … frequency and duration of visits; … rehabilitation potential; … A description of the patient’s/client’s risk for emergency department visits; … Patient/client and caregiver education and training; …Patient/client specific interventions and education; …Measurable outcomes and goals…””
The one inspection in the last three years
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| May 22, 2026 | Recertification inspection | 1 deficiency cited |
Is it certified?
- Medicare-certified home health agency since Sep 20, 2004.
- Ownership: proprietary (for profit).
- No For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual. deficiency on record in the last three years.
CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.
Has anything been proven against it?
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
- 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.
Who does the caring?
- Offers nursing care, physical therapy and occupational therapy.
- Doesn’t offer speech pathology, medical social services and home health aide services.
- CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for home health agencies.
CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Who owns it?
- 9 owners or officers are people: Shannon Hammond (owns 5% or more directly, 51%); Fred Hammond (owns 5% or more directly, 39%); Brian Hammond (owns 5% or more directly, 10%); Fred Hammond (corporate officer); Fred Hammond (corporate director); Fred Hammond (managing employee (on the payroll)); Shannon Hammond (corporate officer); Shannon Hammond (corporate director); Brian Hammond (runs it (operational or managerial control)).
- No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
- No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
CMS, Home Health Agency All Owners and Home Health Agency Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.
How do patients fare?
- CMS gives no CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.: “The number of patient episodes for this measure is too small to report.”
- CMS gives no CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.: “No survey results are available for this period.”
CMS, Home Health Care Agencies and Home Health Patient Survey. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | Rating |
|---|---|
| Quality of patient care ratingCMS star rating, 1 to 5 in half stars | Not rated |
| Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the agency’s patients, 1 to 5 | Not rated |
How does it compare nearby?
- CMS gives this agency no quality of patient care rating to compare.
CMS, Home Health ZIP Codes and Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Place | Quality rating |
|---|---|
| Total Patient Care Home Health | 4 |
| Diamond Care Health Services LLC | Not given |
| Good Shepherd Home Healthcare Agency | Not given |
| Excel Plus Home Health LLC | 4 |
| Choice Health Rpm | 4.5 |
| Excel Home Health Services LLC | Not given |
| Meridian Home Health Care | Not given |
| Everkind Home Health Care | 2 |
| Advanced Senior Care Home Health | 3.5 |
| Vital Home Health Care Inc. | Not given |
| A&s Home Health Care | 3.5 |
| A Sensitive Touch Home Healthcare LLC | Not given |
What the record doesn’t say
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
- Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
- QCOR says some of its home health reports are accurate or available only through May 19, 2021, because of a systems migration.
- Many home health agencies are inspected by a private accrediting organisation instead of the state, and QCOR’s home health file doesn’t appear to include those inspections: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.
Sources
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Home Health Care Agencies (6jpm-sxkc).
Released Oct 21, 2026 and checked Oct 24, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Home Health Patient Survey (ccn4-8vby).
Released Oct 21, 2026 and checked Oct 24, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, QCOR home health inspection reports (HHA_2567s_2018_to_2026YTD.xlsx).
Released Oct 20, 2026 and checked Oct 24, 2026. Updated monthly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Home Health Agency All Owners (fc009b2d-7846-44b1-b4a1-692f0c143879).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Oct 24, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Home Health Agency Enrollments (15f64ab4-3172-4a27-b589-ebd67a6d28aa).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Oct 24, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Home Health ZIP Codes (m5eg-upu5).
Released Oct 21, 2026 and checked Oct 24, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Oct 24, 2026.
From the agency
The public record above comes first. Anything the agency adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the agency will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the agency”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.