Hearth Record

Calvary Hill Health Services LLC

A home health agency in Midlothian, Texas 76065

3663 Rolling Meadows Dr, Midlothian, Texas 76065. (214) 448-6567.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 21, 2026.

The last 24 months 3 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Mar 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean2
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Mar 17, 2025: a recertification inspection.

3 deficiencies cited in the last three years.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

3 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Mar 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 24, 2026.

3 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Mar 17, 2025: recertification inspection3 deficiencies
  • Home Health Aide Assignments And Duties

    The inspectors’ words, 437 words

    “Home health aide assignments and duties CFR(s): 484.80(g)(1) Standard: Home health aide assignments and duties. Home health aides are assigned to a specific patient by a registered nurse or other appropriate skilled professional, with written patient care instructions for a home health aide prepared by that registered nurse or other appropriate skilled professional (that is, physical therapist, speech-language pathologist, or occupational therapist). This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review, observation, and interview the agency failed to ensure a home health aide was given written patient care instructions prepared by a registered nurse for one (Patient # 2) of one patient record reviewed with home health aide services. The failure placed the patient’s health and safety at risk if care was not provided as established the patient’s plan of care. Patient # 2: Review of the clinical record for Patient # 2 revealed a POC for Patient # 2’s discharge episode with a SOC date of 10/25/2022. The POC contained a certification period of 02/22/2023 to 04/22/2023 dated and signed by the Admin/DON on 12/21/2022. The POC contained orders for SN visits one time per week for eight weeks. Continued review of the clinical record for Patient # 2 revealed the Patient’s episodes of care record from 02/22/2023 to 04/22/2023. Review of the patient episodes of care record (visit schedule) revealed that Patient # 2 received home health aide visits five times per week by Office Mgr./hha. Continued review of the record did not reveal that the Admin/DON provided the hha with written patient care instructions. During a home visit with Patient # 2 on 03/13/2025 at 10:00 a.m. the surveyor observed and reviewed the home admission folder. There was no written patient care instruction in the folder. The patient stated that all records were in the folder (no records removed since admission to the agency). During an interview with the Admin/DON on 03/17/2025 at 3:58 p.m. the surveyor reviewed the findings and asked why there was no home health aide care plan (written instructions for patient care) for Patient # 2. The Admin/DON stated, “That’s my error.” Review of agency policy titled; “Implementing Care and Treatment” last reviewed 05/02/24 read in part: “Purpose [:] To ensure patient/client care and treatment are provided as identified in the care planning process…V. Home health aides are members of the interdisciplinary team and are assigned to a specific patient/client by a registered nurse (RN)…within a time frame to meet the patient’s/client’s identified needs and per physician and/or non-physician practitioner orders. The home health aide will be provided with written patient/client care instructions prepared by that RN…””

    Rule G0798. Standard-level.

  • Verbal Orders

    The inspectors’ words, 564 words

    “Verbal orders CFR(s): 484.60(b)(3)(4) (3) Verbal orders must be accepted only by personnel authorized to do so by applicable state laws and regulations and by the HHA’s internal policies. (4) When services are provided on the basis of a physician or allowed practitioner’s verbal orders, a nurse acting in accordance with state licensure requirements, or other qualified practitioner responsible for furnishing or supervising the ordered services, in accordance with state law and the HHA’s policies, must document the orders in the patient’s clinical record, and sign, date, and time the orders. Verbal orders must be authenticated and dated by the physician or allowed pracitioner in accordance with applicable state laws and regulations, as well as the HHA’s internal policies. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interviews, the agency failed to ensure services that were provided based on a physician’s verbal orders, in that: the agency failed to ensure that the verbal orders were authenticated and dated by the physician in accordance with the HHA’s internal policies, in two (Patients #1 and #2) of two records reviewed that included unsigned verbal order. The failure placed the patients at risk to experience health complications because orders were not reviewed and signed by the physician. Findings included: Patient # 1: Review of the clinical records revealed a “Home Health Certification and Plan Of Care (POC)” with a SOC date of 07/02/2024. Review of the POC revealed a certification period 07/02/2024 to 08/30/2024 was e-signed by the Admin/DON on 07/02/2024. The POC contained orders for SN visits one time per week for nine weeks. Continued review of Patient # 1’s clinical records did not reveal that physician (Identifier 300) had authenticated (signed) and dated the verbal order (POC). Patient # 2: Further review of the clinical record for Patient # 2 revealed a POC for Patient # 2’s initial episode with a SOC date of 10/25/2022. The POC contained a certification period of 10/25/2022 to 12/23/2022 dated and signed by the Admin/DON on 10/25/2022. The POC contained orders for SN visits once every week. Continued review of Patient # 2’s clinical records did not reveal that physician (Identifier 400) and nurse practitioner (Identifier 500) had not authenticated (signed) and dated the verbal orders (POCs). Review of the clinical records for Patient # 2 revealed a POC for Patient # 2’s discharge episode with a SOC date of 10/25/2022. The POC contained a certification period of 02/22/2023 to 04/22/2023 dated and signed by the Admin/DON on 12/21/2022. The POC contained orders for SN visits one time per week for eight weeks. During an interview with the Admin/DON on 03/17/2025 at 3:36 p.m., the surveyor reviewed the findings and asked why verbal orders (POCs) were not authenticated and dated by physician (Identifier 330 and 400) and nurse practitioner (Identifier 500). The Admin/DON replied, “It’s another headache with (Identifier 100). It’s highly frustrating.” The Admin/DON stated that the agency faxed the records to the physician’s office location. Agency policy titled; “Orders for Care” last reviewed 05/01/2024 read in part “… XIII. The Plan of Care may be used as the verbal start of care when signed and dated by the RN. XIV. Verbal orders must be authenticated and dated by the physician and/or non-physician practitioner. Physician and/or non-physician practitioner signatures are obtained on Plan of Care and supplemental verbal orders within sixty (60) days…””

    Rule G0584. Element-level.

  • Reviewed, Revised By Physician Every 60 Days

    The inspectors’ words, 690 words

    “Reviewed, revised by physician every 60 days CFR(s): 484.60(c)(1) The individualized plan of care must be reviewed and revised by the physician or allowed practitioner who is responsible for the home health plan of care and the HHA as frequently as the patient’s condition or needs require, but no less frequently than once every 60 days, beginning with the start of care date. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview the agency failed to ensure that the patient’s individualized plan of care (POC) had been reviewed and revised by the patient’s physician no less frequently than once every 60 days, in two (Patients # 2 and # 4) of three discharged skilled patient records reviewed. The failure placed the patients at risk of harm due to lack of physician oversight if there were changes in the patient’s condition or if there was a need for additional care and services. Findings Included: Patient # 2: Further review of the clinical record for Patient # 2 revealed a POC for Patient # 2’s initial episode with a SOC date of 10/25/2022. The POC contained a certification period of 10/25/2022 to 12/23/2022 dated and signed by the Admin/DON on 10/25/2022. The POC contained orders for SN visits once every week. Continued review of the POC revealed that it read in part; “…I estimate continued services will be required for 30 days…” Continued review of the record did not reveal that a new POC was received after 30 days (due 11/24/2022). The POCs were not signed by physician identifier (400) and nurse practitioner (500). Review of the clinical record for Patient # 2 revealed a POC for Patient # 2’s discharge episode with a SOC date of 10/25/2022. The POC contained a certification period of 02/22/2023 to 04/22/2023 dated and signed by the Admin/DON on 12/21/2022. The POC contained orders for SN visits one time per week for eight weeks. Continued review of the POC revealed that it read in part; “…I estimate continued services will be required for 30 days…” Continued review of the record did not reveal that a new POC was received after 30 days (due 03/24/2023). Patient # 4: Review of the clinical record for Patient # 4 revealed a POC for Patient # 4’s discharge episode with a SOC date of 08/21/2024. The POC contained a certification period of 08/21/2024 to 10/19/2024 dated and signed by the Admin/DON on 02/07/2024. The POC contained orders for SN visits one time per week for nine weeks. Continued review of the POC revealed that it read in part; “…I estimate continued services will be required for 30 days…” Continued review of the record did not reveal that a new POC was received after 30 days (due 09/20/2024). During an interview with the Admin/DON on 03/17/2025 at approximately 3:42 p.m., the surveyor reviewed the findings and asked why Patients # 2 and 4 did not have individualized plan of care (POCs) that had been reviewed and revised by the patient’s physician at least every 60 days. The Adm replied, “It must have been a mistake in the drop down.” The surveyor asked what the agency’s process was for ensuring accuracy and that the POCs were reviewed and revised by the physicians every 60 days. The Admin/DON replied, “I will have to be more vigilant.” The surveyor asked how the failure could adversely affect the patients. The Admin/DON stated that the failure might impact the accuracy of services. Review of the agency policy titled; “Plan of Care” last reviewed 05/02/24 read in part: “ ... VI. The individualized Plan of Care must be reviewed and revised by the physician and/or non-physician practitioner who is responsible for the home health Plan of Care and the Agency as frequently as the patient’s/client’s condition or needs require, but no less frequently than once every 60 days, beginning with the start of care date. The Agency must promptly alert the relevant physician(s), and/or non-physician practitioner(s) to any changes in the patient’s/client’s condition or needs that suggest that outcomes are not being achieved and/or that the Plan of Care should be altered…””

    Rule G0588. Element-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Mar 17, 2025Recertification inspection3 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified home health agency since Apr 9, 2009.
  • Ownership: proprietary (for profit).
  • No deficiency on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Who does the caring?

  • Offers nursing care, physical therapy, occupational therapy, speech pathology, medical social services and home health aide services.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for home health agencies.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • 3 owners or officers are people: Oluyemisi Babajide (owns 5% or more directly, 100%); Oluyemisi Babajide (corporate director, 100%); Oluyemisi Babajide (managing employee (on the payroll), 100%).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Agency All Owners and Home Health Agency Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

How do patients fare?

  • CMS gives no : “The number of patient episodes for this measure is too small to report.”
  • CMS gives no : “No survey results are available for this period.”
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies and Home Health Patient Survey. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Quality of patient care ratingCMS star rating, 1 to 5 in half starsNot rated
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the agency’s patients, 1 to 5Not rated

How does it compare nearby?

  • CMS gives this agency no quality of patient care rating to compare.
Source:

CMS, Home Health ZIP Codes and Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • QCOR says some of its home health reports are accurate or available only through May 19, 2021, because of a systems migration.
  • Many home health agencies are inspected by a private accrediting organisation instead of the state, and QCOR’s home health file doesn’t appear to include those inspections: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 24, 2026.

From the agency

The public record above comes first. Anything the agency adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the agency will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the agency”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.