Hearth Record

Hope Home Care Inc.

A home health agency in Keller, Texas 76248

703 Briar Meadow Court, Keller, Texas 76248. (817) 498-3403.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 21, 2026.

The last 24 months 1 deficiency in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jan 2026. Most serious: Element-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean2
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Jan 13, 2026: a recertification inspection.

1 deficiency cited in the last three years.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

1 deficiency in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jan 2026. Most serious: Element-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 24, 2026.

1 deficiency by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Jan 13, 2026: recertification inspection1 deficiency
  • Plan Of Care Must Include The Following

    The inspectors’ words, 1,204 words

    “Plan of care must include the following CFR(s): 484.60(a)(2)(i-xvi) The individualized plan of care must include the following: (i) All pertinent diagnoses; (ii) The patient’s mental, psychosocial, and cognitive status; (iii) The types of services, supplies, and equipment required; (iv) The frequency and duration of visits to be made; (v) Prognosis; (vi) Rehabilitation potential; (vii) Functional limitations; (viii) Activities permitted; (ix) Nutritional requirements; (x) All medications and treatments; (xi) Safety measures to protect against injury; (xii) A description of the patient’s risk for emergency department visits and hospital re-admission, and all necessary interventions to address the underlying risk factors. (xiii) Patient and caregiver education and training to facilitate timely discharge; (xiv) Patient-specific interventions and education; measurable outcomes and goals identified by the HHA and the patient; (xv) Information related to any advanced directives; and (xvi) Any additional items the HHA or physician or allowed practitioner may choose to include. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview, the agency failed to ensure the plan of cares included a description of the patient’s risk for emergency department visits and hospital re-admission, and all necessary interventions to address the underlying risk factors and information related to any advanced directives in 7 of 7 records reviewed (Patient 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10). These failures placed patients in jeopardy of harm from agency staff who could not address the patient’s risk factors and types of services needed for appropriate care and placed them at risk of a declining health status and complications. Findings included: Patient 4: Record review of the electronic and paper medical record included a plan of care dated 08/26/2025 to 10/24/2025 signed by the Adm/DON/Sup Nurse on 08/21/2025 with a start of care date of 04/28/2025. The physician/ordering practitioner ordered the nurse to visit the patient once a week for nine weeks. The plan of care included a diagnosis of the loss of thinking, remembering, and reasoning and high blood pressure. The plan of care did not include a description of the patient’s risk for emergency department visits and hospital re-admission, and all necessary interventions to address the underlying risk factors and information related to any advanced directives (legal documents signed by a competent person to provide guidance for medical and health care decisions). Patient 5: Record review of the electronic and paper medical record included a plan of care dated 12/10/2025 to 02/07/2026 signed by the Adm/DON/Sup Nurse on 12/10/2025 with a start of care date of 12/10/2025. The physician/ordering practitioner ordered the nurse to visit the patient once a week for nine weeks. The plan of care included a diagnosis of high levels of fat in the blood and pain. The plan of care did not include a description of the patient’s risk for emergency department visits and hospital re-admission, and all necessary interventions to address the underlying risk factors and information related to any advanced directives. Patient 6: Record review of the electronic and paper medical record included a plan of care dated 10/20/2025 to 12/18/2025 signed by the Adm/DON/Sup Nurse on 10/15/2025 with a start of care date of 08/21/2025. The physician/ordering practitioner ordered the nurse to visit the patient once a week for nine weeks. The plan of care included a diagnosis of brittle and weak bones and heart disease. The plan of care did not include a description of the patient’s risk for emergency department visits and hospital re-admission, and all necessary interventions to address the underlying risk factors and information related to any advanced directives. Patient 7: Record review of the electronic and paper medical record included a plan of care dated 04/01/2025 to 05/30/2025 signed by the Adm/DON/Sup Nurse on 04/03/2025 with a start of care date of 04/01/2025. The physician/ordering practitioner ordered the nurse to visit the patient once a week for nine weeks. The plan of care included a diagnosis of lung disease and heart failure. The plan of care did not include a description of the patient’s risk for emergency department visits and hospital re-admission, and all necessary interventions to address the underlying risk factors and information related to any advanced directives. Patient 8: Record review of the electronic and paper medical record included a plan of care dated 08/25/2025 to 10/23/2025 signed by the Adm/DON/Sup Nurse on 08/20/2025 with a start of care date of 06/26/2025. The physician/ordering practitioner ordered the nurse to visit the patient once a week for nine weeks. The plan of care included a diagnosis of high blood sugar levels and high blood pressure. The plan of care did not include a description of the patient’s risk for emergency department visits and hospital re-admission, and all necessary interventions to address the underlying risk factors and information related to any advanced directives. Patient 9: Record review of the electronic and paper medical record included a plan of care dated 05/08/2025 to 07/06/2025 signed by the Adm/DON/Sup Nurse on 09/25/2025 with a start of care date of 04/28/2025. The physician/ordering practitioner ordered the nurse to visit the patient once a week for nine weeks. The plan of care included a diagnosis of high blood pressure and high levels of fat in the blood. The plan of care did not include a description of the patient’s risk for emergency department visits and hospital re-admission, and all necessary interventions to address the underlying risk factors and information related to any advanced directives. Patient 10: Record review of the electronic and paper medical record included a plan of care dated 09/25/2025 to 11/23/2025 signed by the Adm/DON/Sup Nurse on 05/03/2025 with a start of care date of 09/25/2025. The physician/ordering practitioner ordered the nurse to visit the patient once a week for nine weeks. The plan of care included a diagnosis of high blood sugar levels and high blood pressure. The plan of care did not include a description of the patient’s risk for emergency department visits and hospital re-admission, and all necessary interventions to address the underlying risk factors and information related to any advanced directives. During an interview with the Adm/DON/Sup Nurse on 01/13/2026 at 2:30 PM, the Adm/DON/Sup Nurse stated she was responsible for ensuring the plan of cares included all required elements. During an interview with the Adm/DON/Sup Nurse on 01/13/2026 at 3:00 PM, the surveyor asked why the plan of care for Patients 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10 did not include the patient’s risk for emergency department visits and hospital re-admission, and all necessary interventions to address the underlying risk factors and information related to any advanced directives. The Adm/DON/Sup Nurse stated the information should have populated onto the plan of cares from the comprehensive assessments, but it did not. During an interview with the Adm/DON/Sup Nurse on 01/13/2026 at 3:30 PM, the surveyor asked why agency policy was not followed. The Adm/DON/Sup Nurse stated it was an oversight. Agency policy titled, “Plan of Care PC.35” with a last reviewed date of 01/01/2026 read in part, “… Procedure… The individualized Plan of Care must include the following… a description of the patient’s/client’s risk for emergency department visits and hospital re admission, and all necessary interventions to address the underlying risk factors… Information related to any advance directives…””

    Rule G0574. Element-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Jan 13, 2026Recertification inspection1 deficiency cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified home health agency since Jan 23, 2008.
  • Ownership: proprietary (for profit).
  • No deficiency on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Who does the caring?

  • Offers nursing care, physical therapy, occupational therapy, speech pathology, medical social services and home health aide services.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for home health agencies.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • 5 owners or officers are people: Paul Onyeabor (owns 5% or more directly, 5%); Paul Onyeabor (corporate director); Susan Onyeabor (owns 5% or more directly); Susan Onyeabor (corporate director); Susan Onyeabor (managing employee (on the payroll)).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Agency All Owners and Home Health Agency Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

How do patients fare?

  • CMS gives no : “The number of patient episodes for this measure is too small to report.”
  • CMS gives no : “No survey results are available for this period.”
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies and Home Health Patient Survey. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Quality of patient care ratingCMS star rating, 1 to 5 in half starsNot rated
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the agency’s patients, 1 to 5Not rated

How does it compare nearby?

  • CMS gives this agency no quality of patient care rating to compare.
Source:

CMS, Home Health ZIP Codes and Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • QCOR says some of its home health reports are accurate or available only through May 19, 2021, because of a systems migration.
  • Many home health agencies are inspected by a private accrediting organisation instead of the state, and QCOR’s home health file doesn’t appear to include those inspections: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 24, 2026.

From the agency

The public record above comes first. Anything the agency adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the agency will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the agency”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.