Hearth Record

Opt Home Healthcare Inc.

A home health agency in Houston, Texas 77082

11111 Richmond Ave., Suite 290, Houston, Texas 77082. (713) 622-0500.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 21, 2026.

The last 24 months 1 deficiency in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jun 2025. Most serious: Element-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Jun 13, 2025: a recertification inspection.

1 deficiency cited in the last three years.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

1 deficiency in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jun 2025. Most serious: Element-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 24, 2026.

1 deficiency by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Jun 13, 2025: recertification inspection1 deficiency
  • A Review Of All Current Medications

    The inspectors’ words, 1,835 words

    “A review of all current medications CFR(s): 484.55(c)(5) A review of all medications the patient is currently using in order to identify any potential adverse effects and drug reactions, including ineffective drug therapy, significant side effects, significant drug interactions, duplicate drug therapy, and noncompliance with drug therapy. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review, observation, and interview, the agency failed to ensure medication reconciliation was completed during the comprehensive assessment for 2 of 2 active patients. (Patients #1 & Patient #2) The assigned nurse did not identify or address expired medications present in each patient’s home. This failure placed patients at risk for adverse effects and drug reactions, including ineffective drug therapy, significant side effects, significant drug interactions, duplicate drug therapy, and noncompliance with drug therapy. Findings: Review of active Patient #1 electronic medical record (EMR) revealed a form titled “Home Health Certification and Plan of Care” (POC) for the period of 04/07/2025-06/05/2025, with primary diagnosis of primary hypertension (develops when blood flows through your arteries at higher-than-normal pressures), and generalized osteoarthritis (a progressive disorder of the joints caused by gradual loss of cartilage). Further review of the POC revealed orders for skilled nursing (SN) once a week for 9 weeks and physical therapy to evaluate and treat. SN to perform medication review each skilled nursing visit and reconcile medications as indicated. SN to instruct on all new and changed medications and reinforce teaching related to use of medications as part of the disease process or demonstration of knowledge deficit. During a home visit on 06/11/2025@ 12:00 P.M., Patient #1 stated that he was very compliant with his medications and had taken his medications for the day. Surveyor observed an expired bottle of Phenytoin EX (medication used to control seizures) 100mg capsules with an expiration date of 01/31/2024, and an additional medication bottled labeled Dilantin (medication used to control and prevent seizures) 100mg capsule with an expiration date of 02/24/2025 located on the living room table which Patient #1 stated was his current medications. Patient #1 stated he had taken medications from those bottles and those were the bottles he used every day. Patient #1 stated that he managed his own medications, and his provider did not assist with his medical needs. He also denied that his assigned nurse checks his medications during weekly visits. An interview with RN A on 06/11/2025 at 2:02 P.M. revealed, that he was the assigned skilled nurse for Patient #1 and he did the admission and had been his nurse since that time. RN A stated that during his weekly skilled nurse visits he performs a head-to-toe assessment, checks his medications by telling him to take his medications, check the expiration dates, and ask if there are any new medications. He stated that he was not aware of any expired mediations in the patient’s home. RN A stated that he did not think it was a big problem with expired medications and he himself sometimes took expired medications. RN A also stated that he was aware that expired medications could possibly not have the desired effect and gastric upset as the potential impact on the patient. RN A also stated that patient may have a seizure if it’s the wrong dose of medications. RN A stated that he had not communicated to the patient’s doctor about the expired medications because he was not aware of them. RN A stated that he has read and understands his job description and essential functions of his job. Patient #2 Review of active Patient #1 electronic medical record (EMR) revealed a form titled “Home Health Certification and Plan of Care” (POC) for the period of 04/24/2025-06/22/2025 with primary diagnosis of lumbar radiculopathy (a disease involving the lower back spinal nerve root) and primary hypertension (develops when blood flows through your arteries at higher-than-normal pressures). Further review of the POC revealed orders for skilled nursing (SN) once a week for 8 weeks and physical therapy once a week for 8 weeks. SN to perform medication review each skilled nursing visit and reconcile medications as indicated. SN to instruct on all new and changed medications and reinforce teaching related to use of medications as part of the disease process or demonstration of knowledge deficit. During a home visit on 06/11/2025 @ 2:20 P.M., Patient #2 stated that she was very compliant with her medications and had taken her medications for the day. Patient #2was observed to have an expired bottle of Furosemide (medication used to treat conditions involving excess fluid in the body and high blood pressure) 20 mg, with directions to take 2 tablets every day with an expiration date of 03/13/2025. The furosemide was in the bag of current medications that Patient #2 gave to the Surveyor. Patient #2 stated she had not taken medications from that bottle because she only takes them when her nurse tells her to. She stated that sometimes she had lower extremity swelling and needed to get rid of some fluid. Patient #2 also stated that her doctor had given her those instructions as well. Patient #2 stated that she had taken medications from that bottle within the last few weeks because RN A instructed her to do so but was unsure of the exact date. She stated that her assigned nurse checked her medications during weekly visits. An interview with RN A on 06/11/2025 at 2:45 P.M. revealed, that he was the assigned skilled nurse for Patient #2, and he did the admission and had been her nurse since that time. RN A stated that during his weekly skilled nurse visits he performs a head-to-toe assessment, checks her medications by telling her to take her medications, checks the expiration dates, and ask if there are any new medications. He stated that he was not aware of any expired mediations in the patient’s home. RN A stated that he thought he had checked the medications. Surveyor asked RN A if he had instructed her to take the furosemide. RN A stated that he had but also was unsure of the exact date, but it was recently. RN A stated that he did not think it was a big problem with expired medications and he himself was a doctor by profession in the Philippines and he knows that the medications would not harm Patient #2. RN A stated that he knows that the Patient #2 can take medications that had expired up to 2-3 months without any problems. Surveyor asked RN A if he has communicated with Patient #2’s doctor regarding the change in instructions. RN A stated that he communicated with the doctor regarding the order change to as needed. RN A was unable to provide Surveyor with any documentation of communication between himself and Patient #2’s doctor. RN A denied being a doctor here in Texas at this time. RN A also stated that he was aware that expired medications could possibly not have the desired effect and gastric upset. RN A stated that he had not communicated to the patient’s doctor about the expired medications because he was not aware of them. RN A stated that he has read and understands his job description. Record review of RN A personnel file revealed that he had a date of hire of 10/13/2017. An agency document titled, “Job Description/ Performance Evaluation- Registered Nurse.” The document was signed by the RN A on 10132027. RN A personnel file revealed a license verification of his registered nurse licensure with an expiration date of 07/31/2025. Record review of DON personnel file, an agency document titled, “Job Description/ Performance Evaluation-Supervising Nurse/ Alternate.” Supervising Nurse was circled indicating that this job description was for the Supervising Nurse. The document was signed by the DON on 02/01/2025. The DON had an original hire date of 10/13/2017, however she was promoted to the DON position as of 02/01/2025. Interview with the DON on 06/13/2025 at 1:00 pm revealed that the DON had read and understood her job description and expectations of her and the nurses that report to her. Surveyor questioned how she ensured that medication reconciliation was happening with every visit. The DON stated that she reminds the nurses every so often, but they should know to perform the medication reconciliation because it is part of a comprehensive assessment which should happen every visit. She stated that the RN who performs the admission they are reminded that it is the agency’s policy to perform medication reconciliation and to check the medications on hand. The DON stated again that she did not know why the nurse did not follow the agency’s clinical policies. The DON was unable to provide the Surveyor with any documentation between the agency and Patient #1 or #2’s doctor related to expired medications or changes in medications. Surveyor asked what the potential impact to the patients could be. DON stated that the patients could receive ineffective medications and not receive the intended treatment. Record review of Admin personnel file, an agency document titled, “Job Description/ Performance Evaluation-Administrator/ Alternate.” Administrator was circled indicating that this job description was for the Administrator. The document was signed by the Admin on 04/03/2017. The Admin had an original hire date of 05/21/2007, however she was promoted to the Administrator position as of 04/03/2017. Most recent job evaluation was signed and dated by the Admin on 04/01/2025. Interview with Admin on 06/13/2025 at 1:30 P.M. revealed that the Admin was not sure why RN A was not performing medication reconciliation on each visit as the POC indicated. He stated that he was unsure why RN A thought it was not a problem for the Patient ##1 to take expired medications. He stated that RN A is not representing the policies of the agency, and he was expected to follow all policies and procedures and did not receive any type of exemptions. Admin stated that he did not know why RN A was not following the agency’s policies. Admin also stated that he was not sure why the DON failed to ensure that Patient #1’or Patient #2’s POC was not being followed. Surveyor asked what the potential impact on the patients could be. The Admin stated that the patients could not be receiving the intended treatment or spoiled medications. Review of agency’s updated policy manual with a revision date of 05/02/2024 and titled “Administrative Policy Manual – Home Care Medication List and Monitoring” PC.80 pg. 1 of 2, reads in part… “Purpose: To outline a process for ongoing medication monitoring. Policy: Assessments of a patient’s /client’s response to the medication regimen are used when evaluating the continuation of the medication regimen, evaluating the patient’s/ client’s compliance, and/or identifying problems. Procedure: V. The RN, assessing clinician, or qualified clinician identified by agency policy, will monitor medications, for potential adverse effects and drug reactions, including ineffective drug therapy, significant side effects, significant drug interactions, duplicate drug therapy, and noncompliance with drug therapy.” No additional information was provided by the end of survey on 06/13/2025.”

    Rule G0536. Element-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Jun 13, 2025Recertification inspection1 deficiency cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified home health agency since Aug 3, 2007.
  • Ownership: proprietary (for profit).
  • No deficiency on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Who does the caring?

  • Offers nursing care, physical therapy, occupational therapy, speech pathology, medical social services and home health aide services.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for home health agencies.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • 6 owners or officers are people: Francis Sagullo (owns 5% or more directly, 51%); Francis Sagullo (managing employee (on the payroll), 51%); Francis Sagullo (runs it (operational or managerial control), 51%); Joseph Sagullo (owns 5% or more directly, 49%); Joseph Sagullo (corporate officer, 49%); Joseph Sagullo (corporate director, 49%).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Agency All Owners and Home Health Agency Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

How do patients fare?

  • CMS rates its quality of patient care 4.5 of 5.
  • CMS gives no : “Zero, or very few, patients met the survey’s rules for inclusion.”
  • CMS compares it with the national rate: discharged to the community, the same; potentially preventable hospital stays, the same.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies and Home Health Patient Survey. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Quality of patient care ratingCMS star rating, 1 to 5 in half stars4.5 of 5
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the agency’s patients, 1 to 5Not rated
Discharged to the communityCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate70.28% (same as the national rate)
Potentially preventable hospital staysCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate14.22% (same as the national rate)

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 189 agencies CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 77082, where this agency’s office is, 139 have a quality of patient care rating; the middle one is 2.5 of 5, and this one is rated 4.5 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Home Health ZIP Codes and Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • QCOR says some of its home health reports are accurate or available only through May 19, 2021, because of a systems migration.
  • Many home health agencies are inspected by a private accrediting organisation instead of the state, and QCOR’s home health file doesn’t appear to include those inspections: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 24, 2026.

From the agency

The public record above comes first. Anything the agency adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the agency will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the agency”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.