Hearth Record

Lifespring Home Care

A home health agency in Fort Worth, Texas 76108

9608 Bartlett Cir Ste 150, Fort Worth, Texas 76108. (817) 249-6800.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 21, 2026.

The last 24 months 1 deficiency in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jul 2025. Most serious: Element-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Jul 17, 2025: a recertification inspection.

1 deficiency cited in the last three years.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

1 deficiency in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jul 2025. Most serious: Element-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 24, 2026.

1 deficiency by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Jul 17, 2025: recertification inspection1 deficiency
  • Immediate Reporting Of Abuse By All Staff

    The inspectors’ words, 818 words

    “Immediate reporting of abuse by all staff CFR(s): 484.50(e)(2) Any HHA staff (whether employed directly or under arrangements) in the normal course of providing services to patients, who identifies, notices, or recognizes incidences or circumstances of mistreatment, neglect, verbal, mental, sexual, and/or physical abuse, including injuries of unknown source, or misappropriation of patient property, must report these findings immediately to the HHA and other appropriate authorities in accordance with state law. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on interview and record review the agency failed to report an allegation of abuse to the Texas Health and Human Services Commission (HHSC) and Department of Family Protective Services (DFPS) within 24 hours for 1 of 10 clients (Client #9) reviewed that received services from the agency. This failure to immediately report an allegation of abuse to HHSC and DFPS delayed the state investigation and placed (Patient # 9) at risk for continued abuse if the allegation was substantiated. During pre-survey preparation on 07/09/2025, a review was conducted of TULIP (Texas Unified Licensure Information Portal) a database utilized by the state to maintain licensing, demographic information, complaints and self-reported incidents on Home Health and for the State of Texas. Review of the agency information failed to reveal the agency had submitted self-reported incidents of alleged abuse, neglect or exploitation. Record review of Complaint log documentation: Revealed a document titled, “COMPLAINT FORM.” The date of the complaint/problem was dated May 1st, 2024, and signed by the Administrator on 05/07/2024. The complaint form included approximately 11 pages of documents attached to the complaint. The report read in part, “On Friday, 05/03/2024 at 5:00 PM I received a phone call… Family Member (FM) wants to file a complaint against one of our male nurses for inappropriate contact between this male nurse and (Client 9)… the nurse began rubbing her neck and shoulders, then moved his hand down into her cleavage and “rubbed up and around” each breast… FM Z stated several times during my phone call with him that he wanted no legal pressure, but wanted to ensure that no further female patients would endure abuse at this nurse’s hands…” Phone interview with the Administrator on 07/14/2025 at 11:47 a.m., the surveyor discussed the complaint that involved client 9 that the surveyor reviewed from the agency complaint log. The administrator explained that she was the agency employee that spoke with Family Member Z regarding the complaint and the Administrator was the person that conducted the agency investigation. The surveyor asked the Administrator if the documentation in the complaint form was accurate. The Administrator stated, “yes, of course it is.” The surveyor asked the Administrator what the agency policy was regarding when to report an allegation of ANE to the state. The Administrator stated, “Any serious allegation…” The surveyor asked the Administrator what the agency considered a serious allegation. The Administrator stated, “I don’t know. She couldn’t even remember anything. I’m not going to ruin a nurse’s career over something like that.” The surveyor asked if the allegation was serious enough for the Administrator to contact the police to file a report, then wouldn’t that be serious enough to report to the state. The Administrator stated, “I don’t know. I did what I felt I had to do. The son expected me to do something, but I didn’t know what to do so I thought that was the best thing to do…” The surveyor asked the Administrator if the agency reported the allegation of abuse to HHSC or DFPS. The Administrator stated, “We didn’t believe it ever happened. We never even thought about reporting it to the state because we didn’t take it seriously.” The surveyor asked the Administrator why the agency didn’t report the complaint of abuse to DFPS and HHSC. The Administrator stated, “because it never occurred to do it. I am very complaint with the rules. She couldn’t remember the date or the time or the nurse and frankly I didn’t know what else to do.” On 07/17/2025 at 12:21 PM., an interview was conducted with the agency’s Administrator and Alternate Administrator. The surveyor reviewed the agency policy titled, “Identifying and Reporting Abuse, Neglect, Misappropriation, or Exploitation of Patients” with the Administrator and Alternate Administrator. The surveyor asked the Administrator according to the agency policy how long the agency had to report allegation of abuse neglect or exploitation. The Administrator stated, “5 days.” Review of the agency’s policy & procedure manual included a policy titled, “IDENTIFYING AND REPORTING ABUSE, NEGLECT, MISAPPROPRIATION, OR EXPLOITATION OF PATIENTS” DOC ID: 3.08.1 with a revised date: 12/23/2021. The document read in part, ... “PURPOSE: To define reporting requirements for situations of child or adult abuse and/or neglect… PROCEDURE When Abuse, neglect, and/or exploitation are suspected… They will immediately make recommendation to the appropriate reporting agencies as mandated by law… This reporting will be completed within at least five working days of the incident.””

    Rule G0488. Element-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Jul 17, 2025Recertification inspection1 deficiency cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified home health agency since Nov 3, 2000.
  • Ownership: proprietary (for profit).
  • No deficiency on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Who does the caring?

  • Offers nursing care, physical therapy, occupational therapy, speech pathology, medical social services and home health aide services.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for home health agencies.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • Van Dyck Home Care Enterprises LLC owns 100% directly since Jun 1, 2013.
  • Van Dyck Home Care Enterprises LLC runs it.
  • 4 owners or officers are people: Elizabeth A Van Dyck (owns 5% or more through other companies, 100%); Elizabeth A Van Dyck (managing employee (on the payroll), 100%); Elizabeth A Van Dyck (runs it (operational or managerial control), 100%); Elizabeth A Van Dyck (corporate officer).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Agency All Owners and Home Health Agency Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Van Dyck Home Care Enterprises LLCOwns 5% or more directly100%Jun 1, 2013
Van Dyck Home Care Enterprises LLCRuns it (operational or managerial control)Jun 1, 2013

How do patients fare?

  • CMS rates its quality of patient care 4 of 5.
  • CMS gives no : “Fewer than 70 patients completed the survey.”
  • CMS compares it with the national rate: discharged to the community, worse; potentially preventable hospital stays, the same.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies and Home Health Patient Survey. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Quality of patient care ratingCMS star rating, 1 to 5 in half stars4 of 5
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the agency’s patients, 1 to 5Not rated
Discharged to the communityCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate25.76% (worse than the national rate)
Potentially preventable hospital staysCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate15.23% (same as the national rate)

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 131 agencies CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 76108, where this agency’s office is, 110 have a quality of patient care rating; the middle one is 3 of 5, and this one is rated 4 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Home Health ZIP Codes and Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

The 131 agencies CMS lists serving ZIP code 76108
PlaceQuality rating
Lifespring Home Care This home health agency4
Dfw Home Health4
Renew Home Health3.5
Enhabit Home HealthNot given
Reliant at Home4.5
Universal Health Services2
Guardian Healthcare4
Cook Childrens Home HealthNot given
Health Masters Homecare Inc.3
Theracare Home Health3
Enhabit Home Health3
Klarus Home Care3

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • QCOR says some of its home health reports are accurate or available only through May 19, 2021, because of a systems migration.
  • Many home health agencies are inspected by a private accrediting organisation instead of the state, and QCOR’s home health file doesn’t appear to include those inspections: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 24, 2026.

From the agency

The public record above comes first. Anything the agency adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the agency will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the agency”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.