Careworks Home Health Services Inc.
A home health agency in Dallas, Texas 75244
13612 Midway Road Suite 103, Dallas, Texas 75244. (972) 991-9966.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.
The short answer
Record last released by CMS on Oct 21, 2026.
- 1.5of 5 quality of patient care rating
- Not rated patient survey rating
- 2 deficiencies cited in the last three years
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean3
- Star ratings
- CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
What did inspectors find?
The last inspection on record was on Jul 29, 2025: a recertification inspection.
2 deficiencies cited in the last three years.
CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.
When those deficiencies happened
2 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jul 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 24, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Nov | Dec | ||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each deficiency, as cited
Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.
CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.
Jul 29, 2025: recertification inspection2 deficiencies
-
Performance Improvement Projects
The inspectors’ words, 459 words
“Performance improvement projects CFR(s): 484.65(d)(1)(2) Standard: Performance improvement projects. Beginning July 13, 2018 HHAs must conduct performance improvement projects. (1) The number and scope of distinct improvement projects conducted annually must reflect the scope, complexity, and past performance of the HHA’s services and operations. (2) The HHA must document the quality improvement projects undertaken, the reasons for conducting these projects, and the measurable progress achieved on these projects. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview, the agency failed to have at least one performance improvement project (PIP) either in development, on-going, or completed each calendar year for 3 (2022, 2023, 2024) of 3 years reviewed. This failure could result in patient’s receiving inadequate care or complaints and service failures not being identified and addressed to improve quality of care. Findings: Record review of the undated QAPI documentation provided to the surveyor by the agency revealed a lack of PIP documentation for 2022, 2023, and 2024. In an interview 7/29/2025 at 1:30pm, the surveyor asked Administrator (ADM) and Alternate Administrator (AADM) who was responsible for the QAPI program. AADM stated, “Director of Nurses (DON) is.” Surveyor informed ADM and AADM that unable to locate a PIP for 2022, 2023, or 2024. ADM and AADM looked in the area where the QAPI documentation had been located. Both ADM and AADM stated, “we don’t have one [PIP].” On 7/29/2025 at 2:30pm, the surveyor spoke with DON, ADM, and AADM. The surveyor asked DON who was responsible for the QAPI program and documentation. DON stated, “I am.” Surveyor asked DON to show them the PIPs for 2022, 2023, and 2024. DON stated, “I didn’t know we had to do one. The consultants and other surveyors never said anything about it.” When asked how not having PIPs could affect patient care DON C stated, “there could be an problem with the quality of care.” The agency had a policy (QAPI.5) dated 5/1/24 titled; “Quality Assessment Performance Improvement Program.” The policy read in parts: “…Procedure: …III. …E. Performance improvement projects: 1. The number and scope of distinct improvement projects conducted annually will reflect the scope, complexity, and past performance of the Agency’s services and operations. 2. The Agency will document the quality improvement projects undertaken, the reasons conducting these projects, and the measurable progress achieved on these projects…” The agency had a policy (QAPI.25) dated 5/1/24 titled; “Performance Improvement Process: Improvement Activities.” The policy read in parts: “…Purpose: To establish a standard for achieving and sustaining improved performance. Policy: …II. The governing body will determine the number and scope of distinct Performance Improvement Projects (PIP) conducted annually. …IV. All performance improvement activities/ projects undertaken will be documented and include the reasons for conducting and the measurable progress achieved…””
-
Plan Of Care Must Include The Following
The inspectors’ words, 848 words
“Plan of care must include the following CFR(s): 484.60(a)(2)(i-xvi) The individualized plan of care must include the following: (i) All pertinent diagnoses; (ii) The patient’s mental, psychosocial, and cognitive status; (iii) The types of services, supplies, and equipment required; (iv) The frequency and duration of visits to be made; (v) Prognosis; (vi) Rehabilitation potential; (vii) Functional limitations; (viii) Activities permitted; (ix) Nutritional requirements; (x) All medications and treatments; (xi) Safety measures to protect against injury; (xii) A description of the patient’s risk for emergency department visits and hospital re-admission, and all necessary interventions to address the underlying risk factors. (xiii) Patient and caregiver education and training to facilitate timely discharge; (xiv) Patient-specific interventions and education; measurable outcomes and goals identified by the HHA and the patient; (xv) Information related to any advanced directives; and (xvi) Any additional items the HHA or physician or allowed practitioner may choose to include. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview, the agency failed to include a description of the patient’s risk for emergency department visits and hospital readmission, and all necessary interventions to address the underlying risk factors in the plan of care for 6 (Patient #1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #6) of 6 active patient records reviewed. This failure could result in a lack of interventions causing the patient unnecessary emergency room or hospital visits. Findings: Record review of Patient 1’s medical record revealed the patient was admitted to services on 9/23/2024. Review of the plan of care for benefit period 5/21/25-7/19/25 revealed the description of the patient’s risk for emergency department visits and hospital readmission and all necessary interventions to address the underlying risk factors was not located in the plan of care. Record review of Patient 2’s medical record revealed the patient was admitted to services on 4/5/2025. Review of the plan of care for benefit period 4/5/25-6/3/25 revealed the description of the patient’s risk for emergency department visits and hospital readmission and all necessary interventions to address the underlying risk factors was not located in the plan of care. Record review of Patient 3’s medical record revealed the patient was admitted to services on 4/28/2023. Review of the plan of care for benefit period 4/17/25-6/15/25 revealed the description of the patient’s risk for emergency department visits and hospital readmission and all necessary interventions to address the underlying risk factors was not located in the plan of care. Record review of Patient 4’s medical record revealed the patient was admitted to services on 5/22/2024. Review of the plan of care for benefit period 5/17/25-7/15/25 revealed the description of the patient’s risk for emergency department visits and hospital readmission and all necessary interventions to address the underlying risk factors was not located in the plan of care. Record review of Patient 5’s medical record revealed the patient was admitted to services on 10/2/2024. Review of the plan of care for benefit period 5/30/25-7/28/25 revealed the description of the patient’s risk for emergency department visits and hospital readmission and all necessary interventions to address the underlying risk factors was not located in the plan of care. Record review of Patient 6’s medical record revealed the patient was admitted to services on 3/8/2023. Review of the plan of care for benefit period 4/26/25-6/24/25 revealed the description of the patient’s risk for emergency department visits and hospital readmission and all necessary interventions to address the underlying risk factors was not located in the plan of care. During an interview with the Administrator (ADM) and Alternate Administrator (AADM) on 7/29/2025 at 1:30pm, the surveyor asked why the plan of care was missing the risk for emergency department visits and hospital readmission and all necessary interventions to address the underlying risk factors. The Administrator stated, “I don’t know why it isn’t on there [POC]. On 7/29/2025 at 2:30pm the surveyor met with the Director of Nurses (DON), Administrator (ADM), and Alternate Administrator (AADM). The surveyor asked about the plan of care missing the risk for emergency department visits and hospital readmission and all necessary interventions to address the underlying risk factors for 6 patients. The DON stated, “it is on the Outcome and Assessment Information Set (OASIS). I didn’t realize it wasn’t getting to the plan of care.” ADM stated, “it’s an issue with the electronic medical record. I have already put in a request to address the issue.” When asked how the risks for emergency department visits and hospital readmission and all necessary interventions to address the underlying risk factors not being on the plan of care affected or could affect the patient, DON stated, “they might go to the hospital.” The agency had a policy (PC.35) dated 5/2/24 titled; “Plan of Care.” The policy read in parts: “…Purpose: To ensure that care provided is appropriately planned in a timely manner to meet the patient’s/ client’s specific needs and problems… …Procedure: …III …A. The individualized plan of care must include the following: …12. A description of the patient’s/ client’s risk for emergency department visits and hospital readmission, and all necessary interventions to address the underlying risk factors…””
The one inspection in the last three years
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| Jul 29, 2025 | Recertification inspection | 2 deficiencies cited |
Is it certified?
- Medicare-certified home health agency since Jul 22, 1996.
- Ownership: proprietary (for profit).
- No For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual. deficiency on record in the last three years.
CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.
Has anything been proven against it?
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
- 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.
Who does the caring?
- Offers nursing care, physical therapy, occupational therapy, speech pathology, medical social services and home health aide services.
- CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for home health agencies.
CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Who owns it?
- 5 owners or officers are people: Joselito Pangilinan (owns 5% or more directly); Joselito Pangilinan (corporate director); Joselito Pangilinan (managing employee (on the payroll)); Beatriz Pangilinan (corporate director); Beatriz Pangilinan (managing employee (on the payroll)).
- No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
- No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
CMS, Home Health Agency All Owners and Home Health Agency Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.
How do patients fare?
- CMS rates its quality of patient care 1.5 of 5.
- CMS gives no CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.: “Zero, or very few, patients met the survey’s rules for inclusion.”
- CMS compares it with the national rate: discharged to the community, worse; potentially preventable hospital stays, the same.
CMS, Home Health Care Agencies and Home Health Patient Survey. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | Rating |
|---|---|
| Quality of patient care ratingCMS star rating, 1 to 5 in half stars | 1.5 of 5 |
| Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the agency’s patients, 1 to 5 | Not rated |
| Discharged to the communityCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate | 33.45% (worse than the national rate) |
| Potentially preventable hospital staysCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate | 12.96% (same as the national rate) |
How does it compare nearby?
- Of the 99 agencies CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 75244, where this agency’s office is, 92 have a quality of patient care rating; the middle one is 3.5 of 5, and this one is rated 1.5 of 5.
CMS, Home Health ZIP Codes and Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Place | Quality rating |
|---|---|
| Careworks Home Health Services Inc. This home health agency | 1.5 |
| Kidscare Home Health | Not given |
| Texas Premier Home Healthcare, Inc. | Not given |
| Home Care Providers of Texas | 2 |
| Provista Healthcare | 4 |
| Home Health Professionals Dallas | 4.5 |
| Elim Home Health Inc. | 1 |
| Cuddle Me Home Care | 4 |
| Dfw Home Health | 3 |
| Novel Home Healthcare Agency | 2 |
| UT Southwestern Home Health Care | 2.5 |
| Enhabit Home Health | 2.5 |
What the record doesn’t say
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
- Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
- QCOR says some of its home health reports are accurate or available only through May 19, 2021, because of a systems migration.
- Many home health agencies are inspected by a private accrediting organisation instead of the state, and QCOR’s home health file doesn’t appear to include those inspections: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.
Sources
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Home Health Care Agencies (6jpm-sxkc).
Released Oct 21, 2026 and checked Oct 24, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Home Health Patient Survey (ccn4-8vby).
Released Oct 21, 2026 and checked Oct 24, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, QCOR home health inspection reports (HHA_2567s_2018_to_2026YTD.xlsx).
Released Oct 20, 2026 and checked Oct 24, 2026. Updated monthly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Home Health Agency All Owners (fc009b2d-7846-44b1-b4a1-692f0c143879).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Oct 24, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Home Health Agency Enrollments (15f64ab4-3172-4a27-b589-ebd67a6d28aa).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Oct 24, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Home Health ZIP Codes (m5eg-upu5).
Released Oct 21, 2026 and checked Oct 24, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Oct 24, 2026.
From the agency
The public record above comes first. Anything the agency adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the agency will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the agency”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.