Hearth Record

Heritage Home Health of East Texas

A home health agency in Sulphur Springs, Texas 75482

1428 S. Broadway St, Sulphur Springs, Texas 75482. (888) 466-3016.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 21, 2026.

The last 24 months 1 deficiency in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jan 2026. Most serious: Element-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Jan 21, 2026: a complaint inspection.

1 deficiency cited in the last three years.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

1 deficiency in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jan 2026. Most serious: Element-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 24, 2026.

1 deficiency by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Jan 21, 2026: complaint inspection1 deficiency
  • Rn Performs Assessment

    The inspectors’ words, 1,419 words

    “RN performs assessment CFR(s): 484.55(a)(1) A registered nurse must conduct an initial assessment visit to determine the immediate care and support needs of the patient; and, for Medicare patients, to determine eligibility for the Medicare home health benefit, including homebound status. The initial assessment visit must be held either within 48 hours of referral, or within 48 hours of the patient’s return home, or on the physician or allowed practitioner - ordered start of care date. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview, the agency failed to ensure a registered nurse conducted an initial assessment visit to determine the immediate care and support needs of the patient within 48 hours of referral, or on the physician order start of care date for 1 of 4 patient records reviewed. (Client #1) The agency did not provide an initial assessment of Client #1 within 48 hours of her discharge from the nursing facility. This failure could have resulted in a delay in addressing client needs and required services in a timely manner and could cause decline in client health status. Findings included: Record review of a policy titled Timelines dated 07/01/2025 1. All agency staff, physicians and/or non-physician practitioners and physician office staff, as appropriate, will be oriented to the following parameters: A. The evaluation visit for admission to agency is conducted within 48 hours of referral, or within 48 hours of the patient/clients return to home, or on the physician and /or non-physician practitioner start of care date. Record review of a spreadsheet titled Referrals indicated the agency received a referral from the nursing facility for Patient#1 on 12/3/2025. Record review of a spreadsheet titled agency admissions for December 2025 did not indicate Patient#1 was admitted to services. Record review of a spreadsheet titled Non-admissions indicated Patient#1 was a non-admission. Record review of an email dated 12/5/2025 indicated Intake Coordinator C said Patient#1 had picked the agency for home health services. Record review of an email dated 12/5/2025 indicated Intake Coordinator C received a message from Liaison A regarding Patient#1’s discharge from the nursing facility being on hold. Record review of an email dated 12/12/2025 at 2:11 PM indicated Intake Coordinator C was notified by Liaison A, Patient#1 discharged from the nursing facility on Wednesday 12/10/2025 and he did not see the message until this morning. Intake Coordinator C questioned if she needed to wait until the office visit note from Patient #1s doctors visit yesterday. Record review of an email dated 12/15/2025 at 1:12 P.M., from the lead admission coordinator indicated she was sending Patient#1 referral for start of care. Record review of an email dated 12/15/2025 at 3:26 p.m. from the lead admissions coordinator indicated she had spoken with Patient #1’s daughter, she was good for Wednesday start of care if the patient did not end up back in the hospital due to the nursing facility discharged her with a urinary tract infection. Record review of an email dated 12/16/2025 at 3:50 p.m. from the lead admissions coordinator indicated Patient#1’s daughter called and said patient was picked up by another home health agency and the agency would be non-admitting. The email indicated Patient#1’s doctor sent to another agency because the agency did not admit within 48 hours. During an interview on 1/21/2026 at 11:49 a.m. Liaison A said he had not officially started working for the agency when the referral for Patient #1 was received. Liaison A said originally, he was given this referral by nursing facility B when he was still employed by another home health agency. Liaison A said he notified the case worker at nursing facility B that he had resigned from his current position and would be starting at this agency. He said he told the social worker she could fax the referral to his current agency or if the patient requested the referral could be sent to the agency he would be employed by on 12/15/2025. He said the social worker spoke with Patient #1 and she requested to go with this agency. He said Patient#1’s discharge from nursing facility B was delayed. He said the week of 12/9/2025 he was home sick and missed the text message from the social worker at nursing facility B that notified him the patient was being discharged the next day on 12/10/2025. Liaison A said he did not see this text message until 12/12/2025 and he contacted this agency to notify them of the discharge from nursing facility B so that an admission visit could be scheduled. Liaison A said a standard admission would take place normally within 24 hours of discharge from the nursing facility. Liaison A said he took accountability for missing the text message notification of discharge. Liaison A said Patient#1 was ultimately a non-admission. During an interview on 1/21/2026 at 12:17 p.m., the alternate administrator said the agency did receive the referral for Patient#1 from nursing facility B on approximately 12/5/2025 but the referral did not indicate a discharge date and the agency did not receive any communication regarding Patient#1’s discharge from nursing facility A or the liaison who had not officially started with the agency until around 12/12/2025. During an interview on 1/21/2026 at 12:30 p.m. the lead admissions coordinator said when a referral was received from a nursing facility without a discharge date, they should follow up with the nursing facility to ensure the patient did not get discharged without their knowledge. The lead admissions coordinator said she was not aware of the reasons behind the intake coordinator not reaching out to the facility after the referral of Patient #1. The lead admissions coordinator said clients should be admitted within 48 hours of discharge from the facility. During an interview on 1/21/2026 at 12:40 p.m., intake coordinator C said when she received a referral from a nursing facility, she sent an email to all intake staff for benefit check, ensured patient was not a current or previous client, and if the intake came directly from a nursing facility without a discharge date, she stayed in contact with the facility at least every other day to monitor for discharge. Intake Coordinator C said she was familiar with the referral for Patient #1. Intake Coordinator C said she had been communicating with Liaison A regarding Patient#1’s referral even though he had not officially started at the agency. Intake Coordinator C said she found out from Liaison A on 12/12/2025 that Patient#1 had been discharged from the nursing facility on 12/10/2025. She said after being notified she had been discharged home several questions came up regarding Patient #1 such as did the agency service the area where the patient was and was the patient home health appropriate. She said she was unsure why there was a gap in time between 12/12/2025 and 12/15/2025 when the agency called to schedule the admission for 12/17/2025. During an interview on 1/21/2025 at 12:52 p.m., the alternate administrator said there was admittedly a huge gap in time between 12/12/2025 when they were told Patient#1 had been discharged from the agency and 12/15/2025 when Patient#1 was contacted to schedule an admission assessment. The alternate administrator said if he had been aware of this delay he would have sent someone from the agency to do the admission assessment much sooner. The alternate administrator said clients should be admitted to services within 48 hours after discharge from the nursing facility. The alternate administrator said it was important for admissions to be done timely because many times the patient was being discharged from a nursing facility or hospital and was in the middle of an acute (sudden onset) situation and as to not delay care. The alternate administrator said generally it was the liaisons responsibility to communicate with the nursing facilities to get a discharge date but it was intakes responsibility to follow up with the referral source in the absence of the liaison. During an interview on 1/21/2026 at 1:52 p.m. the DON said the only part she played in intake/referrals was the clinical review to see if the patient referred was appropriate and if the agency had appropriate staffing to care for the client. The DON said clients should be admitted to home health services within 48 hours of discharge from the nursing facility unless the patientor client’s family requested otherwise. The DON said this timeline was important to provide adequate and quality of care. The DON said she had not been made aware of Patient#1’s referral or non-admission to the agency.”

    Rule G0514. Element-level. From a complaint.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Jan 21, 2026Complaint inspection1 deficiency cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified home health agency since Apr 4, 2006.
  • Ownership: proprietary (for profit).
  • No deficiency on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • 1 deficiency cited in the last three years came from an inspection that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Who does the caring?

  • Offers nursing care, physical therapy, occupational therapy, speech pathology, medical social services and home health aide services.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for home health agencies.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • 3 owners or officers are people: Blake R Rich (owns 5% or more directly, 100%); Christopher Clemens (managing employee (on the payroll)); Morgan Wilhite (managing employee (on the payroll)).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Agency All Owners and Home Health Agency Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

How do patients fare?

  • CMS rates its quality of patient care 4 of 5.
  • CMS gives no : “Fewer than 70 patients completed the survey.”
  • CMS compares it with the national rate: discharged to the community, worse; potentially preventable hospital stays, the same; potentially preventable readmissions after discharge, the same.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies and Home Health Patient Survey. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Quality of patient care ratingCMS star rating, 1 to 5 in half stars4 of 5
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the agency’s patients, 1 to 5Not rated
Discharged to the communityCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate71.27% (worse than the national rate)
Potentially preventable hospital staysCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate14.68% (same as the national rate)
Potentially preventable readmissions after dischargeCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate4.12% (same as the national rate)

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 39 agencies CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 75482, where this agency’s office is, 37 have a quality of patient care rating; the middle one is 4 of 5, and this one is rated 4 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Home Health ZIP Codes and Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

The 39 agencies CMS lists serving ZIP code 75482
PlaceQuality rating
Heritage Home Health of East Texas This home health agency4
Vitalcaring Group3.5
Amatus Health Care East Texas Inc.3.5
Altruist Home Care SolutionsNot given
Elite Home Health3.5
Centerwell Home Health5
Elara Caring4.5
Mays Home Health of Paris TX LLC4
Enhabit Home Health3.5
Paradigm Homecare4.5
Guardian Healthcare4.5
Choice Homecare4

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • QCOR says some of its home health reports are accurate or available only through May 19, 2021, because of a systems migration.
  • Many home health agencies are inspected by a private accrediting organisation instead of the state, and QCOR’s home health file doesn’t appear to include those inspections: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 24, 2026.

From the agency

The public record above comes first. Anything the agency adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the agency will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the agency”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.